Push on the electromagnetic fields in the quantum vacuum and you should get an equal and opposite force.
The quantum vacuum has fascinated physicists ever since Hendrik Casimir and Dirk Polder suggested in 1948 that it would exert a force on a pair of narrowly separated conducting plates. Their idea was eventually confirmed when the force was measured in 1997. Just how to exploit this force is still not clear, however.
In recent years, a new way of thinking about the quantum vacuum has emerged which has vastly more potential. And today, one physicist describes how it could be used to create propulsion.
Before we discuss that, let's track back a little. According to quantum mechanics, any vacuum will be filled with electromagnetic waves leaping in and out of existence. It turns out that these waves can have various measurable effects, such as the Casimir-Polder force.
The new approach focuses on the momentum associated with these electromagnetic fields rather than the force they exert. The question is whether it is possible to modify this momentum because, if you can, you should receive an equal and opposite kick. That's what rocket scientists call propulsion.
Today, Alex Feigel at the Soreq Nuclear Research Center, a government lab in Yavne Israel, suggests an entirely new way to modify the momentum of the quantum vacuum and how this can be exploited to generate propulsion.
Feigel's approach combines two well-established ideas. The first is the Lorentz force experienced by a charged particle in electric and magnetic fields that are crossed. The second is the magnetoelectric effect--the phenomenon in which an external magnetic field induces a polarised internal electric field in certain materials and vice versa.
The question that Feigel asks is in what circumstances the electromagnetic fields in a quantum vacuum can exert a Lorentz force. The answer is that the quantum vacuum constantly interacts with magnetoelectric materials generating Lorentz forces. Most of the time, however, these forces sum to zero.
Hwever, Feigel says there are four cases in which the forces do not sum to zero. Two of these are already known, for example confining the quantum field between two plates, which excludes longer wavelength waves.
But Feigel says the two others offer entirely new ways to exploit the quantum vacuum using magnetoelectric nanoparticles to interact with the electromagnetic fields it contains.
The first method is to rapidly aggregate a number of magnetoelectric nanoparticles, a process which influences the boundary conditions for higher frequency electromagnetic waves, generating a force.
The second is simply to rotate a group of magnetoelectric nanoparticles, which also generates a Lorentz force.
Either way, the result is a change in velocity. As Feigel puts it: "mechanical action of quantum vacuum on magneto-electric objects may be observable and have a significant value."
The beauty of Feigel's idea is that it can be easily tested. He suggests building an addressable array of magnetoelectric nanoparticles, perhaps made of a material such as FeGaO3 which has a magnetoelectric constant of 10^-4 in a weak magnetic field.
These nanoparticles simply have to be rotated in the required way to generate a force. Feigel calls it a magnetoelectric quantum wheel.
Of course, nobody is getting a free lunch here. "Although the proposed engine will consume energy for manipulation of the particles, the propulsion will occur without any loss of mass," says Feigel. He even suggests, with masterful understatement, that this might have practical implications.
So here is a high-risk idea with a huge potential payoff. The question is: who has the balls to try it?
Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0912.1031: A Magneto-Electric Quantum Wheel
Comments
Liam
12/09/2009
Posts:1
afeder
12/11/2009
Posts:1
I'm delighted. Just as scores of other authors have predicted science, once again, we see it happening again. Bravo.
I'm looking forward to see if this experiment bears fruit. We desperately need some sort of quantum propulsion device.
ArdRhi
12/11/2009
Posts:1
ta2025
12/11/2009
Posts:1
Sunil Thakur
http://www.norlabs.org
sunil.thak...
12/11/2009
Posts:22
happyjack2...
12/11/2009
Posts:2
rshelton30...
12/13/2009
Posts:12
And btw, in addition to being wrong, your argument was incomplete: you didn't even bother to propose how electromagnetics can violate the law of conservation. (Which would be ironic, seeing as though it's considered one of the forces through which it acts.)
happyjack2...
12/14/2009
Posts:2
Think of a maglev train, not a spaceship. Through the application of electroweak force in a specific manifestation (the magnetic component, to the extent this is severable), a force lifts and propels the train without reaction mass leaving the train.
Likewise, if you wish to only speak about spaceships (which seems to be the source of your logical error above) a mag-field generator used when near a magnetized body would produce acceleration through the interaction of magnetic fields without ejecting any reaction mass from the spacecraft.
Your mistake was in confusing electromagnetic propulsion with what is called "ionic propulsion" by the aerospace industry.
Your proper reply to this should be, well, yes, I misunderstood, but even the examples here which correct that misunderstanding do not violate the principle in question: the track (and the planet to which it is connected) is pressed back as the train is pressed forward in the first case and in the second case, the generic "magnetized body" - Jupiter might be a good example, the earth is another - is pushed back.
But you are missing the point if you reply in such a way. The proponents of this concept are excited about not carrying the reaction mass on board the space-craft. They are not excited about violating known physics.
Hope this clears up the confusion...
your friendly, neighborhood cripdyke
cripdyke
12/16/2009
Posts:39
The two have no meaningful difference.
YetAnother...
12/11/2009
Posts:1
You only have to learn one formula: Q = CV .
Mit had a good laugh when I told someone there how it worked and they were not interested to publicize it.
It is based on the impossible-to-do-in practice-
problem by Faraday (The two metal concentric spheres that do not touch and form a capacitor etc etc.).
Just like Nasa, where they found that the Propulsion Engineers would become obsolete.
Who would need them if we could fly to the Moon in an hour or top Mars inside one day?
US patent 4,095,162
Spacer
12/11/2009
Posts:2
smithsomia...
12/14/2009
Posts:168
Are not the two metalic plates metalic planets ?
The vacuum is outterspace between the planets ??
And the nanoparticles are there in space being spun up by robotic lasers on energy producing satilites which would create a magnetic worm whole ???
The magnetic fields of the planets would be joined together adding to the power of the worm hole, thus it MIGHT create a quantum singularity for any metal object like a space ship tossed into it, meaning the ship could quickly accelerate to lightspeed, mass gains would be irrellevent !!!!!!
If THAT does NOT happen a ship could still ride the massive magnetic wave between the two planets !
MACchine
12/19/2009
Posts:8
Set up your nano particles and robotic laser system to spin the particles between the Sun and Jupiter to get a super powerful worm whole, if you used the Earth with Jupiter the Earth might move a little bit more then normal -- BAD SCIENTIST !
Anything metallic entering the worm whole would immediately accelerate in whatever direction it was traveling in to light speed.
Maybe this is how the SUN REALLY WORKS no fusion just quantum accelerated particles slamming into each other living in a zero time quantum flux.
MACchine
12/22/2009
Posts:8