The principle behind a novel form of spacecraft propulsion could be tested at the world's most powerful particle accelerator.
In 1924, the influential German mathematician David Hilbert published a
paper called "The Foundations of Physics," in which he outlined an
extraordinary side effect of Einstein's theory of relativity.
Hilbert was studying the interaction between a relativistic particle moving
toward or away from a stationary mass. His conclusion was that if the
relativistic particle had a velocity greater than about half the speed of
light, a stationary mass should repel it. At least, that's how it would appear
to a distant inertial observer.
That's an interesting result, and one that has been more or less forgotten,
says Franklin Felber, an independent physicist based in the United States. (Hilbert's
paper was written in German.)
Felber has turned this idea on its head, predicting that a relativistic
particle should also repel a stationary mass. He says that this effect could be
exploited to propel an initially stationary mass to a good fraction of the
speed of light.
The basis for Felber's "hypervelocity propulsion" drive is that
the repulsive effect allows a relativistic particle to deliver a specific
impulse that is greater than its specific momentum, thereby achieving speeds
greater than the driving particle's speed. He says this is analogous to the elastic
collision of a heavy mass with a much lighter, stationary mass, from which the
lighter mass rebounds with about twice the speed of the heavy mass.
What's more, Felber predicts that this speed can be achieved without
generating the severe stresses that could damage a space vehicle or its
occupants. That's because the spacecraft follows a geodetic trajectory, in
which the only stresses arise from tidal forces (although it's not clear why
those forces wouldn't be substantial).
That's a neat idea, but little better than science fiction, were it not for
one further corollary: Felber is proposing an experiment that could prove his
ideas or damn them.
It turns out that when it is up and running, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
will accelerate particles to the kind of energies that generate this repulsive
force. Felber's idea is to set up a test mass next to the beam line and measure
the forces on it as the particles whiz past.
The repulsive force that Felber predicts will be tiny, but it could be detected
using resonant test mass. And since the experiment wouldn't interfere with the
LHC's main business of colliding particles, it could be run in conjunction with
it.
While the huge energy of the LHC makes it first choice for such an
experiment, Felber says the effect could also be seen at Fermilab's Tevatron,
albeit with a signal strength that would be three orders of magnitude smaller.
Perhaps that's something to consider as a last hurrah for the old Tevatron,
before they begin mothballing it sometime next year.
Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0910.1084: Test of Relativistic Gravity for Propulsion at the Large Hadron Collider
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Comments
sandratycova
10/09/2009
Posts:4
but if the influence of a passing proton beam would be measurable than i beleive the trajectory of the beam would be changed also this way perhaps more than allowed for the on going experiments
emilius
10/09/2009
Posts:5
fadude
10/09/2009
Posts:2
sckavassalis
10/15/2009
Posts:1
Qasem
10/18/2009
Posts:3
Regarding tidal forces: Tidal forces within a spacecraft are smaller than the gravitational force on its center of mass by a factor of order d/R, where d is the spacecraft dimension and R is the distance to the gravitating body.
Regarding detectability: The impulse delivered by a single proton bunch in one orbit, 3 nm/s^2 for 2 ns, is undetectable, but 31,576,000 such impulses per second (!) delivered for 10 hours (!) to a high-Q detector produces a trillion-fold amplification of the detector amplitude at its resonant frequency.
Regarding changes to the proton beam trajectory: The gravitational effects of a detector are negligible compared to gravitational effects of the LHC structure and surroundings, and gravitational effects altogether are negligible compared to electromagnetic effects, for which the LHC fully compensates.
Regarding Hilbert repulsion: Hilbert’s paper, published in a journal co-edited with Einstein, has had many references in the literature and historical papers devoted to it. He calculated the repulsion that would be measured by a distant unaccelerated observer.
Regarding the electromagnetic force: The LHC accelerating structures provide great electromagnetic shielding of equipment outside the beam pipe, but even so, care must be taken to keep the detector completely charge-neutral within its own heavily shielded vacuum chamber.
felber
11/10/2009
Posts:1