Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

arXiv blog

The Physics arXiv Blog produces daily coverage of the best new ideas from an online forum called the Physics arXiv on which scientists post early versions of their latest ideas. Contact me at KentuckyFC @ arxivblog.com

Email Subscription

Recently on the arXiv blog...

Recent comments on the arXivblog

  • AKT : This shows complete stupidity of physicists and their culture. They are hopeless people.   In the...
  • doanwon : AKT: With your good mathematical background, I think you should spend your energy developing your...
  • AKT : Why don't you write a paper on your claim and send it to JSL, JPAL, MLQ, JPL etc. Good luck.  ...
  • AKT : Take it easy. Chemistry is based upon Quantum Physics, a theory which has no known classical...
  • bergerdj : Nonsense. The BS about "life could form under any conditions" shows nothing but ignorance of...
  • AKT : This is an absolute double standard. This chap accepts academic physics which the small technical...
  • ... : As a webmaster who has taken on her first adult site, an escorts and adult entertainment...
  • ZephirAWT : You still didn't demonstrate, AWT doesn't work. And who is we? Are you suffering with schizophrenia?
  • flared0ne : But that doesn't work. So we continue ignoring you.
  • ZephirAWT : Every theory is based on inconsistent postulate set, as I explained you already. If these...
  • ZephirAWT : It doesn't matter, what you're thinking AWT - the influence means, you're thinking about it...
  • brentrobot : Hey freeze it in some water, put it under vacuum, blast it with a bunch of radiation and see if...
  • AKT : Take it easy. These biologists are not calling themsleves "king of science".   The king odf...
  • AKT : The only thing which is scieitificaly legitimate these is that SR is inconsistent.   Best...
  • AKT : > So, yes, accelerator-based characterizations of particle identities ARE valid and viable,...
  • AKT : MIT could not teach you how to maintain consistency in your thought. You believe that a theory...
  • AKT : This is not a scientific response to any of the issues I raised. The matter is fatal to all...
  • flared0ne : I still remember, as a freshman at MIT, that first semester Physics class where we went through...
  • Brian H : Aha, so that answers my post above. Yeast extract would give all the nutrients one could desire. 
  • Brian H : Yabut -- it needs STUFF. Chemicals to assemble, food. Cells do not live by energy alone, much...
Advertisement
Friday, February 12, 2010

The Uncredited Discoverer of Cosmic Rays

The Austrian physicist Victor Hess received the Nobel Prize for the discovery cosmic rays but a new translation of the work of an obscure Italian scientist indicates that he wasn't alone in this discovery.

The history of science is littered with injustices and today Alessandro De Angelis at the University of Udine in Italy outlines another associated with the discovery of cosmic rays .

Today, the person largely credited with the discovery of cosmic rays is the Austrian physicist Victor Hess. In the early part of the 20th century, the large amount of ionising radiation in the Earth's atmosphere caused a great deal of head-scratching.

The world's physicists naturally assumed that the origin of this radiation was the Earth's crust but were puzzled by measurements that seemed to show that radiation levels increased higher up in the atmosphere.

Hess developed a technique for measuring radiation levels with much greater accuracy and then flew himself and his apparatus by balloon to altitudes of over 5 kilometres to take measurements. The data revealed that radiation levels at 5km were about twice as high as at sea level.

Hess rightly concluded that the Earth could not be the source of this radiation, which was later christened cosmic rays.

But Hess wasn't the only one working on this problem. De Angelis points out that the Italian scientist Domenico Pacini at the Italian Agency of Meteorology and Geodynamics made the same discovery at the same time with a slightly different method. Instead of flying his measuring apparatus at altitude, Pacini placed it in a copper box and submerged it in the salty waters of the Bay of Livorno.

He found that the intensity of radiation underwater was significantly less than at the surface and concluded, like Hess, that it could not be coming from the Earth. De Angelis has even unearthed the paper in which Pacini published this work and offers the first English translation on the arXiv.

De Angelis points out that both men were aware of each other's work but that their scientific legacies are very different. "While Hess is remembered as the discoverer of cosmic rays, the simultaneous discovery by Pacini is forgotten by most," he says.

Google confirms this assertion with blunt ignominy. While typing the phrase "Victor Hess" into the search engine gives you over 900,000 results, doing the same for "Domenico Pacini" gives only 90,000, the first of which is the question "Did you mean: Domenico Pacitti".

It's not hard to understand why. Pacini died in 1934. Two years later, the Nobel Prize for Physics (which cannot be awarded posthumously) was given to Hess for his work on the discovery of cosmic rays.
Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1002.1810: Penetrating Radiation At The Surface Of Water

Comments

Advertisement

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review September/October 2010

Current Issue

The TR35
Our annual selection of the world's top innovators under the age of 35.
•  Subscribe
Save 36%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
» Gift Subscription
» Digital Subscription
» Reprints, Back Issues
» Subscribe
» Table of Contents
» MIT News

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.