Delta-V

Magnetically Levitating Mice

NASA has built a device that keeps mice floating to study the health effects of spaceflight.

Brittany Sauser 09/11/2009

  • 12 Comments
A three-week-old mouse weighing about 10 grams is being levitated
by magnetic fields, either with a magnet (a) or without (b).
Credit: Da-Ming Zhu et al.

NASA engineers have built a device that can suspend mice in the air for hours. The purpose is to understand how zero gravity affects the bone density and muscle mass of astronauts.

The levitation device, built by Yuanming Liu and colleagues at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, uses a magnetic field that distorts the movement of electrons in water molecules to let the mice float.

According to New Scientist:

[The researchers] used a purpose-built levitation device containing a coil of wire, or solenoid, cooled to a few degrees above absolute zero so that it became superconducting. Running a current through the solenoid creates a magnetic field of 17 teslas, ten thousand times as strong as a typical fridge magnet and 10 million times that of the Earth.

The researchers have shown previously that the device can levitate water-based items for hours, but were skeptical that it would be able to make a mouse, weighing10-grams, float for long periods of time. Yet, they were able to "fly" the mouse for hours, allowing it to roam freely, and giving it food and water.

The experiment is a significant step to study bone and muscle loss, and even changes in blood flow in zero gravity, which is a common problem for astronauts when they return for space missions or extended stays on the space station. Engineers have built exercise equipment to combat the losses, which can result in long-term health issues, but there has been limited ways to actually study zero-gravity effects on humans on Earth.

Print

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

Shiladie

56 Comments

  • 884 Days Ago
  • 09/13/2009

Energy requirements?

Anyone know the energy requirements for fields that strong?  Also, does this scale well by size and mass?

This could be an interesting technology to see advance once we are able to efficiently scale it up massively.

Reply

Danieleveld

28 Comments

  • 883 Days Ago
  • 09/14/2009

Re: Energy requirements?

I read about the first non-NASA prototype, which required massive amounts of energy to run for a short time, and could only levitate objects in a space little more than an inch in diameter. The energy requirements, and consequent overheating, is my guess as to why they can only keep these mice aloft for a few hours. As a whole, it may be more cost effective to just put some mice on the space station, but this would give ready access to research on the ground, and (though I really don't care) be safer for the mice!

Reply

ideat

1 Comment

  • 883 Days Ago
  • 09/14/2009

Protecting humans against G-forces

If this could later harmlessly levitate humans, maybe it could shield from G-forces, which might facilitate interplanetary and interstellar human missions, by enabling higher accelerations to be used.

For example, I think G-forces currently limit the terminal speed of a rotate-then-release bolas-type system where the tether density/strength and endurable centrifugal G-force together limit the maximum release velocity from the bolas (composed of craft-tether-counterweight), for human transport anyway.

Incidentally, this is a rather cool system as (after rotation has built up and on release) the craft can travel at constant velocity from a to b then stop immediately by converting the craft to another (half-sized bolas) and spinning it up en route to stop at b in a reverse of the release process, (with no greater G-force than that experienced during rotation), using an opposite release vector.

Add another couple of "nested" bolases (1/4 & 1/8th of the original mass) and you might even be able to return to a :)

Could it make a better air-bag?

In general also, could such a strong magnetic field protect against metallic fragments from Improvised Explosive Devices, etc by rapid (explosive?) deployment say underneath a vehicle at the right time, creating eddy currents in the fragments or something similar?

Reply

Handshake

19 Comments

  • 883 Days Ago
  • 09/14/2009

Airplane G air-bag

"Could it make a better air-bag?"

Imagine a spacecraft or an airplane that will sustain a life human at 100 or more G’s.
The best trained pilot can sustain 10-15 G… after that … he can black out successfully or just die.

These technologies are for military THE thing that really can make a difference.

Nobody is going to space, everyone is preparing for the next war.

Reply

Carltoned

1 Comment

  • 883 Days Ago
  • 09/14/2009

Simple no-pressure points

Forget interplanetary travel.
This technology would be great for creating a zero-pressure point sleeping system for those of us who bodies have begun to hurt at shoulders, hips and neck somewhere in the past four or five years.
Sleep well.

Reply

Mapou

357 Comments

  • 883 Days Ago
  • 09/14/2009

Pseudo Gravity?

This technology could potentially be used to simulate gravity inside a spaceship. But just as important, researchers need to show that it has no deleterious side effects on living organims in the long run.

Reply

djweber

10 Comments

  • 883 Days Ago
  • 09/14/2009

Levitation is not zero gravity

You can hold someone up with a magnetic field. You can also hold someone up with wires, or with a table. None of these mean you don't feel gravity.

If all it took to study micro-gravity was to suspend someone from wires for a few months, finding volunteers for that would be a lot cheaper than sending men up to the ISS.

Reply

Advertisement

Danieleveld

28 Comments

  • 883 Days Ago
  • 09/14/2009

Re: Levitation is not zero gravity

Yeah, this is a good point. This system is essentially a suspended free-fall. Gravity would still have a constant effect, just as if the creature were standing on the ground. Only instead of the ground creating resistance to the gravitational forces, its electro-magnetism.
   I like the post about using this for gravitational simulation. Instead of spreading the forces of magnetism around the subject, use them to bring the subject toward a focus. However, that kind of energy is a long way in the future.

Reply

doanwon

76 Comments

  • 883 Days Ago
  • 09/14/2009

Re: Levitation is not zero gravity

Actually, I have seen levitation by magnetic field done on a small frog over 10 years ago.  I don't know why this article is touting it as some kind of new revolutionary technology.

Levitation done by a magnetic field IS zero gravity.  Over 97% of the body mass is water so if the force of gravity on the water has been CANCELED out by magnetism then it is essentially weightless since there is Zero net force acting on the mouse. The difference is the cancellation has been distributed evenly if the water molecules gravitation pull has been negated by the magnetic force.  Whereas if you were standing on the table, there is still a pull on all the masses in your body that you can feel.

Great idea by 'ideat'.  In the absence of a force you could use this technology to produce artificial gravity, too.

Reply

snedunuri

67 Comments

  • 882 Days Ago
  • 09/15/2009

Im curious

What are the health effects of such an intense magnetic field on the human body?

Reply

doanwon

76 Comments

  • 882 Days Ago
  • 09/15/2009

Re: Im curious

The only reference we have is MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), which uses powerful vectored magnetic field to perform imaging.  If this method is safe I guess it's ok to assume if you crank up the power then it's also safe.  I hope so.

Reply

samurai.stewart

5 Comments

  • 879 Days Ago
  • 09/18/2009

Re: Im curious

Im not sure but i would think it means higher than normal exposure to electro magnetic radiation from the assumed high voltage device.

Reply

Bio

This blog focuses on the nuts-and-bolts of space technology. We're interested in the hardware that's actually going into orbit and beyond. We write about what's involved in building, launching, and operating spacecraft, exploration vehicles, and habitats (and what it takes on the ground to support them) today.

Delta-V is written by Stephen Cass, a senior editor at TR who has covered space technology and exploration for nine years, and Brittany Sauser, a space technology reporter at TR.

Subscribe to the Delta-V RSS Feed

Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement