TR Editors' blog

Stem-Cell Restrictions Lifted

Obama also promises to return scientific integrity to government decision making.

Emily Singer 03/09/2009

  • 7 Comments

Stem-cell scientists aren't the only ones celebrating today. In addition to signing an executive order that will lift federal funding restrictions for embryonic stem-cell research, President Obama signed a presidential memorandum aimed at restoring scientific integrity to government decision making. Hopefully, that will help bring an end to what has been broadly viewed as a dark time for science, with political and religious views hijacking high-level scientific discourse.

According to his statement, made earlier today,

This Order is an important step in advancing the cause of science in America. But let's be clear: promoting science isn't just about providing resources--it is also about protecting free and open inquiry. It is about letting scientists like those here today do their jobs, free from manipulation or coercion, and listening to what they tell us, even when it's inconvenient--especially when it's inconvenient. It is about ensuring that scientific data is never distorted or concealed to serve a political agenda--and that we make scientific decisions based on facts, not ideology.

By doing this, we will ensure America's continued global leadership in scientific discoveries and technological breakthroughs. That is essential not only for our economic prosperity, but for the progress of all humanity.

That is why today, I am also signing a Presidential Memorandum directing the head of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy to develop a strategy for restoring scientific integrity to government decision making. To ensure that in this new Administration, we base our public policies on the soundest science; that we appoint scientific advisors based on their credentials and experience, not their politics or ideology; and that we are open and honest with the American people about the science behind our decisions. That is how we will harness the power of science to achieve our goals--to preserve our environment and protect our national security; to create the jobs of the future, and live longer, healthier lives.

You can read the full remarks here.

Doug Melton, codirector of the Harvard Stem Cell Institute, has been instrumental in pushing stem-cell research forward despite funding restrictions. In a statement issued this morning, Melton gives a personal perspective on the difficulties of the past eight years:

On a personal level, it is an enormous relief and a time for celebration. It is a relief from the bureaucratic and accounting nightmares that have slowed our work, discouraged young scientists, and delayed progress for nearly 8 years. It is a relief to know that we can now collaborate openly and freely with other scientists in our own University and elsewhere, without restrictions on what equipment, data, or ideas can be shared. Science thrives when there is an open and collaborative exchange, not when there are artificial barriers, silos, constructed by the government.

But this is to me a day that marks an important change in spirit, in our national outlook. I think sometimes of how August 9, 2001 was a dark day for science and for America because political ideology was used to define how science should be done. I am going to gather my lab at 11:45 in our tea room to celebrate. And here I mean celebrate listening to our nation's leader, President Obama, state forcibly that science should guide policies, scientific facts should inform our thinking and decisions. Science as a way of knowing is a very powerful tool for good and it is liberating to hear that science, not political ideology, will guide the Obama Administration in its decisions. I was always uncomfortable being put in the position of being an opponent to my own government, being set up in opposition to what the previous Administration implied was an ethical approach to science when in fact it was not an ethical decision made on 8 August, 2001, but a political decision. I am deeply happy to say that those days are done.

Print

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

dmm

270 Comments

  • 1071 Days Ago
  • 03/09/2009

Way to be even-handed!

quote from Obama: 3 paragraphs
quote from stem-cell supporter: 2 paragraphs
quote from stem-cell opponent: nothing

Reply

gabrielg01

450 Comments

  • 1071 Days Ago
  • 03/09/2009

Re: Way to be even-handed!

Yes, but the quote from the opponents would be the drivel of religious fundamentalists. You really miss that?

It would be the type of drivel claiming the "sanctity" of God's dominion, which we've heard ad nauseam since the time of Andreas Vesalius.

Reply

geraldwilhite

3 Comments

  • 1070 Days Ago
  • 03/10/2009

Re: Way to be even-handed!

Way to respect the scientific method, garbrialgo1. You arrogantly presume you know what the evidence is going to be and want to refuse to even allow it to be submitted for review.

Reply

gabrielg01

450 Comments

  • 1070 Days Ago
  • 03/10/2009

Re: Way to be even-handed!

This issue is not about the scientific method, but about science policy.

And by the way, just as a side note, the scientific method is not democratic. You don't get to vote about the existence of gravity. So, please don't mix things up.

Reply

jmaximus9

86 Comments

  • 1070 Days Ago
  • 03/10/2009

One for Logic

Finally a president who doesn't think the universe is 6,000 years old and that the Flintstones is documentary. 

Reply

rjp

1 Comment

  • 1070 Days Ago
  • 03/10/2009

Re: One for Logic

It is disingenuous, and an exemplary straw man argument, for the President to claim that his new policy, unlike past policy, is free of ideology. Although I am an atheist who favors some forms of stem cell research, I can not dismiss unreflectively ethical questions raised by opponents. Moral implications and their social ramifications are inherent in any scientific endeavor. Should new stem cell lines derive solely from unused IVF embryos? Or should human embryos be created for the sole purpose of establishing new stem cell lines? If the technique for converting ordinary skin cells into induced pluripotent stem (ips) cells (techniques begun employing embryonic stem cell lines that the Bush administration had approved for federally funded research) prove successful--the journal Cell just published a paper demonstrating a new technique eliminating a major risk of the technique--should embryo-derived research then be limited? These are questions deserving of reflection. I can only hope that, once the NIH makes its recommendations, the administration will foster a deliberative ethical process.

Reply

cdenver

3 Comments

  • 864 Days Ago
  • 10/02/2009

Re: One for Logic

Your questions are thoughtful and right-on. However there are no easy answers to your questions. I think the next five years of stem cell research should be monitored very closely by an appropriate watchdog group.

Under Obama administration guidelines, stem cell research will get a big boost. The research program will move forward in the right direction. Recently, I am learning a lot about stem cell research. The motivation behind my interest in this subject was stimulated by a novel titled "AGELESS A Stem cell mystery". If anyone is interested, there is a website devoted to this book. The website address is:
     www.ageless-stemcellmystery.com
Try it out. It may also stimulate your interest in this subject.

http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2009/07/06/new-rules-could-further-expand-stem-cell-research/

Reply

About

Insights, opinions, and our editors' analysis of the latest in emerging technologies.

Subscribe to the TR Editors' blog RSS Feed

Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement