The Clue That Could Explain The Fly-By Anomalies
If collisions with dark matter are the cause of the mysterious fly-by anomalies, then spacecraft ought to heat up as they fly past Earth.
kfc 10/13/2009
- 3 Comments

The fly-by anomalies are one of the outstanding puzzles in modern physics. Various spacecraft that have flown past Earth on their way to other parts of the Solar System, seem to have undergone a step-like change in velocity at their point of closest approach. The question is why.
Last year, we looked at an idea from Stephen Adler at Princeton University, that suggested the change in velocity could caused by collisions between the spacecraft and particles of dark matter. Adler even calculated the kind of distribution of dark matter particles that would explain the observed changes in velocity--a kind of halo of them around Earth.
Part of the puzzle is that some spacecraft seem to experience an acceleration while others a deceleration. But Adler has worked this out too. Apparently, a certain distribution of two kinds of dark matter particle could explain this.
Now he's back with an idea that could settle the matter. He points out that when one thing bangs into another, some of the kinetic energy is dissipated as heat. There' s no reason to think that that won't be just as true of collisions between ordinary matter and its dark cousin. So Adler's suggestion is to measure the temperature of spacecraft passing through the region of dark matter that his model says should surround Earth.
That can be done it two ways. The first is to send a spacecraft up that is specifically designed to measure any change in temperature. That's expensive and time consuming.
The second and much easier approach is to mine the historical record for evidence that earlier satellites or spacecraft have heated up unexpectedly.
That's a call to action (as Obama might say). The first evidence that dark matter not only exists but is smashing into our spacecraft would be valuable new physics indeed.
There are other explanations for the fly-by anomalies, however (my favourite). Not least of these is the possibility that the anomalies are artifacts of the current orbital data fitting techniques.
I know what I'm rooting for.
Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0910.1564: Spacecraft Calorimetry As A Test Of The Dark Matter Scattering Model For Flyby Anomalies



ZephirAWT
299 Comments
Problem of formal models of dark matter
While theoretical physicists tends to ignore predicate logics in their reasoning on behalf of formal models, we can expect, as the number of these models increases, intuitive logics would remain the main clue, which could help us to distinguishing correct solution.
IMO, the above explanation is correct in the point, fly-by anomalies are related to dark matter phenomena. But it implies particle character of dark matter, which isn't proved and it's not very pronounced in general. For example, anomalous deceleration of Pioneer spaceprobe corresponds to product of speed of light and Hubble constant, which means, dark matter effect is related to freezing of light in expanding Universe, instead of particle field and particle models of DM cannot explain this relation.
On the other hand, particle model can explain easier, why anomalous deceleration is proportional the crosscut area of objects, instead of their mass. In AWT model dispersion of light in CMB field is related to Universe expansion from insintric perspective and dark matter from exsintric perspective. Casimir force is shielding force of CMB fluctuations, which explains, how dark matter is related to violation of equivalence principle at both long, both short distance scales and concept of Unruh radiation.
http://aetherwavetheory.blogspot.com/2009/07/awt-approach-to-dark-matter.html
The problem is in point, the same dispersion (anomalous deceleration) applies to massive particles present in cosmic space, the antimatter particles in particular - so we can expect, dark matter is composite effect, consisting of particles ("hot dark matter") trapped inside of dense vacuum around massive bodies ("cold dark matter") due the gravity field gradient in omnidirectionally expanding space-time - and it would contain the more particles, the older massive objects are.
So that no simple model based on particle shielding or space-time deforms would describe all observed dark matter phenomena exactly.
Reply