• 570 Days Ago
• 07/19/2010

Time Travel or Time Re-Observation?

If the quantum tunneling takes an agent (particle or person) back in time to another time state via this postselection process which limits the state of the agent to its already determined state... isn't this theory really proposing a method of looking back in time rather than pysically sending an agent back into time? 

• 570 Days Ago
• 07/19/2010

Arthur C. Clarke

Wrote a story with Stephen Baxter about the possibility of looking back in time through wormholes in "The Light of Other Days"

Since Arthur is "usually" right ;), everybody knows his prediction of satellites, maybe it's necessary to create a stable wormhole to allow for nonlinear quantum mechanics.

• 570 Days Ago
• 07/19/2010

tunnel from the future to the past

When you're walking to the job or school, you're actually avoiding the consequences of future: you would be punished, if you wouldn't do so. Actually instinctive fear, prophecy or prediction can be considered as a manifestation of future affecting the past. In general, it's a memory mechanism which provides the communication of the past with future.

• 570 Days Ago
• 07/19/2010

The past as present state.

I guess the last paragraphs of the article summarizes my thoughts. We need to figure out if the universe allows parallel quantum states that "behave as our present". And More than travelling to the past we would be travelling to a N-verse that has a quantum offset relative to our present state.

• 570 Days Ago
• 07/19/2010

Enough with the Crackpottery Already!

I wish Technology Review would stop printing articles about pseudoscientific nonsense like time travel. It's annoying, to say the least. Time travel in any direction is impossible because time cannot change by definition. This is the reason that Karl Popper called spacetime, "Einstein's block universe in which nothing happens" (source: Conjectures and Refutations). Why are most physicists still unaware of this fact? Why are papers on time travel still passing peer review? When will the crackpottery end?

Nothing Can Move in Spacetime

• 569 Days Ago
• 07/20/2010

Memory Effect, Not Time Travel

Scientists keep confusing what could be a memory effect with time travel. A memory effect is where future states reflect past states. Memory effects are science, and time travel is science fiction. The closest we get to time travel is the memory effect, like replaying a video over again.

• 569 Days Ago
• 07/20/2010

The quantum paradox

I believe the probability of being paid for purveying similar arrant non-sense may be calculated in a Monte Carlo simulation that would operate as a perpetuum mobile money making machine. Oh, sorry I forgot about the so-called "rocket scientist" quants  on Wall Street that gave us the exotic derivative products. Hmm... is it just chance or could there be a connection here?

• 569 Days Ago
• 07/20/2010

tempus fugit

Time machines are tricky inventions,
Because they defy normal quantum conventions,
They have to move fast to show up in the past,
And make that future connection.

• 569 Days Ago
• 07/20/2010

What's amazing about this time machine is that it is not plagued by the usual paradoxes of time travel, such as the grandfather paradox, in which a particle travels back in time and some how prevents itself from existing in the first place.

Paradoxes result only because we don't have a proper formal understanding of a subject, in this case, the nature of time. Every paradox in science and mathematics has been resolved by refining our models with more careful reasoning, or forcefully ejecting contradictory assumptions.

Such will be the case with time travel. Ultimately, time travel will either be consistent with causality such as this QM theory, or time travel will turn out to be impossible.

• 568 Days Ago
• 07/21/2010

Quantum Mechanics vs. Relativity

As an alternative to Quantum Theory there is a new theory that describes and explains the mysteries of physical reality. While not disrespecting the value of Quantum Mechanics as a tool to explain the role of quanta in our universe. This theory states that there is also a
classical explanation for the paradoxes such as EPR and the Wave-Particle Duality. The Theory is called the Theory of Super Relativity and is located at: Super Relativity
This theory is a philosophical attempt to reconnect the physical universe to realism and deterministic concepts. It explains the mysterious.

• 564 Days Ago
• 07/25/2010

I was thinking...

I was thinking that relativity is slightly wrong..

" In relativistic contexts, however, time cannot be separated from the three dimensions of space, because the observed rate at which time passes for an object depends on the object's velocity relative to the observer and also on the strength of intense gravitational fields, which can slow the passage of time."

Anyone see any flaws in this wiki statement...

After thought experimenting things out a while ago and seeing this i thought i would comment.

I took the atomic clock scenario where two clocks starting out at the same time, flown around the world differ by seconds.

(Things dont need to be observed to be affected by time. Every "atom" (or the smallest piece of matter) has its own time and the observed time we see as differing is because everything moves through time at a different rate.)

If a plane takes off and at a specific time interval will tell the ground control to abort the take-off of the next plane. On the ground we have a fixed time for a plane to take off. Hence the plane flying would stop the other plane taking off if it gets the stop signal in before hand.

Thus the future has prevented the present and affected it.

So the future can only effect the present and never the past. I also disproved frames in my thinking such that if you theoretically placed your time-frame in the period between future and present you would be in fact looking at the past. Which disagrees with what the experiment just proved so disproving frames.

Now if the quantum time machine is doing a similar job to what i just did with the standard theory, you can see the two theories are in fact identical.

You just need to adjust the standard model slightly to remove the observer perhaps, and a slightly differing view of time. The observer is never seeing an exact time but a collection of pieces moving through time at a specific rate for that period. The observer is infact seeing a union of time dilation for a brief period.

I would change relativity to be:

"In relativistic contexts, however, time cannot be separated from the three dimensions of space, because the observed rate at which time passes for an object depends on the object's velocity and also on the strength of intense gravitational fields, which can slow the passage of time."

I could be completely wrong of course, but its interesting stuff!

Not sure about about Gravitational effects which would increase velocity thus speeding time, (while at the same time slowing time down?). It says can slow time, i am assuming they are refering to a singularity in this instance and the combined effect past the event horizon?

Im also mulling over whether time in fact only affects 1 dimension rather than all 3. The fact that the 3 exist together implies time affects all equally (perhaps shared), but im not as fixed in that view point. It wouldnt surprise me if the dimension of time could be found to affect a single dimension with out the need for the other two.

Also i note that Age(time) is likely a key part of evolution, allowing a species to change faster and adapt quick to changing environments.While it is (likely) possible to engineer a system that would last forever it probably wasnt done because of resource issues.

• 564 Days Ago
• 07/25/2010

The Answer?

This certainly pertains to the answer to the puzzle.

• 562 Days Ago
• 07/27/2010

Can't wait or must I

The really cool thing is that this construct will probably work while probably not working!

• 455 Days Ago
• 11/11/2010

Grandfather paradox?

I think everyone's overlooking something important in considering the GP. Consider if you can go back and kill a grandfather, what happens if you do not? You would witness your parents coming together, conceiving, and then your own birth. At this point there are two of you, so in fact you would never have been able to prevent your own birth, most logically. What in fact you WOULD do by killing your granfather, is prevent being born AGAIN. Since if you don't prevent the birth, there would be two, then your own birth would not have been in jeopardy.

This concept was made by me, an outside-the-box thinker with a naturally abstract way of looking at things, such as a UFO that maneuvers in a way that seeminigly should kill a person from the G-forces. I submit a gravity drive would warp spacetime, and the craft could only APPEAR to be moving fast when it may only be moving at a different time rate.

• 387 Days Ago
• 01/18/2011

time travel

To travel in time you need to define that point in time. This actual previous point was universal hence you would need to recreate this point with regards to energy and matter in universal terms. If this point could be recreated it would exist alongside our current reality which would double the mass and energy of the current universe, this in itself is improbable within the current confines of physics given the universe has fixed mass and energy.

Dropping out of time / reality may be possible and could be construed as time travel however would be better described as teleportation ie dissappearing from reality to instantaneosly reappear some where else within it.The point of change being the transition from one point in space to another in zero time.

reality may be simply being part of and or aware of the changes in the dispersion of energy and mass within the universe the physics of which are based on the normal limitations of these phenomenon. Consider light and absolute zero as being related as opposite extemes of this spectrum beyond these limits the rules must change.

Absolute zero, a point at which all the energy within a mass is expelled causing the remaining particles of mass to close together and become stationary, frictionless, immovable (as soon as you move it you input energy)

Light speed, an upper limit past which we cant accelerate, an event horizon shouldnt therefore exist as we cant see past it.

Vaguely considering these points suggests that removing all energy from a mass no light no heat no nothing would create absolute zero the inert particles therein should collapse similar to a black hole. Would this mass then reduce to produce a negative energy acting as a magnet causing the acceleration of any particle towards it, so light would now break its own laws at the attraction event (event horizon) and to current reality dissappear, and this is where the fun would now start. Lots of clever stuff then happens..... and as the original mass takes on energy the event horizon shrinks to a point where the black hole theoretically disappears, the universe requires it however to redress the balance of reality hence an equal mass is created elsewhere as a result of teleportation / instantaneous movement through time.

hmmm, probably too many loose ends here, but a starter

Regards P



Obviously

• 387 Days Ago
• 01/18/2011

time travel

I like the grounding comments about the time difference between a static and moving clock. In the scheme of things we are simply experiencing the phenomenon that a moving clock is experiencing more energy input from movement and contact with other energy both radiated and other. As previously stated removing energy from a mass could be the key and attaining absolute zero the window to understanding the universe and everything, including in this theme, time.

• 69 Days Ago
• 12/02/2011

TIME JUMP

therein lies the dilemma of the scientific community. When people do not realise their own intellectual limits, they do not enter into the struggle to understand that which they have failed to comprehend. Learning is no substitute for understanding. It is in admitting a lack of understanding and in wrestling with the problem that the mistakes of the past are rectified
the world of physics recognises both the conservation of momentum and the conservation of kinetic energy. However how can both be conserved simultaneously in any given situation if one is equal to mv and the other ½ mv²? One is directly equal to ‘v’ and the other ‘v²’. It doesn’t take a brilliant mathematician to observe that this is clearly impossible.
This is just a brief outline of a small amount of the work I have undertaken.      The whole known universe is made is made up off atoms containing electrons which contain neutrons protons quarks ECT and gluons that modern day physicists believe hold them all together.
I would like to put forward a new concept based on the last 25 years work involving the research into the behaviour of atoms and there relationship to each other.
After developing a new form of mathematics’ using 6 dimensional space and resonance frequency it was possible to map out the interactions and the multi dimensional space they occupy.
I then concentrated on just a few different atoms that make up magnetic material and the behaviour of atoms in static charge it was possible to conduct a experiment where a piece of matter that was alien to the controlled environment was placed in side the apparatus and then the natural frequency of the electrons in the static was put out of phaze and the piece of matter was made to resonate at the same frequency as the electrons in the magnetic material the outcome was the small piece of matter floated up ward in a helix motion approximately 7cm and then moved to the centre of the helix then proceeded to fall slowly down the centre of the helix the experiment was repeated a number of times with different bits of matter with the same result by of setting the static frequency by different degrees has a profound effect on the matters behaviour in the experiment the one most notably was the instantaneous acceleration from one side of the controlled space to a different point within the control space it covered 230mm in an instance the experiment was carried out many different times with the same result the only thing that changed was the direction and distance covered but controlling this was not easy to overcome a millimetre grid was set up 300mm2 and a piece of tobacco leaf strand was placed within the grid reference a magnified photo was then taken of the tobacco strand before the experiment was run and again after wards it was noted that no matter what distance it covered or how fast it instantaneously  travelled it would keep the exact position it was in at point A B and C no matter how many times it moved it held it fragile shape this was shown by overlaying photographs many times .this effect was possible due to the interactions of the electrons/atoms that made up the tobacco strand and by reprogramming the resonant frequency of the atoms into a AlterNet state holds them in a 6 dimension stases field that protects them from the journey from point A to B at incredible speeds . All atoms / electrons have a control TAG and it is this TAG that tells the atoms /electrons how to behave and how to interact within there environments it is possible to mathematically work out where this TAG is positioned in relation to its given atoms once you know the position of the TAG you can work out the true frequency of the atoms and then set about to reprogram the TAGS natural frequency thus changing the matters state and its natural behaviour to many different AlterNet states.
The problem with mathematics is it’s a man made concept and based on time which is another man made concept time isn’t a constant. When you look at all the great physics’ mathematical equations’ they all come up against a wall so the problem is overcome by the physicists inventing new dimensions so his or her equations make more sense but you cant do this if it doesn’t add up it doesn’t add up and inventing dimensions that don’t exist is not the way forward I believe they are at about 13 dimensions now or was last time I looked .