Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Delta-V

This blog focuses on the nuts-and-bolts of space technology. We're interested in the hardware that's actually going into orbit and beyond. We write about what's involved in building, launching, and operating spacecraft, exploration vehicles, and habitats (and what it takes on the ground to support them) today.

Delta-V is written by Stephen Cass, a senior editor at TR who has covered space technology and exploration for nine years, and Brittany Sauser, a space technology reporter at TR.

Advertisement
Monday, November 30, 2009

A New Recipe for Rocket Fuel

Researchers are using aluminum and frozen water to make a propellant that could allow rockets to refuel on the moon or even Mars.
A time-lapse photo of a rocket launch powered by new
aluminum-ice propellant. Credit: Purdue University

Last week researchers from Purdue and Penn State University launched a rocket that uses an unconventional propellant: aluminum-ice. The fuel mix, dubbed ALICE, is made of nano-aluminum powder and frozen water, and gets its thrust from the chemical reaction between the ingredients. The propellant is environmentally friendly, and it could perhaps allow spacecraft to refuel at locations like the moon, where water has been discovered.

Using aluminum for fuel is not completely new--the space shuttle's solid rocket boosters use a small amount of the metal, as will NASA's Ares rocket. But the new work involves making aluminum one of the key ingredients by using nanoscale particles. These tiny particles, when ignited, combust more rapidly than larger particles, forcing more exhaust gases out of the metal and giving the rocket the necessary kick.

The oxygen and hydrogen in water molecules enhance the combustion of the aluminum. Freezing the propellant keeps it intact, avoiding any premature reactions.

The propellant was able to lift a rocket 396 meters during an August flight test, which was funded by NASA and the Air Force Office of Scientific Research. Now, for even better performance, the researchers are working on adjusting the ratios of different ingredients and possibly mixing the nano-aluminum with larger aluminum particles.

A water-based propellant might one day mean that spacecraft could carry less fuel when traveling to distant locations like the moon or even mars. But it would also be nice to have a "greener" fuel for rocket launches back on Earth.

Comments

  • [no subject]
    Gives new meaning to the phrase "To the moon ALice"
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ScottleslieC...
    11/30/2009
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
  • 396 meters
    396 meters = 1299 feet 2.5 inches.  Methinks the rocket rose more or less 1300 feet and some PR flack did the metric conversion, adding false accuracy in the process.  A round number like 400 meters might have been more truthful.  Some verbiage on energy density versus standard fuels would have been nice, but the real issue is that any monopropellant that can't be safely stored at room temperature is a (non)ticking time bomb.  Even cryogenic fuels have the advantage of boiling off without spontaneous ignition.  This stuff might be of interest to the Pentagon for time delay bombs, but as rocket fuel I consider it a curiosity.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    olaney
    11/30/2009
    Posts:3
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: 396 meters
      Or, they might have used any of the several barometric altimeters available commercially to rocketeers -- many for <$100 -- to measure the actual achieved altitude to the nearest meter.

      Rocket hobbyists, including kids, get altitude data to this level of precision (note that it's precision we're really talking about; accuracy is a different matter) on flying fields all over the country, pretty much every weekend. There's really no need to presume journalistic sloppiness here.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      dauphinb
      11/30/2009
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
    • Re: 396 meters
      @olaney:  I agree room temperature (or pad temperature) stability is very important.  It's not clear to me, though, that room temperature reactions would be chain reactions rather than just degradation of the fuel.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      brianboonstr...
      11/30/2009
      Posts:2
      • Re: 396 meters
        Also, if the idea is to bring some aluminum powder to the moon and gin up the fuel mixture in a crater using the H2O there, then we're not too worried about stability at 300K.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        brianboonstr...
        11/30/2009
        Posts:2
  • >>> but it's NOT easier >>>
    .

    there are other options based on metals like magnesium and (it seems) salt water:

    http://www.ghostnasa.com/posts/007saltrocket.html

    however, I did not agree that an aluminum-water rocket is better and simpler for Moon or Mars ISRU refuel than a (much simpler) LOX/LH2 engine

    .
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Gaetano Mara...
    11/30/2009
    Posts:139
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    • Re: >>> but it's NOT easier >>>
      But it is easier if you are trying to refuel on the moon where aluminum and water are locally available, but LOX/LH2 is not. 
      Rate this comment: 12345

      YankeeBruce
      11/30/2009
      Posts:12
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      • Re: >>> but it's NOT easier >>>
        .

        elementary school science:

        LOX and LH2 are the cryogenic states of oxygen and hydrogen, can be made with water + energy and "freezed" then burned in a rocket engine WITHOUT aluminum or other metals
        Rate this comment: 12345

        Gaetano Mara...
        11/30/2009
        Posts:139
        Avg Rating:
        2/5
  • Green? Greener? Greenest?
    It might be greener than using a big dumb SRB, or using notoriously toxic hypergolic fuels, but I can't see how this would be somehow "Greener" than using a hydrogen/oxygen engine: If you burn hydrogen and oxygen, you get water. What could be greener than that?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Republibot 3...
    11/30/2009
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
Advertisement

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
•  Subscribe
Save 36%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
» Gift Subscription
» Digital Subscription
» Reprints, Back Issues
» Subscribe
» Table of Contents
» MIT News

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.