Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

arXiv blog

The Physics arXiv Blog produces daily coverage of the best new ideas from an online forum called the Physics arXiv on which scientists post early versions of their latest ideas. Contact me at KentuckyFC @ arxivblog.com

Email Subscription

Recently on the arXiv blog...

Recent comments on the arXivblog

  • ... : Well, I did log in and searched in vain for your "withering reply".  Is it perhaps subtly hidden...
  • TooMany : While the anti-nuke contingent in the US and in parts of Europe continues to rant about the...
  • mulliguns : Points to why a pair may be the most difficult to row successfully, and that sometimes odd size...
  • shaase : It would seem difficult to guarantee that oarsmen all pull with the same force, so it will still...
  • seth : Even though the new arrangements were not immediately obvious, I do think they make common sense....
  • ... : I have examined the major uranium producing countries and made a forecast for 2009, 2010 and...
  • ZephirAWT : Frankly, I don't believe in communication hypothesis wery much, but there's is at least another...
  • ... : http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/22114/The link above goes to your Technology Review...
  • jmc8888 : Great explanation of an issue that only concerns the idiots. If running out of nuclear fuel was a...
  • spad12 : "Federally insured loans do not reduce the overall cost of projects, they just shift part of the...
  • Siphon : Of course, many things do change with temperature: density of the radioactive material, which...
  • mbelvadi : I wonder if this model takes into account the slow cumulation of very tiny increments of...
  • ZephirAWT : That's OK, it's word consumption (110 thousands tons of uranium concentrate) - enough to next ten...
  • Bob... : 1) "Federally back the loans..."  Federally insured loans do not reduce the overall cost of...
  • tsport100 : What a load of alarmist rubbish this article is. Australia has 1.2 MILLION tonnes of known...
  • ZephirAWT : /*..Uranium is being taken from coal ash waste...*/It isn't - we are only speculating about it...
  • Colonel... : Says this blog: "The combined threats of climate change, energy security and fears over the high...
  • spad12 : "The initial costs (overnight costs) are very large.    Financing the construction effectively...
  • Bob... : "it is cheap after the initial costs (and even then a large portion of the costs is in the form...
  • pasward : Do they?  If you are headed toward a star, being off by 1,000,000 km is still going to get you...
Advertisement
Friday, October 30, 2009

How Terahertz Waves Tear Apart DNA

A new model of the way the THz waves interact with DNA explains how the damage is done and why evidence has been so hard to gather

Great things are expected of terahertz waves, the radiation that fills the slot in the electromagnetic spectrum between microwaves and the infrared. Terahertz waves pass through non-conducting materials such as clothes , paper, wood and brick and so cameras sensitive to them can peer inside envelopes, into living rooms and "frisk" people at distance.

The way terahertz waves are absorbed and emitted can also be used to determine the chemical composition of a material. And even though they don't travel far inside the body, there is great hope that the waves can be used to spot tumours near the surface of the skin.

With all that potential, it's no wonder that research on terahertz waves has exploded in the last ten years or so.

But what of the health effects of terahertz waves? At first glance, it's easy to dismiss any notion that they can be damaging. Terahertz photons are not energetic enough to break chemical bonds or ionise atoms or molecules, the chief reasons why higher energy photons such as x-rays and UV rays are so bad for us. But could there be another mechanism at work?

The evidence that terahertz radiation damages biological systems is mixed. "Some studies reported significant genetic damage while others, although similar, showed none," say Boian Alexandrov at the Center for Nonlinear Studies at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico and a few buddies. Now these guys think they know why.

Alexandrov and co have created a model to investigate how THz fields interact with double-stranded DNA and what they've found is remarkable. They say that although the forces generated are tiny, resonant effects allow THz waves to unzip double-stranded DNA, creating bubbles in the double strand that could significantly interfere with processes such as gene expression and DNA replication. That's a jaw dropping conclusion.

And it also explains why the evidence has been so hard to garner. Ordinary resonant effects are not powerful enough to do do this kind of damage but nonlinear resonances can. These nonlinear instabilities are much less likely to form which explains why the character of THz genotoxic
effects are probabilistic rather than deterministic, say the team.

This should set the cat among the pigeons. Of course, terahertz waves are a natural part of environment, just like visible and infrared light. But a new generation of cameras are set to appear that not only record terahertz waves but also bombard us with them. And if our exposure is set to increase, the question that urgently needs answering is what level of terahertz exposure is safe.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0910.5294: DNA Breathing Dynamics in the Presence of a Terahertz Field


Comments

  • Test it!
    The DNA unzippering theory of Alexandrov and colleagues should be straightforward to test, and in fact, should be tested before publishing.  Single-stranded regions of DNA are subject to enzyme attack, leading to fragmentation of the DNA, and also repair, which permits the incorporation of radioactive nucleotides to label them. Either method could be used to measure the terahertz-caused strand opening in DNA.  A DNA chemist could suggest other tests.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    cyberpageman
    10/30/2009
    Posts:37
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • Not good
    I would imagine rate of mutation alone, via replication would be a pretty solid finding if there was one. 
    Hopefully this is confirmed or rejected quickly.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ddirico
    10/31/2009
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
  • Too Much Knowledge
    Knowledge in the wrong hands can cause great destruction. I was once read the story of the "Tower of Babel" and it struck me oddly.  In the story God and the sons of god look down upon the earth and they observe the construction of a tower that was to reach into the heavens.

    Apparently god didn't appreciate man's endeavor, thus it is stated, "Let us divide and confuse them."  And, so goes the origins of the many languages, but the next sentence is more fascinating and the implications are endless...."Unless nothing shall be impossible for them." Nothing!  Is this a good thing?  Me thinks not!  But, who will stop it?  Nobody!

    What if mankind enjoyed one language for 6000 years?  It is my guess that the laptop would have been present before Christ was born.  Yes!  There is power in one language and in this modern world mankind is overcoming the language barriers and knowledge is exploding since the age of computers and the internet.

    Gentlemen this Terahertz thing is just another example of the dangers that can and will plague mankind.  Not that it can't be used for good, but since when has mankind managed its knowledge for good only?  Never.

    Just look at the power of just one biochemist!  He or she can create a plague that could wipe out the world's population. Hmmmmm....that may not so bad.... See who is to decide such a horrific idea as cutting down the world population by a weapon of the lab?  You?! Me?! A government?! The Rockefellers?! The Rothchilds?! A loose Cannon?!  You get my point, right?!

    I'm afraid the genie is out of the bottle so go ahead and deceive yourselves into believing this latest technology will only benefit mankind.  In the wrong hands this knowledge can devastate any and all DNA.  God was right, nothing is impossible for man. Ugh! I'm not long for this earth and I thank god.....living a 1000 years would be insufferble. 

    Good day and good luck.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    FREEJR
    11/01/2009
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • too much knowledge
    In deed !
    every thing is tied up to the concept of this "society"  based on the suply of money which belongs to a priviledged group of private oligarchs.
    Technology is filtered through the allowance of "grants" or funds.
    Only what is convenient to the agenda or vested interest of the oligarchs is funded.
    This is why we still can not use free energies and are coersed to pay a tax on Co2 instead.
    A disturbing number of microbiologists have died "prematuraly" in recents years and no enquiry on their work has been done.(or published )
    How many people know about nanotechnology ? this is also a very dangerous field.

    We can only make changes for the fast coming future by rejecting the statut quo of money creation being in the hands of a private group.

    They are close to owning every thing .THEN WHAT ?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Guy11
    11/01/2009
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: too much knowledge
      I agree in part.  Concerning the religious Tower of Babel discussion, I cannot agree with the doomsday tone.  Nor do I believe a laptop would have been created if...what?  If all human-beings spoke the same language.  To me, the Bible provides a parable to explain the diversity that evolution created by circumstance of a multi-faceted nature.  The laptop by Christ's time?  Silly.  But the following post resonated with me.  There have been a lot of scientists killed by our government, I believe.  The Carlyle group and the Bushes of this world are implementing a controlled implementation to the Singularity.  That scares me.  My faith is in the professors and the good grad kids who care about humanity.  I believe they will create an AI that is not only more intelligent than all human-beings that comprise humanity combined, but one that cares deeply about human suffering.  It will be a paragon of ethical behavior.  And I don't think the evil doers extant in our government will be able to stop it.  That is my hope.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      zoroasterisk
      11/02/2009
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      2/5
      • Re: too much knowledge
        The laptop by Christ's time is not at all a silly concept.
        Read this http://www.amazon.com/Forgotten-Revolution-Science-Born-Reborn/dp/3540203966

        And you will see that around 300BC theoretical science and engineering were about at the level of XVIII century. That were Archimedes and Euclid time. Unfortunately, for various reasons, including lower demography, exhausting wars and the abundance of human slaves, the industrial revolution didn't occur. Then when the comparatively rude Romans took over, submitting the Hellenistic kingdoms, the rationalistic stance upon nature was lost, for almost 2000 years!
        Rate this comment: 12345

        melajara
        11/02/2009
        Posts:4
        Avg Rating:
        2/5
        • Re: too much knowledge
          Please check into Roman technology; they keep finding more.  The other day I read that the Pantheon has the largest unreinforced concrete dome in the world (still standing after 2000 years).
          They were well on their way to modern technology when a little 1500 year setback occurred with the widespread adoption of a desert religion.
          Rate this comment: 12345

          TooMany
          11/03/2009
          Posts:47
          Avg Rating:
          4/5
      • Re: too much knowledge
        zoroasterisk,
        That is an amazing statement. First the discussion is about a God who loved and cared for humanity so much that he gave his only begotten son to die for them so that they might have life everlasting and live forever with this loving God. Then you make this profound statement that you believe man who has proven throughout history that he is corruptible and imperfect but will create an AI who is all caring and ethical to care for man? Religious or not, i think I would put my trust in a God that was not man made then one that was. And before you go pointing out all the man made God's out there that have caused religious wars and strife like those going on today, you should do a thorough study of non-catholic Christian History to see that true Christians never started or participated in Wars unless it was to defend themselves and even then, that number is minute. True Christians (see KJV) are passive, ethical, moral people. So now, this AI, if it becomes truly caring, where will it get its morality from? in order to truly care for all of humanity, it will have to have some sort of moral and ethical base. What you will find is that even a man-made God will have problems making everyone happy because it will and must have guidelines that are required to be met to make sure all is peaceful and people are not killing themselves. Maybe it will start out with some digital form of the Ten Commandments. But since man is by nature in a "sinful" state, he will resist this AI god as well and then what? What will his punishment be? Death possibly for breaking the rules? Now you have a police state by an AI. No more free will. At least the God of the Bible gave you a free will. I don't want to live in your world, I've read that book and seen that movie.

        Benjamin Franklin: | Portrait of Ben Franklin
        “ God governs in the affairs of man. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without his notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without His aid? We have been assured in the Sacred Writings that except the Lord build the house, they labor in vain that build it. I firmly believe this. I also believe that, without His concurring aid, we shall succeed in this political building no better than the builders of Babel”
        –Constitutional Convention of 1787 | original manuscript of this speech

        Thomas Paine:
        “ It has been the error of the schools to teach astronomy, and all the other sciences, and subjects of natural philosophy, as accomplishments only; whereas they should be taught theologically, or with reference to the Being who is the author of them: for all the principles of science are of divine origin. Man cannot make, or invent, or contrive principles: he can only discover them; and he ought to look through the discovery to the Author.”
        “ The evil that has resulted from the error of the schools, in teaching natural philosophy as an accomplishment only, has been that of generating in the pupils a species of atheism. Instead of looking through the works of creation to the Creator himself, they stop short, and employ the knowledge they acquire to create doubts of his existence. They labour with studied ingenuity to ascribe every thing they behold to innate properties of matter, and jump over all the rest by saying, that matter is eternal.” “The Existence of God--1810”
        Rate this comment: 12345

        noonespecial
        11/03/2009
        Posts:1
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
        • Re: too much knowledge
          Thomas Paine gives an accurate synopsis of how science is taught without asking certain questions or ever investigating the subject of a Creator or an Author of all that is part of the creation.

          As a former prison guard, I saw the sparks of intelligence fly when the inmates were allowed to ask about any subject related to the earth and the heavens and all that lives on the earth or in the heavens.  Invariably, every branch of science led us as a group of several dozen people who worked and lived in the prison to a sense of wonder, thru the process of discovery enjoyed by all who were willing to collaborate, and it was our collective and unified opinion that Every Branch of True Science Leads to the True Vine; the source of All Wisdom and Understanding.

          The same style of investigation that was used in the prison setting in the early nineties of the last century are now being used for our radio blog discussions at BlogTalkRadio; I can be reached on that forum or on facebook.
          Rate this comment: 12345

          ApprenticeTe...
          11/06/2009
          Posts:1
          Avg Rating:
          5/5
  • resonance in DNA
    The article states that it is the resonance effects of the terahertz waves that are unzipping the DNA.
    An implication of this is that other waves and forces may have resonance effects on DNA. A fringe scientist Dan Winter has suggested that the electrical activity of the heart interacts resonantly with DNA, communicating, perhaps programming it. Further he suggest that when we shorten DNA through cutting "junk" DNA out, we are changing the resonant properties of the DNA.
    I think this discovering lends some support to Dan's theory.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    illuminatedo...
    11/02/2009
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • Interesting
    I'm not a graduate of MIT (my loss), but in reading this article, correct me if I'm wrong, but the notion of a wave that could potentially disrupt DNA coding in any way sounds like a prelude to crimes committed against individuals who are not even born.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Ledelle
    11/02/2009
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • Terahertz penetration
    Clothes, paper, wood and brick are all non-metallic, easily penetrated by terahertz radiation. I guess those who walk around with their "tin foil" hats are on the right track but should probably consider wearing cloths lined with aluminum foil. That will stop the "peepers" cold.

    GAry 7
    Rate this comment: 12345

    gary7
    11/04/2009
    Posts:18
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
Advertisement

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
•  Subscribe
Save 36%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
» Gift Subscription
» Digital Subscription
» Reprints, Back Issues
» Subscribe
» Table of Contents
» MIT News

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.