arXiv blog

Mathematics Reveal Universal Properties Of Old Rope

Mathematicians prove that a three-stranded rope is always 68% the length of its component strands, regardless of the material from which it is made.

kfc 04/09/2010

  • 5 Comments

Ropes are generally useful things to have around, not least because the best of them tend not to stretch under tension.

The ancient Egyptians can attest to that and thoughtfully left pictures on the inside of various tombs showing how they made their ropes. It turns out they do it in a way that it essentially identical to way we do it today, with the strands under tension as they are wound.

Despite rope's obvious geometric properties, the art of rope making has been strangely neglected by mathematicians over the centuries. Today, Jakob Bohr and Kasper Olsen at the Technical University of Denmark put that right by proving the remarkable property that ropes cannot have more than a certain number of turns per unit length, a number which depends on the diameter of the component strands.

And that's just the start. They go on to show that a rope with a smaller number turns than this maximum will always twist in one direction or another under tension. So they call this maximum number of turns the zero-twist configuration.

Perhaps more remarkably, they also prove that strands in a zero twist configuration will always be laid at a specific pitch angle. This leads to a proof that up a rope in a zero-twist configuration will always be a specific proportion of the length of its component strands.

Let's take the example of a three strand rope. To achieve the zero twist configuration, the strands have to be laid down at an angle of 42.5 degrees relative to the horizontal in the image above. This always produces a rope that is 68 per cent the length of the strands.

The work also explains why ropes are best made with the strands under tension. The force causes the pitch angle to be less than ideal so that when the force is relaxed the rope 'relaxes' into the zero twist configuration, which cannot be further stretched under tension.

How these properties of ropes have escaped attention is a mystery, given they've been around for so long.

But most amazing of all is that these properties of rope depend only on its geometry, not its material properties. Which also explains why ropes made of all kinds of different materials look and behave in remarkably similar ways.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1004.0814: The Ancient Art Of Laying Rope

TRSF: Read the Best New Science Fiction inspired by today’s emerging technologies.

Print

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

VictorPurinton

1 Comment

  • 674 Days Ago
  • 04/10/2010

Next topic ...

the snorkel!

Reply

arazzook

1 Comment

  • 673 Days Ago
  • 04/11/2010

68% Rule

Anytime I hear 68%, I think of the normal distribution from statistics where 68% of the population falls within one standard deviation of the mean.  Anyone care to speculate if there is any meaning to this...

Reply

CarlM2012

1 Comment

  • 672 Days Ago
  • 04/12/2010

Re: 68% Rule

It has nothing to do with statistics and standard deviations.  In the article, they mention that the zero-twist angle is 42.5 degrees for three-stranded rope.  With some simple geometry, you find that the length of the rope should be the strand length times the sine of this angle.  If you take the sine of this angle and round it off, you get 0.68, thus the 68% rule.

Reply

flared0ne

395 Comments

  • 671 Days Ago
  • 04/13/2010

This report suffers from imprecise language...

Kind of in order:

"ropes cannot have more than a certain number of turns per unit length" -- they CAN, they just then aren't as good a rope because ______...

"A rope with a smaller number of turns than this maximum will always twist in one direction or another under tension" -- if "smaller number of turns" implies "will always twist", what factor defines "one direction or another"?? Should this instead say "with a different number of turns than this optimum", and imply "turns less-than/greater-than optimum" influences "one direction or another"??

"When the force is relaxed the rope 'relaxes' into the zero-twist configuration, which cannot be further stretched under tension" -- maybe graphically this makes sense somehow; WHAT cannot be further stretched under tension, the rope itself??

I thought the whole point was that the zero-twist configuration specifically prevented unwanted torquing when the rope IS stretching...

Reply

PastorB

1 Comment

  • 669 Days Ago
  • 04/15/2010

Re: This report suffers from imprecise language...

I thought the article was very interesting, but agree with your comments.  It was confusing in its claims.  Of course, a rope will continue to stretch (if it didn't it would never break - now that would be useful!).  But the zero twist when under tension at a certain twist angle is a very interesting thing to know about.

Reply

Bio

The Physics arXiv Blog produces daily coverage of the best new ideas from an online forum called the Physics arXiv on which scientists post early versions of their latest ideas. Contact me at KentuckyFC @ arxivblog.com

Follow The Physics arXiv Blog on Twitter

Subscribe to the arXiv blog RSS Feed

Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement