Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

TR Editors' blog

Insights, opinions, and our editors' analysis of the latest in emerging technologies.

Blog Topics

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

  • StephaneFr : "new" operating system based on 40 years old kernel concepts ?I'd like to see something really...
  • kstauff : Not that I'd want to turn those off, but it's pretty easy to do.  It auto-updates, so I don't...
  • Gaetano... : .I've already predicted the GoOS (and posted everywhere on the web) with some of its main specs...
  • vinaymodi : I wrote about a year back on cloud computing and Web os....
  • cnvikas : Its a win win situation for the users. Chrome is one of the best browser we are having. Lets hope...
  • GaryB : So you can use sleep mode ... how did you turn off the incessant and often very pushy updates? ...
  • dmm : I presume there are harmful side effects.  If not, how do I get some?
  • palash291 : Can i get more information about similar research on fly-like robots in other institutes?
  • kstauff : So to cut down on or remove entirely boot time, they intend to just remove a lot of OS.  That...
  • ... : I think we need to get through our heads that the our masters in Washington have a different...
Advertisement
Wednesday, October 24, 2007

Power from Space?

A study released by the National Security Space Office says that space-based solar-power systems could be built within several decades.
By Brittany Sauser

"Can the United States and partners enable the development and deployment of a space-based solar power system within the first half of the 21st Century such that if constructed could provide affordable, clean, safe, reliable, sustainable, and expandable energy for its consumers?"

That's the fundamental question the National Security Space Office (NSSO) asked in an online collaborative forum that included 170 academic, scientific, technical, legal, and business experts from around the world. The discussion took place over a five-month period, during which the NSSO gathered and organized information pertaining to the feasibility of space-based solar. The results of the study were released on October 10.

The study concluded "that while the business case for SBSP cannot be closed for construction to begin in 2007, the technical feasibility of the concept has never been better and all science and technology development vectors appear to indicate that there is credible potential for SBSP to be built within a strategically relevant period of time."

It has been more than a decade since a study by a U.S. government agency examined the feasibility of space-based solar power, a concept that was first brought to the government's attention in the 1960s.

From that earlier study:

The basic idea is very straightforward: place very large solar arrays into continuously and intensely sunlit Earth orbit (1,366 watts/m2), collect gigawatts of electrical energy, electromagnetically beam it to Earth, and receive it on the surface for use either as baseload power via direct connection to the existing electrical grid, conversion into manufactured synthetic hydrocarbon fuels, or as low-intensity broadcast power beamed directly to consumers.

Increasing oil prices and expanding populations have brought the development of alternative energy sources to the forefront of governmental concerns. The NSSO study recommends that while several major challenges need to be overcome, such as low-cost space access and supporting infrastructure on Earth and in space, the U.S government should continue research in this field and encourage the development of space-based solar power.

Images Credit NSSO

Advertisement

Comments

  • Power from Space
    Ok, let’s think about this.  Our planet to warming up so let’s collect energy that would have missed striking our planet and redirect it.  Is this not called a concentrator? And do they not increase the temperature where the energy is directed.  So this does not sound like a good idea unless we are in an ice age.

    Think, Whole House Performance
    Rate this comment: 12345

    andyenergy
    10/29/2007
    Posts:1
    • Re: Power from Space
      When comparing system impact, end-to-end efficiency should be considered. The ground-based power collectors used in a space-based solar power system will convert microwaves to electricity at nearly 90% efficiency. They will thus produce far less heat load on the planet than almost any other source. The real question is, can we build such system cheap enough, and soon enough?
      Rate this comment: 12345

      levit8r
      10/29/2007
      Posts:4
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
  • energy balance?
    The energy cost of bringing very large items into  orbit would be horrendous; how many years of successful energy harvesting would first go into repaying that cost? Plus, the environmental shock from solid fuel booster rockets that would likely be brought into play (cf. Space Shuttle) during launch would be no laughing matter.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    djs
    10/29/2007
    Posts:23
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: energy balance?
      Space-based solar power satellites will never be cost effective if conventional launch systems, such as solid fuel boosters, are used. Other launch approaches, such as electro-magnetic launch, could orbit payloads at an energy cost of less than 20 kWh per kg, which the collector would return in short order -- possibly a day or two. EM launch also would have almost no impact on the atmosphere. However, EM launch needs much R&D before proven feasible. Unless someone takes the development risk, technologies like this will never become available.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      levit8r
      10/29/2007
      Posts:4
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
  • power from space
    How about the path loss calculations?  Would be interesting to see them.  Sounds like some hellishly large dishes would be required?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    rrbv
    10/30/2007
    Posts:2
  • power from space
    How about the path loss calculations?  Would be interesting to see them.  Sounds like some hellishly large dishes would be required?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    rrbv
    10/30/2007
    Posts:2
  • Can anyone say "death ray?"
    This idea has been floated before, and was nixed for the same reason that will kill it now: Who will you trust to point these orbiting Gigawatt microwave transmitters?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    dmm
    11/01/2007
    Posts:174
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • Can anyone say "death ray?"
    This idea has been floated before, and was nixed for the same reason that will kill it now: Who will you trust to point these orbiting Gigawatt microwave transmitters?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    dmm
    11/01/2007
    Posts:174
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • Landind energy from space is better
    Hi Brittany: once we all understand that dirtfuels and cleanfuels (from petro-crudes, biocrudes, carbons,  natgas, biogas, and even hidrogen) no matter what but all bunrs hot to overheat our atmosfere. please read following message and resend it all over,

    To: Presidente Calderon
    To: Senator Dianne
    To: vice_president@whitehouse.gov
    Cc: comments@whitehouse.gov
    Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 12:09 AM
    Subject: be aware of CLIMATE CHANGE TRUE FACTS

    GLOBAL WARMING DUE TO GREEN HOUSE EFFECT IS FALSE.

    - It is a tricky sentence from Petro-oriented-men that want us to believe in, TO CONFUSE EVERY BODY-  and you too.

    - IT IS A CRAISY IDEA to send satelite MIRRORS to BLIND AND REDUCE incoming solar energy to avoid climate change -due to a mitic green house effect-.... Sun has never been harmfull to Earth....... Sun Radiation is in a perfect Thermal Equilibrium with Earth ever since.... is`nt it so?............ we Humans are the danger to the planet.

    REAL CAUSES of global warming:

    Real causes are down here, where HUGE amounts of waisted heat from more than 6 billions tons of hot gases -per year- are generated while burning fuels -from our motor vehicles, water heaters, boilers, thermoelectric generators, driers, ranges, ovens, etc-. We dont have to be scientist to understand a math equation, which evidence that the problem results from the extra added heat -we humans put in to atmosphere-:

    IR sun energy + extra waisted heat from burning fuels = atmosphere overheating

    = more evaporation = denser clouds = flooding storms = polar deice = actual kaoz

    - Do you know what happens now that petroleum XX century is gone ......very simple.....the depleted AND EXPENSIVE petroleum will go down to 1 dollar per barrel and petroleum industry will crack....... once in XXI century we replace all fuels-WITH CLEAN NATURAL SOLAR ENERGY?- that is free, so peaple can save money to buy many thing else -as an electric car -and so on----- politically impossible?....IT SEEM LIKE FICTION MOVIE….....but remember that sun is not a problem -it is the best solution-

    TWO SOLUTIONS:

    1. Urge to replace all combustion devices, equipments and engines -WITH SOLAR AND ELECTRIC POWERED ONES-.

    2. As well as urgent is to reforest the world with billions of trees – they are magic factories that will clean air from CO2, by:

    Sucking CO2 + Absorbing solar UV and solar heat = to return us pure and fresh OXIGEN -instead-

    Trees never heat the air -so- the craisy green house effect does not happen -that's a lie-

    As PETRO-dependants, We are cooking our selve's in this global pot, due to a PETRO-effect.

    HOW YOU CAN HELP? :

    - I urge any body who has responsability of enviromental care and have funds -you must support any projects where products (vehicles or equipments) pursue this change over -to a new solar and electric eco-culture-.

    -I urge Presidents all -to issue compulsory regulations to stop using any apparatus, device or engines where combustion of fuels take place -of any hidrocarbons (liquid or gas) alcohols, biofuels, carbons or hidrogen too- because all react exothermicaly generating the hot gases that over-heat the air -depleting oxigen O2 and ozone O3 as well while they burn to CO2 -which excess is getting a letal concentration level, too-.

    - Now, I hope you understand it better -the real global warming problem- & communicate it to all your friends -what is going on- to become more that GREEN peaple -but co-responsible ECOLOGY ORIENTE PEAPLE- don't relay on heaven help, only. PLEASE STOP BURNIG FUELS.

    jose ma jimenez, Senior Chem. Eng, MS from UMass,

    Zapopan, jal. Mexico
    Rate this comment: 12345

    chema
    11/17/2007
    Posts:4
Advertisement

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review July/August 2009

Current Issue

Search Me
Inside the launch of Stephen Wolfram’s new “computational knowledge engine.”
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
» Gift Subscription
» Digital Subscription
» Reprints, Back Issues
» Subscribe
» Table of Contents
» MIT News

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.