arXiv blog

Martian Gullies Were Formed By Flow Of Sand

Martian gullies were once hailed as evidence of liquid water on Mars. Now a new theory backed by experiment explains how they are formed by the flow of sand

kfc 05/04/2010

  • 6 Comments

In 1999, the Mars Global Surveyor spacecraft sent back some extraordinary images of the surface of the Red Planet. They showed gullies that had been carved into Martian hillsides in the mid-latitudes of the planet.

The same sort of gullies form on Earth and here their existence is the result of water erosion. Various planetary geologists immediately suggested that a similar process must be at work on Mars. Their thinking was that some fluid must be responsible.

That's an exciting idea but one that is fraught with problems. Recent evidence from Mars rovers suggest that liquid water once flowed on the surface of Mars but way back in the planet's past. By contrast, the gullies spotted by the Global Surveyor are probably only a few million years old and over this timescale, the Martian atmosphere has been too cold and thin for liquid water.

To counter this, the geologists say that some other heating mechanism could cause liquid water to flow from an underground aquifer. But the gullies look to be the result of repeated flows so if this explanation is correct, there has to be a mechanism that refills the aquifers. On Earth, that mechanism is rain. On Mars, such a mechanism is patently absent.

There is another possibility, however. Perhaps the gullies are caused by the flow of sand and dust. Similar gullies are known to occur on dunes on Earth but only when the angle of the hillside is above some critical threshold. The trouble with Martian gullies is that most of the hillsides are not steep enough for this process to occur.

Today, Yolanda Cedillo-Flores and Héctor Javier Durand-Manterola at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México suggest a solution to this conundrum. Their idea is that the gullies are formed when carbon dioxide in the ground sublimates, causing the sand to become fluidised.

This solves a number of problems. For a start, it allows the sand to flow on hillsides that are much less shallow than the critical threshold. It also explains how the gullies form by the action of repeated flows over long periods of time. Their idea is that carbon dioxide is deposited on the ground during cold periods and covered with windblown dust. The carbon dioxide then sublimates during warmer periods, causing the sand to flow downhill.

This theory also explains why the gullies form mainly at mid-latitudes and not at the equator or the poles. At the poles, it rarely gets warm enough to regularly heat sand-covered carbon dioxide and at the equator it is too warm for it to form. So the mid-latitudes are the best places for gullies to form.

Cedillo-Flores and Durand-Manterola attempt to seal the deal by recreate in their lab the conditions for martian gully formation by injecting air into a bed of sand. Sure enough, this process leads to the formation of martian-like gullies at angles well below the critical threshold (see picture above).

There are some important difference between the experimental gullies and the ones that form on Mars, such as their length. But the researchers say that this can be explained by the difference between the way air is injected into sand and the way carbon dioxide sublimates.

Best of all, the new theory requires no special hypotheses about the Red Planet. "Our model does not require exotic conditions; only the ones found at present on Mars," say Cedillo-Flores and Durand-Manterola.

That's a convincing explanation for the formation of martian gullies. And it will be a substantial blow to those looking for evidence of liquid water on the surface of Mars (and the possibility of life it suggests).

Water may still be present on Mars but it is looking increasingly clear that there are better places in the Solar System for astrobiologists to focus their attention.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1004.5417: Martian Gullies: Produced By Fluidization Of Dry Material

TRSF: Read the Best New Science Fiction inspired by today’s emerging technologies.

Print

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

TMEubanks

1 Comment

  • 650 Days Ago
  • 05/04/2010

Martian Water

RE: "over this timescale, the Martian atmosphere has been too cold and thin for liquid water."

I read something like this frequently, and yet it is simply wrong and I wish people would stop repeating it.

Liquid water is not magic, but governed by physics. For there to be liquid water on Mars, all that is needed is water be present, that the surface pressure be above the triple point of water, and that the temperature be above the freezing point. (Actually, this can be relaxed somewhat for brines and the like, but let's put that aside for the moment.) We know that Mars has water. What about the other two conditions ?

Much of the surface of Mars is above the triple point of water (i.e., at a low enough elevation that the surface pressure is higher than 611.7 pascals). Any low lying region is. The Viking 2 landing site is (some of the time) and the Phoenix landing site is (all of the time). The entire Hellas basin is, and it is highly likely to have liquid water at times (as the surface temperature there is warm enough during the day). Remember, peak surface soil temperatures on Mars can reach 27 C, even under current climate conditions.

Further, the atmospheric pressure on Mars varies greatly during its obliquity cycle, and it is highly likely that the entire planet (except for the high volcanoes of Tharsis) can support liquid water at times during each obliquity cycle. During those phases of the cycle, the atmospheric temperatures will be generally warmer, as well.

Now, this does not prove or disprove that these gullies are formed by water rather than sand, but you don't need unusually strong brines or geothermal vents to have liquid water on Mars (even though both of those probably exist as well), and it is quite reasonable to expect its presence in places, even under current atmospheric conditions.

Reply

ncm

56 Comments

  • 650 Days Ago
  • 05/04/2010

Mars?

Mars is a dump.  Only Mercury is less interesting.  Asteroids are the future.

Reply

vanzandtj

21 Comments

  • 649 Days Ago
  • 05/05/2010

Re: Mars?

It's true that whatever resources we find on an asteroid would be much more accessible (i.e. not at the bottom of a gravitational well).  On the other hand, resources on Mars may well be easier to find (via satellite) and more concentrated (since there are more geological processes that could differentiate them).  For that matter, geological processes are even more active on Mercury.

Reply

tharrison

1 Comment

  • 649 Days Ago
  • 05/05/2010

We've Been Down This Road Before

This model suffers from the same problem as the dry gully hypothesis put forth by Shinbrot et al. (2004) (http://www.pnas.org/content/101/23/8542.abstract). Yes, you can get an alcove and an apron, but it's missing the key defining characteristic of gullies, which is the channel. Their experiments did not produce the sinuous, anastomosing channels often observed in martian crater wall gullies. They call some features in their experiments "channels," but terrestrial geologists studying landslides on sand dune faces wouldn't call those features channels. They're more like chutes. The gullies on Mars also aren't just simple landslides of loose sand/dust on slopes; in many places the channels cut into the underlying rock, which requires something able to erode such rock (i.e. liquid water).

Reply

shinbrot

1 Comment

  • 646 Days Ago
  • 05/08/2010

Re: We've Been Down This Road Before

To be fair, the recent paper's morphologies differ considerably from prior experiments.  In the latter, channels were unambiguously scoured into the supporting bed, while the recent work produces flow on top of the bed.  It remains unclear whether either model is accurate under Martian conditions, but the flows in http://www.pnas.org/content/101/23/8542.abstract are "cut into" the underlying bed.

Reply

rneilmunro

1 Comment

  • 649 Days Ago
  • 05/05/2010

Martian Gullies and Particle Flows

I wrote about this in New Scientist's Last Word (no 2605, May 26 , 2007) following an observation of such gullies forming in a sand pit at an archaeological excavation in Yemen on edge of Rub al Khali  desert (parts near there being as like Mars as you will ever find. Erosion of soft sands or loose materials beneath a hard cap (in this case a very slightly firm sand) led, due to some disturbance - usually from someone walking along the edge of the pit - to gully formation and sand flowing and also cascading down to the base of the pit. Videos show the sand rushing and cascading down, the sand equivalent of a waterfall, and often flowing for minutes on end. The gully head meanwhile was creeping backwards below the resistant cap, parts of which would break off and incraese the flow down, until some resistant pebble / or a piece of old camel dung / or some other hard material, caused the flow to stop, and stabilise the slope; at base of the gully a sand fan spreads out onto the floor of the pit: eventually the pit will fill up. On Mars though strong winds will deflate such sediments out of the valleys or canyons laying the way open for further events to occur. Whilst water features on Mars are ancient these can be recent and modern.  There is no need for water at all to make this sort of particle  flow be initiated, but it seems to be and behaves like water in a mountain stream and leave a pattern of dendritic drainage features and gully heads, that look the same as gullies in badlands.

Reply

Bio

The Physics arXiv Blog produces daily coverage of the best new ideas from an online forum called the Physics arXiv on which scientists post early versions of their latest ideas. Contact me at KentuckyFC @ arxivblog.com

Follow The Physics arXiv Blog on Twitter

Subscribe to the arXiv blog RSS Feed

Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement