• 685 Days Ago
• 03/26/2010

periodics central gravity

The collection of mass to the subjective system of energies light, osmosis and oxyegen relocate by periodic solar restrictions by methods formulating the communications of osmic recollections earths gravitational pull desolves the scientific synthetics by photo genetics to filamentally breath with periodics cycles will releif the genetic chromasome of universal collections within collective genders around periodics we willl filamentally collect oxygenation through cerebrum air waves to center gravity through thr conciencesness cerebrumm delutional gravities correcting by osmic systems triangular direct air waves by harmonics recoils the ionics system to recover the genetic damages around the hyper extensions of magnetic polarities recycleing to formulas XR-ohms = the cycles around circular polarity will osmopsis the prasmic cosmic collidding atomic anomolies into a whirl wind dialogues to instrumentall oerform a diagnostic to balance the unified measurements into a parralleling instrumentally diahgram that will genetically correct all field lines of incsisions into a huge field of measurements incorrect oscilations will devolve central locallities by magnesium dialoguing instrumental delusions gravity centrals by harmonic periods that reconstruct Undefined locations to correct universal corrections this is defined ordr to chaotic parralleling unifed order stream of genetic parradoxies thus transmitting an orderly motion to emotional constraints by the periodic system replinished by nothing and nothingness of hyphonics perionics and omnivasions for triumphantly osmic solar perplexing the bubble elastic membrains of general flaws parralelling the members of undefined solid malnurished genetic parralels http://scientificstrings.blogspot.com

• 685 Days Ago
• 03/26/2010

X(SQ) + Y(SQ)=Z(SQ)

The central motion instrumentally turbulances through The barrier instructing periods to perform a osmic cornice desolving the universal by general desolving substances of light magnetics by balances of anti- substances = the parradoxial periodics instrumentally corridor matter of negativity through dimmensional periods thus recoilling the properties of negativities into a parring mass cycle that ballances and dismantels by a unified solar correction transmitting through genetics that corners the dialogue of genetics, that will demonstrate parralleling mass by ionics condenstaion by compress extensions thus gravity recoils photo mass collections parrallels mass osmic collections with solar flairing properties to increase the balncing by a self evolving mass system by nothing and nothing being the metabolic system by symptoms in reajusting the periodics.
http://scientificstrings.blogspot.com
The checks and balance by turbulances increments by measuremental science diagnostics is prognosis within periodics diagnostics by polarity cycles increase extensions by subjectivities photo synthesis with hydration within the transforming fields corrects turbulance with a parralleling periodic system

• 685 Days Ago
• 03/26/2010

"Gravity Emerges from Quantum Information, Say Physicists"

The statement that gravity is an emergent force reducible to quantum information raises a few problems and fundamental issues:

"Force" is a name, postulated towards observed effects in the systems. Physics does not have any fundamental definition of force that addresses the nature of force, and the respective character of necessity: a force's permanent formative causality.

In what regards the "force of gravity", the knowledge that is accessible about it is from the effects in the systems, at formative structural levels, in which are included the systemic processes of aggregation/disaggregation.

Nothing is known about the fundamental nature of that which is postulated as being the force of gravity, therefore, it is not possible to make a causal reduction.

Regarding the ontological and epistemological nature of information, for dynamics and processes of macroscopic nature as well as microscopic, one can state that one is before information, whenever one is before patterns/order or structures and, thus, before systemic relations, therefore, information is a name for all that can be designated by existing thing ("res"), and there is no existing thing, in "our known universe", that does not causally depend, in formative fundamental terms, upon that which is plausibly called "gravitic effect".

In cognitive terms of conceptual synthesis towards ontological levels, it can be stated that without gravity there would not be the type of order/patterns/information/("res") observed, but it cannot be stated that the type of formative causality that is given the name of force of gravity, postulated as being behind the gravitic effects, could not act under the form of other causal dynamics towards systemic effects with empirical evidence.

The statement that "gravity is essentially a phenomenon of information" and that "Gravity Emerges from Quantum Information", unfortunately, seems to accompany the tendency of reflexive precarity of the "publish or perish law of science writing".

• 685 Days Ago
• 03/26/2010

Huh?

Gravity as entropy creation. Cool idea. Makes sense of black holes too, directly. But those other comments before me... huh? What information content did they have? Or did entropy get them first?

• 685 Days Ago
• 03/26/2010

Le-Sage Aether theory

is still the best known explanation of gravity, known so far...

• 684 Days Ago
• 03/27/2010

Entropy = change of pressure

There is no drawing force, no expanding space, no curving space, no extra dimensions, no dark matter or dark energy!

There is only energy whos density changing in space who dont change at all!

Quarks expanding / exploding all a time, emit energywaces and absorbs energy and thats why quarks change all quark energy with time.

There is only entropy and thats why energyconcentration change of pressure in space who allready been there.

http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=2

http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l2

.

• 684 Days Ago
• 03/27/2010

Video

Check out some video first.

How visible universe energy moving

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGbdPc4M87A

.

Bending light with out curving space

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e805oRZNU9U

.

No gravity

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFPYHdllHa4

I found out one more reason for "gravity" with out drawing force. This particle who is far away from earth now and going to centre of earth getting closer eachother when this particle move to here and to centre of earth. Two time closer, when this particle move two time closer earth.

This is also good to remember when you make some mathematic for theory of everything, you know!

.

• 684 Days Ago
• 03/27/2010

Does Erik Verlinde Understand Motion?

-
Before Erik Verlinde can explain gravity, he should first answer the following question:

What causes two bodies in relative inertial motion to remain in motion?

Erik does not know the answer and neither does anybody else in the physics community. So how can these learned folks explain gravity to us mere mortals when they don't even understand what causes motion? Answer: they can't. All this stuff about gravity emerging out of information/entropy is a pile of unmitigated crackpot nonsense that they pulled out of their collective hind orifice. And they know it.

The lay public is tired of being fed hogwash and talked down to by the pompous elite in academia. We are not as stupid as they think we are and we don't like the way our research money is being spent. Indeed, we are beginning to believe that they are the stupid ones.

If you're interested in understanding motion, you should read Physics: The Problem with Motion. Then you'll know enough to understand the cause of Gravity.

• 684 Days Ago
• 03/27/2010

shrodingers cat near blackhole

after reading the article, I realize I drew this conclusion serendipidously.

http://iteetoo.com/images/atomiccat.jpg

• 683 Days Ago
• 03/28/2010

Universal Gravitation

Quote from "Universal Gravitation", UniversalPhysics.org/article_8.html

"(24)  Universal gravitation involving two bodies in space is not an event where each body is "pulled" by some outside agent toward the other.  There is no mechanism in place whereby Earth "pulls" on the distant Moon forcing the Moon to orbit Earth.  Instead, Universal gravitation is initiated by an exchange of gravitational energy between two bodies.  This exchange is not instantaneous.  It takes some time for Earth's gravitational energy to reach the Moon's matter for it travels or expands away from Earth in all directions at the normal speed of light in a vacuum of 186,000 miles per second.  The transit time between Earth and the Moon is a small portion more than 1 second.  Think of Earth as shining a gravitational "flashlight" toward the Moon.  If the Moon did not shine a gravitational "flashlight" of its own back toward Earth, Earth would be completely unaffected by the Moon's presence in space.  There would be no tides on Earth beyond those caused by the Sun, and no Earthly wobble resulting from Earth's former 3000 mile orbital radius of the former Earth/Moon baricenter.

(25)  The force of gravitation in Earth's direction is generated separately within each component of the Moon's matter upon each component's reception of the energy from Earth's gravitational "flashlight".  Generally, this action force of Earth gravitation is the result of an imbalance in the operation of the Moon's atoms causing each atom to actively and forcefully displace itself in Earth's direction with its own internal acceleration/Action force of gravitation toward Earth which causes both the atom's inward-directed (centripetal) acceleration toward Earth and the reactive generation of the atom's internal force of acceleration/Reaction which is the outward-directed (centrifugal) force that provides the Newton LAW III required support and termination for the event-causing acceleration/Action force of gravitation in Earth's direction."

Also from "Universal Gravitation", Article VIII

(36)  Now that we accept that Isaac Newton did not predict any such thing as Universal Gravitation being an "instantaneous" event, are you wondering what Newton actually did have to say about the cause of gravitation?  Not much, due most likely to the ever-present critical climate of the scientific community in regard to the expression of new understandings.  But what little he did write in PRINCIPIA was nothing short of profound when one considers that in Newton's time, scientific understandings were just starting to break free from the restrictions imposed by religious logic and beliefs.

    "And when such cases occur, we are to compute the attractions of the bodies by assigning to each of their particles its proper force, and then finding the sum of them all.  I here use the word attraction in general for any endeavor whatever, made by bodies to approach to each other, whether that endeavor arise from the action of the bodies themselves, as tending to each other or agitating each other by spirits emitted..." [1]

[1] Sir Isaac Newton, 1686, 1729, Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy and His System of the World, 1934, 1962, PRINCIPIA, University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London, page 192
 

(37)  First note Newton's reference to "assigning to each of their particles its proper force,...".  Here I see that Newton views gravitation as a "proper force" and further that it is an internal force present within each of a body's "particles" or components of matter.  Here one could say that Newton sees the force of an object's weight as being the sum of the force of weight of each of the object's components or "particles".  It is a small step from this recognition of his to recognition of the Universal Physics stacking of forces effect (See Article IV) as the particles' internal forces of gravitational weight stack up in the direction of Earth's supporting surface below. 
 

(38)  Now focus on Newton's words translated into English in PRINCIPIA regarding his understanding as to the cause of Universal gravitation.  
"I here use the word attraction in general for any endeavor whatever, made by bodies to approach to each other, whether that endeavor arise from the action of the bodies themselves, as tending to each other or agitating each other by spirits emitted..."


(39)  Here I see Newton telling us that a good possibility as to the cause of the mutual gravitation of two bodies in the direction of each other is if each body is "emitting" "spirits" that travel across the intervening space between the two bodies and upon reception by the receiving body cause an "agitation" within the "particles" of the receiving body's matter resulting in the receiving body experiencing a "tending" or "attraction" in the direction of the "emitting" body.
 

(40) This explanation of Newton's regarding the cause of the mutual forces of gravitation affecting any two bodies present in the Universe is comfortably compatible with the Universal Physics understanding whereby each body continually "emits" gravitational energy "spirits" that, after traveling at light-speed across the intervening space between the two bodies, arrive to cause an imbalance or "agitation" in the atomic operation of the receiving body's components of matter or "particles" resulting in the receiving components displacing, "tending" or attracting" themselves in the direction of the "emitting" body.  For such thoughts as these, it is obvious that in the continuing development of Universal Physics, Isaac Newton will always remain the Master of Gravitation.
       

(41)  Are you wondering as to the reason why the mutual forces of Universal gravitation experienced by two bodies of dissimilar size, such as Earth and the Moon are always equal in magnitude?  This equality is predicted by the seldom-read second-half of Newton's LAW III regarding the equality of action-at-a-distance forces, by part 3 of the Universal Law of Mutual Forces (See Article III), and by Rule 8 of the Universal Physics Rules for Force & Motion set forth in Article X.
  Newton's LAW III: To every action there is always opposed an equal reaction: or, the mutual actions of two bodies upon each other are always equal, and directed to contrary parts.
 
(42)  In LAW III, Newton recognizes that the "mutual action" Earth's emissions have upon the components of the Moon's matter is equal and opposite to the "mutual action" the Moon's emissions have upon the components of Earth's matter.  I have found that I have a natural tendency to think that due to Earth's greater quantity of matter, surely the gravitational force experienced by the Moon is greater than the gravitational force experienced by Earth.  But upon some reflection, I have found that such is not the case.  The forces experienced by each body upon reception of gravitational energy emission from the other body are always equal in magnitude regardless of any difference in the quantity of matter of the two bodies.
   
(43)  In working out this problem, I first consider that astronomers report that Earth contains a quantity of matter 81 times greater than that of the Moon.  Then I imagine Earth being composed of just 81 identical atoms and the Moon being composed of just 1 such atom.  Next I recognize that gravitational emissions and the forces evoked upon their receptions are a component to component event.  Thus I begin by considering that there is no reason to think that the gravitational force caused within the 1 Moon atom by its reception of the gravitational energy emissions sent by just 1 of the Earth atoms is anything but equal in magnitude to the gravitational force caused in the 1 Earth atom.  The equal emissions from each of these two equal atoms will logically cause the generation ("agitation") of equal gravitational forces in the other atom upon the emission's reception.

(44) ...

Ethan Skyler, Author

• 682 Days Ago
• 03/29/2010

Verbosity lives!

Just two quotes to consider:

"Most of the fundamental ideas of science are essentially simple, and may, as a rule, be expressed in a language comprehensible to everyone".
Albert Einstein

"He can compress the most words into the smallest ideas better than any man I ever met".
Abrahan Lincoln

TTFN.  Gary

• 681 Days Ago
• 03/30/2010

my goodness, we have a fat and well fed troll in this thread.

• 681 Days Ago
• 03/30/2010

An observation

It is often remarked how weak the force of gravity is compared to other forces, but it is indisputable  that gravity attracts crackpots much more strongly than the other forces (the amount of drivel in these comments makes this clear). Perhaps some experiments on crackpots could throw some light on this curious anomaly? I am sure that accelerating them to a large fraction of the speed of light and colliding them with each other would be most enlightening.

• 656 Days Ago
• 04/24/2010

Likely

I agree that gravity is probably a emergent property of quantum information theory. The way that I think of it is as a negative pressure created by the bias in information or energy. Imagine it as each time a particle is forced to confirm its current state(spin, position, velocity, ect.) the fabric of space is force to convey this information after it performs thee calculations of forces acting on the particle, then it moves this information until the probability that it hits another particle is 1 and so the slight pit is space created by the information or energy in the space fabric will bias its movement toward the reverse vector of the one that hit it.
total gravity = force of information * probability of interaction ( total energy of object/ distance ^ dimensions of space)

• 626 Days Ago
• 05/24/2010

Time

Anyways, ignoring all the nonsense posts, I've always understood that gravity is simply a manifestation of the passage of matter through time, and since entropy is the passage of information through time, then it makes sense that entropy and gravity (and time) are all interrelated.

• 517 Days Ago
• 09/10/2010

Information - it's what you receive when you perform experiments.  It's also what others receive when they perform experiments.  It's reasonable to assume that the 'information' in different human minds is not the same.

A 'theory of everything' therefore, is a mathematical model whereby ANY experiment performed by ANYBODY result in a situation where each human mind either AGREES that the results do in fact fit the model, or agrees to NOT UNDERSTAND it.  Further, as time goes on  - and more experiments are performed -  the above situation changes only in a way that more humans pass from 'not understanding' to: 'agreeing, applying,  and using more parts of it to build stuff.

This increases information - and decreases entropy -  especially in the minds of humans in the latter group.   It is much like what actually happened to Relativity Theory thru the decades of the 20th century.

Mathematics seems to be the only useful tool, because of its universal acceptance. Everybody agrees that 2+3=5,  but may not understand the proof of x^2 + y^2 = z^2.

Universal information - like that proposed to exist at the edge of black hole horizons, or at our own horizons(information flowing to us at the speed of light from afar)  is itself slightly different because of our locations on earth.

The real question: is it periodic?  or more generally, is it ergodic? 

Wikipedia informally illustrates 'Ergodic'  with the help of a robot exploring a box.  The robot will eventually understand it even if its search methods are not periodic.  The box -rather information in the box - is 'ergodic'. 
On the other hand if there are 'cats' in there changing stuff as it explores, robotic understanding is not possible and the information is not 'ergodic'.  (The stock market is also clearly not ergodic!)

If Universal Information not at least ergodic, then there can be no 'theory of everything'.

• 408 Days Ago
• 12/28/2010

a grave situation

Some of TR's posters are able to produce,
Grand theories that are just a little obtuse,
While many think their ideas are profound,
Very few of them have found,
That too much information is a form of abuse.

• 408 Days Ago
• 12/28/2010

42!

Taking a pragmatic approach, I decided to go through the piece and simply solve all the equations.

Turns out Douglas Adams is correct regarding the answer... it's 42.

However he's likely incorrect about the question:

The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe and Everything...

Turns out he neglected the uncertainty principle... "That is, the more precisely one property is measured, the less precisely the other can be measured."

Hence, it could be that the question is accurate, however the answer is somewhere between 40 and 46!

Or maybe the answer IS 42 exactly... but the question refers to a bunch of life and lots of the universe... but not quite everything.

Just wanted to take this chance to clear things up!

(Gotta have fun somehow in this lousy economy.)

Actually the idea of gravity as an emergent property associated with a move towards entropy is intriguing... at first it made me wonder then why I wasn't being sucked right off the planet. But once I considered all the chaos going on right here on Earth it all became much clearer.

• 408 Days Ago
• 12/28/2010

Confused but interested

My very basic understanding is that gravity and information are both negatively related to entropy, in other words, increasing information decreases entropy and entropy is also lower when gravity is higher, that is, in an area where mass is concentrated.

Now the original post here seems to be suggesting that gravity generates low entropy or rather, that gravity emerges as a force whose tendency is to reduce entropy. It seems to be the opposite of what I understood.

Is my understanding completely wrong or is this contentious?

• 408 Days Ago
• 12/28/2010

Describing Gravity & Stages of Entropy

Maybe gravity is an oversimplification and need be done away with all together? In the over simplification of gravity, or planetary interactions, do we not lose understanding rather than gain it?

Does entropy occur in stages? Are the stages confined to limits, say phase changes? If there are limits what governs the limitation of the stage/s change/s? Is the governor universal? What degree are the changes interrelated between the interactions of information coming and going and going and coming? How much of the information is lost/amplified within the transfer process and does this play a role in future interactions?

• 408 Days Ago
• 12/28/2010

Spin fields, vortex fields, information fields, flo energy

A Russian scientist claimed to have empirical proof that we are embedded in a ubiquitous dimension referred to as an information field (among other terms) and biological entropy is accelerated by the disruption in modern social lifestiles of the natural"flo" patterns of these info fields. He patented a contraption that supposedly tapped this field but an attempt to profit from its practical value apparently failed to tap the requisite information about new business ventures in capitalist markets in spite of the scientific case evidence it cited as empirical proof of such cosmic information fields.  Personally, I can't prove or disprove such phenomena or its relevance to the profound conondrum of gravitational dynamics.

I do however recall a moment of profound insight on gravity scribbled in the stall of an ivory tower library toilet asserting boldly, "gravity sucks!" Some may claim it as empirical support for the theory linking gravity to information just as adamantly as others who profess the virtues of immaculate conception as sacrosanct.

c/s 

• 407 Days Ago
• 12/29/2010

An Intelligent System

Matter is programmed at the subatomic level to respond in predetermined ways. Gravity is simply a manifestation of a programmed response. Until scientists accept the existence of innate intelligence woven through the fabric of the universe, they will never fully understand how it works.

• 200 Days Ago
• 07/24/2011

interesting

Some physicists are convinced that the properties of information do not come from the behaviour of information carriers such as photons and electrons but the other way round. They think that information itself is the ghostly bedrock on which our universe is built.

i read this before somewhere.
proverbs 8:22-36 King Solomon