Characterizing the Perfect Golf Swing
A new, simpler way to measure golf swings could finally reveal the secrets of the perfect golf swing.
kfc 01/08/2010
- 4 Comments
Various complex devices and techniques are available for analysing a golf swing. Some approaches use various types of software to analyse video images of a swing while others use various types of electronic sensors and processors connected to the club itself. "Over time, the tendency has been to make ever more sophisticated measurements in an effort to obtain increasingly detailed understanding of the golf swing," says Robert Grober, an expert on the physics of golf at Yale University in New Haven.
Today Grober reveals a new, simpler approach that allows a golf swing to be accurately reconstructed. The measurement system consists of two accelerometers mounted in the shaft of a golf club with the direction of sensitivity oriented along the axis of the shaft. One accelerometer is located under the grip, preferably at a point between the two hands. The other is located further down the shaft. And that's it.
Reconstructing the motion is simply a matter of assuming that a golf swing consists of a double pendulum motion and then fitting the data to this model.
Grober says the system is simple and robust and provides a detailed insight into the tempo, timing and rhythm of the golf swing. That should make it easier to work out what it is that separates the Tigers from the tabbies.
Grober has already put his device to good use. A comparative study of twenty-five golfers shows that club speed is generated in the downswing as a two step process. The first phase starts at the top of the swing and involves impulsive acceleration of the hands and club. This is followed by a second phase, the release, where the club is accelerated while the hands decelerate.
On Twitter
Become a Fan on Facebook
Subscribe to the Feed
rharm888
1 Comment
On the Hadron Collider and blowing up the world.
After reading the article, I believe the legality will boil down to the "right" to make a mistake. Courts are usually concerned with the difference between intent (criminality) and negligence (competence). Although they may have the best educations, the best physicists are still human; they are subject to mistakes regardless of race, creed, color, or even education.
Instead of questioning the legality of taking risks that involve everyone (see my last paragraph) better questions are: can science can be mastered/perfected? Is science absolute? and possibly even, is science the search for perfection?
Anything less than perfection will bring mistakes and errors and the inevitable consequences of these errors. I believe that there is a cliche about playing in the "big leagues" that expresses my point. If you want to play with universal forces, you're playing in a very large ball park and you need to be prepared for the fact you are going to lose a game or two. The question becomes, can the human race survive losing a game or two at this level.
It is a matter of public opinion whether they have the "right" to blow up the world. Public opinion is like any other opinion; I believe you can fill in the rest of the expression. The past incidents, listed in the article, are actually evidence of this "public" opinion and an indicator of the public's opinion towards playing russian roulette with the world. Whether the opinion in correct or not is up for debate.
Reply