arXiv blog

New Charging Method Could Slash Battery Recharge Times

Apply an oscillating electric field to the anode of a lithium battery and the recharge time drops dramatically, say chemists.

kfc 03/10/2010

  • 14 Comments

One of the biggest problems with batteries is the time it takes to recharge them. Run out of juice and it'll be several hours before you're mobile again, a particular showstopper for electric vehicles.

Today, Ibrahim Abou Hamad at Mississippi State University and few buddies reveal an entirely new technique for charging lithium ion batteries that could lead to exponential improvements in charging time.

The business end of a lithium battery, the anode, consists of a graphite electrode, in other words a stack of graphene sheets, bathed in an electrolyte of ethylene carbonate and propylene carbonate molecules through which lithium and hexafluorophosphate ions diffuse. During charging, an electric field pushes the lithium ions towards and into the graphene sheets, where they have to cross a potential barrier to become embedded and stored, a process called intercalation.

The Mississippi team have studied the movement of these ions and molecules by creating a computer model of the forces acting on them. Their model consists of 160 carbon atoms arranged in 4 graphene sheets, 69 propylene carbonate and 87 ethylene carbonate molecules forming a liquid electrolyte and finally, two hexafluorophosphate ions and10 lithium ions. They then apply an electric field across this system and watch what happens.

It turns out that while the electric field pushes the lithium ions towards the graphene, the rate limiting step is the process of intercalation--the rate at which the lithium ions can cross the potential barrier into the graphene .

What Hamad and co have found is a relatively simple way to overcome this barrier. The trick is to superimpose an oscillating electric field onto the charging field. This has the effect of helping the lithium ions to hop over the barrier.

But get this: the team says there is an exponential relationship between the intercalation time and the oscillating field amplitude. So a small increase in amplitude of the field leads to a massive speed up of the process of intercalation.

"These simulations suggest a new charging method that has the potential to deliver much shorter charging times, as well as the possibility of providing higher power densities," they say.

That's a neat piece of work which should be relatively straightforward to test in a real battery.

That doesn't mean that we'll see a ten minute charging time for electric vehicles any time soon.

Battery performance is a complicated balance between huge numbers of competing factors. If this oscillating field does improve charging time in real batteries, manufacturers will then have to check its effect on other performance metrics such as the number of these charging cycles a battery can withstand and how long it holds its charge, to name just two.

Nevertheless, these Mississippi guys have come up with an interesting new approach that will have more than peaked the interest of battery makers around the globe.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1003.1678: A New Battery-Charging Method Suggested By Molecular Dynamics Simulations

TRSF: Read the Best New Science Fiction inspired by today’s emerging technologies.

Print

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

literalman

1 Comment

  • 697 Days Ago
  • 03/10/2010

Pique not peek :-)

See http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/peaked.html for an explanation.

Otherwise, fascinating article!

Reply

microgold

1 Comment

  • 696 Days Ago
  • 03/11/2010

Re: Pique not peek :-)

I think he was making a pun on the word peak for battery charging, so I suspect this was done on purpose.

Reply

mvwoon

3 Comments

  • 693 Days Ago
  • 03/14/2010

Re: Pique not peek :-)

That's a typo

Reply

UncleAl

405 Comments

  • 697 Days Ago
  • 03/10/2010

Theory absent observation

The simulations were performed on 2.6 GHz Opteron processors, using 160 processors at a time. The total computer time required was approximately 400,000 CPU hours.

Buy a few lithium batteries or contact Tesla Motors, then try it out. The oscillating input will be dissipated as abundant heat, lessening miles/kwhr. Theory predicts what observation tells it to predict.

Reply

monettsys

2 Comments

  • 697 Days Ago
  • 03/10/2010

Re: Theory absent observation

I agree with Uncle Al. Trying to apply a 25GHz signal to a battery is impractical. The wavelength at 25GHz is only 1.2cm. This would produce standing waves on the electrodes, and some points would receive larger signals, some would receive none.

The impedance of the cell would vary with the size and location of the connections, so it would be impossible to deliver a known and uniform amount of energy to the electrodes.

The ions would have little chance to move very far in the rapidly-changing field. As Uncle Al concludes, the result would simply heat the cell and produce no increase in charging efficiency.

Mike Monett

Reply

ncm

56 Comments

  • 697 Days Ago
  • 03/10/2010

Re: Theory absent observation

I think you are misunderstanding the method.  The average and instantaneous field produces force on the ions in one direction, just not of constant magnitude.

Reply

rkomatsu

52 Comments

  • 696 Days Ago
  • 03/11/2010

Re: Theory absent observation

Perhaps they could apply a combination of frequencies instead. The article says they will study the effect of "other frequencies" in the future.  

Reply

Advertisement

ZephirAWT

299 Comments

  • 696 Days Ago
  • 03/11/2010

Re: Trying to apply a 25GHz signal to a battery is impractical.

The problem is not in the small wavelength, but in huge capacitance of electrodes, which are behaving like giant capacitor. But maybe even lower frequencies could work in sufficient way. After all, the charging with AC component is used widely, as it decreases the tendency of some batteries to formation of dendrites.

Reply

ryuuguu

44 Comments

  • 696 Days Ago
  • 03/11/2010

Re: Theory absent observation

So you tried this with a few batteries? Or is this just another theory like the one your criticizing?

Reply

ncm

56 Comments

  • 697 Days Ago
  • 03/10/2010

exponential

(The article uses "exponential" twice.  The first use is nonsense.  Such usage has become common in nonsensical contexts, but this is supposed to be science reporting.)

What we expect to see, if I understand this correctly, is that without increasing the average charging voltage, the charging current would increase exponentially with the amplitude of the oscillatory signal, up to some point of diminishing benefit.  Presumably this is the point where all the ions that encounter the surface of the carbon electrode are already intercalating successfully.  The increased current had better not result in increased heating in the cell.

Or, maybe the charging voltage is reduced until the (less) increased current doesn't create any more heat.  I would guess frequency doesn't matter much, as long as it's high enough.  Should charging voltage be reduced by at least half the peak oscillation amplitude?

Reply

nradonic@comcast.net

31 Comments

  • 696 Days Ago
  • 03/11/2010

fast intercalation Li

The exponential rate versus voltage reminds me of tunneling behavior. The use of 25 GHz doesn't mean anything to me - yet. And I have to ask if four layers of graphite matches the physical arrangement in existing batteries electrodes - i.e. you might not be able to do this with solid graphite. If you do need microwave 'injection' frequencies then we'll need to start building oscillators into the batteries due to parasitic distribution losses. This is good theoretical work which will need to be developed for practical use.

Reply

rkomatsu

52 Comments

  • 696 Days Ago
  • 03/11/2010

Re: fast intercalation Li

The 25GHz frequency is arbitrary. In the conclusion of the article, they say "future work will consider the effect of other frequencies".

Reply

Reptile

20 Comments

  • 696 Days Ago
  • 03/11/2010

Is it that hard to test?

Haven't read the article, but sounds interesting.  Giga hertz?  And does it go through a rectifier of some sort?  Could have all sorts of wierd effects

Seems to me, very crudely by analogy, that they are trying describe something that maximizes flow (electron movement?) something like fluid dynamics through some sort of aperture, and minimize turbulence.  But I don't know if this image is at all helpful.

There must be a good reason that they haven't tested this before publication, but I can't think of one.

Reply

nradonic@comcast.net

31 Comments

  • 696 Days Ago
  • 03/11/2010

Re: Is it that hard to test?

Not electron movement - lithium ions

Reply

Bio

The Physics arXiv Blog produces daily coverage of the best new ideas from an online forum called the Physics arXiv on which scientists post early versions of their latest ideas. Contact me at KentuckyFC @ arxivblog.com

Follow The Physics arXiv Blog on Twitter

Subscribe to the arXiv blog RSS Feed

Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement