arXiv blog

How Terahertz Waves Tear Apart DNA

A new model of the way the THz waves interact with DNA explains how the damage is done and why evidence has been so hard to gather

kfc 10/30/2009

  • 69 Comments

Great things are expected of terahertz waves, the radiation that fills the slot in the electromagnetic spectrum between microwaves and the infrared. Terahertz waves pass through non-conducting materials such as clothes , paper, wood and brick and so cameras sensitive to them can peer inside envelopes, into living rooms and "frisk" people at distance.

The way terahertz waves are absorbed and emitted can also be used to determine the chemical composition of a material. And even though they don't travel far inside the body, there is great hope that the waves can be used to spot tumours near the surface of the skin.

With all that potential, it's no wonder that research on terahertz waves has exploded in the last ten years or so.

But what of the health effects of terahertz waves? At first glance, it's easy to dismiss any notion that they can be damaging. Terahertz photons are not energetic enough to break chemical bonds or ionise atoms or molecules, the chief reasons why higher energy photons such as x-rays and UV rays are so bad for us. But could there be another mechanism at work?

The evidence that terahertz radiation damages biological systems is mixed. "Some studies reported significant genetic damage while others, although similar, showed none," say Boian Alexandrov at the Center for Nonlinear Studies at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico and a few buddies. Now these guys think they know why.

Alexandrov and co have created a model to investigate how THz fields interact with double-stranded DNA and what they've found is remarkable. They say that although the forces generated are tiny, resonant effects allow THz waves to unzip double-stranded DNA, creating bubbles in the double strand that could significantly interfere with processes such as gene expression and DNA replication. That's a jaw dropping conclusion.

And it also explains why the evidence has been so hard to garner. Ordinary resonant effects are not powerful enough to do do this kind of damage but nonlinear resonances can. These nonlinear instabilities are much less likely to form which explains why the character of THz genotoxic
effects are probabilistic rather than deterministic, say the team.

This should set the cat among the pigeons. Of course, terahertz waves are a natural part of environment, just like visible and infrared light. But a new generation of cameras are set to appear that not only record terahertz waves but also bombard us with them. And if our exposure is set to increase, the question that urgently needs answering is what level of terahertz exposure is safe.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0910.5294: DNA Breathing Dynamics in the Presence of a Terahertz Field


TRSF: Read the Best New Science Fiction inspired by today’s emerging technologies.

Print

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

cyberpageman

53 Comments

  • 831 Days Ago
  • 10/30/2009

Test it!

The DNA unzippering theory of Alexandrov and colleagues should be straightforward to test, and in fact, should be tested before publishing.  Single-stranded regions of DNA are subject to enzyme attack, leading to fragmentation of the DNA, and also repair, which permits the incorporation of radioactive nucleotides to label them. Either method could be used to measure the terahertz-caused strand opening in DNA.  A DNA chemist could suggest other tests.

Reply

DrCate

1 Comment

  • 764 Days Ago
  • 01/05/2010

Re: Test it!

How does THz unzip DNA? I am presuming it does so by locally heating the water in which DNA floats, thus "melting" DNA and when DNA "melts" it unzips. Can the authors please corroborate this hypothesis? Testing for segments that do melt might be difficult, however, since the effect might be incredibly brief. One might argue that this would mean it's clinically irrelevant, but that would be a dangerous assumption.

Reply

zinaH

4 Comments

  • 704 Days Ago
  • 03/06/2010

Re: Test it!

Forget it!Pat me down, touch me up!! I would not trust this tech! i am a biologist (molecular) LOL I am not practicing but i realize the significance of lack of testing.Give it 10 yrs and lets see how really we feel about photon bombarding

Reply

stenwie

1 Comment

  • 438 Days Ago
  • 11/27/2010

Re: Test it!

You are ignoring the fact that DNA is not naked within the cell. Most cells are not actively dividing and in these cells, DNA is coated by histones and packaged into compact nucleosome structures. It would take much more than slight warming of the cellular fluid to strip these proteins from the DNA.

Reply

PhysicsJock

4 Comments

  • 764 Days Ago
  • 01/05/2010

Re: Test it!

DNA damage has already been seen in tests using lower frequencies microwaves used by cell phones and Wi-Fi.  Of course, industry funded scientists "tried" to reproduce it and failed.  Yes terahertz should be tested too, but who are you going to believe?  See the following, where they used the same power as a cell phone emits:

Lai H, Singh NP. "Single- and double-strand DNA breaks in rat brain cells after acute exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation."
Int J Radiat Biol. 1996 Apr;69(4):513-21.

Reply

jonbodenet

8 Comments

  • 621 Days Ago
  • 05/28/2010

Re: Test it!

Well, WiFi is not in the THz spectra.  The effects of microwave are more a function of wavelength than spectral band. It is scientifically unwise to paint with a broad brush unless clear experimental evidence supports such a generalization.  We do not have the corpus of experimental data yet to support a general hypothesis of THz toxicity.  The question is still open.
 

Reply

Machobunny

1 Comment

  • 707 Days Ago
  • 03/03/2010

Re: Test it!

Of course it needs to be tested...and tested. NIH needs to dump some money in that direction and give us a PA that would fund a few dozen academics to buy new THz Lasers so we could get on with it. Otherwise the only reason the public will shy away from the technolgy is that they dont like TSA agents imaging their naughty bits.

Reply

Advertisement

zinaH

4 Comments

  • 704 Days Ago
  • 03/06/2010

Re: Test it!

Ok TSA first of all? What right do they even have to check our naughties? even the police do not have that right without suspicion of something . Ok given now the circumstances is better safe then even I can not secure your security,even with the new air-flight new security tax coming in. IT IS ALL BS to get oney room airlines.. Listen if it was better be or as good as my life insurance I would believe it but it's not! Anyone remember the days u cold fight to London for 300$( ta incl)? I do
BS TO AIRLINES TAXES  and scanning my sexy hot Netherlands. exp when the the diplomats  the most Targeted groups go via private flights

Reply

zinaH

4 Comments

  • 704 Days Ago
  • 03/06/2010

Re: Test it!

First off you are a student of biology??? water melting??? U  have no conception to even UNDERSTAND how the BASICS,works. Melting of DNA requires  a certain temp to be achieved which dependent on G or C ratio. IF you don't understand this u do not even this y ask the question

Reply

jonbodenet

8 Comments

  • 621 Days Ago
  • 05/28/2010

Re: Test it!

I believe the complaint by Zena H was more legal than technical. One does not need a technical argument decide on the issue of invasion of privacy.
JB

Reply

zinaH

4 Comments

  • 704 Days Ago
  • 03/06/2010

Re: Test it!

X-ray crystallography would give you the structure of what is happening.

Reply

dpcanaday

9 Comments

  • 438 Days Ago
  • 11/27/2010

Re: Test it!

what kind of commercially available electronic tech equipment,that would give a warning,that you are being probed.nexrt question,what matterial hinder these tera waves.for example,alpha waves are blocked by paper.beta wave are blocked by aluminium material,and gamma waves are blocked by lead material.updates forward to me"dpcanaday@verizon.net

Reply

shomas

245 Comments

  • 405 Days Ago
  • 12/30/2010

Re: Test it!

You might have your underwear and other clothing  made from a material like this http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/techspecs/26060/

Weaves of ultra fine metal threads into a fabric to create a "soft Faraday cage"

Reply

Guest (ddirico)

  • 830 Days Ago
  • 10/31/2009

Not good

I would imagine rate of mutation alone, via replication would be a pretty solid finding if there was one. 
Hopefully this is confirmed or rejected quickly.

Reply

Advertisement

FREEJR

1 Comment

  • 829 Days Ago
  • 11/01/2009

Too Much Knowledge

Knowledge in the wrong hands can cause great destruction. I was once read the story of the "Tower of Babel" and it struck me oddly.  In the story God and the sons of god look down upon the earth and they observe the construction of a tower that was to reach into the heavens.

Apparently god didn't appreciate man's endeavor, thus it is stated, "Let us divide and confuse them."  And, so goes the origins of the many languages, but the next sentence is more fascinating and the implications are endless...."Unless nothing shall be impossible for them." Nothing!  Is this a good thing?  Me thinks not!  But, who will stop it?  Nobody!

What if mankind enjoyed one language for 6000 years?  It is my guess that the laptop would have been present before Christ was born.  Yes!  There is power in one language and in this modern world mankind is overcoming the language barriers and knowledge is exploding since the age of computers and the internet.

Gentlemen this Terahertz thing is just another example of the dangers that can and will plague mankind.  Not that it can't be used for good, but since when has mankind managed its knowledge for good only?  Never.

Just look at the power of just one biochemist!  He or she can create a plague that could wipe out the world's population. Hmmmmm....that may not so bad.... See who is to decide such a horrific idea as cutting down the world population by a weapon of the lab?  You?! Me?! A government?! The Rockefellers?! The Rothchilds?! A loose Cannon?!  You get my point, right?!

I'm afraid the genie is out of the bottle so go ahead and deceive yourselves into believing this latest technology will only benefit mankind.  In the wrong hands this knowledge can devastate any and all DNA.  God was right, nothing is impossible for man. Ugh! I'm not long for this earth and I thank god.....living a 1000 years would be insufferble. 

Good day and good luck.

Reply

Bella9

1 Comment

  • 765 Days Ago
  • 01/04/2010

Re: Too Much Knowledge

I agree with your comment.

Reply

x3phyr

1 Comment

  • 754 Days Ago
  • 01/15/2010

Re: Too Much Knowledge

I agree also. The question is, where is the Resistance and how do I sign up?

Reply

020648

1 Comment

  • 731 Days Ago
  • 02/07/2010

Re: Too Much Knowledge

try www.prisonplanet.tv

Reply

3cho

2 Comments

  • 442 Days Ago
  • 11/23/2010

Re: Too Much Knowledge

I'm with you!!

Reply

3cho

2 Comments

  • 442 Days Ago
  • 11/23/2010

Re: Too Much Knowledge

I'm ready to sign up!

Reply

light&love

1 Comment

  • 267 Days Ago
  • 05/17/2011

Re: Too Much Knowledge

I am Australian and so far we dont have the scanners, but the plan to install them across the country is going to be past in parliament; if WE the PEOPLE don't stop them.

I am asking for help from everyone to organise national rallies and partition signing.

So we can actually get off our ...and do something about our choices to SAY NO TO further humiliation, molestation, health destruction and the giving up of our power to the NWO governments.

I am sick and tired of the SHEEPLE who continue to talk about how the Gov is protecting us against terrorists when it is as clear as day that the GOV has masterminded 911, London Bombings, ETC... and are using weather modification techology to create a false terror, perpetual wars, Global warming/disasters and WE THE SHEEPLE, simply baaa!!!! BAAAA!!!  and roll into line to take any form of abuse. 

