David Ewing Duncan's blog

For Valentine's Day, Give Her Sweat, Not Chocolate

A UC Berkeley study has found that a chemical in a man's sweat can trigger the hormones that sexually arouse women.

David Ewing Duncan 02/14/2007

  • 5 Comments

Anyone who has clicked with a lover knows that there is something in the air that causes a most delicious attraction--a certain "chemistry."

Now we know: one element of this is a chemical in a man's sweat.

At the University of California at Berkeley, researchers asked undergraduate women averaging 21 years of age to sniff men's sweat. Specifically, they took a whiff of androstadienone, a male chemical signal already known to cause sexual arousal, an enhanced mood, and an elevated heart rate in women. A derivative of testosterone, this musky-smelling compound is also found in saliva and semen.

Some 15 minutes after sniffing this stuff in a jar, the 48 women participating in the study had an elevated level of cortisol, a hormone that keeps one aroused and feeling good and helps people cope with stress. As a control, the women also smelled yeast in a jar, which did nothing to them. (That's a relief!) The study was published in the Journal of Neuroscience and was led by Claire Wyartm, a postdoctoral fellow at Berkeley.

This adds further credence to the idea that pure chemistry might be a major element in the great mystery of why two people can have an explosive, wild, unexplained attraction. If true, then we may be more like rats and other animals than we thought, driven by chemicals as much as by a shared love of, say, Arctic Monkeys, Shakespeare sonnets, and sea kayaking.

I don't know about you other men, but today, Valentine's Day, I'm not going to forego the flowers or perhaps a stanza or two of poetry. But should I skip a shower? This might make me dangerously pungent … or it could be just the trick.

Print

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

pw

2 Comments

  • 1819 Days Ago
  • 02/14/2007

Heterosexual Women Only

It bears pointing out that this study tested only heterosexual women.

Reply

Guest (David Ewing Duncan)

  • 1819 Days Ago
  • 02/14/2007

Re:

You are right, these women were all heterosexual.

Reply

MikeySparks

5 Comments

  • 1812 Days Ago
  • 02/21/2007

Re:

Do you think the results would have been different if the women were homosexual?

Reply

jcampobello

1 Comment

  • 1701 Days Ago
  • 06/12/2007

Re:

for sure it's a sexist "study" with only ht opinion. a jar of man's sweat can only makes me throw up... poor science

Reply

paintehandarm

3 Comments

  • 1812 Days Ago
  • 02/21/2007

Duh!

And a researcher was needed to discover this? The researcher must have been a man, because this is something women have long known.

Reply

Bio

Getting real about the life sciences, medicine and biological discovery.

Subscribe to the David Ewing Duncan's blog RSS Feed

Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement