Apple users are fervent in their love for Steve Jobs' devices. I'm happy they have technology that works for them -- but they're misguided.
UPDATE: I knew the storm was coming when I posted this, but I did it anyway. Possibly I wasn't clear enough. I'm willing to admit that. However, let me reiterate my point in a very clear way: I've got no problem with Apple. I used Apple products until 1999, when I started working at Wired, a PC shop, and began covering digital entertainment, which didn't really exist on Apple products back then. So -- truly folks -- I get it. I understand. For loads of people, Apple is what they choose.
The simple point I'm trying to make here: Jobs' deal with the entertainment industry and its DRM practices are bad for consumers. This isn't a knock on the iPod (although I really don't get it). If you love your iPod, by all means, use it in complete happiness and joy. But that doesn't mean you should be overjoyed by the DRM practices the company has built itself on. Now -- on to the original post.
Let me start this post by saying this: if you like Apple, you are likely going to want to stab me with a fork when you are done reading this. I apologize for that. But since we're all friends here, I think it's important that I remind you of a few things.
Okay, now that's out of the way. As you probably know, MacWorld takes place next week, and I have no doubt that Apple addicts around the planet are so giddy with anticipation that many of them can't sleep. I also know that no matter how much I try to make this blog sound respectful, I am going to fail miserably because it's difficult to have a rational discussion with people who are so into anything.
But I completely respect that stance. I would even go so far as to say, I completely understand their stance. I feel that way about The Ohio State University, the Cincinnati Bengals, the Cincinnati Reds, and the Cincinnati Bearcats, and my mother.
However, sometimes, blind faith isn't enough. And in this particular case, unquestioning faith in all things Steve is a bad idea. (For what it's worth, this McSweeney's post should take some of the heat off me, I hope.)
The immediate response I get when I bring this up is always the same: Microsoft is soooo much worse. But I disagree. There is an army of programmers around the world who are developing applications, work-arounds, and other goodies that allow me to circumvent most of the aspects about Microsoft products I don't like. The coolest thing that I do is record television with my PC, hack the DRM, burn it to a DVD, and take that program with me anywhere. But I know that's doesn't even touch the tip of the iceberg.
However, that's not what really, really sticks in my craw. I reserve that (possibly irrational) anger for the iPod and iTunes, two music products that are so restrictive in their licensing and user set-ups that I have never been able to bring myself to download the software to purchase music through iTunes or pony up the cash to by an iPod.
It's fairly well publicized that if you have music on your hard drive, music you've purchased a license to use through iTunes, and your computer crashes -- you lose all of that music. It's not a common occurrence for sure (at least, I hope it's not), but when it does happen (as it nearly did to one editor here), your view of Apple suddenly, and dramatically, changes. (This doesn't even begin to touch on the fact that the iPod was clearly not the first digital music player, and for my tastes, isn't even the best player -- but the Altoids-style packaging has certainly resonated with consumers, which is the bottom line.)
That said, even that restrictive licensing doesn't ultimately get to me. Every company has the right to set up the terms of use (within reason), and that is the road Apple chose to go down. The problem is they've been so compliant with the entertainment industry -- foisting ridiculous digital rights management on consumers -- that they may very well be setting the table for the music and movie industries to expand their restrictive licensing to entirely new platforms.
Jobs has, by and large, become a proxy for the music and movie industries in the continual eroding of consumer rights in a digital age. And -- for everyone who shells out their hard-earned money for the latest and greatest gadget -- you've all fallen for it.
No, what really gets to me is that I think all of the Apple users around the planet know this already, but simply have stopped caring -- and I can't figure out why. However, I think I may have figured it out, thanks to one unnamed person who said to me: "Yes, but the iPod is so cute."
Comments
Thanks - you learn something new everyday!
01/04/2006
Posts:1
Thanks, you learn something new everyday, I guess!
01/04/2006
Posts:1
01/04/2006
Posts:1
01/04/2006
Posts:1
01/04/2006
Posts:1
01/04/2006
Posts:1
07/24/2006
Posts:1
It works flawlessly with my Mac. >>A superior computer and operating system. By the way, iTunes is the only legal way to buy music - for the Mac. Therefore the compatibility is the highest.
More accessories available than any other MP3 player.
It holds my photos and my videos (now).
It plugs in directly to my car stereo system and is controlled by the steering wheel controls.
Oh yeah and It looks awesome.
When you can approach an Apple product with an open mind... Come back and see me.
01/04/2006
Posts:1
01/04/2006
Posts:1
Is it ok for them because its OK to hate Microsoft and we believe theyll screw us over anyway?
The only reason people bitch about iTunes and iTMS is because the iPod doesnt play Windows Media Player Audio files.. pure and simple. I have no iTMS AAC files on my iPod because I wont submit to DRM. All my audio files are MP3s converted from CDs I bought.. which as far as Im concerned is fairusage and legal. As long as the **IA, Apple, Microsoft and others keep trying to use Digital Restriction Management software for online music purchases.. Ill not buy them. When they make CDs unable to be converted to MP3s.. Ill stop buying them. Oh Bloody well. Theyll not get my dollar for each format they want to shove down our throats every few years.. and I wont rent my music for a monthly fee.. guess Im too friggin old. When I bought an LP or a tape.. it was mine to listen to until the media wore out. *shrug*
01/04/2006
Posts:1
Right now I am experiencing some wierd ActiveX problem with my Internet Explorer. All of my anti-virus software and anti-spyware software says my machine clean and working optimally. BS! Its a piece of crap and brand new. Ive had it working on this junk and its time for a change.
Say what you will about Apple, Steve Jobs, and iPods. Apple Computer has a loyal following for a reason. They care about the products they develop and they are about to gain another loyal customer in the near future. Bill Gates and Ballmer can sell their wares to the third world for all I care. Like GM, they had their chance and they blew it!
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/06/2006
Posts:1
01/04/2006
Posts:1
01/04/2006
Posts:1
It works flawlessly with my Mac. >>A superior computer and operating system. By the way, iTunes is the only legal way to buy music - for the Mac. Therefore the compatibility is the highest.
More accessories available than any other MP3 player.
It holds my photos and my videos (now).
It plugs in directly to my car stereo system and is controlled by the steering wheel controls.
Oh yeah and It looks awesome.
When you can approach an Apple product with an open mind... Come back and see me.
01/04/2006
Posts:1
01/04/2006
Posts:1
Is it ok for them because its OK to hate Microsoft and we believe theyll screw us over anyway?
The only reason people bitch about iTunes and iTMS is because the iPod doesnt play Windows Media Player Audio files.. pure and simple. I have no iTMS AAC files on my iPod because I wont submit to DRM. All my audio files are MP3s converted from CDs I bought.. which as far as Im concerned is fairusage and legal. As long as the **IA, Apple, Microsoft and others keep trying to use Digital Restriction Management software for online music purchases.. Ill not buy them. When they make CDs unable to be converted to MP3s.. Ill stop buying them. Oh Bloody well. Theyll not get my dollar for each format they want to shove down our throats every few years.. and I wont rent my music for a monthly fee.. guess Im too friggin old. When I bought an LP or a tape.. it was mine to listen to until the media wore out. *shrug*
01/04/2006
Posts:1
Right now I am experiencing some wierd ActiveX problem with my Internet Explorer. All of my anti-virus software and anti-spyware software says my machine clean and working optimally. BS! Its a piece of crap and brand new. Ive had it working on this junk and its time for a change.
Say what you will about Apple, Steve Jobs, and iPods. Apple Computer has a loyal following for a reason. They care about the products they develop and they are about to gain another loyal customer in the near future. Bill Gates and Ballmer can sell their wares to the third world for all I care. Like GM, they had their chance and they blew it!
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/06/2006
Posts:1
01/04/2006
Posts:1
He is no freakin journalist or reviewer but he definitely knows how to run up some hit counters!!
-MacAubie
01/04/2006
Posts:1
Ill guess youll get hits on this. Hate/Ignorance like yours can sometimes blind rational thought. Just be happy with what you have and dont worry about what others are using.
Incidentally, Microsoft and the entertainment companies were working on DRM long ago, thank god Apple came along... or your DVD player would soon have to feature a windows OS and DRM scheme just to play rented/purchased DVDs let alone video downloads.
01/04/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
The time to start worrying is if DRM becomes mandatory.
01/06/2006
Posts:1
The time to start worrying is if DRM becomes mandatory.
01/06/2006
Posts:1
The time to start worrying is if DRM becomes mandatory.
01/06/2006
Posts:1
He is no freakin journalist or reviewer but he definitely knows how to run up some hit counters!!
-MacAubie
01/04/2006
Posts:1
Ill guess youll get hits on this. Hate/Ignorance like yours can sometimes blind rational thought. Just be happy with what you have and dont worry about what others are using.
Incidentally, Microsoft and the entertainment companies were working on DRM long ago, thank god Apple came along... or your DVD player would soon have to feature a windows OS and DRM scheme just to play rented/purchased DVDs let alone video downloads.
01/04/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
The time to start worrying is if DRM becomes mandatory.
01/06/2006
Posts:1
Uhm to them comment on what a product can or cannot do without using them is ridiculous. I am beginning to think reviews are just words on a pc to make a deadline because there is no substative value to this whole "technology review" unless you just call it an uninformed rant. At least EDUCATE people with SPECIFICS man. Yes, you are allowed your opinion just dont portray it as an informed one to the readers if you havent done your research.
01/04/2006
Posts:1
01/04/2006
Posts:1
Okay. Sure. Why? Personally, Im trying to stay off the satellite radio bandwagon. Come on - its technology, its reliable, and if it serves a purpose for you why avoid something.
Or are you 15 and the cool thing some poor kid at your school started is that its cool to NOT own an iPod. Its a bandwagon either way. Grow up.
01/04/2006
Posts:1
Okay. Sure. Why? Personally, Im trying to stay off the satellite radio bandwagon. Come on - its technology, its reliable, and if it serves a purpose for you why avoid something.
Or are you 15 and the cool thing some poor kid at your school started is that its cool to NOT own an iPod. Its a bandwagon either way. Grow up.
01/04/2006
Posts:1
Too see the grammar Brad and MS Word originally let pass - check out the quoted article in its original form at http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/writer_ive_never_used_an_ipod_or_itunes_but_i_think_people_who_do_are_dupes/
01/04/2006
Posts:1
2) Everybody I know who uses iTunes and an iPod uses them primarily as a way of organizing, sorting, and listening to music that they already own on CD or from some other non-iTunes Music Store source. In other words, the restrictions of the iTunes music store only matter if you use it. If you dont like em, dont use em.
3) if you regularly back up your hard drive, you will never lose your iTunes music. If you dont, you will. Do you ask Atlantic to replace your Phil Collins CDs when your house burns down? I didnt think so. Then why is Apple responsible for your music once you purchase it?
4) Oh never mind. Why bother....
01/04/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/04/2006
Posts:1
2) Everybody I know who uses iTunes and an iPod uses them primarily as a way of organizing, sorting, and listening to music that they already own on CD or from some other non-iTunes Music Store source. In other words, the restrictions of the iTunes music store only matter if you use it. If you dont like em, dont use em.
3) if you regularly back up your hard drive, you will never lose your iTunes music. If you dont, you will. Do you ask Atlantic to replace your Phil Collins CDs when your house burns down? I didnt think so. Then why is Apple responsible for your music once you purchase it?
4) Oh never mind. Why bother....
01/04/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
Dont like Macs or iPods or Apple? Fine. No problem with that, but dont you at least have to have some background or experience with said product before you can bash it or even comment on its relative worth?
01/04/2006
Posts:1
Yes, iPod and iTunes is proprietary. But so is the stereo for my BMW (does not work in my Porsche).
Yes, if I crash my hard disk, musik that is not backed up is lost (but so was my thesis... different story).
I would love to not be bound to the limitations you mention too, but I also enjoy listening to proper music by artist who can afford to create it.
You blame Steve for his success?
The bottom line for me is: The iPod and iTunes on my iMac at home and my GatesBox at the office is the fist combination that lets me buy music for a fair price which I can listen to where ever I like and share with my friends and family.
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
Yes, iPod and iTunes is proprietary. But so is the stereo for my BMW (does not work in my Porsche).
Yes, if I crash my hard disk, musik that is not backed up is lost (but so was my thesis... different story).
I would love to not be bound to the limitations you mention too, but I also enjoy listening to proper music by artist who can afford to create it.
You blame Steve for his success?
The bottom line for me is: The iPod and iTunes on my iMac at home and my GatesBox at the office is the fist combination that lets me buy music for a fair price which I can listen to where ever I like and share with my friends and family.
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
Too see the grammar Brad and MS Word originally let pass - check out the quoted article in its original form at http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/writer_ive_never_used_an_ipod_or_itunes_but_i_think_people_who_do_are_dupes/
01/04/2006
Posts:1
01/04/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/04/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/04/2006
Posts:1
Second, you dont have to use any DRM to use an iPod. You can rip non-DRMed CDs and load the music onto an iPod.
Third, you can back up your hard drive. Apple gives away its Backup software. They also encourage you to back up your music. If you dont, thats your own fault.
Fourth, Apples FairPlay is probably the least restrictive DRM out there. Rather than dragging consumers into restrictive DRM, Apple has bargained to get digital music out there as an alternative to more restrictive DRM.
So, there. All your arguments are refuted and I can stick a fork in them (as in "done".)
01/04/2006
Posts:1
01/04/2006
Posts:1
01/04/2006
Posts:1
Apple, iPod and the Mac are not perfect... But they are better than almost all the rest.
But hey, You are getting the hits to your web site just like you intended... I say bravo for knowing how to pull in the traffic...
Other than that, I can not believe someone gave you a place to write your flawed opinion.
01/04/2006
Posts:1
BTW: Double check your facts about licensing restrictions and consequences of HDD crashes on music files. Indeed, I believe an official correction is in order here.
01/08/2006
Posts:1
BTW: Double check your facts about licensing restrictions and consequences of HDD crashes on music files. Indeed, I believe an official correction is in order here.
01/08/2006
Posts:1
BTW: Double check your facts about licensing restrictions and consequences of HDD crashes on music files. Indeed, I believe an official correction is in order here.
01/08/2006
Posts:1
BTW: Double check your facts about licensing restrictions and consequences of HDD crashes on music files. Indeed, I believe an official correction is in order here.
01/08/2006
Posts:1
BTW: Double check your facts about licensing restrictions and consequences of HDD crashes on music files. Indeed, I believe an official correction is in order here.
01/08/2006
Posts:1
01/04/2006
Posts:1
To the author - great job on the article! Im assuming that your follow up will discuss all of the Microsoft-friendly alternatives that I can purchase now that Ive abandoned all things Apple simply because you think were all idiots.
01/04/2006
Posts:1
Only an idiot wouldnt back up purchased music. You back up illegally downloaded music files dont you?
01/04/2006
Posts:1
To the author - great job on the article! Im assuming that your follow up will discuss all of the Microsoft-friendly alternatives that I can purchase now that Ive abandoned all things Apple simply because you think were all idiots.
01/04/2006
Posts:1
Only an idiot wouldnt back up purchased music. You back up illegally downloaded music files dont you?
01/04/2006
Posts:1
01/04/2006
Posts:1
There is a bit of a performative contradiction here. You appear to be "so into" free media, that you cant appreciate the compromise that was required to allow legal (and easy) downloading of music.
01/04/2006
Posts:1
There is a bit of a performative contradiction here. You appear to be "so into" free media, that you cant appreciate the compromise that was required to allow legal (and easy) downloading of music.
01/04/2006
Posts:1
01/04/2006
Posts:1
I back up my music. So should they.
01/04/2006
Posts:1
Whats else ? tiger, the macs familly. nothing perfect but do we get windows without he Mac in 1984 certainly not. Inovation comes at a price, even hight when it is in fierce business time. but freedom and equity always triomphe.
01/04/2006
Posts:1
Consumer rights? What are you talking about? If I buy a song from the iTunes Music Store, Im not having to buy an entire album, nor am I concerned about dloading a virus. I am also supporting the creators (musicians, actors, engineers, etc. etc.) of the content - more so than if I were to buy an album or if I was freeloading using a P2P service.
Have fun ripping your DVDs. Ive got better things to do.
01/04/2006
Posts:1
01/04/2006
Posts:1
By the way, I sure wish I could get a Toyota engine in a Honda Accord body... That would be great.
Wake up and look around. Your view is skewed.
01/04/2006
Posts:1
01/04/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
By the way, I sure wish I could get a Toyota engine in a Honda Accord body... That would be great.
Wake up and look around. Your view is skewed.
01/04/2006
Posts:1
01/04/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
Brad King does not understand the concept of backing up your data, as the iTunes application suggests to the user periodically. My advice is to make regular backup copies of your files, and ignore Brad Kings dubious advice. He is a rank amateur who isnt qualified to give advice about Macs, iPods or computers in general.
01/04/2006
Posts:1
01/04/2006
Posts:1
01/04/2006
Posts:1
01/04/2006
Posts:1
But please dont bother to actually use something before you offer such a qualified opinion. Hearsay is so much more convincing. Shame on TR for allowing this drivel.
Brad: Guess what my CD player is loaded with in my car? Give up? Legally burned CDs of all of the songs I bought from the iTunes Music Store. Do you know what else thats called? BACKUP! It was simple to do and practical. http://www.apple.com/itunes/burn/ You need to have that craw looked at by a professional.
01/04/2006
Posts:1
Bitching about DRM exudes a Marxist naivete: as if there really is no such thing as property rights.
Just because you grew up consuming Disney videos for FREE, doesnt mean that there is a FREE component to ALL things that you consider consuming.
The reason the world now has portable media consumption of intellectual property is BECAUSE there is DRM technology.
Get over it and pony up, boy....
01/04/2006
Posts:1
Bitching about DRM exudes a Marxist naivete: as if there really is no such thing as property rights.
Just because you grew up consuming Disney videos for FREE, doesnt mean that there is a FREE component to ALL things that you consider consuming.
The reason the world now has portable media consumption of intellectual property is BECAUSE there is DRM technology.
Get over it and pony up, boy....
01/04/2006
Posts:1
Bitching about DRM exudes a Marxist naivete: as if there really is no such thing as property rights.
Just because you grew up consuming Disney videos for FREE, doesnt mean that there is a FREE component to ALL things that you consider consuming.
The reason the world now has portable media consumption of intellectual property is BECAUSE there is DRM technology.
Get over it and pony up, boy....
01/04/2006
Posts:1
01/04/2006
Posts:1
2. You have 5 licenses to put your purchased music on 5 different machines
3. Which music player could possibly be better than an iPod? Explain.
So whats the point of your article?
01/04/2006
Posts:1
For the record- Apple Music Store files can be converted to mp3 or burned to CD as audio, can be backed up, can be played on multiple computers, and can even be recovered from your iPod (assuming your hard drvie crashes- I had to do this once) through one of those hacks that you seem to think are acceptable when it comes to Microsoft.
01/04/2006
Posts:1
Which he is. I sent a polite, nice letter, noting the innacuracies. Maybe MIT has an Ombudsman that can have a chat with this guy.
01/04/2006
Posts:1
Which he is. I sent a polite, nice letter, noting the innacuracies. Maybe MIT has an Ombudsman that can have a chat with this guy.
01/04/2006
Posts:1
Journalism today is waking up in the morning and thinking : " Hey I can post a piece today about this ...and that... and get paid at the end of the month"...
01/04/2006
Posts:1
And FYI, Ive been a Mac user since 1985.
01/04/2006
Posts:1
And FYI, Ive been a Mac user since 1985.
01/04/2006
Posts:1
01/04/2006
Posts:1
01/04/2006
Posts:1
And my first thought is always - is he/she that stupid or is the payoff that much that he/she is willing to sink to that level and deliberately show their ignorance or obiedience to Microsoft!
01/04/2006
Posts:1
Are you advocating deliberate hacking of Windows DRM? You can easily burn a CD and rerip to iTunes without that army of programmers...
Data loss will occur regardless if you have products with DRM or not...
Looks like this was just a blog to promote your, funnily enough, iPod Google ads...
01/04/2006
Posts:1
Wrong statement 1: I actually did have a crash that was bad enough to cause me to lose about a dozen purchased CDs. I made a phone call, taked to a sympathetic Apple employee and got the purchaseed music reauthorized and was able to get them again (which was how I learned about backup). Learn before you speak I guess...
And Microsoft isbetter, nicer, whatever because they have more people hacking thier device? These same loving dependable folks that drop viruses in all of those DRM circumvented programs? Thats good? Whoa...
And of course ttheres always the beauty of the blogger who doesnt bother to provide an email for comment back-Brave Windows User!
01/04/2006
Posts:1
Wrong statement 1: I actually did have a crash that was bad enough to cause me to lose about a dozen purchased CDs. I made a phone call, taked to a sympathetic Apple employee and got the purchaseed music reauthorized and was able to get them again (which was how I learned about backup). Learn before you speak I guess...
And Microsoft isbetter, nicer, whatever because they have more people hacking thier device? These same loving dependable folks that drop viruses in all of those DRM circumvented programs? Thats good? Whoa...
And of course ttheres always the beauty of the blogger who doesnt bother to provide an email for comment back-Brave Windows User!
01/04/2006
Posts:1
Then come back and tell us your experience. Until then, please shut up.
01/04/2006
Posts:1
Oh, was recently a windows user, but switched. I actually tried the stuff out, then made a decision. ...sheesh...
01/04/2006
Posts:1
Oh, was recently a windows user, but switched. I actually tried the stuff out, then made a decision. ...sheesh...
01/04/2006
Posts:1
First, youve never bought or used an iPod or iTunes? And yet, youre sure its awful.
Second, an editor at your magazine "nearly" lost all his music when his computer crashed. Ever heard of backups? I am not sure what the objection is here.
This artiicle amounts to: "I dont like iTunes or the iPod, so it sucks."
Something like 75% of all people who buy music online or use a music player disagree with you. Given the substantive mistakes in this article, you might want to look into this a little more...
01/04/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/09/2006
Posts:1
Had you ever used an iPod or iTunes, you would know that the Apple DRM is very easy to circumvent without any fancy software, etc. Im no pirate, but I easily share new iTunes music with friends that often results in them purchasing music themselves.
As for losing music, ever heard of backing up your data?
01/04/2006
Posts:1
01/04/2006
Posts:1
List them... Its not fair to viewers who are not familiar with these restrictions. Why not list them and let the readers judge for themselves. I bet you dont even know it.
Unlike you, I know what the restrictions are and I have no problems with them.
01/04/2006
Posts:1
01/04/2006
Posts:1
One other thing, only ipods let you rip your data at real CD rates, meaning you can actually listen to full spectrum audio. Try that with your Creative labs stuff.
01/05/2006
Posts:1
One other thing, only ipods let you rip your data at real CD rates, meaning you can actually listen to full spectrum audio. Try that with your Creative labs stuff.
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/04/2006
Posts:1
01/04/2006
Posts:1
listen, you seem like a nice guy from your follow up post. But writing an article without actually using the software or hardware youre writing about is a bit less that good journalism dont you think?
Do youre homework before you write next time. There are a ton of us out here who use both platforms, and like them for what they bring to the table, writing like this is a disservice
01/04/2006
Posts:1
(second) there are legions of Linux and Unix developers writing VERY good FREE (did I mention free?) software that does anything you want (Sourceforge, etc.), even share music among DIFFERENT ipods - if circumventing DRM is your thing
(third) rent or own music? which is better - I think the latter for sure
(last) the human interface and attention to design are the hallmarks of Apple. rarely am I dissatisfied as an Apple user. I know no one who loves PC (really), but there are legions who settle
01/05/2006
Posts:1
(second) there are legions of Linux and Unix developers writing VERY good FREE (did I mention free?) software that does anything you want (Sourceforge, etc.), even share music among DIFFERENT ipods - if circumventing DRM is your thing
(third) rent or own music? which is better - I think the latter for sure
(last) the human interface and attention to design are the hallmarks of Apple. rarely am I dissatisfied as an Apple user. I know no one who loves PC (really), but there are legions who settle
01/05/2006
Posts:1
"Its fairly [blah.. blah..blah..] computer crashes -- you lose all of that music. Its not a common occurrence [blah..blah.blah." ]
You are free to back up your purchased songs to any media you like or copying them to any number of computers. FairPlay doesnt restrict you from doing that.
If your computer crashs u might loose your data.. well der... Einstein, If my house burn down i would loose my furniture, unfortunately i cant back furniture up can I?
In fact you can even burn your music to a standard CD that you can play in any CD player. Fairplay DRM allows u to own the music, not borrow it.
01/05/2006
Posts:1
How do you figure that Jobs is not looking out for your rights as a consumer?
01/05/2006
Posts:1
How do you figure that Jobs is not looking out for your rights as a consumer?
01/05/2006
Posts:1
How do you figure that Jobs is not looking out for your rights as a consumer?
01/05/2006
Posts:1
(second) there are legions of Linux and Unix developers writing VERY good FREE (did I mention free?) software that does anything you want (Sourceforge, etc.), even share music among DIFFERENT ipods - if circumventing DRM is your thing
(third) rent or own music? which is better - I think the latter for sure
(last) the human interface and attention to design are the hallmarks of Apple. rarely am I dissatisfied as an Apple user. I know no one who loves PC (really), but there are legions who settle
01/05/2006
Posts:1
"Its fairly [blah.. blah..blah..] computer crashes -- you lose all of that music. Its not a common occurrence [blah..blah.blah." ]
You are free to back up your purchased songs to any media you like or copying them to any number of computers. FairPlay doesnt restrict you from doing that.
If your computer crashs u might loose your data.. well der... Einstein, If my house burn down i would loose my furniture, unfortunately i cant back furniture up can I?
In fact you can even burn your music to a standard CD that you can play in any CD player. Fairplay DRM allows u to own the music, not borrow it.
01/05/2006
Posts:1
How do you figure that Jobs is not looking out for your rights as a consumer?
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/04/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
Get an EXISTENCE people!
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
Get an EXISTENCE people!
01/05/2006
Posts:1
How are mac users harmed by supporting iTMS when none of the WMA based store can support mac users anyway? MSFT has no interest in updating WMP for OSX because they want to lock people into their platform.
01/05/2006
Posts:1
(Dont know what Septic means? Look to the Uk)
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
Second, I truly find Microsofts DRM to be far more restrictive than Apples. Even with the videos I have downloaded from iTMS, I can save them elsewhere (cd, dvd, another harddrive) without any circumvention of the DRM. I think Jobs has gone to bat for the consumers. If the RIAA and MPAA hop into bed with Gates, he wont care how much leverage they have over the consumer - it seems to be his favorite pastime to gain an advantage over those who give him money for product.
Hopefully, civil discussion can continue and we can learn to disagree and still go out for a beer after!
01/05/2006
Posts:1
You say, "And -- for everyone who shells out their hard-earned money for the latest and greatest gadget -- youve all fallen for it." Well, the DVD player, the VCR, the copy of Half-Life 2 youve got... Those are all Macrovision, not apple. YOUVE fallen for it and you didnt even know it.
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
Second, I truly find Microsofts DRM to be far more restrictive than Apples. Even with the videos I have downloaded from iTMS, I can save them elsewhere (cd, dvd, another harddrive) without any circumvention of the DRM. I think Jobs has gone to bat for the consumers. If the RIAA and MPAA hop into bed with Gates, he wont care how much leverage they have over the consumer - it seems to be his favorite pastime to gain an advantage over those who give him money for product.
Hopefully, civil discussion can continue and we can learn to disagree and still go out for a beer after!
01/05/2006
Posts:1
You say, "And -- for everyone who shells out their hard-earned money for the latest and greatest gadget -- youve all fallen for it." Well, the DVD player, the VCR, the copy of Half-Life 2 youve got... Those are all Macrovision, not apple. YOUVE fallen for it and you didnt even know it.
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
"[blah blah blah]music youve purchased a license to use through iTunes, and your computer crashes -- you lose all of that music. [blah blah blah]."
MORON.. that only applies to subscription, which Apple doesnt use, fairly allows you to own the files, therefore you can back it up, on anything you want, for as long as you want because you own it! FairPlay doesnt restrict you from doing that.
If my computer crashed data may be lost, well der Einstein, if my house burnt down, my furniture may be lost, but unfortunatly i dont have the option to back that up do I?
Do your research FOOL. I dont even use itunes or have an iPod but im not as stupid as to right rubbish like this.
01/05/2006
Posts:1
im getting hits at last...
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
im getting hits at last...
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
I am assuming that Brad is advocating the illegal download of "unrestricted" music (which is illegal). Or the purchase of CDs and ripping (which is environmentally unfriendly). If you are going to do any essay, you should know about counterpoints. Completely presenting only one side makes great sound bites, but discredits the intelligence of your sites visitors.
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
Whether you are pro- or anti-DRM should be the focus of this article. Introducing the Apple/Microsoft clash where its not native smacks of calling attention to yourself. By saying anti-DRM crowds are in bed with Apple and sleeping by its rules, but are not equally in bed with Microsoft, youre guilty of selective vision.
In the end, Brad points out a real problem and then avoids talking about it by attaching it to a fake Apple/Microsoft division.
01/05/2006
Posts:1
just one thing you forgot, exactly what other music offering out there offers a better deal with drm? please elaborate, youve spent so much time explaining apples short comings and how were all a bunch of morons, please guide us to the right place you who knows all and sees all.
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
1. convenience - it just works. This factor may not be very valuable to a tech-saavy person like yourself, but is priceless for a non-techie. Cuteness is only a dessert. Functionality is the entree.
2. reliabiltiy - the same reason most people pony up $10+ for a real DVD vs. $4 for a bootleg DVD. Yes DRM is a constraint, but there is the concurrent benefit of good quality media with little effort and risk.
Theres my 2 cents.
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
I personally do not have an iPod, iTunes, or anything else apple (other than quicktime). I do however really like my Rio Karma mp3 player. Reads double the file types of the iPod, and its not white and shiney.
01/08/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
I personally do not have an iPod, iTunes, or anything else apple (other than quicktime). I do however really like my Rio Karma mp3 player. Reads double the file types of the iPod, and its not white and shiney.
01/08/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
FWIW - I dont care if you choose Mac or PC or *nix for your home system, just dont be an evangelist about it. The people who think that is what your article is about should reread it, or have their manager read and explain it to them. We are talking about tools would you cuss out someone who preferred Makita to DeWalt?
01/05/2006
Posts:1
FWIW - I dont care if you choose Mac or PC or *nix for your home system, just dont be an evangelist about it. The people who think that is what your article is about should reread it, or have their manager read and explain it to them. We are talking about tools would you cuss out someone who preferred Makita to DeWalt?
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
01/06/2006
Posts:1
01/06/2006
Posts:1
01/05/2006
Posts:1
God save us all from the dumbasses in the midwest.
01/06/2006
Posts:1
Computer crashes... Hu? Do you back up? Reinstall DMR files on a new computer, authorize it and away you go.
Your to dumb to talk if your not willing to try first hand. Why are we bothering to listen to someone relying on hearsay to think. Switch back to MS and leave the rest of us to think for you.
- M.
01/06/2006
Posts:1
Apples DRM is by far the least restrictive one out there as mentioned before, lets not froget that apple overlooks the fact that users can strip the DRM off tracks by burning them to a cd.
I want to OWN my music when I buy it apple even puts my name on the files when they are downloaded. Its like buying a cd what will the record store say to you when you loose all of your cds? I dont mind backing up either.
01/06/2006
Posts:1
01/06/2006
Posts:1
01/06/2006
Posts:1
01/07/2006
Posts:1
01/07/2006
Posts:1
You know, I dont own a scalpel and Ive never really learned how to do brain surgery but I would be willing to work on Brads. No, theres just too much to fix in there that I am sure that it is not worth my time!
01/06/2006
Posts:1
01/08/2006
Posts:1