• 788 Days Ago
• 12/08/2009

There is at least one older crytallization model

Universe as a Phase Boundary in a Four-Dimensional Euclidean Space by Michael Grady. arXiv:gr-qc/9805076

• 788 Days Ago
• 12/08/2009

Nothing Happens in a Block Universe

This is the reason that nothing moves in spacetime and why, contrary to the pronouncements of certain famous physicists, time travel is nonsense. In other words, spacetime is a fictitious math construct. So how can any model use a block construct to represent the universe if nothing can happen in it? We observe phenomena, no? I smell a contradiction.

• 788 Days Ago
• 12/08/2009

Past Crystallizes out of the Future

This model has a very good meaning in AWT, in which every causal observer would see it's neighborhood in a such a way, future would crystallize from past automatically. We can illustrate it by model of nested density fluctuation of Aether, in which every density fluctuation would see itself exactly at the middle of dimensional scale. In this connection, AWT recognizes pair of thermodynamical time arrows, which are intersecting mutually just exactly at the distance/energy density scale of observer, i.e. at presence.

http://aetherwavetheory.blogspot.com/2009/08/awt-and-cosmological-time-arrow.html

At the water surface, where capillary waves are spreading the longitudinal waves exists on both lower, both higher wavelengths. This is a geometrical consequence of observational perspective, because capillary waves are the slowest waves in such system, so that neighborhood of observer appears always as large, as possible just by using them.

http://www.aetherwavetheory.info/images/physics/waves/water_celerity.gif

But I'm in doubt, the conclusion presented in article could be derived just by using of (postulates of) quantum mechanics in sequence of logical steps, because quantum mechanics itself is atemporal, so it says nothing about time (arrow), future or past and their mutual relation the less. Therefore the reference to mainstream theories in this connection is redundant and misleading BS, the only purpose of which is to cover underlying emergent Aether model. If you don't believe me, simply try to reproduce "derivation" presented in article for yourself (it doesn't contain any equations, so it shouldn't be a problem).

For further reading about Block Universe model see http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0605049

• 788 Days Ago
• 12/08/2009

past is dominated by ...classical mechanics

In fact it's dominated by relativity - only presence (the boundary of which isn't so sharp in this model) is classical one. But due the spontaneous symmetry breaking, the very distant past undergoes phase transition and it becomes chaotic again, because it transforms in future again, because inside of nested Aether foam transversal energy is spreading in large circles in simmilar way, like inside of real foam. We should realize, all these models are based on classical mechanics, which is accessible for human thinking - not abstract concepts of space or time.

• 787 Days Ago
• 12/09/2009

Absurdities must have a limit

The article epitomizes the absurdities that seem to be becoming part of scientific exploration. If anything, future is an effect and therefore, it cannot precede or determine the cause. Logic and common sense must be an inherent feature of scientific theories. Sooner the physics gets rid of such absurd analysis, the better it will be for us.

Objects are supposed to be spacetime structures and whether it is second law of thermodynamics or it is quantum mechanics, time is supposed to move only in forward direction.

Principle of superposition does not suggest that a particle can exist at more than one place. If particles are spacetime structures then they can exist only at one place. Cat can never be alive and dead simultaneously, it is either alive or dead. However, because we have our observational limitations, we cannot know the fate of the cat in a sealed box, therefore, we cannot rule out either of the two possibilities. Our observational limitations do not allow us to conclude that an entity can be in two different physical states simultaneously. For us, cat is alive and dead simultaneously because we do not know whether it is alive or dead but it does not mean that can be alive and dead simultaneously.

All the proposals of quantum mechanics make a lot of sense if we add two words to its every proposal, 'For us'. We do not know whether moon is there in the sky or not unless we make an observation, therefore, as scientists, moon does not exist for us but since we do not know whether moon is there or not therefore we cannot even conclude that moon is not there when we are not watching it.

This proposal that future crystallizes against the basic tenets of physics.

Sunil Thakur
http://www.norlabs.org

• 787 Days Ago
• 12/09/2009

Limits

As a lay person interested in science, I find that limits are always superseded.......Clearly, as visceral humans, our observations are somewhat limited to the physical that we can relate to theoretical extensons of those observations.

Fourth and fifth and further dimensions require higher levels of math than most of us lay persons
posses, but if it is possible to concieve of the idea of the big bang theory, then it is also possible for us to accept notions of limitless discovery of dimensions beyond our(lay persons) comprehension.

Of course,until we are all virtualized, with limitless intelligence, and unlimited "life" spans, we must rely on all you disciplined and riqorous scientists to prove or disprove these new and future theories.

• 787 Days Ago
• 12/09/2009

A non-specialist who really hopes this turns out to be a useful model

I am fascinated to find out more about this.

I'm a non-specialist (a philosopher who's been claiming for years that he works at the boundaries between aesthetics and metaphysics, despite the fact that such a boundary doesn't exist).

But this strikes me as the sort of idea that might have interlinks in places we wouldn't expect.

I have been using the idea of a hermeneutical crystal to replace the idea of a hermeneutical circle in Heidegger for a couple of years now --- the idea is that a good understanding of the present would be constituted through the push-back b/w the future understood as pure possibilility and the future that will have happened (and that will be seen to have been "caused" by the past).

I've been writing about this mostly in terms of problems in the philosophy of art, but recently have turned to applying this to an alternative model for explaining strange entanglement.

Where would you suggest that a non-physicist who is conversant in the basics of quantum mechanics and relativity and can follow mathematical notation would go to understand the kind of model you're arguing for?

• 787 Days Ago
• 12/09/2009

Problem of irreversibility of time arrow

IMO time arrow is irreversible, because it's just defined so. Phenomena, which occurs in reversible way are atemporal. Irreversible means temporal, so that every ask for atemporal time arrow is just an oxymoron.

In AWT the spreading of transversal waves of light in space-time formed by vacuum could be modeled by spreading of transversal waves at surface, formed by density gradient of massive particles. From this follows, the vacuum is formed by gradient of massive particles as well and the time dimension is direction parallel with this gradient, whereas spatial dimensions are formed by remaining directions, which are perpendicular to time dimension.

http://aetherwavetheory.blogspot.com/2008/09/aether-and-definition-of-time.html

From more general analysis follows, the time dimension is in fact reversible like any other dimension, we just don't perceive it so. In AWT the space-time brane is in fact formed by pair of dual time arrows: radiation and gravitational one, which are both manifestation of thermodynamic time arrow from dual perspective.

http://aetherwavetheory.blogspot.com/2009/08/awt-and-cosmological-time-arrow.html

• 783 Days Ago
• 12/13/2009

Cyclic evolution and electromagnetic wave

In AWT the evolution or nested condensation or dispersion of waves in environment occurs in Ouroboros circles or Mobius loops: the effect of tiny density fluctuations cumulates in emergent way, until it transforms into new homogeneous phase, in which density of fluctuations increases gradually until it forms nearly homogeneous phase in which... etc... Note, that we can observe a dark matter or supersymmetry phenomena here: the chaotic portion of quantitative models can ofter serve for formulation of new qualitative models and vice versa in simmilar way, like longitudinal waves (Brownian noise) at water surface are dispersing into transversal ones (capillary waves) and back again into longitudinal waves (gravity waves).

Well, mainstream physics is now in the phase, when the number of various theories developed in formal models in rather ad-hoced way increased above critical level, so that new meta-theories started to emerge. These meta-theories are now in their protoscience state like vague density fluctuations forming inside of dense gas - but we shouldn't throw the baby out with the bath water too soon, because the formal approach apparently reached its limits. We can call it an informational singularity, but I'd prefer rather gradualistic view of this process, in which phase-shifted boundaries of both formal, both non-formal approaches are fuzzy and they travel together like crystallization zone through block universe - or like light wave through vacuum.

• 777 Days Ago
• 12/19/2009

past is future condensed

I need the mega million numbers for Dec 22 2009 please.  Send as list or simple equation.  will split payout 50 50. Many thanks. MB

• 767 Days Ago
• 12/29/2009

Retrocausality

An interesting mail received by me points to the retrocausality that suggests that effect may precede the cause but if cause is the producer of the effect then effect can never precede the cause.

Sunil Thakur
http://www.norlabs.org

• 762 Days Ago
• 01/03/2010

spacetime

Every attempt to separate the four basic "starting" dimensions fails. It helps to renumber the dimensions and stop thinking of time as the 4th dimension just because it was "discovered" 4th. Place it first, instead and you see that it cannot exist without x,y, and z. In the beginning was time, but it had no place to go but "outwards" in x,y, and z simultaneously. Thus, spacetime "expands." It is this "expansion" - or "inflation" (if that word helps)of spacetime that can be observed only in the racing away of distant galaxies from one another. From that we infer that it is an accelerated expansion (I'm dropping the annoying quotation marks which symbolize analogies which are all we have to help us think about these subjects, and yes, math is also an analogy). The expansion is not even, but effected by gravitational forces that localize it.One cannot reverse the arrow of time because one would have to simultaneously reverse the arrows of x,y, and z that are bound to it. If I want to go back even one second in time, I have to backtrack x,y, and z as well, because the planet has rotated, revolved around the sun, around the galaxy and across the universe in that slice of time. Despite the dreams of science fiction writers, we can never go back in all those dimensions at once.

• 749 Days Ago
• 01/16/2010

one correction

The past is as indefined as future, so the time is not dimension, but illusion or math simplification. Real is only present time, where interactions change probabilities, but nobody records neither probabilities, nor interactions -  only instant values are playing and it gives the effect of motion in some direction. In other words, if we do reconstruction of t-rex, it means we do new reconstruction on base of real for now bones but not really existing t-rex, and t-rex in the past is the same illusion as some creature in the future or imagination.

• 708 Days Ago
• 02/26/2010

Old idea

The crystal universe was presented in This new scientist article from 1999:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg16121735.000-cosmic-crystal.html

As for the past being classical, Roger Penrose disagrees. He's actually treating the big bang with the same fuzziness that quantum mechanics ascribes to future outcomes.

• 201 Days Ago
• 07/18/2011

I am by no means a scientist, but I do like to sit and try to imagine things. I have been wondering how matter can be both a particle and a wave, how can light be a wave through seemingly empty space, and what is this thing called time?  It does make sense to me that there is this material, or substance called spacetime or the aether. It seems to me that particles do not move, however waves do move. I see mass acting as a static wave moving through spacetime. Imagine spacetime being like the Pacific ocean where the coast off of China is the distant past and the California coast as being the distant future. The now moment is a wave that moves from west to east. The crests in the wave that we see on the ocean's surface is mass moving through spacetime. The particles that made up mass in the past is not the same particles that make up the same mass as time goes on. We can not experience the fabric of spacetime or observe it because waves can only observe other waves, much like if each of us were actors in our own lives projected upon a screen. We are unaware of the screen. The past is still there behind our "now" wave just as the future exists before us.