Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

TR Editors' blog

Insights, opinions, and our editors' analysis of the latest in emerging technologies.

Blog Topics

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

  • ssptng01 : U suck and so does Bush!!!!!
  • ... : I am very excited about this project, and can foresee the day when we might be able to harness...
  • ... : I believe the same is said for the human brain. There is no information completely beyond recall,...
  • ... : Very cool.  I think it's interesting how in trying to program effective AI we seem to end up...
  • SirLanse : Getting the government to give you cash is not capitalism.  The complaint is that the chinese...
  • justme : I wiped out the flu with high daily doses of Vitamin D.  First day the congestion markedly...
  • UgoSugo : All the China-US thing has nothing to do with bloody environmentalists or corrupted politicians...
  • gabrielg01 : If solar cells become a commodity, then it's far better to let the Chinese do it. Low wages,...
  • msmsimon : The E.coli strain used in our research is non-pathogenic and of Biosafety Level 1 ("work...
  • xyzt : Now that Multitouch is realized this is the next concept from Minority Report that is being...
Advertisement
Thursday, January 31, 2008

Female Sperm?

Scientists generate primitive sperm cells from female stem cells.
By Emily Singer

Good news for lesbians who want to have biological children related to both parents: a new stem-cell technique could allow scientists to convert female cells into sperm. Use that sperm to fertilize an egg, and voila: children with two female biological parents.

In unpublished work reported by New Scientist and the Telegraph, British scientists at the University of Newcastle coaxed female embryonic stem cells to develop into primitive sperm cells. Next, the researchers, led by stem-cell biologist Karim Nayernia, plan to create sperm cells from female bone marrow, making the procedure more practical. They haven't yet made the primitive sperm undergo the final cell division that generates the correct amount of genetic material for fertilization, a process known as meiosis.

Scientists have been skeptical that sperm can be produced from female cells, which lack a Y chromosome and thus whichever Y-linked genes are crucial to sperm production.

According to the Telegraph:

Dr Robin Lovell-Badge, a stem cell and sex determination expert at the National Institute for Medical Research, Mill Hill, London, doubts it will work: "The presence of two X chromosomes is incompatible with this. Moreover they need genes from the Y chromosome to go through meiosis. So they are at least double-damned."

Nayernia's team has had success generating sperm from male stem cells. Last year, the researchers made primitive sperm from stem cells collected from adult men. And in a 2006 proof of principle experiment, Nayernia used "sperm derived from male embryonic stem cells to fertilize mice to produce seven pups, six of which lived to adulthood, though the survivors did suffer problems," according to the Telegraph.

Tags: stem cells, sperm

Comments

  • Additional developments with female sperm
    A web site reviewing decades of research into samesex procreation for humans, including a copy of a patent application which addresses how to create female sperm while compensating for the missing Y chromosome, is available at:  www.samesexprocreation.com.  The site mentions the 1997 work of Japanese scientists who created chicken female sperm.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    gregaha
    01/31/2008
    Posts:1
  • Brave New Science
    Why thank you people! Great news everyone! It is great to know we are one step closer to satisfy every whim of a society that has completely lost its sense of humility... And millions out there are lacking basics like clean drinking water! Another sample of science in the benefit of a fringe category  that has the big bucks. Really, congratulations! What else can I say? When I read things like this, even Frankenstein seems more moral to me... Is perchance the likelihood to have genetically dysfunctional offsprings not increased by applying this technology?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    CountZ3ro
    02/04/2008
    Posts:20
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
  • useful tech?
    This might be useful for preserving endangered species.  It would give another tool for controlling inbreeding in small populations, especially if there were a shortage of males, as is often the case.  The usual sperm from remaining males could be sorted for XY and XX, and used to produce mostly male offspring.  Of course, you would need some female offspring from the males, or you would lose any genes on the males' X chromosomes.  However, the bulk of female offspring could be produced with "female sperm."  At first glance, I think this would lessen shrinkage of the gene pool compared to normal ways of procreation.

    This could be useful for isolated human pops too, though most would probably reject it due to religious or cultural objections.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    dmm
    02/07/2008
    Posts:191
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • [no subject]
    Why don’t they call this what it is, non-identical cloning.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    zig158
    02/15/2008
    Posts:64
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • Breakthrough?
    This scientific playground accomplishment, heralded as a "new" and "cutting edge" is nothing "new." New would be making life out of a block of wood. Female sperm are still sperm. Intellectual honesty requires acknowledging that this method of reproduction still depends upon philosophically heterosexual (that is, opposite/complementary) means of reproduction. If one can make 2 eggs into a baby, or 2 sperm into a baby, then that would be a homosexual means of reproduction.
    Until then, one has not done anything new but is dependent upon another idea; this is a parasitic idea, that is, a copycat--one dependent upon an already existent means of reproduction that is methodologically hijacked and called "new."
      I do not write this to be caustic, nor vitriolic, but philosophically honest. True LBGT rights movement people will recognize what I have written is true as the central movement people have written that gay marriage is not the goal; instead, they write that traditional relationships need to be completely reworked. Until that happens, a sperm/egg combination, whether in the womb via artificial insemination or in a petri dish, is heterosexual and an affirmation of the natural order.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    StephenC
    03/12/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
Advertisement

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
•  Subscribe
Save 36%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
» Gift Subscription
» Digital Subscription
» Reprints, Back Issues
» Subscribe
» Table of Contents
» MIT News

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.