Technology Review - Published By MIT
Log in to My.TechnologyReview.com | Register
Advertisement
 

Insights, opinions, and our editors' analysis of the latest in emerging technologies.

Add RSS Feed XML

Nobel Prizes, Climate Keywords

Google helps organize the world's disinformation, too.
Friday, October 12, 2007
By David Talbot

Google famously and charmingly admonishes itself, "Don't Be Evil." Google also cultivates the image of the ultragreen company, giving subsidies to employees to buy hybrid cards and spending millions to install 1.6 megawatts of photovoltaic panels at its Mountain View, CA, headquarters. So on the day that Al Gore and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change won the Nobel Peace Prize for promulgating accurate climate science in the public interest, here's a riddle: why does Google lend its technical muscle to science-bashing and fact-distorting websites that mislead Gmail readers and other Google customers on global warming and climate change?

When I registered for a Gmail account, I understood that Google would display advertisements related to words in my e-mails. The company explains: "Gmail uses a completely automated process to provide useful information and relevant ads in the sidebar of your Gmail account pages." Fair enough. If somebody wants to offer me useful tips for insulating my house, or sell me a pack of energy-efficient light bulbs, I have no problem with that. Many of the ads that pop up next to my climate-related e-mails are, indeed, for such sites.

But I've also noted that part of the way Google has funded its hybrid subsidies is by taking checks from disinformation centers like www.CO2science.org ("Is carbon dioxide a harmful air pollutant, or is it an amazingly effective aerial fertilizer?") and the slicker Heartland Institute, which has ties to Exxon/Mobil's global-warming disinformation campaign. The Heartland site includes a simple quiz whose true-false and multiple-choice questions mislead readers into thinking that global warming is trivial, natural, and unlikely to result in any serious consequences.

Here are some true-false questions that don't appear. 1: Mankind boosted levels of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide more than 30 percent in just 150 years--to levels not seen in hundreds of thousands of years. 2: Virtually all scientists agree that much of the recent spike in global warming is almost certainly courtesy of human-caused emissions of greenhouse gases. 3: According to a vast body of peer-reviewed science, continued warming will likely cause great disruption to the stable climate we've enjoyed for 10,000 years and may trigger catastrophic sea-level rises.

Google spokeswoman Diana Adair wrote me to say that the ads from the two groups did not run afoul of its policies. However, those policies don't seem to say anything about advertisements that are false or misleading and, in their way, evil.

Comments

  • variables affecting climate
    burnside on 10/14/2007 at 1:52 AM
    Posts:
    6
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    A comment moderately on-topic: In addition to greenhouse gas driven climate change models, there is work in progress - at the Max Planck Institute and elsewhere - to understand the effects of variations in cosmic radiation, related to solar winds, on changes in the earth's climate.

    Naturally, a Google search on the subject turns up a Felliniesque banquet of disinformation with only the rare nugget of substantive research.

    MIT seems to be silent on the matter. The two theories are not natural antagonists, though journalists appear to see them in that light. More information is good.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Oh, come come!
    dmm on 10/15/2007 at 1:39 PM
    Posts:
    135
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    You aren't seriously suggesting that Google fact-check every advertisement, or that ads for things like Coke aren't ever misleading?  Where would it end?  Do you really want a Google nanny state?  Should they ban ads for harmful and/or deceptive products?  You know, things like: tobacco, alcohol, candy, junk food, vitamins, fertilizer, meat, vegans, guns, pacifists, abortion clinics, adoption clinics, churches, atheists, right wingers, left wingers, pets, PETA, [insert your pet peeve here], etc.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Oh, come come!
      Elroch on 10/23/2007 at 4:53 AM
      Posts:
      28
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      Specific services and products that may not be advertised using Google ads are to be found at Google adwords content policy , and contains a substantial overlap with the (presumably intended to be spoof) list in the message above.
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • Tut, tut - spelling
    Elroch on 10/23/2007 at 4:34 AM
    Posts:
    28
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    That's hybrid cars (not cards).
    Rate this comment: 12345

Video

A Messy Art Katrina S. Firlik, a neurosurgeon in Greenwich, CT, talks about using technology in neurosurgery.
The Next Bubble Home Tweet Home Who Owns Your Friends? Brain Games Sequencing a Single Molecule of DNA
The Next Bubble
Home Tweet Home
Who Owns Your Friends?
Brain Games
Sequencing a Single Molecule of DNA
 
 
The Next Bubble
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review July/August 2008
The Business of Social Networks
The future of the Web is social. But can social-networking sites ever make money?
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology