Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

arXiv blog

The Physics arXiv Blog produces daily coverage of the best new ideas from an online forum called the Physics arXiv on which scientists post early versions of their latest ideas. Contact me at KentuckyFC @ arxivblog.com

Email Subscription

Recently on the arXiv blog...

Recent comments on the arXivblog

  • royboy2019 : "Some foolish men declare that a Creator made the world. The doctrine that the world was created...
  • AKT : Let me ask you a question. What do you mean by Quantum Mechanics?   Many physicists in main...
  • rsanchez1 : As for me, I eagerly await his explanation for the Cosmic Microwave Background. The big bang...
  • ... : I was drawn to this discussion from Kurzweilai.net by the fact that the subject relates to my own...
  • smoker : What happens when light is red shifted so far that it stops being a wave form altogetherThat...
  • mvardon : Am I missing something here or are we exerting significant energies on a 'paradox' based on a...
  • ZephirAWT : The Top 30 Problems with the Big Bang http://www.metaresearch.org/cosmology/BB-top-30.aspRecently...
  • ZephirAWT : Actually there exists a number of models involving periodic Universe, some the similar one was...
  • B. Honest : What you are describing is very similar to the subatomic quantum fluctuations, where particles...
  • B. Honest : If our 'Universe' is ruled by quantum mechanics I think that, like subatomic particles that...
  • Taymon : This is my only objection to an otherwise good and well-written article--but it is a very serious...
  • ... : Agreed. Perhaps you and I have some differences in opinion on the strength of predictive modeling...
  • naasking : Say what you like, but it must have happened somewhere.Yes, it happened everywhere.Also, the CMB...
  • Netizen : The Big Bang is a problematic black box theory because it fails to answer what happened BEFORE it...
  • irjsiq : The 'Big Bang' never gained traction with my thinking . . . 'no beginning no end', though...
  • ... : I'm glad to see that Shu has put some flesh on those old dry bones. My preferred theory, also...
  • sfcwelch : rather narrow point of view, the speed of light has different speeds in different materials a...
  • luddite : Entropy is a quantifiable device, Which can measure the amount of matter in light, And the energy...
  • ZephirAWT : In dense aether theory Universe appear like fractal nested density fluctuation of hypothetical...
  • ZephirAWT : In dense aether theory the Universe does it simultaneously. It's entropy is decreasing above the...
Advertisement
Sunday, March 07, 2010

Theoretical Breakthrough for Quantum Cryptography

Quantum cryptography only works if Alice and Bob share their relative positions in advance. Now physicists have worked out how to do it without this information.

The world of cryptography is currently undergoing a quantum revolution. The weird laws of quantum mechanics allow cryptographers to create codes that guarantee perfect secrecy. Until recently, the best cryptographers could aim for was just pretty good secrecy with codes that were always compromised in some way or another. Quantum cryptography, on the other hand, is perfect: theoretically and practically secure.

A few companies have even sprung up to sell the gear that can send perfectly secure messages, mainly to banks and governments (although the gear itself creates some loopholes that eavesdroppers can attack).

But it's still early days for this technology and naturally it suffers from several drawbacks. For example, one well known limitation is that quantum cryptography can only be used over point-to-point connections and not through networks where data has to be routed. That's because the routing process destroys the quantum properties of the photons used to secure messages.

A lesser known limitation is that the sender and receiver of quantum encrypted messages--the famous Alice and Bob--must be perfectly aligned so that they can carry out well-defined polarisation measurements on the photons as they arrive. Physicists say that Alice and Bob must share the same reference frame.

That's not so hard to do when Alice and Bob are both based in labs on the ground. But it's much harder when one or the other is moving, in a satellite, for example, which would be both spinning and orbiting the Earth.

Today, Anthony Laing from the University of Bristol and a few pals show how to get round this. The trick is to use entangled triplets of photons, so-called qutrits, rather than entangled pairs.

This solves the problem by embedding it in an extra abstract dimension, which is independent of space. So as long as both Alice and Bob know the way in which all these abstract dimensions are related, the third provides a reference against which measurements of the other two can be made.

That allows Alice and Bob to make any measurements they need without having to agree ahead of time on a frame of reference. There is one proviso: Alice and Bob cannot move too quickly during the measurements since this changes their relative orientation and a new qutrit will be needed to establish a reference.

That'll be useful for quantum encryption over satellite links, the kind of thing that government agencies and the military might want to do. But there's another, more valuable application.

If quantum encryption is ever to be widely used, it'll need to work between one microchip and another without the need to share a frame of reference in advance. That's always been a problem because the chips inside computers are constantly on the move (relative the the wavelength of light) and because photon polarisations drift as they move through optical fibres, introducing another source of error.

That's why quantum cryptography that is reference frame independent is an enabling technology and so potentially hugely valuable. It means that Laing and co may have made one of the key breakthroughs that will bring quantum cryptography to the masses.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1003.1050: Reference Frame Independent Quantum Key Distribution


Update: Anthony Laing writes:

I have a few clarifications which may be useful for your readers...

- The protocol is always bipartite - so two people, two particles,
one particle each.

- The protocol works best for particle dimensions of prime or power-
prime, including the 2 dimensional qubit, so an entangled pair of
qubits is the most simple case that works.

- The protocol works because security is guaranteed with a purity
measure on the joint 'entangled' space of Alice and Bob and this
purity would not be reduced too much in a reference frame that varies
slowly on the timescale of rate-of-pair-creation and measurement.



Comments

  • Typo
    Paragraph 11: "the the" -> "to the"
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Reow
    03/09/2010
    Posts:2
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
Advertisement

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review July/August 2010

Current Issue

Can AIDS Be Cured?
Researchers are pursuing radical new strategies to eliminate HIV from the body.
•  Subscribe
Save 36%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
» Gift Subscription
» Digital Subscription
» Reprints, Back Issues
» Subscribe
» Table of Contents
» MIT News

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.