Sending messages using neutrinos could improve data rates by up to three orders of magnitude.
Communicating underwater is a tricky business, as any commander of a nuclear
submarine will tell you. These guys can remain hidden more or less
indefinitely, operating at a depth of 300 meters or so, but communicating is a
serious pain in the stern because it can only be done near the sea surface,
where submarines are most vulnerable to detection and attack.
That's because radio waves do not travel well through water. Only extremely
low frequency (ELF) waves (with a frequency less than 100Hz) make any headway
in water. But they are difficult to produce at high power, and even then, they only
allow data rates of around 1 bit per minute.
Instead, submariners have to rely on very low frequency (VLF) waves of a few
kilohertz. These allow up to 50 bits per second, but they don't travel far
through water. That means they can only be detected by trailing a long radio
antenna close to the surface.
So how to improve matters? One suggestion is to use neutrinos to send
information. The problem is that although neutrinos pass easily through water,
they also pass through everything else, making them close to impossible to
detect. For that reason, neutrino communication has always been thought a
nonstarter.
Now a new analysis suggests that submariners may have been too quick to
dismiss neutrinos. Patrick Huber, a physicist at Virginia Tech, says that
neutrino communication could offer data rates of up to 100 bits per second at
any depth. That's three orders of magnitude better than ELF communication.
So what's changing to make neutrino communication practical? First, says
Huber, is the ability to generate and detect intense beams of neutrinos.
Physicists generate beams of neutrinos by accelerating muons to high energy,
which then decay, producing neutrinos that, because of the moving reference
frame, are tightly collimated. Detecting neutrinos is simply this process in reverse.
When the neutrinos interact with matter, they produce muons that can be detected
relatively easily.
But how easily can this be done for submarine communication? Huber says that
one of the most intense neutrino beams is used in an experiment called MINOS, which
sends a beam from the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Chicago to a 5,000-metric-ton
muon detector in a mine in northern Minnesota, a distance of more than 700 km.
The trouble is that, in the two years that MINOS has been running, the
detector has spotted only 730 muons. "Obviously, an improvement of at
least six orders of magnitude is required," says Huber, with no little
understatement.
But he believes this kind of improvement will be possible with the next
generation of muon accelerators.
Let's take his word on that. The question then is how to detect these
neutrinos in a submarine. Here, Huber has been a little more creative. He says
there are essentially two ways to spot neutrinos. "We would use thin muon-detector
modules, which can be used very much like wallpaper to cover the majority of
the vessel's hull," says Huber. This effectively turns a submarine into a
giant, cylindrical muon detector about 10 meters in diameter and 100 meters
long.
How would this work? "The muons would enter on one side of the
submarine and leave it on the other side," he says. "The entry and exit points
are measured, and thus the muon direction can be reconstructed quite precisely."
But there's also another way to detect neutrinos: look for the Cerenkov
light radiation produced by fast-moving muons in seawater. That's clever,
because it allows you to create a detector with dimensions that are roughly the
distance that light travels in seawater, about four kilometers or so. Of
course, there's no shortage of noise from bioluminescence, sunlight, and
moonlight, but Huber seems confident that all of that could be filtered out.
The bottom line is that submariners could one day use this technology to
receive messages at data rates of up to 100 bits per second.
There is one drawback, of course. It's only possible to receive messages in
a submarine in this way, not to send them. That's not something that TV viewers
have worried about much. But commanders of nuclear submarines may have a
different view.
Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0909.4554: Submarine neutrino communication
Comments