Physicists Calculate Number of Universes in the Multiverse
If we live in a multiverse, it's reasonable to ask how many other distinguishable universes we may share it with. Now physicists have an answer
kfc 10/15/2009
- 10 Comments

One of the curious developments in cosmology in recent years has been the emergence of the multiverse as a mainstream idea. Instead of the Big Bang producing a single uniform universe, the latest thinking is that it produced many different universes that appear locally uniform.
One question that then arises is how many universes are there. That may sound like the sort of quantity that is inherently unknowable but Andrei Linde and Vitaly Vanchurin at Stanford University in California have worked out an answer, of sorts.
Their answer goes like this. The Big Bang was essentially a quantum process which generated quantum fluctuations in the state of the early universe. The universe then underwent a period of rapid growth called inflation during which these perturbations were "frozen", creating different initial classical conditions in different parts of the cosmos. Since each of these regions would have a different set of laws of low energy physics, they can be thought of as different universes.
What Linde and Vanchurin have done is estimate how many different universes could have appeared as a result of this effect. Their answer is that this number must be proportional to the effect that caused the perturbations in the first place, a process called slow roll inflation, and in particular to the number "e-foldings" of slow roll inflation.
Of course, the actual number depends critically on how you define the difference between universes.
Linde and Vanchurin have applied some reasonable rules to calculate that the number of universes in the multiverse and have totted it up to at least 10^10^10^7. A "humungous" number is how they describe it, with no little understatement.
How many of these could we actually see? What's interesting here is that the properties of the observer become an important factor because of a limit to the amount of information that can be contained within any given volume of space, a number known as the Bekenstein limit, and by the limits of the human brain.
Linde and Vanchurin say that total amount of information that can be absorbed by one individual during a lifetime is about 10^16 bits. So a typical human brain can have 10^10^16 configurations and so could never disintguish more than that number of different universes.
10^10^16 is a big number but it is dwarfed by the "humungous" 10^10^10^7.
"We
have found that the strongest limit on the number of different
locally distinguishable geometries is determined mostly by our
abilities to distinguish between different universes and to remember
our results," say Linde and Vanchurin
So the limit does not depend on the properties of the multiverse but on the properties of the observer.
How profound is that!
Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0910.1589: How Many Universes Are In The Multiverse?



paulsnx2
1 Comment
Number of observable universes...
The logic is flawed. While one person might be so limited in observing other universe (the 10^10^16 value), we as a race are not one person.
This logic seems to imply that if I only have a canoe, that there are only three observable
Continents ... because at most, the average person could only visit three continents by canoe in their life, if that is all they have.
Yet people can be living on all continents. And technology may progress to the point that we have better transportation than a canoe.
Reply
ka5s
59 Comments
Re: Number of observable universes...
Including the capacity of the human brain in the problem is really only the anthropic principle applied (IMO) arrogantly to the universe(s) under discussion; what counts is the number of available interactions, each interaction being an observation in its own right. Bishop Berkeley's chair exists without him.
Looked at differently, if an observation is required to assert an occurrence, a hamster could observe a raindrop fall, an amoeba can be washed away by it, a grain of pollen be moved and a particle of dust be dissolved. The principle being established, there is no limit to how small the observation need be save the smallest interaction possible.
Reply
ZephirAWT
299 Comments
Re: Number of observable universes...
IMO Universe is behaving like Tetris game, which randomly creates less or more complex structures. The more complex these structures are, the lower probability exists for their creation, the larger pile of random configurations is required.
In certain moment the structure of complexity of human brain is created and the surrounding pile of less random states would correspond the Universe, directly observable by this brain. For example, if average human brain contains 10^26 atoms, then the observable Universe would contain 10^(26*26) atoms, or somewhat similar number. It would mean, connected effort of more brains would allow us to see our Universe larger.
This could be meaningful interpretation of the above article.
Reply