David Ewing Duncan's blog

Smoking, Jokes, and the Soul

A small region of the brain called the insula may be a master regulator of actions, cravings, and emotional experiences.

David Ewing Duncan 02/22/2007

  • 5 Comments

Want to quit smoking in a flash--and be instantly conscious of losing the urge to light up?

In Los Angeles, this happened to 19 smokers, though no one would want to emulate how they did it. Each had suffered damage to the insular cortex, a small section of gray matter deep inside the brain that seems to play a key role in processing actions, cravings, anticipation, and emotional responses--and making us aware of certain feelings.

The insula could be the repository of the soul, if such a place exists. (And the list of candidates is getting smaller, the potential seat of the soul having moved from "somewhere" inside people to the heart to the brain). By "soul" I don't mean a specific organ or "place" that is the essence of our spiritual being, or that makes constant contact with a deity--I'm talking about a physical ops center that makes us distinctly human and aware. Think of what the philosopher William James called "embodied recognition," the idea that specific emotional events cause the brain to activate subjective emotional experiences.

The two nodes of the insula in humans and other mammals are associated with the limbic portion of the brain, which is used to process hunger, pain, the smell of rotten food, and the touch of a mate, among other things. The insula is also involved in telling and responding to jokes.

In humans, the front section of the insula is comparatively huge and contains neurons not found in most other mammals. These seem responsible for an emotional element that causes conscious reactions. Pain might make us angry; touching a lover makes us happy and fires up the libido; smelling a rotten banana disgusts us; watching a tear-jerker movie makes us sad. The right-side insula apparently thickens in people who regularly meditate.

For some, anticipating a cigarette or a line of cocaine makes them crave the stuff.

These are highly specialized reactions that make us human--and account for actions both good and not so good, which is one way of defining the soul. Another way to look at it is that this proves there is no soul, and that actions and emotions are mostly programmed by the brain--which is what James suggested. (I plan to touch on this now and then in this blog--the issue of free will vs. the predetermination of the brain in influencing our actions and emotions.)

Now scientists at UCLA, led by Antoine Bechara, report in Science that damage caused by stroke and other neurological problems in 19 patients caused their craving for cigarettes to disappear in a puff. Bechara and other researchers conducting similar experiments suggests that the insula may be the key to treating addictions and other undesirable emotions and actions that apparently stem from this part of the brain.

Scientists must tread carefully, however, since shutting down all or part of the insula might also kill off "good" emotions, reducing us to mere beasts of the field, as the Bible might say--unaware that we want to eat a banana because we love bananas, or that we want to have sex because we enjoy it and perhaps love our partner.

Now, here's a question: if shutting down a few neurons may end an addiction or stop other sins both minor and deadly, what does that mean for the idea of a soul?

And how does that make you (and your insula) feel?

More reading:

http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2007/125/1

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/294/5544/983

 

Print

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

McMillan968

38 Comments

  • 1811 Days Ago
  • 02/22/2007

The Insula DEBATE!!!!!

I know that this is where this will lead and I'm not sure how I totally feel about it,BUT the cure for the sex offender!!!
The reason I am scared of it is it parrallels the labotomies  of mentally ill in what the '50's and early '60's?
It's not going to be reversable.
Does the violent or the child sex offender deserve any less?Do we deserve to expect any less?
We can now civeally incarcerate these people after their incarceration is this any worse?
The DEBATE is on.

Reply

phoenix

172 Comments

  • 1810 Days Ago
  • 02/23/2007

insulate

If anyone is interested in reviewing the life work of a prodigious thinker, then Goggle William James. Although his attempts to understand the dynamics of human thought deserve a certain amount of recognition, one should be aware of his own struggle to understand the inherent duality of human nature. Know thyself, a term often used in Masonic philosophy, and a reminder to take a good look inside your own soul, is without a doubt one of the most difficult and challenging problems which the human race is faced with.

Reply

qraal

12 Comments

  • 1810 Days Ago
  • 02/23/2007

Soul or machine... false dichotomy

Worrying about whether the 'soul' exists or not is self-defeating. The ancient view was that the 'soul' was present in all living, breathing things - the soul/spirit was seen when the breath was doing its thing. Bodies were, in the ancient mind, animated (literally "en-soulled") when breath was present, raising and lowering the chest, analogically like a blacksmith's bellows.

So by definition all living people (and animals) have 'soul' because they are alive. Now all the other "junk" we worry about in these sort of debates is from Western philosophers arguing over ethics, right and wrong. Free-will has a big role in that, or used to. Denying "free-will" is now fashionable amongst materialist philosophers because they think it implies spooky, supernatural stuff they don't like.

But such people aren't physicists or mathematicians generally and know very little about indeterminacy in quantum theory, or sensitivity to initial conditions ("chaos") in good old classic dynamics. Both physical principles mean there's no such thing as absolutely strict determinism. Deterministic versions of quantum theory (eg. Many Worlds, t'Hooft's new theories) might mean that indeterminacy is really ignorance, but "chaos" is still around to amplify the quantum "fuzz" into the unexpected.

And for absolute determinacy there has to be "absolute knowledge" and infinite computational power - neither of which the Universe possesses. There can be no absolute determinism in this Universe! Unless the "atheist materialists" come clean and admit the "absolute knowledge and computational power" of the Universe sounds pretty much like "God" - the very concept they wanted to avoid by denying free-will to start with. 

A good piece on the debate, with respect to quantum theory, was in "Skeptical Inquirer" not too long ago. Also Daniel Dennett has analysed the concepts involved and has pretty much shown the "free-will" issue has been over-stated. We evolved more freedom, more leeway in our choices, and that's all there is to it. "Determinism vs free-will" is just a dumb mental finger-trap that some philosophers haven't abandoned for better things to do.

So in the end there's probably no way in principle, let alone in practice, of knowing what a living brain might do with a given set of inputs. That we have compulsions and drives powered by dedicated circuits is probably a survival device, a leftover short-cut for quick decision making, but that by no means stops us from having freedom of choice.

Personally I'd love to flick a neural switch and not want certain compulsions anymore - or even turn some new ones on. Would make finishing Uni assignments on time a lot easier to do.

Reply

wizardB

18 Comments

  • 1808 Days Ago
  • 02/25/2007

Re: Soul or machine... false dichotomy

Why must some religious nut bar enter every scientific debate these days.Why can't they face it science search for the truth while the religious groups hide in the closet of faith and refuse to admit that the elephant even exists.

Reply

davidis1

5 Comments

  • 1802 Days Ago
  • 03/03/2007

The Soul

So biologists and neurologists are still looking for the spirit of man inside his brain? In the brain one may find the seat of man's will and his emotions, which make up the physical part of his soul. But how can science find man's spirit in something physical such as his brain?

Why are men of science who have dedicated their lives to hard evidence through experimentation and observation still so apparently fascinated with the idea of mankind's uniqueness among all living beings? Why? And where is it written that the mysteries of true unbiased science are diametrically opposed to the correct and unbiased interpretation of the scriptures of the Old and New Testaments? For the open-minded self-honest scientist, is there not an uncanny amount of harmony between the bible and science? Aren't the apparent contradictions between science and the bible merely gaps in our understanding of either one or the other?

Exactly why are we so driven to find our soul in science alone? Once we have found our soul, where then shall we look for our spirit? Shall we not continue to be driven by some unquenched thirst within us to do so? If we are truthful with ourselves, is it not this great thirst within us to understand our place in the universe that which drives us not only in this quest but in all our quests for knowledge?

And while we are on the topic of being thirsty; I wonder at one man's understanding of us and his understanding of what is in our hearts and minds here in the 21st century. I wonder if we might not find this man’s accuracy concerning our condition fairly puzzling. How is it that over 2000 years ago it was Jesus who said of himself that, "Whosoever drinketh of this water shall thirst again: But whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst; but the water that I shall give him shall be in him a well of water springing up into everlasting life."

Reply

Bio

Getting real about the life sciences, medicine and biological discovery.

Subscribe to the David Ewing Duncan's blog RSS Feed

Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement