arXiv blog

Black Holes Should Generate Ring of Light, Say Astronomers

Black holes should be surrounded by a ring of light that reveals their fundamental properties

kfc 05/14/2010

  • 8 Comments

Few astronomers question the existence of black holes. The Universe appears to be brimming with them. And yet the evidence is decidedly circumstantial, inferred from the behaviour of other objects, such as nearby stars and clouds.

That's hardly surprising, given the nature of black holes: regions of space from which nothing can escape.

So astronomers would like to find a way to get a direct measurement of a black hole. In the last couple of years, for example, they have used very long baseline interferometry to create extraordinary images of the supermassive black hole at the centre of our galaxy. These images and the ones that will be possible in the coming years should be able to resolve detail on the scale of the black hole's event horizon.

So what will they see? The race is on to predict what black holes will look like and how the images can be used to test our understanding of them.

One important idea about black holes is called the "no hair theorem" and states that the properties of a black hole can be completely described by its mass and its spin.

Naturally, the no hair theorem places strict limits on the influence a black hole can have on its surroundings. Images of a black hole (actually the shadow it casts on surrounding gas and dust) could disprove the theorem if they show that the black hole, or the flow of matter into it, is distorted in some way.

That's an exciting possibility but will require images that can resolve details in the flow of matter into the hole that are far smaller than the black hole itself.

However, Tim Johannsen and Dimitrios Psaltis at the University of Arizona in Tucson say there is an easier way to test the theorem. Today, they calculate that black holes ought to be surrounded by a ring of light. This light comes from photons that have become trapped in a circular orbit about the black hole, just outside the event horizon, which are then scattered by gas and dust falling into the hole.

This ring has some interesting properties. It should be much brighter than the surrounding gas and dust. It should have a diameter that is some ten times the size of the black hole, meaning that it should be visible in images that will soon be available and will provide a direct measure of the black hole's mass.

And most importantly, its shape depends on the properties of the black hole, not on the structure of the gas and dust falling into the hole. That means the shape of the ring is measure of the properties of the black hole and any asymmetry in the ring will be a direct violation of the no hair theorem, say Johannsen and Psaltis.

Astronomers needn't look far for such a ring. "The black hole in the center of the Milky Way, is the ideal candidate for a test of the no-hair theorem due to its high brightness, large angular size, and relatively unimpeded observational accessibility," say Johannsen and Psaltis.

With a few extra wipes with a lens cloth, today's telescopes should provide such images sooner rather than later.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1005.1931: Testing The No-Hair Theorem With Observations In The Electromagnetic Spectrum: II. Black-Hole Images


TRSF: Read the Best New Science Fiction inspired by today’s emerging technologies.

Print

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

rsanchez1

213 Comments

  • 640 Days Ago
  • 05/14/2010

Photon Sphere?

How is this different from the photon sphere that astronomers theorize exists around a black hole, or are they both the same concept? The way it is described in this article, you would assume the ring of light is a recent discovery, but I remember learning of the photon sphere in an astrophysics class a while back.

Reply

jTechReview

1 Comment

  • 638 Days Ago
  • 05/16/2010

Re: Photon Sphere?

With the images of SgrA that have been published over the past year in multiple wavelengths, why hasn't this ring been seen?  It took a team of astronomers at the Max-Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics (MPE) 10 years to image a star orbiting SgrA at a distance of 17 light-hours (a little larger than our solar system).  Somehow, the idea of seeing such a phenomenon is far-fetched, since advanced telescopes such as Hubble have already been trained on that area, with or without "a few extra wipes with a lens cloth".  Please try harder, TechReview, you are after all, an MIT-based publication.  I was expecting more than this...

Reply

bornyesterday

3 Comments

  • 637 Days Ago
  • 05/17/2010

detectability

I have to doubt that, if such a ring of orbiting photons exists, enough of the photons would be knocked away by other entering particles to allow them to be detectable as any sort of definite shape and not considered simply noise.

Reply

rkomatsu

52 Comments

  • 637 Days Ago
  • 05/17/2010

A hair missing

A black hole also has charge, besides mass and spin.

Reply

Netizen

131 Comments

  • 637 Days Ago
  • 05/17/2010

How can black holes cast shadows?

"Images of a black hole (actually the shadow it casts on surrounding gas and dust) could disprove the theorem if they show that the black hole, or the flow of matter into it, is distorted in some way."

I'm no physicist but if a black hole sucks up all surrounding light waves, then HOW can it cast a shadow on surrounding gas and dust?

Reply

rsanchez1

213 Comments

  • 637 Days Ago
  • 05/17/2010

Re: How can black holes cast shadows?

The "shadow" could just be the area around the black hole around which light is absorbed into the black hole.  If there was a large enough background, it would be illuminated by light except for a region where the light is absorbed by the black hole, and that makes the shadow.

Reply

garylynn

44 Comments

  • 637 Days Ago
  • 05/17/2010

RIng of light

This is news?  Read Larry Niven's "Neutron Star" from 1966. Of course his ring of light was caused by the namesake of the story and not a black hole, but the concept should extend to any supermassive small object. 

Reply

mbloore

39 Comments

  • 635 Days Ago
  • 05/19/2010

Re: RIng of light

i think niven was describing gravitational lensing in that story, not orbiting photons.

Reply

Bio

The Physics arXiv Blog produces daily coverage of the best new ideas from an online forum called the Physics arXiv on which scientists post early versions of their latest ideas. Contact me at KentuckyFC @ arxivblog.com

Follow The Physics arXiv Blog on Twitter

Subscribe to the arXiv blog RSS Feed

Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement