Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

TR Editors' blog

Insights, opinions, and our editors' analysis of the latest in emerging technologies.

Blog Topics

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

  • david k : There is strong history of the street view as art.  Ed Ruscha took photos along the Sunset Strip...
  • chimenti : Under NADIN what procedure does a pilot follow for submitting a flight plan and how is the...
  • fiberman : How amusing. A contributor to the WSJ suggests eating your fellow man. Well, isn't that just what...
  • kstauff : I believe the deficit left by the Bush administration for fiscal '08 was around $500 billion. ...
  • kstauff : You're right, I overestimated the number of democrats in both houses, although I believe that the...
  • kstauff : Are you as angry at Roosevelt, Truman, Kennedy, Johnson and Clinton for the wars they prosecuted?...
  • kstauff : The Obama administration told us it would be 8% without the stimulus.  You tell me if he and his...
  • ... : Just to make it apparent, there's already a Chromium browser which uses the Chrome codebase for...
  • Adalast : people keep throwing around the "New Deal" and saying that it was horrible and didn't help our...
  • ... : All of these careful studies and delays in taking up a form of energy that is far superior to the...
Advertisement
Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Glowing Monkeys Inherit Jellyfish Genes

The genetic-engineering primates could lead to better models for studying disease.
By Emily Singer
Marmoset monkeys engineered to carry the gene for green fluorescent protein. The soles of the animals' feet glow green when shown under UV light.
Courtesy of E. Sasaki et al., 2009

Last month in Japan, a very special marmoset monkey was born--one who inherited from his parents not only their marmoset DNA, but also a jellyfish gene for green fluorescent protein (GFP) that makes both the animal and his parents glow green under fluorescent light. The monkey parents aren't the first primates to fluoresce, but they are the first to pass a genetically engineered trait to their offspring. Scientists hope to use the approach to create animal models of neurological diseases, such as Parkinson's, which cannot be adequately reproduced in rodents--the typical subjects of genetic engineering.

"The birth of this transgenic marmoset baby is undoubtedly a milestone," write Gerald Schatten and Shoukhrat Mitalipov in a piece accompanying the paper, published today in the journal Nature. Scientists have previously created a menagerie of transgenic animals, including rats, rabbits, pigs, cows, cats, dogs, and even monkeys (in one study, scientists created monkeys that genetically mimic Huntington's disease), but "no study has shown transmission of foreign DNA to gametes--the sperm and egg--which is essential for the generation of transgenic offspring. These offspring could then be bred to create transgenic-primate strains," they add.

The ability to genetically engineer primates is essential for creating more-accurate animal models of human diseases, especially neurological ones. For example, Schatten and Mitalipov say,

Mice engineered to express the cystic fibrosis gene, for example, do not develop the lung problems that typify this disorder . . . Disorders of higher brain function, such as Alzheimer's disease, are especially challenging to reproduce in rodents, and here, as with many other diseases, it is our closest animal relatives--the non-human primates--that offer potentially invaluable biological models.

To create the transgenic monkeys, researchers injected viruses carrying the gene for GFP into 91 marmoset embryos. Eighty healthy transgenic embryos were then transplanted into surrogate mothers, who birthed five glowing offspring. Three glowing second-generation marmosets have been born since April.

Comments

  • Glowing Monkey breakthrough
      Would you pay $10,000-$15,000 for an advanced version of the Glowing Monkey? My guess is a lot of us will say yes.

      Suppose we genetically re-engineer monkeys to have hands with human dexterity and enough intelligence to do all your household chores. It has an automatic cut-off switch (with a manual over-ride) that puts the monkey into a state of sleep at the first sign of any erratic or unfriendly behavior.

      Your monkey is also very trainable, so it can learn whatever you want to teach it. You probably get it as a very young monkey, as soon as it can be weaned from its mother's milk. After a year or so, a good market will begin to develop for older second-hand monkeys.

      At some point soon, when you order you'll be able to custom design this monkey to also be cute, loyal, friendly, and a catalog of other options. This will probably make it the hottest new "pet" to ever hit the market. It even cleans up after itself!

      In the not-so-distant future you will probably be able to custom design your $10,000 Glowing Monkey to fit your specific needs. You will select size, color, special intelligence needs, and maybe special personality traits. It seems very likely that the Glowing Monkey of the future will replace the dog as man's best friend.

      Since the advanced versions of the Glowing Monkeys can do basic household chores, they can also be trained to do repetitive factory work. At $10,000-$15000, this new genetically engineered bio-robotic creature is a steal.

      In effect, the Glowing Monkey of the future  will be a very wise household (or factory) investment in a reasonably priced, easily trainable bionic robot that fulfils many everyday needs ... needs that now consume big hunks of household budgets. In a moderately affluent household (or factory), version x of the Glowing Monkey can easily and quickly pay for itself. Instead of competing for the greenest lawn, neighbors will be aspiring for the best-trained Glowing Monkey.

      However, with all this going for the Glowing Monkey it does create problems, starting with basic cultural ethics. Will this futuristic Glowing monkey be a bionic robot? Or is it actually a slave? How high can its intelligence be bio-engineered? How much can it learn? Could it ever become an intelligence that is entitled to citizenship?

      Usually ethical problems are quickly cast aside when a highly marketable new product enters the culture ... witness the pornography revolution of the past 30-40 years. My guess is the huge market potential of the Glowing Money breakthrough will overwhelm any ethical concerns. 

    The creation of creatures is territory humankind has always assigned to its gods. The Glowing Monkey has ripped through that territorial boundary, coincidentally opening a huge door labeled "free market opportunities".

      We are entering an era of great change in how we fundamentally think about our role in the universe. It seems obvious that the Glowing Monkey breakthrough is going to bring our culture's slowly simmering god-versus-science debate to a raging boil of public consciousness.

      Whether we like it or not, the Glowing monkey breakthrough is about to take us where no man has gone before. The interesting question is, are we going to do it boldly or blindly?

    Rate this comment: 12345

    geraldwilhit...
    05/28/2009
    Posts:2
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Glowing Monkey breakthrough
      Sure this glowing monkey issue will get the debate started, but what I would like to see is genetically enhanced humans. Obviously there are many hurdles to get over before this happens.

      When people can be assured to have children with IQs approaching 250 you can expect our technological progress to spike sharply. The current semi-random reproduction method is simply not enough.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      kdubb
      05/28/2009
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      • Re: Glowing Monkey breakthrough
        I hope you are kidding. People need better characters before they get higher IQs. The two do not equate.  As it is now, you'd just have some people who'd put the IQ of 250 toward more diabolical than useful purposes.  But perhaps the people with 250 IQs that were good could outmaneuver them.

        However, I really DO like the idea of glowing monkeys. Glowing dogs.  Glowing cows.  Even glowing people. That would be kind of fun.

        But yeah, I hear you.  People could stand some improvements genetically. I've been trying to grow a third eye for a year now. No luck.

        Rate this comment: 12345

        DJofTexas
        05/28/2009
        Posts:1
        Avg Rating:
        5/5
      • Re: Glowing Monkey breakthrough
        Am I the only one who thinks there's a logical flaw in the superior intelligences of the future being designed to conform to the ideals of "intelligence" ascribed to by their less-intelligent forebears?
        Rate this comment: 12345

        Monsterboy
        06/02/2009
        Posts:89
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
    • Re: Glowing Monkey breakthrough
      hahahaha
      Rate this comment: 12345

      chir0pter
      07/01/2009
      Posts:10
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
  • [no subject]
    I hope you were not serious about altering the gene expression of animals just to create more interesting pets. it's bad enough, although necessary, that we have to experiment on them to reach some breakthrough knowledge. I would hate to think that this techniques will be used with entertainment and profit in mind instead of what they were researched for. to help us learn more about diseases and how to prevent us. I'm not an animal rights fanatic but it really makes me worry that people can consider to do this kind of thing. even if it's inoffensive, I would think it is wrong.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Siroilas
    06/24/2009
    Posts:1
Advertisement

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
•  Subscribe
Save 36%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
» Gift Subscription
» Digital Subscription
» Reprints, Back Issues
» Subscribe
» Table of Contents
» MIT News

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.