arXiv blog

Why Fish Hold the Key to Increasing Wind Farm Power

The way schooling fish swim reveals how to squeeze more power from the wind over a given area of land.

kfc 02/15/2010

  • 4 Comments




What do wind farms and fish schools have in common? Not enough, according to an analysis by Bob Whittlesey and buddies at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena. And here's why.




Most wind farms use horizontal axis turbines because they generate significantly more power from the air flowing through them than vertical axis turbines. That's why you seen plenty of wind farms using horizontal axis turbines and very few using vertical axes.




But there's a problem with horizontal axis turbines. The maximum power a rotor can extract is proportional to the cube



of the windspeed. But sinc, they slow the air passing through them, neighbouring turbines need to be around ten turbine diameters apart. And that places a significant limit on the power that can be generated from a given area of land.




The anecdotal evidence is that vertical axis turbines do better--by some accounts closely packing these turbines can actually increase their power output. Today Whittlesey and co explain why.




The secret appears to be a well known aerodynamic effect called a Karman vortex street, a term you may not know but will surely be familiar with from the example below, wich shows the cloud patterns downwind of the Juan Fernandez Islands off the coast of Chile.
These repeating patterns of vortices in an air stream around a body are relatively common. In fact, fluid dynamicists have well developed models for simulating the way their interaction helps keep schools of fish synchronised and reduces the total propulsive power needed per fish. A similar effect reduces the fuel consumption of vehicles travelling in a platoon.




So for the Caltech kids, it was but a small matter to redesign such a model to simulate the vortices in a 16 x 16 farm of vertical axis wind turbines and to study the effect of close packing the turbines.




It turns out that the additional acceleration that the vortices add to the wind can increase the power of vertical axis turbines. And although they still do not have the power efficiency of horizontal axis turbines, this means they can be packed much more closely together.




That's important because it increases the power that can be genetated from a given area of land and not by a small amount. "These configurations significantly reduced the land use for vertical axis wind turbine wind farms, resulting in array power density increases of over one order of magnitude compared to operational horizontal axis wind turbine wind farms," say the Caltech boys.




Yep, an order of magnitude increase in power density.




Of course, the model is only two dimensional and does not account for complex flow behaviour such as vortex shedding. But is it worth looking into in more detail? You betcha. Caltech has already filed patents.




Not bad for an idea inspired by fish.




Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1002.2250: Fish schooling as a basis for vertical axis wind turbine farm design

TRSF: Read the Best New Science Fiction inspired by today’s emerging technologies.

Print

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

DJTal

154 Comments

  • 727 Days Ago
  • 02/16/2010

VAWT's efficiency.

It may not be true ultimately that HAWT's have a greater efficiency than VAWT's. A Russian company, 'SRC Vertical', whose wind turbines are marketed in the USA by a company called 'Wind-sail', that was funded by the U.S. Department of Energy to build VAWT's, has built VAWT's with an efficiency of 38%, which is up there with the best HAWT's, and they reckon they can increase the efficiency up to 45%. So not only do VAWT's have good efficiency, they have a larger swept area for a given rotor diameter (especially if the rotor is a vertical rectangular shape), and also can be packed more closely together.

Reply

mbelvadi

51 Comments

  • 726 Days Ago
  • 02/17/2010

when turbines cost more than land?

If I understand this correctly, it's advocating more turbines per acre at somewhat reduced efficiency per turbine. This tradeoff makes sense where land is the most expensive component but that's not where wind farms tend to be located. More turbines means more initial cost and more maintenance cost. I was under the impression that it was the equipment cost that was keeping wind at barely the edge of profitability in many places, and even a slight reduction in efficiency *per turbine* (not per acre) would push it over the edge. Using more land and fewer turbines would seem to be the most cost-efficient option. What am I missing here?

Reply

Darryl Phillips

1 Comment

  • 726 Days Ago
  • 02/17/2010

VAWT height

I've built some vertical (savonius) turbines, lost one when the wind suddenly increased no load!

I like the direction this research is going but question the assumptions. Horizontal turbines benefit from a tower while verticals, to use maximum diameter, usually begin at the ground where wind is minimum.

Reply

DAVEG

2 Comments

  • 726 Days Ago
  • 02/17/2010

Wind Maintenance

I think the possibilities are very good for wind generation with reduction in maintainance (new transmissions) and new designs coming all the time we are getting better every day.

Why not use more buildings for power generation?  A vertical unit would be just like an antenna and several could be placed together.  This also has implications fo housing where vertical generators could be similar to chimneys.  DO the vertical generatos create as much noise?

Reply

Bio

The Physics arXiv Blog produces daily coverage of the best new ideas from an online forum called the Physics arXiv on which scientists post early versions of their latest ideas. Contact me at KentuckyFC @ arxivblog.com

Follow The Physics arXiv Blog on Twitter

Subscribe to the arXiv blog RSS Feed

Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement