Physicist Discovers How to Teleport Energy
First, they teleported photons, then atoms and ions. Now one physicist has worked out how to do it with energy, a technique that has profound implications for the future of physics.
kfc 02/03/2010
- 120 Comments
In 1993, Charlie Bennett at IBM's Watson Research Center in New York State and a few pals showed how to transmit quantum information from one point in space to another without traversing the intervening space.
The technique relies on the strange quantum phenomenon called entanglement, in which two particles share the same existence. This deep connection means that a measurement on one particle immediately influences the other, even though they are light-years apart. Bennett and company worked out how to exploit this to send information. (The influence between the particles may be immediate, but the process does not violate relativity because some informatiom has to be sent classically at the speed of light.) They called the technique teleportation.
That's not really an overstatement of its potential. Since quantum particles are indistinguishable but for the information they carry, there is no need to transmit them themselves. A much simpler idea is to send the information they contain instead and ensure that there is a ready supply of particles at the other end to take on their identity. Since then, physicists have used these ideas to actually teleport photons, atoms, and ions. And it's not too hard to imagine that molecules and perhaps even viruses could be teleported in the not-too-distant future.
But Masahiro Hotta at Tohoku University in Japan has come up with a much more exotic idea. Why not use the same quantum principles to teleport energy?
Today, building on a number of papers published in the last year, Hotta outlines his idea and its implications. The process of teleportation involves making a measurement on each one an entangled pair of particles. He points out that the measurement on the first particle injects quantum energy into the system. He then shows that by carefully choosing the measurement to do on the second particle, it is possible to extract the original energy.
All this is possible because there are always quantum fluctuations in the energy of any particle. The teleportation process allows you to inject quantum energy at one point in the universe and then exploit quantum energy fluctuations to extract it from another point. Of course, the energy of the system as whole is unchanged.
He gives the example of a string of entangled ions oscillating back and forth in an electric field trap, a bit like Newton's balls. Measuring the state of the first ion injects energy into the system in the form of a phonon, a quantum of oscillation. Hotta says that performing the right kind of measurement on the last ion extracts this energy. Since this can be done at the speed of light (in principle), the phonon doesn't travel across the intermediate ions so there is no heating of these ions. The energy has been transmitted without traveling across the intervening space. That's teleportation.
Just how we might exploit the ability to teleport energy isn't clear yet. Post your suggestions in the comments section if you have any.
But the really exciting stuff is the implications this has for the foundations of physics. Hotta says that his approach gives physicists a way of exploring the relationship between quantum information and quantum energy for the first time.
There is a growing sense that the properties of the universe are best described not by the laws that govern matter but by the laws that govern information. This appears to be true for the quantum world, is certainly true for special relativity, and is currently being explored for general relativity. Having a way to handle energy on the same footing may help to draw these diverse strands together.
Interesting stuff. There's no telling where this kind of thinking might lead.
Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1002.0200: Energy-Entanglement Relation for Quantum Energy Teleportation
On Twitter
Become a Fan on Facebook
Subscribe to the Feed
spad12
58 Comments
Big implications for space
Due to the fact that the information/energy essentially ignores the space between the particles, the biggest implications for this would be where the distances covered are very large.
For instance, light takes about 10 minutes to travel to mars. Due to this all communication with anything on mars takes about 10 minutes which makes voice communication, and even something along the lines of instant messaging impossible. By entangling 2 particles, keeping 1 on earth and sending the other to mars you would be able to have instant communications accross the vast distance.
In addition to this, anywhere where radio signals have problems would benefit. Submarines, deep mines, moon bases on the dark side of the moon, etc. would all benefit greatly by exploiting quantum entanglement.
The real question is how relativity affects this. As in if you sent one half of the entangled set off to some distant star system at near the speed of light, would it still be possible to send and receive information.
Reply
ickydime
2 Comments
Re: Big implications for space
@spad12, I am a bit confused on the second paragraph of your comment. You mention getting rid of the 10minute lag between here and Mar... However, in the post they make this comment about relativity and not being able to break the speed of light:
"The influence between the particles may be immediate but the process does not violate relativity because some information has to be sent classically at the speed of light."
I don't fully grasp this concept. Would the 'influence' they mention be enough to conduct instant messaging and voice transfer or would we be restricted by the rest of the process since some of the information has to be sent classically.
Reply
spad12
58 Comments
Re: Big implications for space
The information still travels at the speed of light, but the particles behave as if the distance between them is 0, therefore the information can still obey relativity, yet seemingly traverse great distances instantaneously.
Reply
ickydime
2 Comments
Re: Big implications for space
Got it. Thanks for the clarification!
Reply
aamosnyc
1 Comment
Re: Big implications for space
Umm, no. It's not possible to send information faster than light via pairs of entangled particles, because the sender must inform the receiver that he has done something to his half of the entangled pair (so that the receiver can distinguish intentional manipulation by the sender from random quantum fluctuations). Unfortunately, that information can only be sent at light speed or slower.
Reply
pskyboy
3 Comments
Re: Big implications for space
Thanks aamosnyc; you beat me to the reply.
In order to send information i.e. communicate between earth and mars the information has to somehow be encoded onto an energy carrier. For instance currently we modulate the amplitude or frequency of radio waves to actually encode data.
Therefore you would need to encode the data onto the phonon being transmitted "faster then light". Essentially you do this by making measurments on the phonon to force it into a specific state. But alas that's exactly what we need to do to recieve the phonon at the other end "make the correct measurment" and in order to do that, we need to know what the correct measurment is, which can only be determined from the information used during the transmission phase. Thus that information still needs to be sent to the reciever by classical means.
Reply
Pyle
5 Comments
Re: Big implications for space
It seems to me the teleportation of information would precede the teleportation of "photons, atoms, and ions". The "teleportation" in fact seems to be the transference of quantum information across the distance to instill (sameness?) on the "ready supply of particles at the other end to take on their identity." I would think a simple code using the existing technology (particle "teleportation") and preset measurement sequencing would enable information transmission. (0=spin up, 1=spin down or such) Or am I missing something here regarding our inability to predict the effects of our actions/measurements on one end of entanglement?
Perhaps energy storage is an opportunity here as well. What energies are required to separate entangled particles? How do you contain them to affect this separation? What happens at either "end" when you release a contained particle?
Philote anyone?
Reply
doanwon
76 Comments
Here's how to transmit info instantaneously
I agree and don't get it somehow. If you can affect a particle instantaneously with known result then why would you not be able transmit that bit of information? All you would need to do is to change the spin or state of the particle from 0 to 1, as you say. Here's how I would do it.
Entangle a series of particles, say 64 for 64 bits (or more if we feel like it). Synchronize the Martian clock with the earth clock. Keep sampling (measuring) / transmitting (change state of particle) at both ends. The transmission changes the spin of the series of particles from 0/1 or 1/0 and the receiver measures if it's 0 or 1. This is instantaneous communication is it not if that's what entanglement is? I have read through entanglement but still can't understand why you can't transmit information instantaneously. Is the entanglement broken once the receiving end is measured? (Explanation is appreciated.)
Reply
jtankers
2 Comments
Re: Here's how to transmit info instantaneously
Actually a minority of scientists (famously including Einstein) believe that entangled particles do not influence each other instantaneously, they are just cloned (identical) particles. (It is also known as the 'hidden variable' conjecture).
Consistent with this belief, scientists have not been able to transmit information faster than light (though entangled [identical clone] particles can be read [identical information discovered] at two distant places at exactly the same time, but that is not truly communication faster than light speed.)
Reply
doanwon
76 Comments
Re: Here's how to transmit info instantaneously
jtankers, I am seeing a contradiction in you explanation. If you can read the state of the particles (regardless of whether they are clones of each other) in separate places near the same time then you can convey that bit of information across that distance. Scientists like Einstein don't understand that "spooky action at a distance." If there was some influence on the clone particle then there should be a force associated with it--not some mathematical abstract. What is the force? In the absence of a force you can conclude that the effect is instantaneous.
So if you have two locations with entangled pairs and you transmit and sample the particle(s) states/spins at a predetermined sampling rate then you should have instantaneous communication. What am I missing?
Reply
jtankers
2 Comments
Re: Here's how to transmit info instantaneously
The hidden variables conjecture advocates "no spooky/instant action at a distance", no instant communication. You could think of "entangled particles" as similar to two copies of the same music CD. Take one CD to Mars and leave one CD on Earth. You can then play (read) both CDs at the same time in both places, but the CDs are not "communicating" with each other, they are just giving the same information at the same time in different places.
Again though, text books tend to teach the more standard belief that entangled particles do communicate with each other instantly (as Heisenberg argued). Einstein and Bohmian Mechanics proponents reject the "spooky/instant action at a distance" conjecture however, and the issue is not settled.
A good article on the subject is: Quantum randomness may not be random - 22 March 2008 - New Scientist.
Reply
Danieleveld
28 Comments
Re: Here's how to transmit info instantaneously
I think the issue lay with Heisenberg. If you 'guess' at the time or type of information without knowing, your measurement of the system will change the system, thereby preventing you from receiving information.
Transmitting energy is much more viable- as you are continuing a very systematic method of measurement, at a known time with fairly well expected results, it should be possible to do this without stomping on Heisenburg's toes.
Reply
annoloki
1 Comment
Re: Here's how to transmit info instantaneously
The problem I believe is that at this level we're talking statistics. The idea is that when you entangle a couple of particles, you end up with two particles which exactly share a property (eg spin, phase) or properties (exactly or mirrored), whereas if we tried to read that property we'd fail to be able to do it with 100% accuracy.
The claim is that until you do try and take the reading the particle hasn't actually decided yet what the value will be, and in fact exists in a superposition of all possible values at the same time. When you take the reading (which usually involves smashing things into things, so you can only read it once) the wave function collapses, the superposition disapears, and a single value emerges as if it had been that value all along, but because it "decides" when you read it what the value is, there's no way to 100% accurately control or predict it.
Assuming that claim is correct (I'm unconvinced) when you read the state of the entangled particles, you'll find the same value for both, but if they didn't decide what the value was until you made the reading, then how do they know to decide to be the same thing? Spooky action. As you're not the decider of what that value is, you're merely reading it in two places, you can't use it to communicate, but I think the idea here is that you can transfer that information to another particle. If the entangled property is mirrored between the two particles (eg one spins left, the other spins right), then what happens at each side would mirrored too, so information you put in one side in effect is information you can get out of the other.
But not always. This is where the statistics come in. Say we entangle a property that can have a value of either zero or one. If you read a zero from one particle, you're more likely to read a zero from the other than if it was purely chance, but it's not definite . So if you send 1000 entangled particles, more than 500 (but less than 1000) of the readings from one will match the other (so it appears not to be a coincidence) but you've no way of knowing which matched until you compare the results using conventional communication (eg radio or wire), which imposes the speed-of-light speed limit .
Reply
Colonel Corn
1 Comment
Re: Here's how to transmit info instantaneously
To be honest, I only read like the first 15 replies before my common sense kicked in.
We can accomplish what appears to be "simultaneous transmission" by having the receiving end pre-programmed to behave in a certain way, based on the stimulus it receives, can we not? Whatever's on Mars is still going to be a computer. So an action on this end gets a delay of a fraction of a fraction of a second on the receiving end. That's what the human brain does too.
It's more than we can do now, isn't it? Why not do that?
Reply
Quviron
1 Comment
Re: Big implications for space
Surely a communications protocol can negate the relativistic communication to inform the receiver of the manipulation.
e.g. a pattern of change in the particles existence can be used to signify that information has been sent. The question now is how long do the existence sequence changes have to be provide a sufficient level of confidence in the pattern (i.e. not a random variation). Essentially this is just a variant of Morse Code.
Barring complications, this pattern protocol could also be used with two or more sets of sender/receiver particle groups to again increase confidence in the received pattern (i.e. the likelihood of each set receiver particle displaying the same pattern in random noise would get lower, barring that each sender/receiver group was not capable of influencing each other).
Reply
jcatom
1 Comment
Re: Big implications for space
The problem of the speed limit of c still remains no matter what. The most fundamental reason that nothing is going to happen faster than that is that there has to be a receiver. A person or a machine has to be on the other end. Unless one of those can be teleported instantaneously to the "far-away" place then the speed limit remains.
Also, if you could teleport a person or a machine, then you really wouldn't need a receiver at all. Just go yourself...wouldn't take any time so wouldn't be anything but laziness stopping you. You could send a new machine or a new version of whatever is going to be modified by the information.
Reply
bill_mcgonigle
1 Comment
Re: Big implications for space
Yes, this is what I don't understand as well. If both sides are measuring at a given clock rate, then why does the "read it now" information need to be sent classically?
Reply
Locke
2 Comments
Re: Big implications for space
First, The origional particles transfer their energy to the other particles and are destroyed to maintain the conservation of energy. So transfering matter is way off.
Second, transfering information would need a system to relay. People theorized light carrying info before we worked it out so that computers could interpret, this is the same. The discovery was in 1993 and we haven't figured out how to use the tech.
third, It's pointless to compare quantum principles to relativity. Quantum mechanics do not work the way principles of matter do. The reason the article mentions the light speed principle is because it does not violate the principle. It works around it. It works through ...
This is where I am unsure. Where do they go?
Teleporting energy is the crazy part. Think about a space ship that uses energy created here on earth and that has been teleported into a generator on the ship, that is fraking scifi, right?
Reply
ekillaby
2 Comments
Re: Big implications for space
Yea, teleporting energy is pretty cool. Imagine harvesting energy from a star to use in another solar system altogether.
Or imagine teleporting energy on Earth, creating an internet of energy rather than of information.
Reply
ekillaby
2 Comments
I agree with the protocol idea.
At a low level, this is less a "teleportation" than a mirroring. Teleportation is the abstraction that we would then build on top of this medium of mirrored states.
I agree with Quviron's suggestion for a protocol-based technique. A protocol is a practical example of how we could immediately make use of the technique described in the article. It seems like a lot of the comments, though, misunderstand what it means to have a protocol and what benefit it provides.
Imagine two ends of a communication channel in our everyday real world -- at each end we have hardware sitting, waiting and ready for "communication". The two ends are connected via a medium that can propagate information, like a system of fiber optic cables. In order to set up the system, humans or machines have had to travel from point A to point B, connecting the communication hardware on each end with the transmission medium between. That trip only needs to be taken once by a human and then the communication channel is open. Similarly, in order to open a "teleportation" communication channel the setup instructions only have to make the trip from point A to point B once. Then, once the channel is open, changes to one side are instantly reflected at the other side. The protocol is an implicit coupling between the two ends, which means that they're each working with a common understanding of what's happening. This is how packets work across nodes on the internet -- each node knows the signature for how a packet begins and ends and what to do with the body of information contained "within" a packet.
Let's also mention error detection/correction in information systems, since it seems that the comments overlook this. Theory exists to determine how to identify and correct errors in information transmitted across communication streams. The theory is put into practice ubiquitously throughout our connected world (i.e. essentially every personal computer has error detection mechanisms for their communications channels). See here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Error_detection_and_correction for an overview of this.
This all seems pretty straightforward, as long as we understand the "teleportation" as a protocol that sits on top of the mirroring channel. Think abstraction. And think information theory.
Reply
Eleanor McHugh
2 Comments
Re: Big implications for space
Assuming the use of an automated transmitter/receiver pairing there would be no need for any transfer of information to extract energy from the system beyond that required to initiate or terminate transmission. And in principle even this information could be passed as in-band information using an appropriate pulse encoding.
Reply
1viking
2 Comments
Re: Big implications for space
Hotta's observation are congruent with Niels Bohr's in the 30s and 40s. Bohr stated:
"We have to accept the fact that the fundamental principle of the universe is consciousness and not matter."
That's information exchange by entanglement . . .
What took Hotta so long <smiling>
Not to forget, that's exactly what Buddha said 2,500 years ago.
Reply
zin6776
1 Comment
Re: Big implications for space
Could we surmise then, that this is why SETI has heard very little? It would seem we have been listening in the wrong place.
Reply
grahammorehead
1 Comment
Re: Big implications for space
We are all waiting to see if superluminal communication is possible. Very few people think it is, but some have actually tried: Patent: Method and apparatus for selectively controlling the quantum state probability distribution of entangled quantum objects .
The guys who filed this patent spent significant money attempting to send information faster than light using the entangled photons from a down-conversion crystal. They never got it to work and they don't know why, as far as I know.
Reply