Orbits 'n' Obits

The best of the rest from the Physics arXiv this week:

kfc 12/11/2010

4 Comments

Are There Echoes From The Pre-Big Bang Universe? A Search For Low Variance Circles In The CMB Sky

Metamaterial-Based Gradient Index Lens With Strong Focusing In The THz Frequency Range

Why The Water Bridge Does Not Collapse

Vegetable Ash As Raw Material In The Production Of Glasses And Enamels

Time-Symmetric Cellular Automata

Physical Mechanism of Superconductivity

TRSF: Read the Best New Science Fiction inspired by today’s emerging technologies.

Astronomers Find First Evidence Of Other Universes Elegant New Theory Explains Origin Of Asteroid Belt

531 Days Ago
12/11/2010

Penrose circles & aetheric dodecahedron of Universe

Physicists are of short memory (it helps them in reinventing of theories again and again, not to say about asking of money for further research). Before some time the dodecahedron universe model was quite popular and it leads into similar structures in CMBR distribution, too. IMO these concentric "circles" are rather nodes of emergent foam, i.e. vertices of docecahedron, thus being another evidence of E8 heterotic structure of Universe. Mr. Garret should extend his E8 theory to the cosmologic scale... But because these artifacts aren't formed with continuous circles, the opponents of Prof. Penrose have their truth, too. These circles just cannot be seen on the sky reliably. And they're many, in fact - not just three or four.

http://www.aetherwavetheory.info/images/astronomy/cmb/cmbr_radiation.gif

http://www.aetherwavetheory.info/images/physics/aether/dodecahedron.gif

http://www.aetherwavetheory.info/images/astronomy/cmb/honeycomb.gif

Does it mean, Prof. Penrose is wrong? Actually not quite: we are living in foamy "hall of mirrors" composed of nested Gosset-Petrie polytopes, so we can see the neighbouring universe cells - i.e. these more distant in apparent "Universe history". The duality of observational perspectives is very pronounced at the boundaries of observable Universe, because we can see things there both from inside, both from outside of it - and it's not always so easy to distinguish the interior from exterior, a reflection from refraction, etc..

From perspective of AWT, Penrose's conformal geometry is not exact model, it's just approximate. If he wouldn't try to cover it, everyone would see it clearly. His turquoise "circles" are hand drawn in Photoshop - not generated with actual data. Why such hand drawn pictures are ever allowed in scientific publication as an illustration of experimental data? If these results would be reliable to "six sigma" as Mr. Penrose is claiming, why we cannot see them directly? Maybe he is simply guessing in priority race - but I suspect, he's playing a game with the rest of scientific community, as he has some additional backing arguments prepared.

http://eaae-astronomy.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/circles-penrose1.png

What Penrose can actually see on the sky is the Kolmogorov map of CMB. I know about it, because I know about previous articles of his collaborator. Well, it contains some cyclic structures, but they're quite fuzzy and scale invariant. In this sense, prof. Penrose faked the presentation of these results to suit his theory better. But his insight is quite relevant in similar way, like the relativity has been "proven" with noisy data from solar eclipse in 1919 originally. Such noisy data just couldn't be published as a support of relativity by now.

http://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2009/14/aa11625-09/img16.png

There is still rather semantic question opened, whether the parts of observable Universe can ever belong into previous generation of it - or not.

531 Days Ago
12/11/2010

Universe geometry

Gosset-Petrie polytope geometry is closely related to the ancient dodecahedron symbols of Universe and the sacred aether geometry of [five elements](http://aetherwavetheory.blogspot.com/2008/10/archetypes-symbols-and-aether-concept.htmlhttp://aetherwavetheory.blogspot.com/2008/09/e8-lie-group-and-aether-theory.html

The physical vacuum is filled with spongy system of density fluctuations, similar to nested foam. Such structure has even a behavior of soap foam, because it gets more dense after introducing of energy by the same way, like soap foam shaken inside of closed vessel. Such behavior leads to the quantum behavior of vacuum and particle-wave duality. Every energy wave, exchanged between pair of particles (i.e. density fluctuations of foam) is behaving like less or more dense blob of foam, i.e. like gauge boson particle. Every boson can exchange its energy with another particles, including other gauge bosons, thus forming the another generation of intercalated particles. This process can be repeated recursively, until compact E8 structure will be formed in 3D.

http://www.aetherwavetheory.info/images/physics/aether/calibrationgroup.gif

Therefore the nested dodecahedron geometry solves the trivial question: "*Which structure should have the tightest lattice of particles, exchanged/formed by another particles recursively?*". And such question has perfect meaning even from classical physics point of view! Such question has a perfect meaning in theory, describing the most dense structure of inertial particles, which we can ever imagine, i.e. the interior of black hole.

If you're interested, how the Garret E8 theory, heterotic gauge groups of string theory, dodecahedron model of Universe and recent Penrose models are related mutually, feel free to ask for further questions. I don't expect, you could understand something from the above, if you don't know about any of the above concepts.

530 Days Ago
12/12/2010

Crazy pattern search

Can't see my previous comment so again: anyone that claims seeing patterns in gaussian noise (a given property of noise - it generates "information" wholesale, or it wouldn't be stochastic) like the CMBR and think they are significant of something beyond stochasticity is crazy; you can see circles, triangles and your granny's face. Penrose et al tested that they had a pattern, the arxiv papers tested that the patterns _should_ turn up. Penrose and earlier commenters fail, science win.

530 Days Ago
12/12/2010

.... and of course, pattern search is a known hallmark of pathological science.

Bio

The Physics arXiv Blog produces daily coverage of the best new ideas from an online forum called the Physics arXiv on which scientists post early versions of their latest ideas. Contact me at KentuckyFC @ arxivblog.com

Follow The Physics arXiv Blog on Twitter

Subscribe to the arXiv blog RSS Feed