arXiv blog

Dark Matter May Explain the Puzzling Change in Earth-Sun Distance

If the sun sweeps up dark matter as it moves through the galaxy, how would that affect the orbit of the planets?

kfc 01/14/2010

  • 23 Comments

In the last five years or so, astronomers have noticed a puzzling change in the astronomical unit, the distance of the Earth's from the sun. Various measurements indicate that this distance (or at least the length of the Earth's semimajor axis) is increasing at the rate of 15 cm per year (plus or minus 4 cm).

Why that should be, nobody knows. But today, Lorenzo Iorio at the National Institute of Nuclear Physics in Pisa, Italy, says dark matter could be to blame.

Astronomers have long assumed that dark matter must fill the universe. In fact, the motion of the Milky Way implies that there ought to be some 10^-25 grams of the stuff in every cubic centimeter of the galaxy. And the density ought to be even higher near massive bodies such as stars, whose gravity would attract a halo of dark matter. Around the sun, the density of dark matter should be about 10^-19 g/cm^3.

Not only that, but the sun ought to sweep up dark matter as it moves through the galaxy. Iorio says it should have encountered about 200 times its own mass in dark matter during its travels. That means the density of dark matter in the Solar System should be increasing.

Iorio quite naturally asks what effect this might have on the orbits of the planets. The answer is that the orbits ought to shrink as the density of dark matter increases. One curious side effect of this for elliptical orbits is that "the osculating semimajor axis of a gradually shrinking trajectory around a mass-increasing central body gets larger."

Iorio calculates that the rate of the sun's dark matter accumulation at the moment ought to cause the Earth's semi-major axis to increase by about 7 cm per year (plus or minus 5 cm). That's a good enough match to the measured value to give pause for thought.

Iorio goes on to say that dark matter has important implications for the fate of the planets. We know that Earth will one day be swallowed by the sun as it expands into a red giant. But Iorio calculates that dark mater will cause the Earth's orbit to shrink by half in this time scale.

And if that's true, the end could be much nearer than we think.

Ref:arxiv.org/abs/1001.1697: Effect of Planet-Bound DarkMatter on Satellite Dynamics in the Solar System

TRSF: Read the Best New Science Fiction inspired by today’s emerging technologies.

Print

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

ZephirAWT

299 Comments

  • 760 Days Ago
  • 01/14/2010

???

"Its distance... is increasing at the rate of 15 cm per year"

versus

"dark mater will cause the Earth's orbit to shrink by half in this time scale"

I'm missing boolean logic in this point. Of course solar system should expand, or the concept of omnidirectional expansion of space-time is wrong. This expansion was already observed at the case of dilatation of iridium prototypes and it's not related to dark matter, but it should be Universal phenomena.

http://aetherwavetheory.blogspot.com/2009/06/can-dimensionful-quantities-change.html

Reply

Shootist

39 Comments

  • 760 Days Ago
  • 01/14/2010

Re: ???

pseudo-science is harmful to my eyes.

Reply

ZephirAWT

299 Comments

  • 759 Days Ago
  • 01/15/2010

Re: ???

No pseudo-science exist - ony claims, which are based on experiments and observations or not,  logical and illogical. If you see something illogical or not supported experimentally, you're expected to explain your stance.

Without it every subjective stance is pseudoscience as well.

Reply

primate

1 Comment

  • 760 Days Ago
  • 01/14/2010

experimental data

So what astronomers are looking at a distribution of ellipticity vs. star age? If the calculations are correct it would seem to indicate that older stars should have a tendency toward more elliptical planetary systems

Reply

ZephirAWT

299 Comments

  • 759 Days Ago
  • 01/15/2010

Re: experimental data

This is what exactly was observed - but the shape of eliptic gallaxies is explaned by gravitational waves and tidal forces, which are gradually smoothing the path of stars inside of gallaxies. From this reason eliptic gallaxies are usually these ancient ones.

http://aetherwavetheory.blogspot.com/2008/10/awt-inflation-and-brane-cosmology.html

So maybe you're right, maybe not - but I don't see any connection to dark matter explanation, presented in this post.

Reply

rshelton3000

12 Comments

  • 760 Days Ago
  • 01/14/2010

??? 2

I'm in agreement with Zephir.  Why does the article start out stating that the AU is increasing by 15cm +/- 4cm per year but the Dark Matter explanation states that this measurement should decrease?

Reply

Grantgreen

1 Comment

  • 760 Days Ago
  • 01/14/2010

Slightly confusing yes

I think the author means the radii are expanding for now but
later they are contracting .
I love double think (what is the cool german word for that?)

Reply

Advertisement

Mr CP

4 Comments

  • 760 Days Ago
  • 01/14/2010

Two axes

I took it to mean that the Earth's orbit is getting longer and skinnier, meaning the semi-major axis is expanding, but the semi-minor axis is shrinking.  This shift in orbit trajectory is consistent with the idea of orbits "getting more eliptical" with time.  And it would explain how we could be simultaneously getting closer to and farther from the sun.

I would agree that the point could have been made more explictly (presuming my thought here is accurate).

Reply

ZephirAWT

299 Comments

  • 759 Days Ago
  • 01/15/2010

Re: Two axes

In astronomy is well known and quite common, the paths of stars, planets and moons are gettin' more symmetric and circular due tidal forces and their mutual interaction - and no dark matter is required for such explanation.

Reply

Katphiche

1 Comment

  • 760 Days Ago
  • 01/14/2010

simple engineer?

I'm a simple engineer. I had to look up

"An astronomical unit (abbreviated as AU, au, a.u., or sometimes ua) is a unit of length equal to approximately 150 million kilometres (93 million miles)."

My question is how do you measure 15 cm over a distance of 150 million km? Pretty damn precise.

Reply

Mr CP

4 Comments

  • 760 Days Ago
  • 01/14/2010

Capiche?

"Various measurements" obviously  :)

I understand everying except the "katphiche" part.

-Bart Simpson.

Reply

ncm

56 Comments

  • 760 Days Ago
  • 01/14/2010

speculation squared

So, a poorly characterized phenomenon is explained, imperfectly, as the effect of a poorly defined and ill-tested hypothetical explanation for another poorly characterized phenomenon. 

Isn't it dark so far up in there?

Reply

ZephirAWT

299 Comments

  • 759 Days Ago
  • 01/15/2010

Sun will continue to accrete Dark Matter => the orbits of its planets will shrink 

I don't understand this reasoning.

If Sun will attract dark matter, we can expect, vacuum between Sun and planets would become more dense, the existing gravitational forces more weaker relativelly and the path of planets should expand, instead.

Try to imagine, we immerse gravitating system of many bodies into more dense fluid - the bodies would expand - not shrink.

Reply

Mr CP

4 Comments

  • 759 Days Ago
  • 01/15/2010

Re: Sun will continue to accrete Dark Matter => the orbits of its planets will shrink 

If there really is an increasing cloud of dark matter orbiting the sun, and presuming the cloud is symmetric, the effective center of gravity of the sun should remain the same, and the effective mass, and therefore the gravitational pull, will increase, pulling the orbits into more ellipital paths.

I'm not an astronomer and I'm not saying this is happening.  I'm just thinking about Zephir's theory.

Now, if Zephir means that the planets will collide with the dark matter and slow down, then yes I can understand how the orbits should expand.

Reply

Advertisement

ZephirAWT

299 Comments

  • 758 Days Ago
  • 01/16/2010

Re: Sun will continue to accrete Dark Matter => the orbits of its planets will shrink 

I didn't mean it exactly so, but your explanation would lead into simmilar result. We observed dragging effect of dark matter during collisions of galaxies already.

http://tinyurl.com/emvb5

Reply

crauscher

4 Comments

  • 759 Days Ago
  • 01/15/2010

The new Aether

Up to the 1800s, scientists speculated that there was some sort of medium that permeated 'empty' space that allowed for the propagation of light. Many brilliant minds devised experiments to detect (or at least prove the existence of) this medium to no avail. Why didn't scientists find dark matter in earlier experiments, if it is abundant enough to alter the course of the sun and earth by over a tenth of a meter each year?

I suspect that ten years from now, only fringe scientists will believe in the whole dark matter pseudoscience and the rest will accept that there is a flaw with our theory of how inertial and gravitational mass work.

Reply

rvandell

22 Comments

  • 758 Days Ago
  • 01/16/2010

Re: The new Aether

Aye, reminds me of the part in the movie "The Day the Earth Stood Still", where the "visitor" crosses out parts of the equations, and the scientist exclaims “Impossible!”.

Reply

ZephirAWT

299 Comments

  • 758 Days Ago
  • 01/16/2010

Re: The new Aether

My dense Aether theory is not in contradiction with dark matter concept. The same phenomena we can observe at the water surface. Basically it's a consequence of omnidirectional space-time expansion - just perceived from outside perspective. And both dark matter, both space-time expansion is related to dispersion of light by CMB fluctuations in simmilar way, in which waves are dispersed at water surface.

http://tinyurl.com/nts8k9

The physicists know about CMB and space-time expansion very long time - but so far they used it in cosmological theories, only. No other integration of these subtle phenomena into existing theories exists so far.

Reply

Netizen

131 Comments

  • 758 Days Ago
  • 01/16/2010

Move over, Hendrik Lorentz...

Move over, Hendrik Lorentz because there's a new kid on the block. After perusing Wikipedia's write-up on what is now called Lorentz Ether theory ("LET") I'm starting to get a feeling of déjà vu and a tingling sensation from this article.

Reply

x0x0x0

18 Comments

  • 756 Days Ago
  • 01/18/2010

.......

Simple, Norway Event, December 9th,2009

Reply

x0x0x0

18 Comments

  • 756 Days Ago
  • 01/18/2010

.....

Next Hole Event within the next few months will be 10 times worse,larger and longer in duration than Norway. And it will more than likely be the nail on the coffin.........

Reply

Advertisement

x0x0x0

18 Comments

  • 756 Days Ago
  • 01/18/2010

.....

Assuming you all let it HAPPEN>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Reply

SoundsGr8tome

3 Comments

  • 749 Days Ago
  • 01/25/2010

Sun loosing mass

Hmmm....seems to be just a theory about the sun "gaining" mass from dark matter. But...tis a fact...that the sun is "loosing" mass as it depletes it's own fuel. Could that....simply be the/a reason of it having lesser gravity, thereby causing the change in the earth's orbit?
Ciao!

Reply

Bio

The Physics arXiv Blog produces daily coverage of the best new ideas from an online forum called the Physics arXiv on which scientists post early versions of their latest ideas. Contact me at KentuckyFC @ arxivblog.com

Follow The Physics arXiv Blog on Twitter

Subscribe to the arXiv blog RSS Feed

Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement