Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

TR Editors' blog

Insights, opinions, and our editors' analysis of the latest in emerging technologies.

Blog Topics

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

  • david k : There is strong history of the street view as art.  Ed Ruscha took photos along the Sunset Strip...
  • chimenti : Under NADIN what procedure does a pilot follow for submitting a flight plan and how is the...
  • fiberman : How amusing. A contributor to the WSJ suggests eating your fellow man. Well, isn't that just what...
  • kstauff : I believe the deficit left by the Bush administration for fiscal '08 was around $500 billion. ...
  • kstauff : You're right, I overestimated the number of democrats in both houses, although I believe that the...
  • kstauff : Are you as angry at Roosevelt, Truman, Kennedy, Johnson and Clinton for the wars they prosecuted?...
  • kstauff : The Obama administration told us it would be 8% without the stimulus.  You tell me if he and his...
  • ... : Just to make it apparent, there's already a Chromium browser which uses the Chrome codebase for...
  • Adalast : people keep throwing around the "New Deal" and saying that it was horrible and didn't help our...
  • ... : All of these careful studies and delays in taking up a form of energy that is far superior to the...
Advertisement
Tuesday, February 24, 2009

What the Fed Can Learn from California's Energy Policy

The chair of the Air Resources Board has some advice for the new administration.
By Katherine Bourzac

In 2006, the state of California passed landmark legislation aimed at limiting green-house gas emissions. Under the Bush administration, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rejected the state's request to regulate vehicular emissions. Earlier this month, the Obama administration announced it would reconsider this ruling--most likely in order to reverse it.

Mary D. Nichols, chairman of the California Air Resources Board, will be responsible for implementing the state's climate change legislation. In a speech at the Berkeley Energy and Resources Collaborative annual Energy Symposium yesterday, Nichols had some advice for a new presidential administration with the will to act on climate change: follow California's lead on energy efficiency because it's been an economic boon for the state. Nichols mentioned a report by Next 10 that claims cutting energy usage over the past 30 years has created 1.5 million jobs in California. (Still, in a state characterized by suburban sprawl, carbon dioxide emissions are quite high, at 11 tons per capita per year.)

Nichols said the federal government has three things to learn from California's success in curbing emissions and increasing efficiency. First, emissions policies must support a mixed bag of technologies and programs, from funding for public transportation to implementing cap and trade of carbon dioxide.

Second, Nichols strongly advocated that the fed let the states do much of the work. California and other states have been doing well, and the government should keep encouraging this while providing incentives to get other states going on clean-energy initiatives. "The states want to retain the authority to step in if the federal program doesn't work," she said.

Third, an important role for the federal government, Nichols says, will be to provide a central repository for emissions data. She points to the Clean Air Act as a successful state-federal partnership. "It's not perfect, but it has worked effectively in a way that engages local and state governments."

Comments

  • Better article
    There's a similar article right now in Newsweek, but with more detail and a broader subject.  The article covers both pollution and alternative energy usage.  http://www.newsweek.com/id/185792
    Rate this comment: 12345

    lasertekk
    02/24/2009
    Posts:77
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • The can learn a lot more than that
    The fed can also learn that poor fiscal and energy management and out of control spending can put in you so much debt you have to call on, well, the federal government to bail you out.  California might be one of the worst examples of planning one could follow.  I'm just wondering who's going to bail out the feds once they're done spending all of our money to save states like California who can't act with any fiscal responsibility.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    kstauff
    02/24/2009
    Posts:89
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: The can learn a lot more than that
      But there is fiscal responsibility.  Have you not read the news lately?  Gov. Arnold told them, 'this is how much money we have, these are our expenses, we must cut here and there'.  Sure, lifelong politicians will complain about their pork, but they do that everywhere, don't they?
      Rate this comment: 12345

      lasertekk
      02/24/2009
      Posts:77
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • But . . . .
    This is a much more complex situation than one can tell from California's experience.  There are implications both short and long term that are still TBD.

    IF these standards really do improve the environment in a way that makes a difference to climate change, then eventually the world will have to catch up to California.  This gives them a lead in a valuable technology that will reap long term gains.

    BUT if not, then gains will only be short term until this is realized.

    AND in the short term, some companies can simply move to other states to avoid compliance. If this becomes national, they can move to other countries. These short term consequences must be compared to the long term ones above, especially in a recession.

    Politicians need to consider the depth and breadth of their policies.  Failure to do so leads to . . . . real estate crashes, credit crunches, etc.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ergoprof
    02/25/2009
    Posts:2
    Avg Rating:
    1/5
  • Reform on Obama Address: Health Care 9; Education 1; Energy 0.
    I contend that the Fed does not want to learn anything from California energy policy, because the state developed a flawed electricity reform in order to keep an “outdated regulatory system. It is time to put in place tough, new common-sense rules of the road so that our” energy “market rewards drive and innovation, and punishes short-cuts and abuse.” In those two quotes, I only change what President Obama said in his address to the joint session of Congress, by introducing the word energy, instead of financial. There is an urgent need for a real reform.

    To support the need for awareness, I searched a transcript of Mr. Obama address to add the number of times that he said the word reform on the “three areas that are absolutely critical to our economic future: energy, health care, and education.” The score was 0, 9 and 1, respectively. The reason for the zero score in energy is a BIG LIE that originated in the California electricity reform, as can be seen inside the EWPC article Shared Vision: Consumer Driven Electricity System Reform.

    While the large number of green jobs created in the last 30 years could be correct, the costs to create those jobs have been a lot higher than necessary because of regulated programs inefficiencies. By including the cost effective consumer driven reform, while going “line by line through the federal budget in order to eliminate wasteful and ineffective programs,” the Obama administration should expect to identify another “trillion dollars in savings over the next decade,” as a result of the reform.

    A lot of the saving will be in many of the energy efficiency programs in the budget itself without the suggested reform. To learn how to implement the reform, please consider also the EWPC article How to Increase the Leverage of Stimulus Bill to Global Green Energy.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    javs
    02/25/2009
    Posts:89
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
  • Students in Project Home 2010 work on new propulsion technology
    2 students in Project Home 2010 invent a way to propel and hover a vehicle using electromagnetic fields in a controlled electric current that recycles itself. It is being called 'quantum fuel'.
    The site shows working scale models of the propulsion system at work-

    http://www.angelfire.com/clone2/projecthome2010
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Josh
    06/16/2009
    Posts:1
Advertisement

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
•  Subscribe
Save 36%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
» Gift Subscription
» Digital Subscription
» Reprints, Back Issues
» Subscribe
» Table of Contents
» MIT News

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.