Thursday, November 05, 2009
Forecasting Financial Crashes: The Ultimate Experiment Begins
If a new technique for predicting crashes really works, a bold new experiment will measure how well.
Is it really possible to predict the end of financial bubbles?
Didier Sornette at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in
Zurich thinks so and has set up the Financial Crisis Observatory at
ETH to study the idea.
We've looked at his extraordinary predictions before. Earlier
this year, he identified a bubble in the Shanghai Composite Index and
much to this blog's surprise, forecast its end with remarkable
accuracy.
But as many people pointed out, the problem with this kind of
forecast is that it is difficult interpret the results. Does it
really back Sornette's hypothesis that crashes are predictable? How
do we know that he doesn't make these predictions on a regular basis
and only publicise the ones that come true? Or perhaps he modifies
them as the due date gets closer so that they always seem to be right
(as weather forecasters do). It's even possible that his predictions
influence the markets: perhaps they trigger crashes.
Sornette himself is only too well aware of these problems and so
has designed an experiment to properly test two hypotheses. The first
hypothesis is that financial (and other) bubbles can be diagnosed in
real-time before they end. And the second is that the termination of
financial (and other) bubbles can be bracketed using probabilistic
forecasts, with a reliability better than chance.
The experiment--he calls it the Financial Bubble
Experiment--consists of Sornette and his team monitoring world
markets and coming up with predictions about the forthcoming end of
bubbles in the way they have been doing in recent years. But instead
of publishing these predictions, Sornette intends to seal them in an
electronic envelope held by a trusted third party, in this case, the
physics arXiv.
The arXiv time stamps each prediction so that there is no dispute
over when it was made and ensures that it cannot be changed.
Every six months, Sornette says he will open the envelopes and
publish his predictions so that anyone can see how successful he has
been.
That's a brave step forward but one that he has little choice
over, if his ideas are to be broadly accepted.
To start off with, he has made three forecasts which he's posted
to the arXiv. On 1 May 2010, he will unseal them and we'll be
waiting.
Exciting stuff.
Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0911.0454: The Financial Bubble Experiment: Advanced Diagnostics and Forecasts of Bubble Terminations
Comments
The Economist doesn't think a bubble exists (yet) Analysing bubbles is a difficult tasks involving many complex ideas and interactions. We have to be careful that such studies actually work otherwise the markets will become too bullish.
The electronic envelope idea is good. No-one hates a self-fulling prophecy more than I. It is the same as the "blind analysis" technique in physics when extracting controversial values.
omni-impoten...
11/05/2009
Posts:2
Sam, just a handyman by trade
ssamd
11/05/2009
Posts:4
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704471504574443600711779692.html
ronaldoport
11/08/2009
Posts:2
lasertekk
11/05/2009
Posts:78
Wait a minute now. Let us not indite our politicians and the business leaders they control through their regulatory legislation bureaucracy and the donations business leaders make to PACs in such a broad brush way.
Surely there is an honest politician we can clone.
Bonobo
11/05/2009
Posts:8
norm
11/05/2009
Posts:3
Thank you for the comments and help in this forum.
fcofbe
11/06/2009
Posts:1
The current housing bubble and crash was set in motion by the creation of the "Community Reinvestment Act" under the Carter Administration, began its massive growth under the Clinton Administration when it was actively enforced, and became a crisis when the Democratic Congress refused to reign in Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac in 2003 and 2006, allowing sub prime mortgages to reach a tipping point on many institutional balance sheets.
The housing bubble and crash never had to have happened, but the actions of one political party pandering to their constituents made it possible and inevitable.
Thucydides
11/09/2009
Posts:8
TIME: 1pm
LOCATION: M.I.T. Media Lab - Human Dynamics
The Media Laboratory
Wiesner Building, E15
20 Ames Street
Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
This is an opportunity to debate directly on the issues raised in this blog and beyond.
sornette
11/10/2009
Posts:1