arXiv blog

How to Stop Distant Attacks on RFID Chips

The limited power and processing ability of RFID chips makes them vulnerable to attackers operating at a distance. A new protocol could tackle this problem.

kfc 04/16/2010

  • 3 Comments

One drawback with RFID chips is their inability to know the distance of any device that is interrogating them. That allows a malicious user to attack from a distance, more or less at leisure and without the owner being any the wiser. One problem, in particular, is that attackers can set themselves up as intermediaries between readers and cards, so-called relay attacks. This gives attackers all the information they need to mount future fraudulent attacks.

That's an increasingly serious loophole given the role that these cards now play in our society. RFID cards control access to the public transport system, private cars, buildings and in some parts of the world act like ready cash.

In principle, it's not hard to work out the distances by measuring the signal strength or round trip time of returned messages between the card and reader. The problem for RFID chips is that they normally have no internal power, receiving all they need from the reader, and very limited processing ability, which is determined by the standards to which they are designed.

One answer is to give the the chips their own juice and enough horsepower to make distance measurements. Various groups have proposed schemes like this. But in a sense, this defeats the object: RFID cards are useful because they are cheap and passive.

Now Eslam Gamal Ahmed and buddies at Ain Shams University in Cairo have a come up with a protocol that they say prevents relay attacks on standard low cost RFID chips. Their solution is to use both the valid reader and the RFID chip working together to discover and exclude a man-in-the-middle attacker.

Past approaches have tackled this problem by giving both the reader and the tag the ability to generate random numbers and to repeatedly swap them while measuring the propagation time. Distant attackers can listen to this exchange but can only intercede if they are able to guess and send the next bit in advance (otherwise, the increased propagation time will give them away). The protocols are designed so that the attacker has only a (1/2)^n chance of guessing correctly after n swaps.

The trouble with this protocol is that the RFID card has to generate its own random numbers, something that is impossible for today's passive devices.

The trick the Egyptians have come up with is a protocol in which the reader generates random numbers, while the tag simply stores them. That something that current simple devices can easily do.

Crucially, Ahmed and co have tested the idea by simulating the processing ability of an ordinary low cost RFID chip on an FPGA and then implementing the new protocol. They say it works fine.

As ever, new security protocols need to be digested by the community before they can given any reasonable stamp of security assurance. Who knows what loophole their might be in such a scheme.

Nevertheless, this looks like an interesting approach. This and others like it will certainly be needed to counter the growing sophistication of attackers and protect the increasingly valuable loot they seek.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1004.1237: Lightweight Distance bound Protocol for Low Cost RFID Tags

TRSF: Read the Best New Science Fiction inspired by today’s emerging technologies.

Print

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

ncm

56 Comments

  • 665 Days Ago
  • 04/19/2010

Easier

It ought to be much easier than that.  By using more than one antenna, signals not originating very close to the device may be made to cancel out.

Reply

mattgroom

290 Comments

  • 664 Days Ago
  • 04/20/2010

Easy you say

Intermediary attacks wont be affected by noise cancellation.

Im assuming they cant get more juice into the things from the reader to achieve an active scan.

One question they failed to elucidate was how far away the rfid reader was. Are we talking meters or miles here.

For long range attacks Would it help to have active scanners that flick on and off during work hours and checks for strong signals. To triangulate the attacker would take scans at different locations though i guess and even then i doubt it will solve the cat and mouse problem.

Maybe getting the eaves droppers into the camera view so that they can be monitored. You could do this by reducing the angle of acceptable reads from the current 360 degree range to a more discreet 5deg. This though will be circumvented by the organised crimals much like scanners they put up at cash points. or in shops.

The best idea might be to make what they are tasting unpalettable, ie cant make much money from knowing the information.

By reducing rfid capabilities prehaps. Crazy thought hey.

Reply

oprfid.eva

1 Comment

  • 536 Days Ago
  • 08/26/2010

complete solution of RFID service

We offer contact smart cards, contactless cards, UHF products, wristbands, key tags, laundry tags, coin disc tags, animal tags are all our extensive products list. All these items can be modified to suit your makret needs.


Welcome to www.oprfid.com to know about our infromation.

Inquire today and we will respond within 24 hours.



Eva


OPRFID Technologies., LTD

2-603 Room, Hong Feng Jia Yuan ,
270# BeiMo Street Chengxiang Putian City,
Fujian,P.R ,China

Email: OPrfid.Eva@oprfid.com
MSN: OPrfid.Eva@hotmai.com

Reply

Bio

The Physics arXiv Blog produces daily coverage of the best new ideas from an online forum called the Physics arXiv on which scientists post early versions of their latest ideas. Contact me at KentuckyFC @ arxivblog.com

Follow The Physics arXiv Blog on Twitter

Subscribe to the arXiv blog RSS Feed

Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement