NASA is Heading for a Space Fuel Shortage
Supplies of plutonium for deep space exploration are running dangerously low.
Brittany Sauser 09/29/2009
- 5 Comments
Spacecraft traveling to the outer reaches of the solar system, where there's little sunlight and temperatures reach absolute zero, typically have to get their energy from plutonium. But the supply of this fuel is running low and it's unclear if Congress will fork over the $30 million needed to restart production, according to this NPR report.
Plutonium-238 (not plutonium-239, which is used for nuclear weapons) gives off a significant amount of heat, which can be converted into electricity. The material has been used as the power source on over two dozen deep space missions including those of the Voyager spacecraft in the 1970s and the Cassini spacecraft currently imaging Saturn's rings and moons. And it's the only material that can be used for such missions.
The United States has not made any new supplies of plutonium-238 for spacecraft since the 1980s. The U.S. has borrowed from Russia, but its production stopped a while back as well.
From the NPR report:
According to McNutt [a planetary scientist at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory], NASA has enough plutonium-238 for its next Mars rover, called the Mars Science Laboratory, and the next planned major mission to the outer planets.
The agency could also potentially have a relatively low-cost, Discovery-class mission that would use only a small amount of the stuff, to test a new power-generation technology that could more efficiently convert the heat of plutonium-238 to electricity.
But that's about it, and after that, NASA would be stuck, McNutt says. "It's kind of like having a car, and if all the gasoline stations are closed and are out of gasoline, and you're out of gas," he says, "you're not going to go anywhere."
NASA needs about 11 pounds of the stuff per year for its missions, and even if production of plutonium started now it would still take about eight years to satisfy demand.
NPR reports that it would likely cost in excess of $150 million to restart production, however the alternative would leave NASA and planetary scientists without the ability to explore as much of the solar system.
The decision is being left to Congress, which is deciding the future of NASA's human spaceflight program.



Mapou
357 Comments
NASA Has Serious Problems
Interesting article. NASA's problems are much more serious than obtaining enough energy to power their deep space probes. Their primary space transportation technology, rocket propulsion, is cumbersome, severely limited, dangerous and extremely expensive. One thing is certain, the human species is not going to colonize the solar system with her primitive chemical propulsion systems, let alone the galaxy beyond. It's like taking an ox-driven cart onto a 10-lane highway. If aliens were watching us, we would be the laughing stock of the Milky Way. NASA would do well to look way beyond its current payload delivery capabilities and forge a new future.
And what a future it will be. There is clear evidence, based on a reevaluation of our understanding of the causality of motion, that we are immersed in an immense lattice of energetic particles. Soon, we'll have vehicles that can move at tremendous speeds, go almost anywhere and negotiate right angle turns without slowing down and without incurring any damage due to inertial effects. Floating cities, earth to Mars in hours, New York to Beijing in minutes... That's the future of travel and energy.
You don't understand motion, even if you think you do:
http://rebelscience.blogspot.com/2009/09/physics-problem-with-motion-part-i.html
Reply
samurai.stewart
5 Comments
Re: NASA Has Serious Problems
Please stop spamming articles with your energy revolution stuff. It gets annoying after reading it 5 times. Just reply constructively like you did in the first half.
Reply
Mapou
357 Comments
Re: NASA Has Serious Problems
Unless you're a member of this site's administration, you have no say in the matter. If you don't like what I write, ignore it. It's simple, really. Nobody's twisting your arm, right?
Reply