Friday, October 23, 2009
Naming the Exoplanets
The International Astronomical Union is refusing to name the exoplanets. That seems unnecessarily curmudgeonly.
Since 1995, astronomers have found more than 400 planets orbiting
other stars. And yet not one of them has a formal name, other than
their orginal scientific designation such as MOA-2008-BLG-310-L b, (a
sub-Saturnian mass planet recently detected in the Galactic Bulge).
How come?
The official reason from the International Astronomical Union is
that astronomers expect to find numerous exoplanets, so many in fact
that it would be impractical to name them.
Today Wladimir Lyra at the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy in
Germany says this stance makes no sense. He points out that stars are
even more common and it is indeed impractical to name them all but
that hasn't stopped us naming some of them.
The IAU's stance seems difficult to justify, not least because it
is unnecessarily curmudgeonly. There are good reasons for thinking
that some of these exoplanets, perhaps many of them, will turn out to
play significant roles in the history of astronomy, perhaps by
helping us understand the nature of planets and the possibility that
life may exist on some of them.
Lyra points out that some astronomers have begun using unofficial
names for some planets but he wants to go further. He thinks they
should all have names and has come up with one for everyone of the
403 exoplanets discovered to date.
Lyra's scheme uses names from Greek and Roman mythologies, the same system used to name
other heavenly bodies, such as planets stars and asteroids. He's even
explained the mythological significance of the names he has chosen.
So far example CoRoT-3 b becomes Cratos, WASP-6 b becomes Teucrus
and HD 132406 b becomes Atlas. For the full list, see the paper.
That's a creditable effort but surely we could all have a little
more fun with an exoplanet naming system, perhaps by opening it up to the
next generation of astronomers. What better way to
inspire children interested in astronomy than by allocating planets to high schools around the world and asking the kids themselves what these bodies should be called?
Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0910.3989: Naming the extrasolar planets
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Comments
Another practical problem is, the number of exoplanets has increased by number 32 after single recent observation, thus exhausting the storage of ancient names prematurely. Many other, still undiscovered planets may become more significant later and as such worth naming just after when we get Greek/Latin mythology names depleted. We should rather keep these names for significant objects inside of solar system to avoid naming problems in future.
ZephirAWT
10/23/2009
Posts:114
The article is right, this would be a great way to inspire people to look at astronomy just as many horizons are being lifted due to new advanced satellites.
How about allocating a certain number of planets to be named by a vote in each country?
And you have to throw the people who discovered them a bone and let them name a few.
I think this all just shows how weak kneed and uninspired the International Astronomical Union is.
DennisBuller
10/23/2009
Posts:40
Portoricans are from the Exoplanet PortBello,
Puerto Ricans are from Puerto Rico.
Sheesh...
Ron Diehl
10/23/2009
Posts:4
thanx - you gave me an incredibly good point!
ZephirAWT
10/23/2009
Posts:114
lasertekk
10/23/2009
Posts:78