Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

TR Editors' blog

Insights, opinions, and our editors' analysis of the latest in emerging technologies.

Blog Topics

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

  • ssptng01 : U suck and so does Bush!!!!!
  • ... : I am very excited about this project, and can foresee the day when we might be able to harness...
  • ... : I believe the same is said for the human brain. There is no information completely beyond recall,...
  • ... : Very cool.  I think it's interesting how in trying to program effective AI we seem to end up...
  • SirLanse : Getting the government to give you cash is not capitalism.  The complaint is that the chinese...
  • justme : I wiped out the flu with high daily doses of Vitamin D.  First day the congestion markedly...
  • UgoSugo : All the China-US thing has nothing to do with bloody environmentalists or corrupted politicians...
  • gabrielg01 : If solar cells become a commodity, then it's far better to let the Chinese do it. Low wages,...
  • msmsimon : The E.coli strain used in our research is non-pathogenic and of Biosafety Level 1 ("work...
  • xyzt : Now that Multitouch is realized this is the next concept from Minority Report that is being...
Advertisement
Wednesday, November 28, 2007

Google Saves the World

The company will spend millions to make renewable energy cheaper than coal.
By Kevin Bullis

Yesterday Google announced a new renewable-energy initiative. While the press release is a little unclear about how it will play out, the initiative will pour tens of millions of dollars into developing cheap, clean energy next year. It's not just philanthropy. In the coming years, the company also hopes to spend hundreds of millions on clean-energy investments that will make a lot of money.

The goal is to drive down the cost of renewable energy, making it less expensive than even coal, the cheapest source of electricity. A number of other companies have also been working on this.

In a deft public-relations maneuver, Google's huge, energy-hungry data centers have been transformed from an environmental liability into a basis for making the company an environmental leader. Here's a bit from the press release:

"We have gained expertise in designing and building large-scale, energy-intensive facilities by building efficient data centers," said Larry Page, Google Co-founder and President of Products. "We want to apply the same creativity and innovation to the challenge of generating renewable electricity at globally significant scale, and produce it cheaper than from coal."

Brilliant. I'm pretty sure Brin and Page zipping around in their new private Boeing 757 and their legendary Boeing 767 "party jet" also makes them environmental heroes, although I haven't quite figured out how yet.

Although perhaps in a different class, another leading environmentally Janus-faced company is BP, whose corroding pipelines flooded Prudhoe Bay in Alaska with 200,000 gallons of crude oil in 2006. This year the company announced $500 million in funding for a clean-energy initiative.

Comments

  • Energy < cost of coal ?
    Cheaper than coal?
    Somewhere between 1¢ and 6¢ per KWH would be a stunning change.

    Since the 1970's oil shock, the cost of energy has been rising.

    Reversing that trend would stand current expectations and markets on their head.

    Putting the coal industry into bankruptcy?
    Surely all but the very lowest cost producers of oil and natural gas, too?

    They're also saying years, not decades.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    nekote
    11/29/2007
    Posts:138
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • cynical review doesn't cut it
    I find it very disappointing that a Technology Review article could be so cynical about someone trying to support and develop some practical technology, especially when the project goal is desired, indeed needed, by us all. I guess from your articlesattitude you assume that Google is just attmpting some kind of PR stunt, or a rich boys fly in space scheme. I don't think so though. What Google is trying to do doesn't seem like a carpet baggers pitch for a perpetual motion machine or the like, it appears to be reasonably do-able project, and very worth while. If they fail, it will be all our loss. They are preparing to spend real money on a non-frivolous project. They should be commended and encouraged.
    If you want to dis something about technology in your country try a rational review of the George Bush approach to technology development. (Perhaps reading Scientific American occasionally might be instructive for you)
    Hurray for Google and anyone else who wants to step up to the plate. 
    Rate this comment: 12345

    kentgreen
    12/02/2007
    Posts:2
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
    • Re: cynical review doesn't cut it
      For Google's approach to go forward, there is a need to break down a big barrier on the demand side of the electricity industry structure.

      The barrier is known as "native load," in which the enterprise revenue side of the utilities is protected from competition by the less valued (by the utility itself) natural monopoly grid side. Such protection is extended to central generation by long term contracts, working against distributed generation opportunities that Google will be promoting.

      Electricity Without Price Controls (EWPC) is the solution to allow the development of the demand side of the power industry. EWPC is a market architecture and design paradigm shift of the power industry. The development of the demand side is mostly about information technologies, like Google strong know how.

      For details about EWPC, go to www.energyblogs.com/ewpc
      Rate this comment: 12345

      javs
      12/08/2007
      Posts:89
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
Advertisement

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
•  Subscribe
Save 36%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
» Gift Subscription
» Digital Subscription
» Reprints, Back Issues
» Subscribe
» Table of Contents
» MIT News

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.