Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

TR Editors' blog

Insights, opinions, and our editors' analysis of the latest in emerging technologies.

Blog Topics

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

  • medison : Have you considered Green Damn It and biz as usual in China?  Mandatory. Not mandatory. Mandatory...
  • appleann : This touching sad short love story is amazing.Sometimes we lie to the ones we love because we are...
  • jmaximus9 : The only thing this will do is send the last vestige of American manufacturing to China and...
  • gognod : Why should an employee have to spend an extra 2.5 hours a week at the office and not get paid for...
  • chir0pter : hahahaha
  • jjbaulikki : "While cautioning that the Berlin case could be a fluke" well of course it could be a Fluke
  • plasticdoc : Even though US politicians are aware of European failures in similar policies,they will repeat...
  • Siroilas : I hope you were not serious about altering the gene expression of animals just to create more...
  • danbloom : Do we need a new word for the kind of reading we do on a screen?  by Danny Bloom OPED  "Do we...
  • ... : Hopefully the use of composites in structural elements is not a mistake, but thanks for catching...
Advertisement
Thursday, March 29, 2007

The X-Mice

If scientists can create mice with human vision, can they engineer us to see infrared or ultraviolet?
By Emily Singer

With just two photoreceptors to our three, mice normally view the world as a person with red-green color blindness would. But last week, scientists reported that minor genetic tweaking could endow mice with human color vision. Researchers from Johns Hopkins University and the University of California, Santa Barbara, genetically engineered mice to express a third, humanlike photoreceptor. The mice were able to distinguish colors they previously could not see, despite the fact that only their retinas had been tinkered with--the wiring in their brains, which had evolved to use only two photoreceptors, was able to quickly adapt to take advantage of three. "Sensory systems are quite plastic," says Jeremy Nathans, a researcher at Johns Hopkins who led the project.

So if scientists can create X-mice so easily, can they do the same for humans? For example, could they engineer a fourth photoreceptor that would allow us to peer through the night with tigerlike clarity or see ultraviolet radiation like bumblebees? Theoretically, the answer is yes, says Nathans. But practical restraints make it unlikely. "We wouldn't be able to see UV light because the lens in eye is a UV cut-off filter," he says. And background thermal radiation would create a problem at the other end of the spectrum, he adds.

However, some people may actually have a fourth photoreceptor that detects light within the visible range at a slightly different wavelength than the other three. Nathans, who in the 1980s uncovered the structure of the light-sensing proteins in our three types of photoreceptors, says that some people have a fourth variant. While it doesn't give them night vision, it might provide a richer color experience, allowing them to distinguish differences in colors that others cannot.

Tags: genetics

Advertisement

Comments

  • evidence for auras?
    is it possible that people who claim to see auras simply have an extra color receptor?  i dont think it would be a tough thing to determine, and it could put to rest many issues associated with these claims
    Rate this comment: 12345

    paulmay
    04/02/2007
    Posts:1
    • Re: evidence for auras?
      Hmmm... if one's fourth receptor was in near infrared I suppose that could seem like an aura.  I wonder if everyone with four receptors has the same four frequency profiles, and are the RGB ones the same as for normally visioned people.

      As I seem to remember, all vertebrates evolved from quaternary visioned ancestors, which in the case of humans lost two of the receptors (near infrared and green) as did rats and then through accidental replication of one of the remaining ones regained a receptor that drifted in frequency back to green.  Though some of the details might have drifted to incorrect places in my memory.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      rhapsodyingl...
      04/04/2007
      Posts:55
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
  • Ah, that explains...
    why my wife is always telling me that my outfit doesn't match.  It's those 4th type of photoreceptors she has.  Because it can't be me.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    dmm
    04/02/2007
    Posts:172
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
Advertisement

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review July/August 2009

Current Issue

Search Me
Inside the launch of Stephen Wolfram’s new “computational knowledge engine.”
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
» Gift Subscription
» Digital Subscription
» Reprints, Back Issues
» Subscribe
» Table of Contents
» MIT News

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.