If our Universe once collided with another, we might soon be able to see the evidence in the distant reaches of the cosmos, say astrophysicists
As far as we can tell, the universe is about 93 billion light
years big and about 14 billion years old.
That's a head scratcher for cosmologists. In 14 billion years,
light can travel...errr...14 billion light years. So how did the
universe get so big, so quickly?
The best explanation is a mysterious process called inflation. The
general idea is that soon after it was born, the universe rapidly
increased its size by many orders of magnitude in an instant.
Cosmologist love to ponder the way in which inflation was
triggered. Short answer: nobody really knows, although there's no
shortage of speculation.
A somewhat lesser known problem is what might have stopped
inflation. Why doesn't the cosmos continue to expand at an
exponential rate?
One of the most curious answers is this: that the universe is
still expanding and that we exist in a tiny region of
stability, a cosmic bubble in a mighty maelstrom.
Of course, our cosmic bubble would be just one among countless
others.
But how could we ever see these other bubbles given that they must
be beyond the edge of the visible universe?
Today, Anthony Aguirre at the University of California, Santa Cruz
and his buddy Matthew Johnson at Caltech review this scenario and
give an answer of sorts.
They say the only way that we could see evidence of another cosmic
bubble is if it had collided with our universe in the distant past.
Interesting idea but not one without a few challenges. The main
problem is that in mosts cases collisions would destroy the spacetimes in both bubbles, thereby ensuring that we
couldn't be here to observe the aftermath.
However, Aguirre and Johnson identify a class of cosmic collisions
that preserve the three dimensions of space and one of time that we
need for our existence. These are not so much cosmic collisions as glancing blows.
So what would the aftermath of such a cosmic scrape?
Aguirre and Johnson say that evidence of a negative curvature to the
universe we be compatible with the idea that we exist in a cosmic
bubble while positive curvature would rule it out.
Beyond that, a cosmic prang would have left its mark in the form of various symmetric features in the
cosmic microwave background.That's something we could see in the data from telescopes such as Planck.
All tantalising stuff. But the trouble is that none of this would provide definitive,
unambiguous evidence of a collision and that means we'll probably never know for sure.
But cosmologists are not to be
deterred, this is the kind of speculation they love.
Aguirre and Johnson finish with this statement:
"With some luck, the discovery of 'other universes', a
concept seemingly out of science fiction, may be just around the
corner!"
If you believe that, you have a fruitful career ahead of you
in cosmology
Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0908.4105: A Status Report on the Observability of Cosmic Bubble Collisions
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Comments
When the vapor condense and observer happens to remain inside droplet, here's no reason for further density increasing. This explains, why inflation has stopped and cosmos doesn't continue to expand at an exponential rate. It's similar to process, which occurs during condensation of stars: whenever such star is formed, it's density continues to increase a much more slower speed, until most of star evaporates into radiation. Just after then the avalanche-like mechanism of gravitational collapse will increase its speed again. In such way the Universe evolution doesn't differ very much from common collapsar evolution - it's just observed from inside by observers, formed by density fluctuations of vacuum condensate - instead of outside. In AWT such similarity isn't accidental at all.
How could we ever see these other bubbles?
Question is, why we are expecting, these bubbles should remain beyond the edge of the visible universe after inflation. Inflation is believed to smooth all differences in false vacuum density, which makes our Universe so Uniform - so that condensation process could dissolve boundaries between parallel universe, too. After then we would see them as a parallel galaxies and the remnants of bubble boundaries we would see as a foamy streaks of dark matter. Such model integrates inflation with ekpyrotic cosmology quite naturally: colliding branes are simply collapsing bubbles of fast condensing vacuum similar to condensation of over-saturated solution from many places at the same moment.
http://aetherwavetheory.blogspot.com/2008/10/awt-inflation-and-brane-cosmology.html
ZephirAWT
09/25/2009
Posts:99
http://aetherwavetheory.blogspot.com/2009/05/awt-and-multiverse-concept.html
Because Copernican principle requires,neighboring Universe wouldn't differ very much in their properties, maybe every other galaxy is such other Universe, at least a bit. Nevertheless it's possible, some piece of planet from neighboring galaxy could annihilate with matter of Earth in direct contact like antimatter, or in "non-complete way" - it would behave like antimatter from "time shifted" universe, not "time reversed" Universe. Antimatter can be distinguished from ordinary matter in direct contact - but how to recognize parallel Universe at distance?
I recently discussed the problem of parallel detection with Leo Vuyk from Netherlands, and he proposed an recent observation of the absence of Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect in a sample of 31 clusters as such remote evidence.
ZephirAWT
09/25/2009
Posts:99
ZephirAWT
09/25/2009
Posts:99