TR Editors' blog

More Biofuels Woes

The projection that U.S. farmers will grow less corn this year is bad news for ethanol producers.

David Rotman 04/02/2008

  • 8 Comments

That strong wind you might have felt earlier this week was just more air rushing out of the biofuel bubble. Monday's statistics from the U.S. Department of Agriculture--that farmers expect to plant 8 percent fewer acres of corn in 2008, compared with 2007--is very bad news for the already struggling ethanol industry. It takes a lot of corn to make ethanol, and the feedstock is a major cost of creating the biofuel. U.S. farmers' plan to plant less corn this year means that record-high corn prices, which are already above $5 a bushel, will likely stay high. It doesn't take an economist to figure out what the grim numbers portend for ethanol manufacturers. Higher feedstock costs, at the same time that yet more ethanol production capacity is coming online, could mean another very tough year for the ethanol market.

Beyond being a pain for ethanol producers, the high corn prices will further exasperate the tensions between using the crop for fuel rather than for food. In a New York Times article, one expert issues a frightening warning:

"We're hoping for good yields," said David Orden, a senior research fellow at the International Food Policy Research Institute in Washington. "If we get bad yields and tight commodity markets are pushed even tighter, we'll get food prices skyrocketing, inflationary pressures and food riots in developing countries, and countries cutting off their exports."

No one knows, of course, whether it will be a good year or not for growing corn in the United States. If it is a bad year, look for even more criticism of ethanol biofuel and, in particular, the Renewable Fuel Standards that mandate that petroleum suppliers use nine billion gallons of ethanol this year. But even if it's a good year for growing corn, expect the poor profit margins for ethanol producers to continue and more grumbling about the economics of biofuels.

Print

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

mkogrady

425 Comments

  • 1412 Days Ago
  • 04/03/2008

Biofuel Woes

There's a money making opportunity - check those September Corn Futures figures. They're hovering quite high! Buy low - sell high - buy switchgrass property with the profits! Hire immigrant workers to cut the grass!

Farmers Response -
Geez! Look at my skinny pigs and cows

Homemakers Response -
Geez! Look at the price of my bread and milk

Parental Response -
Geez! Look at my skinny kids and spouse!

Doctors Resonse -
Thank you Corn Farmers - we need skinny kids and spouses!

Reply

Tem

1 Comment

  • 1411 Days Ago
  • 04/04/2008

alcohol fuels

Fuel grade ethanol can be made from more than corn.
However, many of the farmers in the US know how to
grow corn very well, so they did what they know.
Switchgrass and several other sources of cellulose are
just comming available, but efficient processes and
Reliable fuel making machines are still in the development
stages. In time, several types of biofuels will be available
in regional markets at different price points because each region
will be more efficient at growing crops that grow well where they live, naturaly.

Reply

kkakyle

1 Comment

  • 1410 Days Ago
  • 04/05/2008

Re: alcohol fuels

First, sugar cane is supposed to yeild 5 times more ethanol than corn, so use sugar cane. Second, I believe that a combination of solar and ultracapacitor technologies will be the answer in the next two years. ZENN motors in Canada will have a car that will go 250 miles on a 5 minute charge with a top speed of 80 mph. This vehicle along with solar charging stations is the primary answer to our woes.

Reply

Elroch

56 Comments

  • 1404 Days Ago
  • 04/11/2008

Re: alcohol fuels

According to the ZENN Motor Company website, the current ZENN fully recharges in 8 hours, reaching 80% of maximum capacity in 4 hours, and has a regulated top speed of 25 mph (aimed exclusively at city driving). It is also said to cost a few cents a mile to run, which has got to be a strong point, but the other parameters could do with improvement. With regard to distance on one charge, there is always going to be a trade-off between making a car light (cheaper to run and better acceleration) and giving it maximum stamina.

Reply

energymv

19 Comments

  • 1355 Days Ago
  • 05/30/2008

Re: alcohol fuels

100% tariff on sugar cane is an issue.

Reply

MakeSense

99 Comments

  • 1407 Days Ago
  • 04/08/2008

Ethanol Is No Solution

Corn ethanol never was an energy solution. Cellulosic ethanol never will be. These are hyped primarily due to the political influence of FARMERS and AGRIBUSINESS. The U.S. consumes 150 billion gallons of gasoline and 40 billion gallons of diesel fuel a year. These figures will grow substantially, if we remain in the liquid fuel mode. Ethanol has no potential to scratch the surface of this demand. When energy values and net energy are considered, the contribution of ethanol is miniscule. When you add the fact that transportation accounts for only 43% of oil consumption, the final effect amounts to zip. It requires enormous amounts of water, land, energy and chemicals to produce ethanol. Without high subsidies it's shortcomings would forbid investment.

Reply

energymv

19 Comments

  • 1355 Days Ago
  • 05/30/2008

Re: Ethanol Is No Solution

I have to agree. The only bio-fuel that will survive on the free market is recycled used cooking oil, garbage, industrial waste byproducts, etc. This corn ethanol boondoggle is not working. Corn is for people, not cars.

Reply

Advertisement

McMillan968

38 Comments

  • 1400 Days Ago
  • 04/15/2008

Ethanol POOR

I PRAY for a corn crop failure!!
I pray that these FAT CATS and ALL their money goes down the drain.THEY DESERVE WORSE!!
The Prez along with them. Afterall isnt it HIS BUDDIES??
They KNEW it would RAISE the price of FOOD AND FUEL !!!!!
NOT JUST for the poor but for EVERYBODY.Pushing more people into poverty.MORE over the edge.
BUT HEY the FAT CATS are making TONS OF MONEY NOW!! More than even they thought possable!!
SOMEBODY FORGOT to check how this would trickle down.Forgot its raises the cost of a CHILDS MILK, a DOGS FOOD,a bowl of CEREAL.Driving the old closer to the edge.Medicine? FOOD?? or HEAT?? or maybe NOT being able to afford to  GET TO THE DOCTOR??
What a FINE COUNTRY WE ARE IN!!
WHAT A NICE JOB WE ARE DOING TAKING CARE OF OUR PEOPLE!!

Reply

About

Insights, opinions, and our editors' analysis of the latest in emerging technologies.

Subscribe to the TR Editors' blog RSS Feed

Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement