Technology Review - Published By MIT
Log in to My.TechnologyReview.com | Register
Advertisement
 

Insights, opinions, and our editors' analysis of the latest in emerging technologies.

Add RSS Feed XML

Hybrids versus Electric Cars

GM is on the hybrid bandwagon while other automakers continue to argue against it.
Thursday, October 25, 2007
By Kevin Bullis

According to the Wall Street Journal, Honda, Nissan, and Renault are making the same arguments against hybrid vehicles that General Motors made several years ago to predict that hybrids would fail. (See "Hybrid or Electric: Car Makers Take Sides" and "Honda Won't Pursue Plug-in Hybrids.") The difference now is that the arguments are right this time--at least for some markets.

In the 1990s, U.S. automakers such as GM led the development of hybrid-vehicle technology. But GM elected to drop hybrids in favor of a much longer-term technology--hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles--arguing that hybrids were too expensive and didn't provide enough environmental benefit to be successful. Then Toyota's Prius proved GM wrong. And recently, GM has become a big promoter of hybrid technology, especially next-generation plug-in hybrids.

Not so Honda, Nissan, and Renault. According to the Journal report, Carlos Ghosn, the CEO of Renault and Nissan, complains that hybrids don't really do much to reduce petroleum consumption and pollution, arguing that it's better to build all-electric vehicles that have zero emissions. U.S. automakers such as GM made the same arguments, although they pushed for fuel-cell vehicles, not battery-powered vehicles. (GM, of course, already had a battery-electric vehicle, the EV1, which it scrapped.)

Honda currently sells hybrid vehicles, but the company's president and CEO, Takeo Fukui, is skeptical of next-generation plug-in hybrids. Such cars would still have both electric motors and a gasoline engine, but they could go much farther on electricity alone than today's hybrids can. GM has been touting its Volt concept, which would go 40 miles on electricity stored in lithium-ion batteries. For longer trips, a gas generator would kick on to recharge the battery, providing an additional 600 miles of range. Fukui's argument is that the gas engine in the Volt is unnecessary. Presumably, he is suggesting that it would be better, and cheaper, to use batteries alone, or to stick with gasoline.

His argument doesn't make sense in the United States, where there's probably not much of a market for a car that can only go 40 miles on a charge. But a couple of trends suggest that there may indeed be a growing market for relatively short-range electric cars. London has a congestion tax on vehicles driving in the city--and other cities are considering imposing similar fees--from which zero-emission vehicles are exempt. It's not unlikely that such regulations could evolve to keep non-zero-emission vehicles out of city centers entirely, Ghosn suggests. Meanwhile, the taxes make it more expensive to drive gas-powered cars. Climate-change legislation could also make it more expensive to drive conventional vehicles. As these costs rise, the people who will feel the pressure most are those who are likely unable to afford a car with both an engine and an electric motor. For them, a 40-mile, zero-emission, all-electric commuter could be appealing, especially considering the fact that (in the United States) most people drive less than 40 miles a day.

Comments

  • GM is not making a HYBRID
    geisemann on 10/25/2007 at 6:29 PM
    Posts:
    2
    Avg Rating:
    1/5
    F
    Hybrid=A combo Technology something MID TERM
    Full Electric= Future.

    The EV1 is all-electric and GM Volt being made is all electric.

    Stop calling the VOLT A HYBRID

    As an Electrical engineer I know the difference between Hybrid and Electric.

    Stop calling the GM volt a HYBRID.  Hybrid in terms of technology is low tech.

    It takes me back to the times of TUBE - Transistor TV sets when Transistor technology was not up to snuff and people had to use tubes.

    Called a 1960 Hybrid TV set.

    All electric is MUCH superior in terms of maintance, no oil changes, no Nickel battery waste etc.

    GM for the record is making an Electric car with an engine to charge the battery if needed.  The charge engine can be removed and the car will still work.  A hybrid cannot do this it uses an old tech gas engine with help from an electric engine.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: GM is not making a HYBRID
      malkmus on 10/26/2007 at 10:36 AM
      Posts:
      1
      Absolutely right, the Volt is by concept an electric car with a (albeit large) on board generator.
      In an interesting aside the weight of a car becomes much less of an issue in electric cars since most of the energy penalty for accelerating a heavy vehicle is recovered during the breaking, hence the penalty in efficiency for having an on board generator is not all that large.

      The only slight worry I see with the Volt is that it is currently specified with LiIon based batteries. There is at the moment no known Li battery that has a sufficient number of recharge cycles for automotive use. Equally there is no in the field experience with automotive LiIon whatsoever. Hence behaviour in harsh environmental conditions over a long period of time has not been tested yet. It seems to me that a realistic time frame for the Volt (or any other mass market Li based electric car) will have to be somewhat further in the future. Maybe if the cycle from Prototype to mass market for most automotive technologies is anything to go by 2012-2015 should be a more reasonable if slightly depressing estimate. Lets hope some major breakthrough in batteries happens soon....
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: GM is not making a HYBRID
        franquellim on 10/26/2007 at 10:59 AM
        Posts:
        10
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
        I have to disagree with your assertions about Lithium Ion batteries. While I am not a scientist, I have read reports about at least two companies, A123 Systems and Compact Power, Inc, which have produced cells which have will be used in demonstration packs due to GM at the end of this month.
        GM expects to begin road testing "mules" (likely malibu frames with EV drivetrains and batteries) by the end of this year. They have announced a manufacturing facility and already have supplies for all major components, including battery packs, with a production target of 2010.
        Please refer to the excellent website "www.gm-volt.com" for additional information.
        (I'm not affiliated with the site, just a fan)
        Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: GM is not making a HYBRID
        jpdemers on 10/26/2007 at 11:02 AM
        Posts:
        31
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
        I believe that today's batteries do have the necessary lifetimes -- the problem right now is the cost (hence the notion of leasing the batteries, to keep the sticker price from being so high that it's dismissed out of hand by consumers.) 

        Americans don't use their cars just to commute, which I think needs to be taken into account.  They take long trips, and take a ton of toys with them, on vacations and weekends.  Most can't afford two cars, which leads to all those single-passenger SUVs making the daily commute to the office at 13 miles per gallon.

        A plug-in electric with an on-board generator, and a 600-mile range, is what these people will be wanting.
        Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: GM is not making a HYBRID
        guetenburg on 10/29/2007 at 11:53 AM
        Posts:
        5
        The GM Volt (If it's made) is a Hybrid. It's a SERIES HYBRID. Thus, there is electric generation in series with the electric motor. One feeds the other. The gasoline / Battery-Electric Motor hybrids are called parallel hybrids.

        For an ELECTRIC CAR, go to www.Plug-InMotors.com. This company is making Pure Electric Plug-In Vehicles. Or EV's.
        Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: GM is not making a HYBRID
      RichardL on 10/26/2007 at 2:29 PM
      Posts:
      3
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
      Actually, it is a hybrid.  Just a different type.  What Toyota makes is called a parallel hybrid because the engine and batter pack worth in parallel to provide power.  The Volt will be a series hybrid, meaning the engine's only reason for existance is to power the battery.
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: GM is not making a HYBRID
      hamid on 10/30/2007 at 10:54 PM
      Posts:
      11
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      Agree, it is conceptually incorrect to call a serial hybrid (as opposed to a Prius parallel hybrid) a hybrid.

      This is an EV with range extension.  So it can be called a

      REEV:  Range extended electric vehicle

      or an

      EREV

      The new nano-phosphate lithium ion batteries have a lifetime of 15 years (5000 recharge cycles), do not catch fire, do not heat, work in -20 temperature, and can deliver so much power that an EV can easily beat a Ferrari.

      Checkout A123.  There are no serious questions remaining about the battery, except for cost.
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • What it's realy all about.
    pberk on 10/25/2007 at 7:58 PM
    Posts:
    1
    This discussion really comes down to something very simple; if a battery can be made that can power an EV far/long enough (including AC/Heat) and sells at a reasonable price then EV's will be the best way to go.  Plug-in's are really transitional vehicles, to allow batteries to evolve while providing a realistic vehicle.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: What it's realy all about.
      B.E.S. on 10/26/2007 at 3:02 AM
      Posts:
      1
      The author of the article misses the point made by Honda's CEO.  If the Volt altogether dispensed with the gas engine, it would save a lot of weight and volume by eliminating the engine block, the gas tank, and all the attendant transmission and infrastructure components, as well as the exhaust management machinery.

      The VERY significant volume thus liberated can then be devoted to ADDITIONAL batteries -- extending the Volt well past its 40-mile plugin range... perhaps into somewhere in the neighborhood of 100+ mile range.  Now that's a commuter car even most Americans could appreciate.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: What it's realy all about.
        advill on 10/26/2007 at 1:28 PM
        Posts:
        11
        Avg Rating:
        1/5
        The U.S has been talking around matters that are already solved in Europe...for instance, diesel, is providing ALREADY the fuel savings that U.S. is expecting for the next 10 years. Not to mention that the next generation of hibrids is a combination of diesel+plug/charge hibrids (Peugeot and Renault will have them in market next year).

        Problems are;
        Regular american is over 220 Lb. (don“t fit in average size car )
        Regulation avoid use of diesel engines
        Americans has to change taxes to gross vehicular weigth or MPG tax to promote economies via market incentives...in the mean time everything will be bla..bla...bla..
        Rate this comment: 12345
        • Re: What it's realy all about.
          hamid on 10/30/2007 at 11:07 PM
          Posts:
          11
          Avg Rating:
          4/5
          Why would you need a diesel when serial EVs are so much more superior and reliable and clean?

          Europe is fighting REEVs because they can never compete globally with an EV.  EVs will be coming from China and India.  Europe is FINISHED!
          Rate this comment: 12345
  • Tesla electric car
    olmon on 10/26/2007 at 3:34 AM
    Posts:
    6
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    There is a totally electric car being built here for those who can afford the price.  The Tesla. 0 to 60 in less then 5 seconds, top speed in excess of 135 mph and a 200 mile range on a charge, with an $89,000 price tag.  I'd love to have one. 

    There have been electric cars in the past that had reasonable ranges & speed and there are other technologies that are proven and could be tapped. The FACT is - - - the public is only going to get what the people that are really in power let us have.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Tesla Range and Think City
      bj on 10/26/2007 at 7:38 AM
      Posts:
      24
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      You forgot to mention Tesla's range, which is up over 200 miles on one charge.

      Also, nobody mentioned the Think City, which was originally designed by Ford, but is now owned by a company in Norway, that has a novel solution for the high cost of the Lithium battery pack-- lease it.

      http://en.think.no/

      Too bad it's an annoying Flash website. Cool commuter car with a range slightly over 100 miles, which makes it usable for most commuters. I wish they'd start selling them in the US.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: Tesla Range and Think City
        soarhead on 10/26/2007 at 12:50 PM
        Posts:
        6
        Avg Rating:
        2/5
        Dear bj,
        An update for you: Tesla recently completed official EPA range testing, and the vehicle came in with a 235 mile highway, 254 city!  Sound backward?  Actually the Tesla gets better mileage in the city because of regenerative breaking in stop-n-go traffic. Go to Teslamotors.com for the latest.
        By the way, I am not a salesperson for the Tesla. I believe GM had the world on a string back when they made the EV-1.  I drove one, had friends who loved them, especially with the newer generation batteries.  They were forced to give up their vehicles!  GM screwed up again!  If only they had stuck with the EV--they would have back orders for their product today, not lay-offs!
        One more by-the-way:  Most all of the stuff GM, Ford, and others are doing ties their technologies to a block of metal that has pistons, rings, crank shafts, valves, etc.  Can you imagine what would happen to all of the supporting industries if a motor with only three moving parts became the norm? The unions wouldn't have it!
        Rate this comment: 12345
        • Re: Tesla Range and Think City
          TimG on 11/03/2007 at 12:12 AM
          Posts:
          8
          Avg Rating:
          3/5
          soarhead,

          You have really nailed it!  When (not if) EVs take off there will be some major fights in Detroit boardrooms.  Everybody knows that the major automakers don't make money selling cars.  They make the big money selling parts!  The simplicity of the EV totally screws their business model.  I think this is the real reason that GM dumped the EV1 - panic.
          Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: Tesla Range and Think City
        advill on 10/26/2007 at 1:43 PM
        Posts:
        11
        Avg Rating:
        1/5
        Problem with electric cars is cost of batteries and it will be that way for a looong time, A123,Valence,Th!nk, all has the same problem of cost (and some others depending technology).

        A mix of supercapacitors + diesel engine could be a better solution.. how is that secret ultracapacitors project doing?
        Rate this comment: 12345
        • Re: Tesla Range and Think City
          hamid on 10/30/2007 at 11:12 PM
          Posts:
          11
          Avg Rating:
          4/5
          Wrong - nanophosphate Li-ion batteries which are best for EVs are now cheaper than lithium-cobalt (laptop) batteries.

          Checkout PHET in China.
          Rate this comment: 12345
  • Volt or hybrids fuel economy
    Alex De Maida on 10/26/2007 at 10:50 AM
    Posts:
    1
    One point is, what's exactly a typical " fuel economy " of a hybrid/Volt vehicle, for example measured in kWh from the grid per km or mile travelled? It's a very important point, because with a such high value hybrids are less efficient than petrol based vehicles regarding the primary energy consumption. For example, 15 kWh per 100 km with 7% in electricity transmission looses and 41% thermal efficiency in electricity generation grossly corresponds to 23 km per liter (or 9 mpg IIRC) of gasoline or diesel fuel, i.e. still lower than today European standard
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Honda spokesman won't commit har-kari
    theBike45 on 10/26/2007 at 11:08 AM
    Posts:
    14
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    Why is anyone surprised that the Honda spakesman claimed that the cars they build (conventional hybrids) are superior to the coming plug-ins, which neither they nor Toyota can build due to a lack of a suitable battery. Do you really think he wants to lose his job? We all know the technologies and the gigantic advantages of plug-ins (especially effficient plug-ins like the Chevy VOLT) over hybrids, which, as one analysts said the other day, have proven to be total failures in acheiving their stated goals. Only those who push proven-as-ineffectual conservation
    strategies are still behind hybrids, although most of them have jumped ship to back plug-ins.
    The math is pretty simple and both economics and emission concerns favor the plug-ins by a very large margin.  Honda breezily talks all-electrics when they can't even produce a plug-in, but typically fails to understand that a plug-in with a 40 mile plus range can accomplish 95% what an
    all-electric car can, and at today's battery prices, do so in an infinitely more economical
    fashion..
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • hybrids vs. electrics
    SVE on 10/26/2007 at 11:58 AM
    Posts:
    42
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    How come nobody mentions the gains from swapping out the gasoline engines for diesels? I'm all for electrics, but if it is paired with any ICE (as in hybrid), at least it should be a diesel.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: hybrids vs. electrics
      Gurthang on 10/26/2007 at 5:23 PM
      Posts:
      13
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      The problem with diesel hybrids is economics.  Diesel engines are significantly more expensive than their gasoline counterparts.  And in a hybrid where the electric drive componets already add several thousands of dollars to the base cost of the vehicle adding a diesel engine just pushes it beyond what most consumers are willing to pay.
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: hybrids vs. electrics
      gabrielg01 on 10/27/2007 at 5:01 PM
      Posts:
      294
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      Indeed, a diesel-hybrid would be amazingly efficient. However, it would also be very expensive. Maybe $10-$15k more expensive than a regular car. People are not willing to pay that kind of premium.
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • No EV - Hospital Trips
    DougDante on 10/29/2007 at 10:29 AM
    Posts:
    2
    I would never drive an EV with a range under 150 miles, unless I can quickly charge it at many convenient locations.

    If I'm commuted 25-50 miles away, and I get an urgent call that a loved one is in the hospital, then I need to go NOW. 

    I don't have time to worry about my car in a situation like that, so I won't buy one that would prevent me from going where I need when I need.

    Also, when I go on vacation, I don't like to do a lot of planning.  Maybe get an oil change, call a hotel, and go.  I don't want to have to choose my destination and timing based on what kind of fuel my car takes.

    That's why plug in hybrids are better - until there is an established quick-charge infastructure, EVs will be secondary cars and toys.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Get Plug-In Electric Vehicle Now!
    guetenburg on 10/29/2007 at 11:48 AM
    Posts:
    5
    Almost all American households have 2 vehicles. It seems to me that there are many people who would use an Electric Vehicle or EV for around town driving. The average American only drives 28mies round trip to work each day. A 40 mile range like that given by Plug-In Motors Inc. www.Plug-InMotors.com seems like the perfect solution.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Battery swapping stations
    gabrielg01 on 10/29/2007 at 12:50 PM
    Posts:
    294
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    Even if electric vehicles have a relatively short range, why can't we set up an infrastructure for swapping batteries? Gas stations would hold charged batteries - you'd just go in, swap a charged battery, pay, and within 5 minutes be on your way.

    Cars would have 2 swappable batteries, and be used in sequential fashion. When one battery is discharged, you would still have one full battery left. You'd go to the gas/battery station and get the new one. This way, one would never "run low" and be in danger of getting stuck.

    Really, what is so effin' complicated about this?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Battery swapping stations
      gjcoram on 10/30/2007 at 10:44 AM
      Posts:
      6
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      Your idea is similar to the propane-tank swapping for your grill -- there are some mighty ugly (rusting) tanks you get for a swap.  Are the stations responsible for verifying that the battery you're turning in hasn't been abused, and will they guarantee that the one you pick up is in good shape?
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: Battery swapping stations
        gabrielg01 on 10/30/2007 at 1:16 PM
        Posts:
        294
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
        Yours is a rather superficial reason to oppose such a system...

        Yes, surely there would be some people/companies trying to abuse the system. But the market would sort them out anyway. Companies that care about their brand image would make sure to provide good service. The regular gasoline business is in fact no different. Lots of people avoid mom-and-pop gas stations, and stick to certain brands for fear of buying poor quality gas.

        There could be additional layers of quality checking. The batteries could have built-in systems that showed how many cycles they gone through already. The batteries could also have an individual ID number, which could be tracked via a database. One could look up battery#9999 and see that it was picked up at the Elm Street Shell station on date x/y/z, and then dropped off at the British Petroleum station a week later, so on and so forth...

        Most of the infrastructure is already in place - only minor and gradual adjustments would be required. We could have a dual gasoline-electric service infrastructure for a long time, as the electric component is phased in, and the gasoline part is phased out.
        Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: Battery swapping stations
        gabrielg01 on 10/30/2007 at 1:17 PM
        Posts:
        294
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
        Yours is a rather superficial reason to oppose such a system...

        Yes, surely there would be some people/companies trying to abuse the system. But the market would sort them out anyway. Companies that care about their brand image would make sure to provide good service. The regular gasoline business is in fact no different. Lots of people avoid mom-and-pop gas stations, and stick to certain brands for fear of buying poor quality gas.

        There could be additional layers of quality checking. The batteries could have built-in systems that showed how many cycles they gone through already. The batteries could also have an individual ID number, which could be tracked via a database. One could look up battery#9999 and see that it was picked up at the Elm Street Shell station on date x/y/z, and then dropped off at the British Petroleum station a week later, so on and so forth...

        Most of the infrastructure is already in place - only minor and gradual adjustments would be required. We could have a dual gasoline-electric service infrastructure for a long time, as the electric component is phased in, and the gasoline part is phased out.
        Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Battery swapping stations
      gjcoram on 10/30/2007 at 10:45 AM
      Posts:
      6
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      Your idea is similar to the propane-tank swapping for your grill -- there are some mighty ugly (rusting) tanks you get for a swap.  Are the stations responsible for verifying that the battery you're turning in hasn't been abused, and will they guarantee that the one you pick up is in good shape?
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Battery swapping stations
      gjcoram on 10/30/2007 at 10:45 AM
      Posts:
      6
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      Your idea is similar to the propane-tank swapping for your grill -- there are some mighty ugly (rusting) tanks you get for a swap.  Are the stations responsible for verifying that the battery you're turning in hasn't been abused, and will they guarantee that the one you pick up is in good shape?
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Battery swapping stations
      williamsmedia on 10/31/2007 at 11:37 AM
      Posts:
      3
      Brilliant idea!
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Battery swapping stations
      TimG on 11/03/2007 at 12:30 AM
      Posts:
      8
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      grabielg01,

      I made this suggestion some years back in a note to Scientific American.  Really, the whole thing could be done robotically w/o ever leaving your car.  You would get a battery that is recharged, tested, and certified with the swipe of a credit card or modern equivalent.  The energy companies could set them up at existing gas stations and they would be a dream of a business model!  No more having to deal with explosive, toxic chemicals or environmental hazards.  Just hire a couple of high school kids to oversee the robot system then sit back and print money.
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • Hybrids versus Electric Cars
    williamsmedia on 10/29/2007 at 8:24 PM
    Posts:
    3
    Until the storage capacity becomes better on electric batteries, and the cost of them, the "versus" Hybrids is a no brainer. Electric cars cannot give consumers the distance most want, or require on one charge.

    Todays consumer Hybrids, even though most use a portion of gas, can reach up to 35-70 miles per gallon. A huge difference in gas consumption, money saving at the pump, and definitely better on the environment. Much better then any new car available in the last year or so.

    Here is a Hybrid car coming out of beta, the company claims around 150-300 miles per gallon: http://www.aptera.com ---Straight out of the Jetsons I know, but some great looking stats. My conscience tells me to go down this direction.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • focus on the topic
    asdar on 10/30/2007 at 4:27 PM
    Posts:
    62
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    Everyone is hopping all over giving their own favorite project, but not hitting the core of the discussion. Which is better Hybrid, or electric.

    The electric has these advantages:
    1. Much less maintenance
    2. less expensive running costs
    3. Doesn't use gasoline directly
    4. Quiet

    The Hybrid has these advantages:
    1. range
    2. convenience
    3. uses less battery material
    4. cheaper
    5. not dependent on charging stations
    6. more easily marketed to the population at large

    Both types use less gas than ICE.

    I'm a huge fan of the Volt series Hybrid because it answers almost all of the questions.

    It's no contest for me between hybrid and electric currently, Hybrid wins.

    The two reasons that it's not a contest are:
    1. The population will buy hybrids, EV's don't offer the convenience.
    2. The battery material for one EV can be used on four hybrids and cover over 80% of the driving, that I call the commuter drive.

    If we can get four times th