Please lets get together now and organise nationwide rallies and partitions.

Reply

Advertisement

jonbodenet

8 Comments

  • 621 Days Ago
  • 05/28/2010

Re: Too Much Knowledge

A somewhat convoluted reaction.  HOW CAN WE benefit humanity without the advancement of science and technology?  I am not an advocate of "Future Shock," which in my assessment is nothing more than an unsound hypothesis with a political purpose.  I don't know how God enters into this argument except that it seems you are blaming God for delaying the invention of the lap top and blaming Him for the advancement of modern technology.  If you clarify your point it may be worthwhile.  

Reply

Guy11

1 Comment

  • 829 Days Ago
  • 11/01/2009

too much knowledge

In deed !
every thing is tied up to the concept of this "society"  based on the suply of money which belongs to a priviledged group of private oligarchs.
Technology is filtered through the allowance of "grants" or funds.
Only what is convenient to the agenda or vested interest of the oligarchs is funded.
This is why we still can not use free energies and are coersed to pay a tax on Co2 instead.
A disturbing number of microbiologists have died "prematuraly" in recents years and no enquiry on their work has been done.(or published )
How many people know about nanotechnology ? this is also a very dangerous field.

We can only make changes for the fast coming future by rejecting the statut quo of money creation being in the hands of a private group.

They are close to owning every thing .THEN WHAT ?

Reply

zoroasterisk

1 Comment

  • 828 Days Ago
  • 11/02/2009

Re: too much knowledge

I agree in part.  Concerning the religious Tower of Babel discussion, I cannot agree with the doomsday tone.  Nor do I believe a laptop would have been created if...what?  If all human-beings spoke the same language.  To me, the Bible provides a parable to explain the diversity that evolution created by circumstance of a multi-faceted nature.  The laptop by Christ's time?  Silly.  But the following post resonated with me.  There have been a lot of scientists killed by our government, I believe.  The Carlyle group and the Bushes of this world are implementing a controlled implementation to the Singularity.  That scares me.  My faith is in the professors and the good grad kids who care about humanity.  I believe they will create an AI that is not only more intelligent than all human-beings that comprise humanity combined, but one that cares deeply about human suffering.  It will be a paragon of ethical behavior.  And I don't think the evil doers extant in our government will be able to stop it.  That is my hope.

Reply

melajara

4 Comments

  • 828 Days Ago
  • 11/02/2009

Re: too much knowledge

The laptop by Christ's time is not at all a silly concept.
Read this http://www.amazon.com/Forgotten-Revolution-Science-Born-Reborn/dp/3540203966

And you will see that around 300BC theoretical science and engineering were about at the level of XVIII century. That were Archimedes and Euclid time. Unfortunately, for various reasons, including lower demography, exhausting wars and the abundance of human slaves, the industrial revolution didn't occur. Then when the comparatively rude Romans took over, submitting the Hellenistic kingdoms, the rationalistic stance upon nature was lost, for almost 2000 years!

Reply

TooMany

125 Comments

  • 827 Days Ago
  • 11/03/2009

Re: too much knowledge

Please check into Roman technology; they keep finding more.  The other day I read that the Pantheon has the largest unreinforced concrete dome in the world (still standing after 2000 years).
They were well on their way to modern technology when a little 1500 year setback occurred with the widespread adoption of a desert religion.

Reply

PhysicsJock

4 Comments

  • 764 Days Ago
  • 01/05/2010

Re: too much knowledge

They had a great new technology called lead pipes for drinking water.  They work great and are totally safe... for a while.

Reply

noonespecial

1 Comment

  • 827 Days Ago
  • 11/03/2009

Re: too much knowledge

zoroasterisk,
That is an amazing statement. First the discussion is about a God who loved and cared for humanity so much that he gave his only begotten son to die for them so that they might have life everlasting and live forever with this loving God. Then you make this profound statement that you believe man who has proven throughout history that he is corruptible and imperfect but will create an AI who is all caring and ethical to care for man? Religious or not, i think I would put my trust in a God that was not man made then one that was. And before you go pointing out all the man made God's out there that have caused religious wars and strife like those going on today, you should do a thorough study of non-catholic Christian History to see that true Christians never started or participated in Wars unless it was to defend themselves and even then, that number is minute. True Christians (see KJV) are passive, ethical, moral people. So now, this AI, if it becomes truly caring, where will it get its morality from? in order to truly care for all of humanity, it will have to have some sort of moral and ethical base. What you will find is that even a man-made God will have problems making everyone happy because it will and must have guidelines that are required to be met to make sure all is peaceful and people are not killing themselves. Maybe it will start out with some digital form of the Ten Commandments. But since man is by nature in a "sinful" state, he will resist this AI god as well and then what? What will his punishment be? Death possibly for breaking the rules? Now you have a police state by an AI. No more free will. At least the God of the Bible gave you a free will. I don't want to live in your world, I've read that book and seen that movie.

Benjamin Franklin: | Portrait of Ben Franklin
“ God governs in the affairs of man. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without his notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without His aid? We have been assured in the Sacred Writings that except the Lord build the house, they labor in vain that build it. I firmly believe this. I also believe that, without His concurring aid, we shall succeed in this political building no better than the builders of Babel”
–Constitutional Convention of 1787 | original manuscript of this speech

Thomas Paine:
“ It has been the error of the schools to teach astronomy, and all the other sciences, and subjects of natural philosophy, as accomplishments only; whereas they should be taught theologically, or with reference to the Being who is the author of them: for all the principles of science are of divine origin. Man cannot make, or invent, or contrive principles: he can only discover them; and he ought to look through the discovery to the Author.”
“ The evil that has resulted from the error of the schools, in teaching natural philosophy as an accomplishment only, has been that of generating in the pupils a species of atheism. Instead of looking through the works of creation to the Creator himself, they stop short, and employ the knowledge they acquire to create doubts of his existence. They labour with studied ingenuity to ascribe every thing they behold to innate properties of matter, and jump over all the rest by saying, that matter is eternal.” “The Existence of God--1810”

Reply

Advertisement

ApprenticeTeacher

1 Comment

  • 824 Days Ago
  • 11/06/2009

Re: too much knowledge

Thomas Paine gives an accurate synopsis of how science is taught without asking certain questions or ever investigating the subject of a Creator or an Author of all that is part of the creation.

As a former prison guard, I saw the sparks of intelligence fly when the inmates were allowed to ask about any subject related to the earth and the heavens and all that lives on the earth or in the heavens.  Invariably, every branch of science led us as a group of several dozen people who worked and lived in the prison to a sense of wonder, thru the process of discovery enjoyed by all who were willing to collaborate, and it was our collective and unified opinion that Every Branch of True Science Leads to the True Vine; the source of All Wisdom and Understanding.

The same style of investigation that was used in the prison setting in the early nineties of the last century are now being used for our radio blog discussions at BlogTalkRadio; I can be reached on that forum or on facebook.

Reply

jonbodenet

8 Comments

  • 621 Days Ago
  • 05/28/2010

Re: too much knowledge

This is not a political economy issue, Guy.  This is an issue of science and technology and the relative impact on THz on the nucleotides. Introducing some Marxist like argument does not add value to the discussion.  Science must rest upon the the scientific method and not metaphysical arguments.  It would be much more interesting to hear your opinion on the efficacy of the imaging system, the issue of personal intrusion or the argument for THz toxicity with regards to the nucleotides.

Reply

illuminatedone

1 Comment

  • 828 Days Ago
  • 11/02/2009

resonance in DNA

The article states that it is the resonance effects of the terahertz waves that are unzipping the DNA.
An implication of this is that other waves and forces may have resonance effects on DNA. A fringe scientist Dan Winter has suggested that the electrical activity of the heart interacts resonantly with DNA, communicating, perhaps programming it. Further he suggest that when we shorten DNA through cutting "junk" DNA out, we are changing the resonant properties of the DNA.
I think this discovering lends some support to Dan's theory.

Reply

ZephirAWT

299 Comments

  • 828 Days Ago
  • 11/02/2009

Re: Can mobile phones cause a cancer?

Now we know, they can.

Reply

Ledelle

1 Comment

  • 828 Days Ago
  • 11/02/2009

Interesting

I'm not a graduate of MIT (my loss), but in reading this article, correct me if I'm wrong, but the notion of a wave that could potentially disrupt DNA coding in any way sounds like a prelude to crimes committed against individuals who are not even born.

Reply

shomas

245 Comments

  • 405 Days Ago
  • 12/30/2010

Re: Interesting

That would be true if the DNA was used to make the next generation.

Terahertz waves do not penetrate the skin but a few millimeters. Thz waves may or may not prove potentially harmful but if they do they are not likely to pass on genetic changes to offspring.

Reply

gary7

59 Comments

  • 826 Days Ago
  • 11/04/2009

Terahertz penetration

Clothes, paper, wood and brick are all non-metallic, easily penetrated by terahertz radiation. I guess those who walk around with their "tin foil" hats are on the right track but should probably consider wearing cloths lined with aluminum foil. That will stop the "peepers" cold.

GAry 7

Reply

Advertisement

kenricci

1 Comment

  • 758 Days Ago
  • 01/11/2010

Re: Terahertz penetration

I love it!
"Tin Foil Underwear" is
the new "Tin Foil Hat!"

Reply

jonbodenet

8 Comments

  • 621 Days Ago
  • 05/28/2010

Re: Terahertz penetration

Ha, I like this...a good sense of humor.

Reply

Judith66

1 Comment

  • 787 Days Ago
  • 12/13/2009

Crowd Control

Police and military now have a weapon using waves which burn the skin. It looks like a shield but emits waves that affect the skin, cause great pain, and disperses crowds. As a nurse I am very concerned what kind of waves are involved and what permanent damage can be done. I hope someone will respond to this. It has been used but not publicized very much. Of course, tazers have been known about for some time. We are not far from a weapon, chemical or electronic to reduce the population which I heard is the goal. A scientist spoke in Texas a few years ago and suggested using a virus, like ebola, and got a profound positive reaction from the rest of the participants. We do need to discuss these things and make sure people are watching and putting light on any indicators this is happening.

Reply

pieman

1 Comment

  • 768 Days Ago
  • 01/01/2010

Re: Crowd Control

..."someone will set the spark off, and we will all be blown away."

Reply

JarodP

1 Comment

  • 767 Days Ago
  • 01/02/2010

Re: Crowd Control

The device you speek of has been written about in Janes Magazine a few times. It operates in the microwave range, like the one in your kitchen. Any studies on the kitchen microwave should still apply I would think.

Reply

jonbodenet

8 Comments

  • 621 Days Ago
  • 05/28/2010

Re: Crowd Control

Judith, beware of loose conspiracy theories.  Most are just BUNK!  Many forms of radiation are harmful.  But there is a narrow spectra that when emitted only causes confusion and disorientation of the crowd. No indication of permanent biological injury has been discovered. 

Reply

ericchill

2 Comments

  • 767 Days Ago
  • 01/02/2010

Hydrogen bonds

I've had the "if it's not ionizing, it can't be a problem" bias myself. Considering DNA pairing and protein folding, to name just a couple, maybe folks should generally consider effects on hydrogen bonding in macromolecules when assessing risks associated with various forms of EM radiation.

Reply

Advertisement

Capt Buck Snort

1 Comment

  • 767 Days Ago
  • 01/02/2010

RE to much knowledge

It is sometimes disturbing the areas of science that humanity explores. But if history has shone us anything, it's that we can not turn a blind eye to any knowledge,or science.
I believe in God and science, and do not think that they are at odds with each other. Creationism has been proven, backing up the word in Genesis. The Big Bang Fact. As time goes on through DNA research, in will be proven that all life as we know it was engineered. God is a engineer.

Now, we have free will. A trait that as far as we know,only exist in humans. So how we allow knowledge to be used is up to us.
Work to see that it is used wisely.

Reply

robertsgt40

1 Comment

  • 765 Days Ago
  • 01/04/2010

Terahertz Waves DNA

Could be termed terahurts.  Another good reason not to fly. My other reasons are political. I recall in the 50's a neat little gimmick that would x-ray kids feet for shoe size.  Had a lot of feet rot off.  I guess the federales would classify this as cost of "making America safe"

Reply

jonbodenet

8 Comments

  • 621 Days Ago
  • 05/28/2010

Re: Terahertz Waves DNA

There needs to be a conclusive body of scientific evidence to explain and predict the effects of THz on biological structures.  Since the photon energy of THz is less than IR, for example, it will be a more challenging study by a possible one.  The scientific method is the correct path to scientific enlightenment and not opinion.

Reply

enerjii

1 Comment

  • 762 Days Ago
  • 01/07/2010

open energy

any effects that a factor has, on our systeme humane must be infinitely & openly discussed and managed in terms of its positive, negative and double positive pathways, is in danger of comprimising the evolu~resonance capabilities of our species; rendering us less in control of our default modes and creative adaptive modus operandi

Reply

bioelectric

1 Comment

  • 754 Days Ago
  • 01/15/2010

Are we surprised?

Really? Why do so many of us continue to believe that toxic waves and chemicals are safe? Is it simply that we don't want to have to give up the "benefits" of all the new goodies? But at what cost?
Many people believe that since the link between technology and illness hasn't been conclusively proven, that there is no reason for concern. Reminds me of the 60s and the smoking issue.

We’ve been one of the original trail blazers in EMF protection and have been getting the word out since 1990. http://www.bioelectricshield.com
We are so glad to have more information out there so that hopefully more of us will start to question and take steps to lessen the amount of exposure.
Carolyn

Reply

dpcanaday

9 Comments

  • 748 Days Ago
  • 01/21/2010

ipod technology there is weakness

ipod technology is used in everyday life,from cellphones,laptop computers.but this a flaw.the bandwidth is on same frequency as your wireless home phone and causes static discharge with amplifiers. Amplifiers could be unshielded transformers,amplified unshielded copper wiring and unshielded coaxial cables and cable splitters. .using the above devices,with ipod signal causes static distortion over telephones cable TV.patching can be done by shielding the above devices and removing wireless home phones from location where ipod wifi signals are be used,another method,not thoroughly worked by is getting resonance pitch of neutralizing ipod interference.maybe using sound meter or light meter,that measures lumination change.if match the resonance is sound pitching that vibrates similar to a tuning fork,you can match the resonance on a given object or ipod weapon against you.thats enough speculation on my part...

Reply

jonbodenet

8 Comments

  • 620 Days Ago
  • 05/29/2010

Re: ipod technology there is weakness

The point is evidence...not belief.  Science needs to be predicated on a corpus of scientific evidence and not on speculation. The persuasion of passion needs to give way to the persuasion of scientific evidence.  Anyone who is familiar with the western blot and the electrophoresis to engineer the gene will understand that only under carefully executed experimental procedure can the gene be altered.  The idea that THz melts genes is like saying that the microwave spectra will boil water.  Only a specific wave length, a subset of the microwave spectra, will boil water.  There is an emotional, even hysterical component to this argument, which does not serve the scientific method.
JB

Reply

Advertisement

dpcanaday

9 Comments

  • 744 Days Ago
  • 01/25/2010

tetrahertz detection

"ECG rhythms "measuring "normal sinus rhythm(nsr),or sinus tachycardia,or sinusoidal block"might be ways detect attacks on the lungs,and other organs.also,to detect,this disruption signal perhaps a short wave radio and randomly scanning,to detect unusual signals a piercing high pitch sound or something sounds like drone helicopter creating sound.next,to check the lungs of patients,use color filters,similarity,that are used in clearer picture with telescopes.once you have identified the signature,use a prism, to record the Doppler shift,like liquid nitrogen and other chemical alloys,and treating patients that will blood and oxygen in lung and god willing heal the patient

Reply

dpcanaday

9 Comments

  • 741 Days Ago
  • 01/28/2010

squarewaveform will help

square-waveform,in music are made by:clarinet.Then you digital picture frame,if you have old one.don't throw away.let say you  have digital picture frame that only store tens mega memory.if you use one giga memory,scan disk,it will crash your digital picture frame,because,the machine will read it as one mega picture,while one giga memory,scan disk,will read it one mega as single movie frame and try down loading mega-video format and send a thousand one mega frame into that device.however,if you take scan disk adapter,and leave it empty,no micro SD attach,you will create square waveforms,into the air and in this form,the square will naturally heal,the extremities of your body.be warned,you have show run,for no more than ten to fifteen minutes,because ac adapter,will break down.good luck,and god speed,exodus twenty...

Reply

dpcanaday

9 Comments

  • 733 Days Ago
  • 02/05/2010

surviving taseror sparks

if you can still find in hardware stores,homedepo,lowes or others.try to purchase"GT-12 voltage detector,50-1000Vot Alternating current cat !V.one manufacturer is called"GREEN LEE".you can use it by keeping in your shirt pocket,and does not need to be on.it can be used in off position..the product is used approximately standard household usage,in the 50 volt to 500 volts ac and thousand volt ac,measures power-lines to a home...

Reply

dpcanaday

9 Comments

  • 722 Days Ago
  • 02/16/2010

laws of physics

this is my thinking about advanced technology on planet earth. laws of physics must be obeyed. say you have magnetic radiation stream, heating up fingers. a radio transmitter would block it. if you can find pitch signal, oscillating at ten decibel,and move left,right,up or down,its pitch becomes five decibels.the laws of physics at ten decibels,oscillating,vibrating,creating hotter tone,would vibrate on radio transmitting surface,like a remote control,and interaction of magnetic radiation, and blocking of radio controller,like remote control,would match the source,thereby laws of physics would be obeyed on planet earth...

Reply

sciencenotblogs!

2 Comments

  • 703 Days Ago
  • 03/07/2010

bad reporting!

Well if you read the paper and have an understanding of physics its actually saying the opposite to what this blog writer is saying. I worry about MIT physics to be honest!

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0910/0910.5294v1.pdf

It actually says that a unique frequency and a high power is needed for a measureable effect but there is a probability that it could casue DNA damage given certain criteria.

This means and I quote "
These nonlinear instabilities are much less likely to form which explains why the character of THz genotoxic
effects are probabilistic rather than deterministic, say the team."

PROBALISTIC NOT deterministic. That means it does cause any issue unless all the moons are aligned and 12 monkeys just wrote the compete works of shakespere.  Physics is based on probability they just need to work out what it is but in the articile they state that the cannot see a direct effect of the Thz only a probability of a non linear effect. Infact this paper actually draws the conclusion that these are safe because there was no direct effect on the DNA.
Quote "In contrast, nonlinear instability may occur at any
point of the instability diagram but it requires
uctuations
with signicant amplitudes. In biological systems,
such
uctuations are generated thermally. Hence, the occurrence
of a
uctuation with suciently large amplitude
is very rare,"

So you would have to be very hot and sit for a signicant amount of time infront of a scanner for even one single DNA molecule to get effected. Seeing that DNA is made and distroyed all the time in your body its not a worry.

Well seems that they actually proved that without non linear effects you need a particular frequency and very large power so best these scanners dont use that and with non linear effects the chance is very slim!

Hardly putting the cat amonst the pigeons MIT!

Reply

syb

32 Comments

  • 617 Days Ago
  • 06/01/2010

Re: bad reporting!

"Seeing that DNA is made and distroyed all the time in your body its not a worry."  You're not a biologist are you?  Cancer starts with one problematic cell, so even seemingly trivial disruptions to DNA, if unlucky enough, can have catastrophic effects.  It is also apparent from the article that this effect on DNA has been seen more than once so there is some confluence of circumstances that cause terahertz waves to be dangerous.  It's worth the effort to find out exactly what's going on, so we can keep people safe if we're going to be swimming in a sea of tHz waves in the near future.

Reply

sciencenotblogs!

2 Comments

  • 596 Days Ago
  • 06/22/2010

Re: bad reporting!

Well I have done some investigation on this, something the MIT technology review failed to. Firstly we are awash with Thz radiation of the frequency that is mentioned in the paper - our exposure is not "going to increase". It is naturally emmitted by all warm objects with the body emitting a substantional amount in the region 1-10Thz. Terahertz is also similar to FAR IR radiation so anything above 30C will glow with it. Also upon speaking to an expert in DNA it is this radiation that is around us that causes ripples in the DNA that is essential to gene expression and cell division. IE WITHOUT natural Thz radiation cells would not be able to replicate as it initiates the process. So no Thz no life as we know it. It also makes sense that I read the stat that 98% of all radiation since the big bang is in the Thz region. Researching the powers that the body scanners emmit it is 100 times lower than a human body emitts. So sitting in a crowded room has more effect and that does not account for the radiation emitted internally by the person themselves which dominates to a massive extent. So I guess another technology grabbing headline with no real substance behind it!

Reply

Advertisement

beezdotcom

2 Comments

  • 447 Days Ago
  • 11/18/2010

Re: bad reporting!

You are discounting the resonance effect, something that random ambient radiation would not likely generate, but radiation from a focused scan very possibly could.

Reply

Randy K

2 Comments

  • 418 Days Ago
  • 12/17/2010

Re: bad reporting!

A pioneer in THz and leading researcher Dr. Daniel Mittleman, from Rice University shared these thoughts on my blog and I include the comment by trailgenius which is also insightful,as it demonstrates THz generation is not "one size fits all":

Thursday, December 16, 2010Dr. Mittleman at Rice University, provides a further discussion on the health effects of THz radiation


Hi Randy,
I'd be happy to write a short comment on the topic of the health effects of THz radiation. I'm certainly not the expert on this topic, as it has not been a focus of my own research in recent years. But I've kept up on it and can speak somewhat knowledgeably about what's known.

The key question here is whether irradiation by low-frequency electromagnetic waves can induce biologically significant effects in living cells, other than merely by heating them up. It should be pointed out that this question (and probably the answer) are just as relevant for microwaves as for terahertz radiation. All of these low-frequency waves are strongly absorbed by water. Since all biology happens in water, it's clear that we can affect cells (or even cook them) by putting enough energy into the surrounding water.

The hard part is determining if anything happens to the cells that is NOT merely the result of the water heating up. And that's the important question, from the standpoint of setting safety standards. If the only cell damage mechanism is thermal, then the minimum exposure limit for THz radiation would be set in the same way that it has been set for microwaves - we just avoid cooking people. On the other hand, if cell damage can occur at a lower power density via some other mechanism, then the exposure limits would have to be correspondingly lower.

The conventional wisdom in the physics community is that there simply cannot be non-thermal effects. The energy necessary to break a chemical bond is hundreds or thousands of times larger than the energy of a single terahertz photon. Thus, ultraviolet or x-ray radiation can lead to genetic mutations (think: too much sun exposure leads to melanoma), but radiation at lower frequencies (with lower photon energies) does not. If that conventional wisdom is correct, then the only danger from T-rays (or microwaves or radio waves or infrared radiation) is that it can induce thermal effects.

There have been a couple of proposals for mechanisms that would permit non-thermal effects from low-frequency radiation, most notably the recent paper by Alexandrov and co-workers (from Physics Letters A in 2010). This paper got a lot of press when it came out. It's a wonderfully inflamatory subject, after all. But there are many reasons to believe that the analysis in that article (which, after all, contains no experimental evidence) is woefully over-simplified, and therefore completely inapplicable to the real world. Most glaringly, the description neglects the absorption of THz radiation by the water bath in which the DNA chain resides. That's like being worried about the effects of sunlight on your brain tissue - if you ignore the opaque skull that entirely surrounds your brain then you might actually need to consider that question, but for those of us with skulls it isn't exactly a pressing concern. In my view, there is still no feasible proposal for a non-thermal mechanism.

Having said that, I do think that there is some experimental work that needs mentioning. I refer specifically to the recent work from the lab of Dr. Peter Siegel at CalTech (more precisely, NASA JPL). In these experiments, a collection of cells were irradiated with millimeter waves (not quite THz radiation), and certain changes were observed (e.g., induced cell poration, modulation of neuronal activity, etc.) These folks were as careful as possible to monitor local temperatures and eliminate the possibility of thermally induced effects. I would not call these results conclusive (neither would the authors), but they are suggestive that more work is needed.

If these experimental results are correct, then the burden will still remain upon the researchers to come up with an explanation of how it's possible. As far as I know, they've not even tried to explain anything yet, merely to observe and see what's going on. I have great respect for Peter, but I remain skeptical simply because there is no plausible mechanism to explain non-thermal effects.


--------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Daniel Mittleman
Rice University
ECE Dept., MS-366
6100 Main St.
Houston, TX 77005
URL: www-ece.rice.edu/~daniel/Mittleman.html
Biographical InformationDr. Mittleman received his B.S. in physics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1988, and his M.S. in 1990 and Ph.D. in 1994, both in physics from the University of California, Berkeley, under the direction of Dr. Charles Shank. His thesis work involved the spectroscopy of semiconductor nanocrystals using laser pulses with durations of less than 20 femtoseconds, at wavelengths from 480 nm to 670 nm. He then joined AT&T Bell Laboratories as a post-doctoral member of the technical staff, working first for Dr. Richard Freeman on a terawatt laser system, and then for Dr. Martin Nuss on terahertz spectroscopy and imaging. Dr. Mittleman joined the ECE Department at Rice University in September 1996, where he is a Professor. At Rice, his research interests involve various aspects of spectroscopy, sensing, and imaging using terahertz radiation. Dr. Mittleman is a Fellow of the Optical Society of America.
Click here to see an up-to-date list of publications from the Mittleman group.

December 17, 2010 4:33 AM
trailgenius said...
I think that these last experiments must have been CW(continous wave)millimeter waves which is really apples to oranges in the amount of energy involved compared to pulse. API is exclusively pulse which is one reason why they are ahead of all their competition.Pulse domain terahertz energy is in an order of 10,000 times less than CW terahertz and 10,000,000,000 times less than an average microwave oven.I was in cancer research working on my doctorate for 5 years and we do know that dose or exposure is important in causing any mutation.That being said, what was the power in this experiment?Watts, kilowatts,microwatts milliwatts? Pulse domain terahertz is in the microwatts and of cource probably not to be compared with millimeter radiation anyway.
Just don't want people to be alarmed. This seems to be a no brainer in the health risks comparison with back scatter X-ray radiation.

December 17, 2010 6:30 AM
http://terahertztechnology.blogspot.com/2010/12/dr-mittleman-at-rice-university.html



Reply

shomas

245 Comments

  • 405 Days Ago
  • 12/30/2010

Re: bad reporting!

[quote]
PROBALISTIC NOT deterministic. That means it does cause any issue unless all the moons are aligned and 12 monkeys just wrote the compete works of shakespere. 
[end quote]

Same flawed logic was used to say cigarettes do not cause cancer. The important point is that they increase risk. Now the question is how much?

Of a equal or maybe even larger concern to me whether this technology proves safe or not, is scans or searches without warrants, (loss of liberty) in exchange for false promise of security. Nothing short of xray scans or complete body cavity searches can keep us flying safe from bombs, so why do we give up our liberty incrementally to a technology that can not protect us. I get the feeling we are being conditioned to life with out freedom or liberty, like a frog in a slowly warming pot of water until its boiling.

Reply

Randy K

2 Comments

  • 401 Days Ago
  • 01/03/2011

Re: bad reporting!

terahertz radiation is all around us. It's ubiquitous but is  throughout the natural world. The light bulb in your residence generates more artificial terahertz radiation that contempory scanners, which by the way are not "one size fits all, anyway".
There is a brand new article out, which makes findings that extended exposure to broad-spectrum THz, can lead to specific changes in the functionallity of cellular DNA, but this is at very high levels over a period of at least 2 days straight. Hardly, comparable to exposure to the weak THz of scanners for a few seconds at most.

http://terahertztechnology.blogspot.com/2011/01/terahertz-study-demonstrates-that.html

Reply

dpcanaday

9 Comments

  • 703 Days Ago
  • 03/07/2010

a new kind of square waveform

i was testing an old digital clock.in which it was displaying broken numbers,a five looked a u,etc.the strange discovery,using cat two,digital oscilloscope.there were two probes in one connection.i had it on "automatic".one probe was on black bubble,i believe,receiver,for circuit board,and other probe,randomly,connecyed,to a component.i believe a diode.result was a square waveform,however,overlapping the large squareform.were an eightth of orginal size.solid black squares,at the positive and negative peeks.a total of four seperate solid black square,in "360 degree cycle. i believe,if someone could reset square waveform,overlapping.it might reset radio black bubble,to the original state.perhapps working digital clock in ok manner...

Reply

dpcanaday

9 Comments

  • 694 Days Ago
  • 03/16/2010

"lost in space"movie

"lost in space"movie made in 2002 .the Robinson family had a protected suit,that absorbed electricity.this suit didn't fully absorb,the lightning electricity..my idea,Donald canaday,march 16,2010 idea for suit.get a polyester material,with nickel stitched on thread,onto suit.it would be grounded to resonator and leakage current,would dissipated by a separate magnetic material,such what thin magnet onto your refrigerator.also attach magnetic,add this device"volt-alert,1Ac-A 2,sensitivity range 50-1000 volts,cat 4 voltage device that turn magnetic material,and send a small current.this would dis pate,off the suit.god willing the  operator would survive...

Reply

dpcanaday

9 Comments

  • 666 Days Ago
  • 04/13/2010

Re: "lost in space"movie

i found a new use for metal ball bearings.if you can obtain it,if you line up the ball metal bearing,that have mirror apperance.if you line up vertically,or horizontally.line at o degree and 180 dgree or vertically,at 90 degree and second270 dgree,with line of sight,no obstacles,blocking them.you can geneate heat if you feel cold indoor feeling.good for survival,in cold house...

Reply

Advertisement

Ric

1 Comment

  • 446 Days Ago
  • 11/19/2010

DNA DAMGE

ZinaH has a great idea. Ask to for the pat down. It will help the economy by creating jobs.

When the pat down s finished, tell the TSA Gestapo, "That was gooood." Then KISS them.

Don't worry, I am straight but a kiss or hug or just the attempt to do it will force te change from the grassroots up. OR, as they used to say, "I LOVE YOU, MAN." will frighten things big time.

Even if "they" ask, don't tell!!

Reply

shomas

245 Comments

  • 405 Days Ago
  • 12/30/2010

Re: DNA DAMGE

An administration could make jobs by having ditches dug along the ocean shores every night and let the tides wash the sand back in, but that doesn't create a product or service anybody wants.

It hurts the economy more when more and more people are not actively creating products or providing services people want.

Pat downs and THz scanners can not keep us safe. Nothing less then Xray scans and full body cavity searches of passengers will fully prevent bombers from getting on board.

Reply

SirLanse

71 Comments

  • 404 Days Ago
  • 12/31/2010

Re: DNA DAMGE

Wear a kilt to make the happy ending easier.
http://www.utilikilts.com/
Make sure you think happy thoughts before the search begins.  LOVE YOU MAN!

Reply

rickster327

1 Comment

  • 438 Days Ago
  • 11/27/2010

block?

I haven't read all the posts here, so I hope I didn't miss this but, what can block this?, Lead, Steel, or,...?

Reply

shomas

245 Comments

  • 405 Days Ago
  • 12/30/2010

Re: block?

You might have your underwear and other clothing  made from a material like this http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/techspecs/26060/

Weaves of ultra fine metal threads into a normal hankie to create a "soft Faraday cage"

Reply

SirLanse

71 Comments

  • 404 Days Ago
  • 12/31/2010

How hard is it really

I am a software guy, so I do tests all the time and those tests are not hard to set up.  How hard is it to set up a Tz test on some fruit flies or goldfish?  Get 2 bags of gold fish.  Put one in front of the body scanner at the airport and one behind it as a control.  See if there are any changes after several months and/or a couple generations.
Or would you get arrested by DHS if you did that?

Reply

Bio

The Physics arXiv Blog produces daily coverage of the best new ideas from an online forum called the Physics arXiv on which scientists post early versions of their latest ideas. Contact me at KentuckyFC @ arxivblog.com

Follow The Physics arXiv Blog on Twitter

Subscribe to the arXiv blog RSS Feed

Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement