arXiv blog

Self-Propelling Bacteria Harnessed to Turn Gears

Attach self-propelling bacteria to a cog and they'll set it spinning for you, say Italian physicists.

kfc 10/19/2009

  • 2 Comments

Last year, we looked at an idea for a bacteria-powered motor dreamt up by Luca Angelani and pals from the University of Rome in Italy. Their idea was to place a cog with asymmetric teeth into a bath of moving bacteria and wait for them to start it spinning for you, like carthorses pushing a millstone.

We said at the time that the idea sounds a bit like extracting kinetic energy from the random motion of particles, which is impossible because the motion is symmetric in time.

But Angelani and co say there is in important difference between Brownian and bacterial motion: the former is in equilibrium but the latter is an open system with a net income of energy provided by nutrients. This breaks the time symmetry allowing energy to be extracted in the form of directed motion.

Now Angelani and co have built one these asymmetric and persuaded a bath full of E. Coli to push it round at a of 1rpm. Interestingly, Angelani and co report that most of the work is done by just a few bacteria, saying that only 2 out of 10 bacteria attached to a single tooth seem to be contributing to the torque.

In theory, they could speed up the rotation rate by persuading the others to put their backs into it. The linear motion of the gears is currently about 2 micrometres per second while the maximum speed of the bacteria is about 20 micrometers per second. So room for improvement there.

As for applications, they're limited only by your imagination. Angelani and co envisage self-propelling micro-machines, micropumps and mixers for microfluidics but they also ask whether the idea could be scaled up to power macrmachines. Bacteria--powered cars? Now there's an idea.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0910.2899: A Bacterial Ratchet Motor

TRSF: Read the Best New Science Fiction inspired by today’s emerging technologies.

Print

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

Shiladie

56 Comments

  • 847 Days Ago
  • 10/19/2009

Scalability/nutrients

At the end of the acticle it says it may be able to be scaled up to macromachine level.  I'm simply wondering at the sheer number of these types of devices to make any impact on a macro scale, as I'm assuming the torque from these is extremely low.  The overhead to make enough of them it seems would be the preventor from this catching on.

The mention that it is not a closed system is essentially saying that there is nutrients being introduced.  What kind of scale are we looking at for this?  This factors into the above question, if we need 100k+ of these things to power a macro machine, how much bacterial nutrients would we need to artificially introduce to the environment, or would there be enough from simply keeping it an open system?

On a lighter note, a purely organic matter powered car brings up amusing fuel oppertunities and ad campaigns...  Also your car can get sick and need a doctor to de-contaminate it.

Reply

jimmyboy

1 Comment

  • 847 Days Ago
  • 10/19/2009

a few nanomagnets and nanocoils with the gear and you have a sugar powered alternator.. a few thousand of these and a way to extract sugar from blood and you have a nanobot able to travel your bloodstream indefinitely..

the nanobots could release drugs in specific locations - clear and clean away wastes and extend your life - search for cancer cells - physically mend broken nerves - even control peoples minds

possibly..

Reply

Bio

The Physics arXiv Blog produces daily coverage of the best new ideas from an online forum called the Physics arXiv on which scientists post early versions of their latest ideas. Contact me at KentuckyFC @ arxivblog.com

Follow The Physics arXiv Blog on Twitter

Subscribe to the arXiv blog RSS Feed

Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement