arXiv blog

Doped Graphane Should Superconduct at 90K

New calculations reveal that p-doped graphane should superconduct at 90K, making possible an entirely new generation of devices cooled by liquid nitrogen.

kfc 02/05/2010

  • 6 Comments

There's a problem with high temperature superconductors. It's now more than two decades since the discovery that certain copper oxides can superconduct at temperatures above 30 K.

Those years have been filled with promise, hyperbole and feverish research. Physicists know that copper oxides superconduct in an entirely different way to conventional BCS superconductors (after Bardeen, Cooper and Schrieffer, who worked out the theory behind them). And yet, nobody agrees on precisely what the new mechanism is. Neither has anybody created a superconductor that works at a usable temperature, that is above the temperature of liquid nitrogen.

Even the resurgence of excitement last year over the discovery that magnesium diboride superconducts at high temperatures, probably in the old fashioned BCS way, soon gave way to malaise as physicists found they were unable to build on the breakthrough to make better superconductors. It's tempting to think that superconductors will never pass the liquid nitrogen barrier.

But today hope is restored thanks to a fascinating set of calculations carried out by Gianluca Savini at the University of Cambridge in the UK and a couple of buddies. They calculate the properties of p-doped graphane from first principles and say that it ought to superconduct at a balmy 90K or more, well within the range of liquid nitrogen cooling.

What's more p-doped graphane should superconduct in the same way as the old fashioned BCS superconductors. That's curious because everybody believes that BCS superconductivity cannot work at high temperatures.

The reason is the energy of the interaction between the superconducting electrons and the surrounding material. In ordinary BCS superconductors this is thought to be just a few tens of meVs. In the copper oxides, however, these interactions have an energy of a few hundred meVs. It's this difference, that makes physicists think that BCS superconductors will never work at the temperature of copper oxides.

And yet the discovery that magnesium diboride superconducts challenges that thinking--energy of these interactions in MgB2 is much higher. Three factors seem to come together to make it possible, say Savini and co. First is the characteristic energy of the phonons in MgB2 which is due to bond stretching and plays an important part in helping superconductors through the structure. Second is the electron density of states in the material and finally they point to the balance between the attractive electron-phonon coupling and the repulsive electron-electron interaction in MgB2.

Might it be possible to find materials in which these quantities can be manipulated further? You betcha. Savini and co noticed that p-doped diamond has two of these characteristics but superconducts only at 4K.

However, they calculate that p-doped graphane fits the bill exactly and should superconduct in the old-fashioned BCS way at 90K. What's more they say there are hints that p-doped diamond nanowires might have similar properties.

Various groups are already playing around with doped diamond nanowires.

The implications of all this are astounding. First up is the possibility of useful superconducting devices cooled only by liquid nitrogen. At last!

But there's another, more exotic implication: by creating transistor-like gates out of graphane doped in different ways, it should be possible to create devices in which the superconductivity can be switched on and off. That'll make possible an entirely new class of switch.

Before all of that, however, somebody has to make p-doped graphane. That will be hard. Graphane itself was made for the first time only last year at the University of Manchester. It should be entertaining to follow the race to make and test a p-doped version.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1002.0653: Doped Graphane: a Prototype High-Tc Electron-Phonon Superconductor

TRSF: Read the Best New Science Fiction inspired by today’s emerging technologies.

Print

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

UncleAl

409 Comments

  • 738 Days Ago
  • 02/05/2010

Doped Graphane Synthesis

graphite to Lewis acid intercalated graphite (stacked isolated graphene sheets) to hydrogenated Lewis acid intercalcated graphane.

http://www.meta-synthesis.com/webbook/13_lab-matrix/LAB_matrix.html

Perhaps Crabtree's catalyst with a less basic nitrogen ligand would intercalate, hydrogenate, and dope all together. US Pat. 4224458 for other alternatives. Graphite also (eletrochemically) intercalates Lewis base reducing agents like lithium metal (lithium batteries). Hydrogenate that, then redope.

If you don't like gaseous hydrogen, ammonium formate will get you there. Ditto borohyride and a hydriding transition metal - e.g., intercalate with (square planar) Ni(II) then have at it with (a crowned cation or phase transfer cation) borohyride. NaBH4 is a pussycat. LiBH4 is vicious as soon as you crack the bottle.

Theorists supply headaches. If you need an aspirin, you get a chemist.

Reply

ZephirAWT

299 Comments

  • 738 Days Ago
  • 02/05/2010

doped diamond nanowires

J.F.Prins found room temperature superconductivity ABOVE p-doped diamond layers before ten years already

http://aetherwavetheory.blogspot.com/2008/11/awt-and-quest-for-ht-superconductivity.html

I don't believe, though, doping of graphene would lead to similar results, because electrons must be squished by pressure of neighbouring layers of atoms and binding strength between graphene layers is weak, incomparable to diamond.

http://aetherwavetheory.blogspot.com/2009/07/aether-and-graphene-behavior.html

Reply

omni-impotent

3 Comments

  • 736 Days Ago
  • 02/07/2010

Make me some 90K Tc superconductor and I'll finish my PhD in a month! How's this for a conspiracy theory? All the cryogenics guys (Oxford, etc...) and sabotaging high Tc research so we continue to buy expensive cryostats from them. :P

P.S: that was just a joke btw. I hope the crackpot commenters, especially this ZephirAWT guy, don't take it too seriously. Dude, life advice, get a life.

Reply

ZephirAWT

299 Comments

  • 736 Days Ago
  • 02/07/2010

Re: How's this for a conspiracy theory?

And what prohibits scientists in ATTEMPT to replicate J.F.Prins experiments? Are they so difficult or expensive or something?

Until they write  some article about it - it's just the mainstream science, who persist in ignorant crackpot stance.

Reply

ms

190 Comments

Reply

jtempere

1 Comment

  • 734 Days Ago
  • 02/09/2010

Re: "Neither has anybody created a superconductor that works at a usable temperature, that is above the temperature of liquid nitrogen." ???

Both yttrium barium copper oxide and the family of bismuth strontium calcium copper oxides have critical temperatures above liquid nitrogen. They are frequently used to give classroom demonstrations of, for example, the Meissner effect, and all you need to get them to superconduct is some liquid nitrogen. These materials have two problems that make technological use difficult: they have a low critical current density, and they are brittle.

Reply

Bio

The Physics arXiv Blog produces daily coverage of the best new ideas from an online forum called the Physics arXiv on which scientists post early versions of their latest ideas. Contact me at KentuckyFC @ arxivblog.com

Follow The Physics arXiv Blog on Twitter

Subscribe to the arXiv blog RSS Feed

Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement