arXiv blog

The Mathematical Secret of Viking Jewelry

A long-standing puzzle over the craftsmanship behind Viking bracelets and necklaces has finally been solved--mathematically.

kfc 08/27/2010

  • 3 Comments

The beautiful bracelets and necklaces made by Viking artisans leave archaeologists with something of a conundrum. These objects are made from rods of gold and silver which have twisted together into double helices. The puzzle is the regularity of these helices, which are remarkably similar in jewelry found in places as diverse as Ireland, Scotland, the Orkney Islands and Scandinavia.

How could craftsmen have achieved this regularity in such disparate places?

The answer comes today thanks to the work of Kasper Olsen and Jakob Bohr at the Technical University of Denmark. They point out that two wires become maximally twisted when no more rotations can be added with deforming the double helix. They go on to demonstrate the properties of maximally twisted wires. (We looked at a similar but more detailed argument about the properties of old rope a few weeks back.)

Olsen and Bohr then measured the properties of helices in Viking jewelry are twisted. It should come as no surprise to find that Viking jewelry is maximally twisted, which neatly explains why it all looks so similar. "Maximally rotated geometry is universal and therefore independent of the skills of the craftsman," say Olsen and Bohr.

Problem solved.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1008.4306: Hidden Beauty in Twisted Viking Neck Rings

TRSF: Read the Best New Science Fiction inspired by today’s emerging technologies.

Print

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

flared0ne

395 Comments

  • 532 Days Ago
  • 08/30/2010

Obviously no "peer review" on THIS posting...

The grammar and basic "garble" in this piece pretty much obscures the entire point (minimal as it was) of the review. "added with deforming" and "jewelry are twisted" -- slipping, guys...

Reply

ncm

56 Comments

  • 532 Days Ago
  • 08/30/2010

Maximal, how?

All this does is defer the mystery to how the Viking craftsmen knew they had reached the point of maximal rotation.  (E.g., does it take a lot more torque to go beyond that point?)  And, doesn't that point depend on the diameter of the wire being twisted?  If so, we're left with wondering, too, how they got their wires so uniform.

Reply

flared0ne

395 Comments

  • 531 Days Ago
  • 08/31/2010

Re: Maximal, how?

Wire-making "technology" was fairly straight-forward, even back then, once someone realized you could "draw" a hot stub of metal through sequential incrementally-smaller holes in something hard (usually a rock, sometimes bone, etc). The labor intensive prep was to drill the hole. The rest of it was fairly simple -- as you drew more wire, the hole got larger, so you moved that rock-with-eroding-hole tool-piece closer to the beginning of the process and kept some trainee busy drilling the tiniest hole possible for the constantly-replaced "finishing" rock.

(Edited to add:) Granted, early on, wire was fabricated in lots of different ways -- and I can't say when my description above would be pertinent -- but "how" really isn't exactly the point here, is it... Sorry...

And "maximal" had everything to do with the geometry of the situation -- which apparently you didn't catch, either this time or (more pertinently) the previous time, the discussion with the rope... When you twist two strands of anything together, there is a point where twisting ANY MORE introduces a visible instability, a "kink", into the helix. THAT is the point of "maximal" twist, and it is the most trivial bit of the whole procedure -- "go until THIS happens" (and demonstrate) "back off, then stop."

But why stop? That kink presents a certain visual effect that could be used as a "gimmick", a style-element, maybe -- except that "kink" is demonstrably the weakest point in the helix now. Weakening a piece of expensive jewelry is bad for repeat business (edited to add:) and of course, the stuff that BROKE didn't make it down the timeline to reach us. It got melted down and "disappeared" back into "the mists of time".

Which raises the question of "why didn't this go without saying, it was SUPPOSED to go without saying." I.e., was there any directed point in this whole discussion? Because what's being discussed is one of those "technically obvious to a craftsman" issues that are going to be "discovered" by anyone who spends any time at all working with similar materials...

Reply

Bio

The Physics arXiv Blog produces daily coverage of the best new ideas from an online forum called the Physics arXiv on which scientists post early versions of their latest ideas. Contact me at KentuckyFC @ arxivblog.com

Follow The Physics arXiv Blog on Twitter

Subscribe to the arXiv blog RSS Feed

Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement