arXiv blog

An Undiscovered Link Between Sensory Perception and Shannon's Theory of Information

The mathematics that describe both sensory perception and the transmission of information turn out to have remarkable similarities.

kfc 02/24/2010

  • 3 Comments

In 1834, the German physiologist Ernst Weber (pictured above) carried out a series of experiments to determine the limits of sensory perception. He gave a blindfolded man a mass to hold and gradually increased its weight, asking the subject to indicate when he first became aware of the change.

These experiments showed that the smallest increase in weight that a human can perceive is proportional to the initial weight. The German psychologist Gustav Fechner later interpreted Weber's work as a way of measuring the relationship between the physical magnitude of a stimulus and its perceived intensity.

The resultant mathematical model of this process is called the Weber-Fechner law and shows that the relationship between the stimulus and perception is logarithmic. (For a straightforward derivation see Wikipedia.) The Weber-Fechner law is important because it established a new field of study called psychophysics.

The logarithmic relationship between a stimulus and its perception crops up in various well known examples such as the logarithmic decibel scale for measuring sound intensity and a similar logarithmic scale for measuring the visible brightness of stars, their magnitude.

Today, Haengjin Choe at Korea University in South Korea, says there is an interesting connection between the Weber-Fechner Law and the famous mathematical theory of information developed by Claude Shannon at Bell Labs in the 1940s.

Shannon's work is among the most important of the 20th century. It establishes the limits on the amount of information that can be sent from one location in the universe to another. It is no exaggeration to say that the world's entire computing and communications infrastructure is based on Shannon's work.

Choe points out that the law developed by Shannon that links the amount of information that can be transmitted by a single symbol is also logarithmic. In fact, it takes exactly the same form as the Weber-Fechner law.

What that means is that psychophysical phenomena can be treated mathematically in the same way as any other form of information transmission and so opens up a new and extensive mathematical toolbox that may provide new insights into the nature of perception .

Of course, the idea that sensory perception is a form of communication and so obeys the same rules, is not entirely surprising. What's astonishing (if true) is that the connection has never been noticed before.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1002.3909: Connection Between Shannon's Information Theory And The Weber-Fechner Law

TRSF: Read the Best New Science Fiction inspired by today’s emerging technologies.

Print

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

dsherr

1 Comment

  • 719 Days Ago
  • 02/24/2010

Noticing connections, eg, Shannon and Weber-Fechner

Three cheers for the world mind enabled by the Internet.  I am sure all types of connections are noticed by someone every day.  As we connect more and more people to the Internet AND increase the bandwidth, Information Entropy becomes exchanged more readily.

Always of great interest to me in regard to Shannon is his Twin concept which shows that it is possible to increase the bandwidth between two points by providing a identical signal predictor in each endpoint and precede each signal by a yes/no bit in case, yes, the predictor got the signal correct, or, no, the signal follows.

I claim that communication between two people familiar with each other follows a similar pattern discussed in this article.  Namely, the more you know about each other, the less you have to say (gesture/write) to communicate.  Look at long married couples interacting.

Shannon and Weaver ROCK!!

Reply

Torbjorn_Larsson_OM

175 Comments

  • 718 Days Ago
  • 02/25/2010

Sorry, no one is biting.

This is exactly the kind of pattern seeking among believers of diverse tripe that we are warned against.

There is no inherent reason for the use of logarithms in Shannon's work:
"Following Nyquist1 and Hartley,2 it is convenient to use a logarithmic measure of information. If a device has possible positions it can, by definition, store log units of information. The choice of the base amounts to a choice of unit, since log log log . We will use the base 2 and call the resulting units binary digits or bits. [Claude Shannon, "Communication in the Presence of Noise".]"

And Hartley's reason was that: "for a measure of information to be of practical engineering value it should be of such nature that the information is proportional to the number of selections" [of primary symbols; Hartley, "Transmission of information".]

To link any measure of information, say channel capacity, to sensory perception, one would need to make a testable prediction out of using them both. That the use of logarithms is convenient for information measures but not necessary falsifies the specific link suggested.

And so it typically goes with pattern seeking - the number of potentially "useful hits" (but not yet tested) drowns in the number of meaningless patterns, that always can be found.

(However, one can well ask _why_ logarithms are convenient. But that is not done here.)

Reply

rkomatsu

52 Comments

  • 718 Days Ago
  • 02/25/2010

Just convenience

Maybe it's just convenience of encoding. The number of bits needed to encode a magnitude range is the log in base 2 of the number of possibilities. For example, to encode the alphabet you need log2(26)= 4.7 bits. Perception is a kind of encoding - your brain encoding the sensible universe. Positional number systems use log N digits to represent a magnitude N, which is a very efficient way to do it. Seems reasonable Nature adopted a similar strategy.

Reply

Bio

The Physics arXiv Blog produces daily coverage of the best new ideas from an online forum called the Physics arXiv on which scientists post early versions of their latest ideas. Contact me at KentuckyFC @ arxivblog.com

Follow The Physics arXiv Blog on Twitter

Subscribe to the arXiv blog RSS Feed

Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement