Spots 'n' Pimples

The best of the rest from the Physics arXiv this week

kfc 03/26/2011

3 Comments

On The Mass Of The Universe Born In A Black Hole

Dansgaard-Oeschger Events: Tipping Points In The Climate System

A Chemical Turnstile

PAMELA Measurements of Cosmic-ray Proton and Helium Spectra

Quantum Reading of a Classical Digital Memory

You can now follow The Physics arXiv Blog on Twitter

TRSF: Read the Best New Science Fiction inspired by today’s emerging technologies.

First Conservation Laws Derived For A Virtual Universe Fission Products in Seattle Reveal Clues about Japan Nuclear Disaster

426 Days Ago
03/26/2011

Black hole origination can be tested

arxiv:1103.4192v1 "On the mass of the Universe born in a black hole"

"In the presence of fermions... spacetime torsion does not vanish because Dirac fields couple minimally to the torsion tensor"

"This scenario also explains the time asymmetry in a new universe forming inside a black hole."

Broken time-reversal sources chirality.

   1) At extreme density fermions and bosons (photons) are not distinguishable by spin.

   2) Photons promptly decouple at lower density. CMB polarization is a poor witness.

   3) An intensely diluted remnant chiral torsion field *today* acts upon chiral atomic mass distribution. A massed sector vacuum left-foot ignores socks and left shoes, but is trace divergent toward right shoes.

   4) A macroscopic, periodic, self-similar, dense atomic lattice with four-atom chirality emergence scale, contrasted with its geometric parity inversion, sums to a detector.

http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/erotor1.jpg

Two geometric parity Eotvos experiments.

Opposite shoes violate the Equivalence Principle. Chemically and macroscopically identical, opposite geometric parity atomic mass distributions locally vacuum free fall along non-identical minimum action trajectories.

Photons are inert, arxiv:0912.5057, 0905.1929, 0706.2031. Chiroptical measurements (optical rotation) are not diagnostic of atomic mass distribution geomeric parity,

http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/norbors.gif

CONTINGENCY! Observation of galaxies' rotation speed versus radius at large radii requires a) dark matter, b) MOND, or c) non-conservation of angular momentum. (c) is obviously ridiculous.

Noether's theorems couple conservation of angular momentum couples with vacuum isotropy. If vacuum anisotropy is reproducibly demonstrated, (c) is possible. Noether's theorems require continuous symmetries or discontinuous symmetries approximated by Taylor series. Geometric parity is outside both.

arxiv:1103.4192v1 demands that an emergent universe is intensely chiral, followed by cosmic inflation and intense dilution of a chiral vacuum background remnant only active toward fermions. Conservation of angular momentum might be approximate, with a limiting non-zero value,

http://physics.aps.org/pdf/10.1103/physrevlett.106.121303.pdf

   PRL 106, 121303 (2011)

   "Novel Test of Modified Newtonian Dynamics with Gas Rich Galaxies"

Estimated angular momentum threshold is ~10^(-10) m/sec^2 or less. An Eotvos experiment contrasts Earth's horizontal angular acceleration at 45 latitude of 0.0169 m/sec^2 with Earth's orbital gravitational acceleration of 0.0059 m/sec^2 to 5x10^(-14) difference/average sensitivity. Necessary non-conservation of angular momentum to validate (c) is *measurable.*

Somebody should look. The worst it can do is succeed.

425 Days Ago
03/27/2011

/* arxiv:1103.4192v1 demands that an emergent universe is intensely chiral */

This article doesn't contain "chiral" word. The chirality of emergence applies only to aether (particle gas) model of observable reality - not the emergence in general sense.

425 Days Ago
03/27/2011

Black hole Universe model in AWT

In AWT such estimation could be done in much easier, because from AWT follows, the observable part of Universe appears like the interior of black hole (described with FLRW metric) of diameter of 2 cm - because this is just the wavelength of cosmic microwave background radiation, which forms the Hawking radiation of the event horizon of such black hole. Such black hole would therefore "evaporate" with life-time corresponding just the age of the observable Universe (i.e. 13.7 GYrs, as estimated with L-CDM model from Hubble red shift and wavelength of CMBR - such estimation is apparently based on two parameters, the wavelenght of CMBR and it's derivation with distance. Whole the geometry of gradient driven reality is described with it.

Actually such size of black hole corresponds the average size of black holes in our Universe - many of them appear much larger, so that they're could host a "daughter" Universes and they could be way way older, than the observable part of Universe.

IMO the black model of Universe is just an dispersive illusion, similar to perspective of landscape under fog: no actual event horizon exists behind the Hubble Ultra Deep Field and the Universe normally continues there, because its geometry at such global scale is driven with geometry of observer, not with Universe itself in accordance to AWT principle "Simillia simillibus observentur". This introduces the anthropic principle into observable part of Universe.

Bio

The Physics arXiv Blog produces daily coverage of the best new ideas from an online forum called the Physics arXiv on which scientists post early versions of their latest ideas. Contact me at KentuckyFC @ arxivblog.com

Follow The Physics arXiv Blog on Twitter

Subscribe to the arXiv blog RSS Feed