arXiv blog

How to Prevent Language Extinction

Two third of the world's languages are endangered. Now a new mathematical model of language competition suggests how to combat the threat

kfc 06/16/2010

  • 26 Comments

The 7 billion inhabitants of Earth currently speak about 6000 different languages. That may seem a healthy multitude but it turns out that just five of these languages dominate. More than half the population speak English, Russian, Mandarin, Hindi and Spanish. These together with the next hundred most popular languages account for 95 per cent of speakers. A mere 5 per cent of the global population speak the rest and two thirds of these lingos are in danger of extinction.

That's a perilous state of affairs. With the death of a language, the planet loses an irreplaceable cultural phenomenon. The fear is that the big five may crush all before them, pushing weaker languages into oblivion and leaving a cultural desert in their wake.

That fear has been exacerbated by mathematical models describing how one language can dominate another and showing how easily extinctions happen.

Today, however, there is better news. The relentless march of dominant languages may not be as inevitable as these early models seemed to show, according to a new analysis by Jose Mira at the Universidade de Santiago de Compostela in Spain and a couple of amigos.

The early analyses looked at a stable population in which two languages competed for speakers who chose one over the other depending on their perceived social and economic advantages and also their similarity, meaning how easy it was to switch between the two.

In these models one language always died out and showed an ominous fit with historical data on the way English has crushed Scottish Gaelic and Welsh, and how Spanish dominates Quechua. The implication was that the writing was clearly on the wall for minor argots.

But Mira and co point out that these early models had some serious limitations. In particular, they do not allow for bilingual speakers, who are a major linguistic force in many societies. When bilinguals are taken into account, the models allow for a co-evolution of two languages, such as Galician and Castillian in north west Spain.

But what of long term stability? Can two languages co-exist in a stable fashion over a long period of time? Or, put another way, is it ever possible that the outcome of the competition between two languages is an uneasy truce?

Today, Mira and and his pals answer this question with a systematic study of the possible outcomes while varying all the important parameters involved. They say that languages can co-exist but that this outcome is hugely sensitive on the initial conditions. "An exogenous injection of just a few speakers into one group or another can determine whether a language lives or dies," they say.

That means that the survival of an entire language and all the history it encompasses can depend on the actions of just a few individuals.

That looks like good news for the many languages currently under threat. If it is possible to create some bilingual speakers in one of the major language groups, then their chances of survival could be greatly enhanced.

And in this internet enabled world, the ability to communicate with other speakers in almost any part of the planet surely makes this more likely.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1006.2737: Importance Of Interlinguistic Similarity And Stable Bilingualism When Two Languages Compete

TRSF: Read the Best New Science Fiction inspired by today’s emerging technologies.

Print

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

Torbjorn_Larsson_OM

175 Comments

  • 603 Days Ago
  • 06/16/2010

Bummer

Bad news - minority languages survive. Good news - it will be scarce.

"There can only be one." (Well, not exactly, it's a large world so language speciation will always happen; even if it's "technical" subset languages.)

Reply

huminado

1 Comment

  • 603 Days Ago
  • 06/16/2010

sentimental

"With the death of a language, the planet loses an irreplaceable cultural phenomenon."  This is a sentimental motivation.  Language is a tool for the purpose of communicating (and the more people you can communicate with, the better the tool).  It's no different than moving from manual typewriters to computers.

Reply

rsanchez1

213 Comments

  • 603 Days Ago
  • 06/16/2010

Re: sentimental

I gotta agree, although if the guys sponsoring this study feel that strongly about preserving languages, more power to them. Personally, I would prevent language extinction by: A). Recording every single language in the world, preferably with the speaker giving a grammar lesson on his language, and B). put all the material on the internet so anyone bored enough can pick up a dead language. Even if the five languages dominate, you know there will be a small group who will create an artificial language, like Esperanto, so the cultural desert prediction is hyperbole.

Reply

EmperorOfTheMoon

2 Comments

  • 603 Days Ago
  • 06/16/2010

Re: sentimental

There are things that can be expressed in one language differently from another. For example, the Roman elite adopted Greek because it was possible to express things in Greek that could not be expressed in Latin. When a language is lost, possible ideas are lost with it. Sure, we won't end up with "doubleplusgood," but the motivation for Oceania developing Newspeak in 1984 was related to the cause for sorrow at the lost of a language--permutations of the human experience are lost. Often, things simply do not translate completely into different languages--puns, for example. Much is lost when a language dies.

Reply

rsanchez1

213 Comments

  • 603 Days Ago
  • 06/16/2010

Re: sentimental

They're not talking about a government eliminating languages, which I would certainly be against. They're talking about languages naturally competing against each other, and some going extinct because they can't compete with other languages. Besides, the big languages used in the world do change over time. Building on your Roman/Greek example, there was a time in history when you could go from India to Italy speaking only Greek. Other languages competing with Greek eventually drove it back to its motherland, so now Greece is only spoken there and in large migrant communities. I believe this is what the authors of the article were referencing.

Reply

gvramanarao

5 Comments

  • 600 Days Ago
  • 06/19/2010

Re: sentimental

I do not agree with you at all. While a language is used for communication, it is much more than that. It is also a tool that lets me see the minds of my ancestors, understand my history through the literature they left behind and get to know my culture. It is truly a sad day, when a language dies, as it signals the end of a culture.

Reply

babblebuster

1 Comment

  • 594 Days Ago
  • 06/25/2010

Re: sentimental

The day to day utilitarian function of a language is far from it's only objective value.  Languages contain a vast array of accumulated knowledge and history in its grammar, syntax, speech characteristics, and alphabet where it exists.  Your statement would be like saying plants are only good for eating, or some other rudimentary function.  Yet we can examine plant DNA and extract all sorts of valuable information about its origins, how it has dealt with environmental pressures, and how it understands the world around it.   Languages are not much different and extremely valuable as maps of the evolution and history of a people.

Interpretation of writings, cultural objects or practices, also often depend on an intimate knowledge of a language.   So is anthropologic science (and linguistics) itself simply "sentimental"?   The Greek maxim, "know thyself" has been a keystone throughout history for the establishment of advanced and peaceful civilizations.   Going forward must always include looking back.

Reply

Advertisement

Hlafordlaes

1 Comment

  • 603 Days Ago
  • 06/16/2010

Language extinctions may deprive linguists of useful datasets, but otherwise the issue should be seen in the light of what causes language change and the eventual evolution of mutually unintelligible languages from a common root. As in biology, diversity arises more easily when populations are isolated, and conformity when not. We may like the idea of language diversity, but when we recognize that the birth of languages usually requires something like the Dark Ages that followed the fall of the Roman Empire, the prospect becomes somewhat less appealing.

Reply

koppelo

1 Comment

  • 597 Days Ago
  • 06/22/2010

Re:

Language diversity didn't come into being in the Dark Ages of Europe – it was there all the time, also during the Roman empire, and in the millennia before that.

Most of these postings fail to see that language is not just a communication tool for sharing information. And, as most of you guys probably are monolingual English speakers ;-) , please let me remind you that learning an international lingua franca doesn't have to mean the loss of your native language. Multilingualism is not an anomaly but a very normal condition.

A language is loaded with cultural, personal and emotional functions. Above all: language loss in families which give up their language is often accompanied by sadness and grief, a feeling of something being irretrievably lost. These people do not give up their language willingly, with a feeling that they have gained something.

Reply

Torbjorn_Larsson_OM

175 Comments

  • 603 Days Ago
  • 06/16/2010

I agree!

... with all of you; good analysis.

Sometimes it is claimed, and it may well be true for technical languages, that language embodies ideas (or Dawkins memes) apart from its traits. Could well be, even if I doubt it is tested. Nevertheless, ideas death's with small languages is a small prize to pay for what has already been mentioned as larger languages as better tools.

Reply

kayosweaver

3 Comments

  • 603 Days Ago
  • 06/16/2010

value of language

The loss of a language isn't a trivial matter, its the loss of the sum knowledge and experience of a culture. Maybe it isn't as efficient as one monolithic human tongue, but it does necessarily limit the possibilities of discourse and knowledge.

As a bilingual myself (English and French) I can tell you with certitude that no translation completely encapsulates the ideas being expressed in the original language. Given how much we're learning about the importance of mental constructs to our perception of the world I think we'd be even more concerned about losing languages.

There are concepts, distinctions and associations in "fringe" languages that simply aren't possible to express in the currently dominant languages. It would be like forcing everyone to use a particular OS on their computers. An immense amount of data, software and access to peripherals would vanish overnight. So it goes with human operating systems.

Reply

rsanchez1

213 Comments

  • 603 Days Ago
  • 06/16/2010

Re: value of language

Being bilingual myself, more often than not you can find a translation that expresses the same meaning as the source language. It's just that the translation will either sound unnatural in the destination language, or will require more words than required in the source language.

Reply

UncleAl

407 Comments

  • 603 Days Ago
  • 06/16/2010

Defective concept

Do computer operating systems CP/M, AmigaOS, DOS "deserve" to be promulgated?  Should sucessive execrable versions of Windows be preserved in use?  Will social software advocates demand resurrection of WordPerfect, WorldStar, edlin...?

Hell no!  That afficionados still use WordStar is personal not social policy.  Go do column block operations in Word.

Languages are art.  Languages are tools.  The major languages as tools are rich and plastic (and should dump the diacritical marks crap as English did.)  As they grow in content they should simplify in mechanism.  Gendered nouns convey nothing.  Synthetic tools like Esperanto failed miserably.

6000 languages have nothing to say.  They are idiosyncratic, inefficient, and too small to convey 21st century meaning.  Tonal languages are particulary nasty, as are non-phonemic written languages and those without written vowels (Sephardic Hebrew; unwritten Arabic tashkeel or harakat). 

There is no evidence that the whole of human experience plus the universe requires 6000 distinct mappings.  Distill out useful or artful specialized vocabulary and structures.  Let the vast mediocrity go its own way unmourned.

BTW, try some CP/M commands on the Windows command line.

Reply

mbmbmb

1 Comment

  • 595 Days Ago
  • 06/24/2010

Re: Defective concept

You have a very lethargic point of view. Every time a very expressive language and writ together dies. You will notice that during the transitions people were looking for an easier way of writing and speaking. E.g. Phoenician to Ancient Greek and so on. The most intelligent scholars and philosophers were against this. It takes more thought and time to speak ancient languages. The current scholars are reverse-engineering if you will to figure these lang. thoroughly. Eventually, you have a modern form of the language of Canaan (the uneducated language). Listen to an adolescent in a run-down area of any metropolitan area, and it is the modern form. The Canaanites were so inbred that they spoke horribly, and the slang was unfathomable and beyond lethargic. Take Nimrod for example. I am sure you don't want any modern language to become even worse. No offense intended. T.A.

Reply

Advertisement

lavilleon

1 Comment

  • 602 Days Ago
  • 06/17/2010

sentimental

Just to broaden a little bit the topic. It is very narrow-minded to just limit consideration of a language as a tool for communication. Through communication, but also through its very specific way to communicate perception of the past, present and future, a given language shapes up a given way of thinking. And no one would deny that the differences in thinking and more broadly cultural differences are an inexhaustible source of innovation and progress, at least in science, if not in society in general. This is partly why linguists compare the extinction of a language to that of a species in nature sciences. Necessary diversity is not only about what you see, it is about perception of the world in which we live, and in which our widest expression of the world remains our language.

Reply

jamesbt

2 Comments

  • 601 Days Ago
  • 06/18/2010

Re: sentimental

"Through communication, but also through its very specific way to communicate perception of the past, present and future, a given language shapes up a given way of thinking."

Outside of certain weak formulations, the concept of linguistic relativity to which you're referring, also known as the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis, has been largely discredited (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linguistic_relativity for a decent overview).

Reply

Torbjorn_Larsson_OM

175 Comments

  • 602 Days Ago
  • 06/17/2010

Still not tested

"There are concepts, distinctions and associations in "fringe" languages that simply aren't possible to express in the currently dominant languages. "

"a given language shapes up a given way of thinking"

I'm sorry, but this is all anecdote, not data. As I noted earlier, I doubt such claims have been thoroughly tested.

One would think that if having "fringe" languages are important outside the culture that it developed in, it would be a fact both easy to test and tested already. That it hasn't makes my suspicion that it is all romantic make belief so much deeper.

Reply

mlsmolens

1 Comment

  • 601 Days Ago
  • 06/18/2010

One must make it easy for the young to use the language in fun ways

Language extinction is a terrible problem for the world, as with it goes local culture, and the last thing we want is a world filled with McDonalds and having everyone watching Desperate Housewives.

Communication is more and more via video on the web and now on mobile devices. dotSUB has developed an easy way to subtitled videos into any language, and have them rendered in native languages - over 300 languages already have a growing library of content.

If the kids can watch cool content and get engaged with making it happen, it is a start in the right direction.

Michael Smolens - Michael@dotsub.com

Reply

TruePath

3 Comments

  • 599 Days Ago
  • 06/20/2010

Re: One must make it easy for the young to use the language in fun ways

Do you watch anything but PBS/CSPAN on TV?  Do you go see big budget hollywood flicks?  Do you find it easier to make friends and socialize because you participate in the same culture they do and could read the book or see the play which changed your life if you made a compelling case?

If so it seems pretty selfish to demand that other people should spend their time propping up a tiny linguistic community thereby limiting their sense of connection (and economic opportunities) with the broader world.

If it's so important to you that some tiny little language no be lost how about you go spend your time learning it and practicing it's traditions rather than trying to figure out how to trick young people who just want to watch hollywood movies, TV shows and relate to their friends who don't speak the language into using time for this language they seem to prefer using for other things.

Reply

jamesbt

2 Comments

  • 601 Days Ago
  • 06/18/2010

Other pathways to language protection

My (unpublished) graduate work @ University of Chicago in 2004 showed that language dynamics in finite populations is dependent upon the spatial distribution of language speakers and the sources of linguistic input for the language learner. From my conclusion: "...simulations in ALingua can provide insight into the possible mechanisms behind language extinction, namely the effects of connectivity and distribution on long-term viability, and the means by which the present decline in diversity may be ameliorated or even countered." If you're interested, see http://www3.isrl.illinois.edu/~junwang4/langev/alt/bontempo04/BonTempo--2004--ExploringTheDynamicsOfLanguageChangeInFinitePopulations.pdf for more information.

Reply

Brian Barker

2 Comments

  • 600 Days Ago
  • 06/19/2010

Language Imperialism of English

With regard to the campaign to save endangered and dying languages, can I point to the contribution, made by the World Esperanto Association, to UNESCO's campaign.

The commitment was made, by the World Esperanto Association at the United Nations' Geneva HQ in September.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=eR7vD9kChBA&feature=related

Your readers may be interested in http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=_YHALnLV9XU Professor Piron was a translator with the United Nations in Geneva.

A glimpse of Esperanto can be seen at http://www.lernu.net

Reply

Advertisement

TruePath

3 Comments

  • 599 Days Ago
  • 06/20/2010

Why Prevent Language Extinction

Sure it's a loss of an irreplaceable part of human culture but so is deleting the embarassing myspace page you made for you band or no longer maintaining the traditions, jokes and rules that went along with chamber pots.  Indeed, merely participating in a culture is to play a part in it's evolution and thus the gradual loss of what it was in the bast. The question is whether the benefit of stopping language extinction is worth the costs.

And the costs here are huge.  The massive economic inefficiencies caused because people who speak other languages can't read what you wrote are mind boggling and they probably pale in comparison to the costs in terms of war, prejudice and misunderstanding fueled by linguistic differences.

Sure people can learn other languages but that's a huge opportunity cost.  I mean for the same number of man hours people spend learning foreign languages we could probably save unimaginable quantities of other cultural information/practices from destruction.  Just because other things being equal it might be neat to keep many languages around doesn't mean it's overall worthwhile.

It doesn't matter what language becomes universal but we all benefit if some language does.  As more people speak this language their cultural practices will change but also change the language in the exact same way that the languages we speak now developed.  Or does anyone feel we need to turn back the clock 100s or 1000s of years to restore dead languages?  If not why not let modern ones die too? 

Reply

  • 598 Days Ago
  • 06/21/2010

Language Diversity Is Good Not Bad!

Personally, I love learning languages. I am only really fluent in English. After studying Japanese and Russian, I came to learn more about Japanese and Russian culture through the language.

Linguistic forms and forms of address have a huge impact on the way a culture develops. The formal address "san" in Japanese has no good English equivalent. Russian experts will argue over the best way to translate certain idioms and sayings, and it still takes a full paragraph to explain some three-word Russian sayings to an English speaker who does not know Russian culture.

Personally I do not think that a "single language" is a natural or desirable outcome. I hope that there is tremendous diversity of language in the future.

Hopefully computers will make it easier for us all to communicate in "a" common language. I hope we never have a future where there is one and only one language, though. "A" common language would be nice. "The" common language would be sinister and authoritarian.

Reply

gregzk1

2 Comments

  • 596 Days Ago
  • 06/23/2010

good riddance

There is little evidence that languages are anything other than obstacles to communication and ways of dividing human beings from each other.  In different words, there is really no clear evidence that there is anything to preserve.

Furthermore, what is this "language" that is supposed to be preserved anyway?  Unless a society is stagnant, its language evolves that it really becomes a rather different language a few centuries later.  Any language that is capable of being preserved is already dead.

Trying to preserve languages because of some academic gathering and preservation instinct is selfish and unfair to the children who will suffer the consequences.

Reply

apost

1 Comment

  • 595 Days Ago
  • 06/24/2010

Ethnocentrism

(I’ve created an account simply to address those posting terribly bigoted comments.)

The thinly-veiled ethnocentrism and (bordering on ‘indistinguishable from the logic of racists’) in many of these “yeah, get rid of all those other piddling languages” comments is shameful.

If the people espousing these viewpoints had any knowledge of how and why a few specific cultures (and their languages, mythologies, etc piggybacking) have risen to dominance over other cultures (&c) there’d be potential for a worthwhile conversation.

Unfortunately—despite your “superior” language—you seem to have stopped developing intellectually after learning it. That’s what’s being communicated, loud and clear. So: Bravo.

Reply

kalanasse

1 Comment

  • 589 Days Ago
  • 06/30/2010

Very Interesting

Interestingly, the article is actually about how to prevent language extinction, not how viable it is to do so. I myself am bilingual in English (American) and Spanish (Mexican). I was born in the United States, but ended up spending time living on a sailboat in Central America for four years before going to high school in Mexico.

Let me tell you, did I learn a lot! The differences in local language from country to country is incredible. I discovered I enjoyed language so much that I took Ancient Greek, Italian, Russian and Japanese in college. One of the most interesting classes I ever took, however, was in high school. It was 'Etymologia.' It was 'the origins of the Spanish laguage from Greek, Latin, and Nahuatl.'

I believe that learning a language is vital to understanding a culture, as the culture shapes the language. It was interesting being in high school in Mexico, as half of our classes were in English, and half were in Spanish. Sitting around the tables at lunch would be, say 5, people chatting. They would jump from English to Spanish (or vice versa) at random intervals as whatever was being discussed would be easier to convey in the other language.

My two cents.

Reply

Bio

The Physics arXiv Blog produces daily coverage of the best new ideas from an online forum called the Physics arXiv on which scientists post early versions of their latest ideas. Contact me at KentuckyFC @ arxivblog.com

Follow The Physics arXiv Blog on Twitter

Subscribe to the arXiv blog RSS Feed

Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement