A new model of the way the THz waves interact with DNA explains how the damage is done and why evidence has been so hard to gather
Great things are expected of terahertz waves, the radiation that
fills the slot in the electromagnetic spectrum between microwaves and
the infrared. Terahertz waves pass through non-conducting
materials such as clothes , paper, wood and brick and so
cameras sensitive to them can peer inside envelopes, into living
rooms and "frisk" people at distance.
The way terahertz waves are absorbed and emitted can also be used to determine the
chemical composition of a material. And even though they don't travel
far inside the body, there is great hope that the waves can be used to
spot tumours near the surface of the skin.
With all that potential, it's no wonder that research on terahertz
waves has exploded in the last ten years or so.
But what of the health effects of terahertz waves? At first
glance, it's easy to dismiss any notion that they can be damaging.
Terahertz photons are not energetic enough to break chemical bonds or
ionise atoms or molecules, the chief reasons why higher energy
photons such as x-rays and UV rays are so bad for us. But could
there be another mechanism at work?
The evidence that terahertz radiation damages biological systems
is mixed. "Some studies reported significant genetic damage
while others, although similar, showed none," say Boian
Alexandrov at the Center for Nonlinear Studies at Los Alamos National
Laboratory in New Mexico and a few buddies. Now these guys think they
know why.
Alexandrov and co have created a model to investigate how THz
fields interact with double-stranded DNA and what they've found is
remarkable. They say that although the forces generated are tiny,
resonant effects allow THz waves to unzip double-stranded DNA,
creating bubbles in the double strand that could significantly
interfere with processes such as gene expression and DNA replication.
That's a jaw dropping conclusion.
And it also explains why the evidence has been so hard to garner.
Ordinary resonant effects are not powerful enough to do do this kind
of damage but nonlinear resonances can. These nonlinear instabilities
are much less likely to form which explains why the character
of THz genotoxic
effects are probabilistic rather than
deterministic, say the team.
This should set the cat among the pigeons. Of course, terahertz waves are a natural part of environment, just like visible and infrared light. But a new generation of cameras
are set to appear that not only record terahertz waves but also bombard us with them. And if our exposure is set to increase, the question that
urgently needs answering is what level of terahertz exposure is safe.
Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0910.5294:
DNA Breathing Dynamics in the Presence of a Terahertz Field
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Comments
cyberpageman
10/30/2009
Posts:37
Hopefully this is confirmed or rejected quickly.
ddirico
10/31/2009
Posts:1
Apparently god didn't appreciate man's endeavor, thus it is stated, "Let us divide and confuse them." And, so goes the origins of the many languages, but the next sentence is more fascinating and the implications are endless...."Unless nothing shall be impossible for them." Nothing! Is this a good thing? Me thinks not! But, who will stop it? Nobody!
What if mankind enjoyed one language for 6000 years? It is my guess that the laptop would have been present before Christ was born. Yes! There is power in one language and in this modern world mankind is overcoming the language barriers and knowledge is exploding since the age of computers and the internet.
Gentlemen this Terahertz thing is just another example of the dangers that can and will plague mankind. Not that it can't be used for good, but since when has mankind managed its knowledge for good only? Never.
Just look at the power of just one biochemist! He or she can create a plague that could wipe out the world's population. Hmmmmm....that may not so bad.... See who is to decide such a horrific idea as cutting down the world population by a weapon of the lab? You?! Me?! A government?! The Rockefellers?! The Rothchilds?! A loose Cannon?! You get my point, right?!
I'm afraid the genie is out of the bottle so go ahead and deceive yourselves into believing this latest technology will only benefit mankind. In the wrong hands this knowledge can devastate any and all DNA. God was right, nothing is impossible for man. Ugh! I'm not long for this earth and I thank god.....living a 1000 years would be insufferble.
Good day and good luck.
FREEJR
11/01/2009
Posts:1
every thing is tied up to the concept of this "society" based on the suply of money which belongs to a priviledged group of private oligarchs.
Technology is filtered through the allowance of "grants" or funds.
Only what is convenient to the agenda or vested interest of the oligarchs is funded.
This is why we still can not use free energies and are coersed to pay a tax on Co2 instead.
A disturbing number of microbiologists have died "prematuraly" in recents years and no enquiry on their work has been done.(or published )
How many people know about nanotechnology ? this is also a very dangerous field.
We can only make changes for the fast coming future by rejecting the statut quo of money creation being in the hands of a private group.
They are close to owning every thing .THEN WHAT ?
Guy11
11/01/2009
Posts:1
zoroasterisk
11/02/2009
Posts:1
Read this http://www.amazon.com/Forgotten-Revolution-Science-Born-Reborn/dp/3540203966
And you will see that around 300BC theoretical science and engineering were about at the level of XVIII century. That were Archimedes and Euclid time. Unfortunately, for various reasons, including lower demography, exhausting wars and the abundance of human slaves, the industrial revolution didn't occur. Then when the comparatively rude Romans took over, submitting the Hellenistic kingdoms, the rationalistic stance upon nature was lost, for almost 2000 years!
melajara
11/02/2009
Posts:4
They were well on their way to modern technology when a little 1500 year setback occurred with the widespread adoption of a desert religion.
TooMany
11/03/2009
Posts:47
That is an amazing statement. First the discussion is about a God who loved and cared for humanity so much that he gave his only begotten son to die for them so that they might have life everlasting and live forever with this loving God. Then you make this profound statement that you believe man who has proven throughout history that he is corruptible and imperfect but will create an AI who is all caring and ethical to care for man? Religious or not, i think I would put my trust in a God that was not man made then one that was. And before you go pointing out all the man made God's out there that have caused religious wars and strife like those going on today, you should do a thorough study of non-catholic Christian History to see that true Christians never started or participated in Wars unless it was to defend themselves and even then, that number is minute. True Christians (see KJV) are passive, ethical, moral people. So now, this AI, if it becomes truly caring, where will it get its morality from? in order to truly care for all of humanity, it will have to have some sort of moral and ethical base. What you will find is that even a man-made God will have problems making everyone happy because it will and must have guidelines that are required to be met to make sure all is peaceful and people are not killing themselves. Maybe it will start out with some digital form of the Ten Commandments. But since man is by nature in a "sinful" state, he will resist this AI god as well and then what? What will his punishment be? Death possibly for breaking the rules? Now you have a police state by an AI. No more free will. At least the God of the Bible gave you a free will. I don't want to live in your world, I've read that book and seen that movie.
Benjamin Franklin: | Portrait of Ben Franklin
“ God governs in the affairs of man. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without his notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without His aid? We have been assured in the Sacred Writings that except the Lord build the house, they labor in vain that build it. I firmly believe this. I also believe that, without His concurring aid, we shall succeed in this political building no better than the builders of Babel” –Constitutional Convention of 1787 | original manuscript of this speech
Thomas Paine:
“ It has been the error of the schools to teach astronomy, and all the other sciences, and subjects of natural philosophy, as accomplishments only; whereas they should be taught theologically, or with reference to the Being who is the author of them: for all the principles of science are of divine origin. Man cannot make, or invent, or contrive principles: he can only discover them; and he ought to look through the discovery to the Author.”
“ The evil that has resulted from the error of the schools, in teaching natural philosophy as an accomplishment only, has been that of generating in the pupils a species of atheism. Instead of looking through the works of creation to the Creator himself, they stop short, and employ the knowledge they acquire to create doubts of his existence. They labour with studied ingenuity to ascribe every thing they behold to innate properties of matter, and jump over all the rest by saying, that matter is eternal.” “The Existence of God--1810”
noonespecial
11/03/2009
Posts:1
As a former prison guard, I saw the sparks of intelligence fly when the inmates were allowed to ask about any subject related to the earth and the heavens and all that lives on the earth or in the heavens. Invariably, every branch of science led us as a group of several dozen people who worked and lived in the prison to a sense of wonder, thru the process of discovery enjoyed by all who were willing to collaborate, and it was our collective and unified opinion that Every Branch of True Science Leads to the True Vine; the source of All Wisdom and Understanding.
The same style of investigation that was used in the prison setting in the early nineties of the last century are now being used for our radio blog discussions at BlogTalkRadio; I can be reached on that forum or on facebook.
ApprenticeTe...
11/06/2009
Posts:1
An implication of this is that other waves and forces may have resonance effects on DNA. A fringe scientist Dan Winter has suggested that the electrical activity of the heart interacts resonantly with DNA, communicating, perhaps programming it. Further he suggest that when we shorten DNA through cutting "junk" DNA out, we are changing the resonant properties of the DNA.
I think this discovering lends some support to Dan's theory.
illuminatedo...
11/02/2009
Posts:1
ZephirAWT
11/02/2009
Posts:99
Ledelle
11/02/2009
Posts:1
GAry 7
gary7
11/04/2009
Posts:18