Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

TR Editors' blog

Insights, opinions, and our editors' analysis of the latest in emerging technologies.

Blog Topics

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

  • gognod : Why should an employee have to spend an extra 2.5 hours a week at the office and not get paid for...
  • chir0pter : hahahaha
  • jjbaulikki : "While cautioning that the Berlin case could be a fluke" well of course it could be a Fluke
  • plasticdoc : Even though US politicians are aware of European failures in similar policies,they will repeat...
  • Siroilas : I hope you were not serious about altering the gene expression of animals just to create more...
  • danbloom : Do we need a new word for the kind of reading we do on a screen?  by Danny Bloom OPED  "Do we...
  • ... : Hopefully the use of composites in structural elements is not a mistake, but thanks for catching...
  • ... : although the 787 is the first to use composites for a majority of the critical aircraft surfaces...
  • rttedrow : That's a little too aggressive for me; too much road rage and too many drivers packing "heat." ...
  • rttedrow : The unending turn signal problem.  My preference would be that the things turn themselves off...
Advertisement
Tuesday, April 08, 2008

Calling for Shows

Foneshow uses "dumb phones" to change radio.
By Erica Naone

Foneshow, one of the companies that demonstrated today at Venture Summit East in Boston, is using the low technology in many people's pockets to challenge the radio industry. Foneshow allows people to listen to radio programs by calling a number from their cell phones. Text messages let them know when new shows are available. The technology is simple, since the show is going out over the same voice channel used for a regular phone call. Foneshow identifies the numbers calling to hear a show and uses that information to save a listener's place in case the listener has to hang up and call back later. The company makes money by including advertising in the notification text messages, and by sharing revenue from interactive ads inside the radio programs with the programs' producers.

I tried out Foneshow, and was taken by its simplicity. So many things are being designed for iPhones and other high-end mobile devices, yet I'm always interested by companies that aim for the "dumb phones" that are carried by far more people. In addition to indie shows, Foneshow includes content from the likes of NPR and the New York Times.

In today's presentation, CEO Erik Schwartz described Foneshow as one effort to adapt radio to coming changes in the market. Like the newspaper industry, he said, radio is having difficulty measuring the effects of advertising, which is undermining its business model. Schwartz, however, is confident in the face of the radio industry's anxiety. "There's nothing I like better than a 20-billion-dollar-a-year industry that thinks it's doomed," he said.

Advertisement

Comments

  • Lexy
    Along the same lines, Lexy brings radio to ordinary cell phones.  I find their service easier to use and more intuitive, though it's basically doing the same thing as Foneshow. www.lexy.com
    Rate this comment: 12345

    mobilefan28
    04/16/2008
    Posts:1
    • Re: Lexy
      Actually there are major differences between Lexy and Foneshow.

      Lexy uses a single phone number, you don't know what you're going to get when you call. Foneshow has a dynamic phone number allocation system. Foneshow SMS's you when the series updates with what the show is about, how long it is, and a 2. customized number (on a user by user basis) to access that SPECIFIC content. There are no ugly voice menus before the program starts.

      The dynamic number system also allows Foneshow to scale with publishers essentially limitlessly.

      There are essentially 3 approaches here.

      1. Single fixed number and then playlist or voice menu. (what we refer to as voicemail hell). Earkive and the late Fonpods use this approach. IMO there's too much friction in this approach.

      2. Fixed number per series. This is the approach Cellecast and Phonecasting use. This obviously does not scale well.

      3. Finally, dynamic number allocation. This is the big difference between Foneshow and our competitors. It's instant access combined with unlimited scalability.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Eriks
      05/27/2008
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
Advertisement

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review July/August 2009

Current Issue

Search Me
Inside the launch of Stephen Wolfram’s new “computational knowledge engine.”
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
» Gift Subscription
» Digital Subscription
» Reprints, Back Issues
» Subscribe
» Table of Contents
» MIT News

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.