Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

arXiv blog

The Physics arXiv Blog produces daily coverage of the best new ideas from an online forum called the Physics arXiv on which scientists post early versions of their latest ideas. Contact me at KentuckyFC @ arxivblog.com

Email Subscription

Recently on the arXiv blog...

Recent comments on the arXivblog

  • ... : so funny ! just like http://www.udtek.com
  • Mr CP : Wow!  These games are almost as fun as throwing a real ball around!  Almost.  :)
  • scoubidoo : I suggest you visit the NooJ website: http://www.nooj4nlp.net/pages/nooj.htmland discover the...
  • coolmike : The other issue that is being overlooked is the type of prepaid service, and how the cost impacts...
  • jhertzberg : I checked the date as I read this (nope, not April 1st). How long until we start using...
  • jtempere : Both yttrium barium copper oxide and the family of bismuth strontium calcium copper oxides have...
  • sleeprun : We read a Wharton study of doctors influencing new treatment adoption.  It was not the most...
  • ZephirAWT : isn't completelly new in this context, as the simmilar concept was proposed by Mark Hucko in 1985...
  • ZephirAWT : If I understood it well, by your theory matter universe is surrounded by antimatter universe and...
  • matt_s : Couldn't we theoretically save the earth from the eventual expansion of the sun in it's...
  • ... : This is not about the originators of ideas, but about how the ideas spread. A well connected...
  • debu : Please read my ether-gravity or theory of gravitoethertons which explains many aspects of quantum...
  • ms : So is AMSC selling superconducting wire that doesn't exist?
  • shazl : I believe the results are not only because of somebody being post-paid or pre-paid. It's...
  • ... : I am surprised no one is addressing an immediate need for energy here on earth, and what this...
  • IXANTI666 : THE NEXT STEP HUMAN TELEPORTATION.SINCE WE ARE MADE UP OF QUATUM MATTER TO BEGIN WITH TO BORROW...
  • 020648 : try www.prisonplanet.tv
  • ZephirAWT : And what prohibits scientists in ATTEMPT to replicate J.F.Prins experiments? Are they so...
  • ... : Make me some 90K Tc superconductor and I'll finish my PhD in a month! How's this for a conspiracy...
  • sfrysfry : For ideas on entangling larger structures, I introduce the conjecture of Nicholas Greaves, an...
Advertisement
Thursday, September 24, 2009

The Evolution of Overconfidence

If overconfidence leads to global disasters such as bank collapses and world wars, how could it have evolved? Researchers have an answer.

What do the following high-profile disasters have in common: World War I, Vietnam, the war in Iraq, the collapse of the banking system, and underpreparedness for natural disasters such as Hurricane Katrina?

According to Dominic Johnson at the University of Edinburgh and his pal James Fowler at the University of California, San Diego, the answer is that they have all been blamed on the all-too-human condition of overconfidence.

The puzzle about overconfidence is its ubiquity. Many studies have shown that most people have an exaggerated sense of their own capabilities, an illusion that they have control over uncontrollable events and are invulnerable to risk. Most people, for example, believe they are above-average drivers, a statistical impossibility. We are all overconfident in one way or another.

But how can such a condition have evolved when overconfidence can lead to destruction of communities and catastrophic loss of life?

That's a mystery that many experimental psychologists have wrestled with, but now Johnson and Fowler say they have the answer. By creating a mathematical model of the way overconfident individuals compete against ordinary individuals, they show that there is a clear advantage in overconfidence.

In fact, if the potential reward is at least twice as great as the cost of competing, then overconfidence is the best strategy. In fact, overconfidence is actually advantageous on average, because it boosts ambition, resolve, morale, and persistence. In other words, overconfidence is the best way to maximize benefits over costs when risks are uncertain.

That's an interesting insight. Experimental psychologists have long known of the role of overconfidence in conflict situations and yet have been unable to explain its origin.

But it is Johnson and Fowler's predictions that are most worrying. Their model implies that optimal overconfidence increases with the magnitude of uncertainty. So the greater the risk, the more overconfident individuals should become.

Johnson and Fowler use that finding to predict that overconfidence will be particularly prevalent in domains where the perceived value of a prize sufficiently exceeds the expected costs of competing.

What might these domains be? Johnson and Fowler highlight several, but perhaps the most obvious and potentially dangerous are international relations, where events are complex and distant and involve foreign cultures and languages; new technologies such as the Internet bubble; and the banking industry, where complex financial instruments abound. Any of that sound familiar?

All of this sets the stage for the next question: how best to mitigate the worst side-effects of rampant overconfidence in a society with a dramatically exaggerated sense of its own abilities.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0909.4043: The Evolution of Overconfidence


Comments

  • Evolution
    Blame women. They decide (for the most part) who have children and how many.  They simply respond to unbridled egoism. Which is why many "geeks" have a hard time finding sex partners: they are too intelligent to believe what is clearly untrue (or at least unprovable).
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Kingofallmed...
    09/24/2009
    Posts:6
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Evolution
      Your view of women sounds a bit cynical and depressing. That's a shame

      Actually is is possible to have most people on one side of the mean if the distribution is skewed, so if the abilities of drivers are skewed then it is possible most people are better than average.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      IkenCEO
      09/24/2009
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
    • Re: Evolution
      Women's fault, of course!
      The habitual response of a manacled mind.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      janebolacha
      09/25/2009
      Posts:2
      Avg Rating:
      2/5
      • Re: Evolution
        You go girlfriend! You put words in his mouth too, maybe, but you go!
        Rate this comment: 12345

        bugme
        09/29/2009
        Posts:29
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
    • Re: Evolution
      Geeks are just as likely to be overconfident, just not concerning things that woman are attracted to.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      brettb123
      09/26/2009
      Posts:1
    • Re: Evolution
      Firstly:

      None of you ever post anything so you'll never see this withering reply.

      Secondly:

      My point on women was meant to be facetious. I was merely trying to point out that our society rewards people who are over confident. It rewards then with wealth. It rewards them with status and it rewards them with sex. I'm sorry if it depresses you but it happens to be true. Read a book called "sperm wars". I'm not saying its wrong for women to want to mate with the over confident, in fact, evolutionarily it's clearly a much better choice.  It's about sexual selection, not chauvinism.

      Thirdly:
      OK. geeks can be over confident (about guitar hero), but once science gets into the mix it's a different story. When was the last time a good scientist said: "Cancer? Cured in two years. Tops". But good football players say stuff like that regularly: "We're gonna crush them!" is like a pregame mantra.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Kingofallmed...
      10/03/2009
      Posts:6
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      • Re: Evolution
        Well, I did log in and searched in vain for your "withering reply".  Is it perhaps subtly hidden somewhere in your words and thus only geek-accessible?  On your assertions that women seek to mate with "over-confident" types and that male "geek-types" have trouble finding mates, I do wonder what is your basis for those statements.  Yes, we are "supposed", if we are "typical" (perhaps a male-defined term in itself) women, to prefer George Clooney or Tom Cruise or some confident but supposedly "attractive" male air-head over some intelligent guy who works in research somewhere or in the local library but with whom we can have a conversation.  I wonder, though, where those "suppositions" come from, I mean the suppositions regarding women, I would guess they are from male sources and are perhaps quite superficial in their approach and in their supposed research.  You may thus perhaps be blinded by your pre-conceptions.  I know we are now way off-topic!
        Rate this comment: 12345

        janebolacha
        11/22/2009
        Posts:2
        Avg Rating:
        2/5
  • Frightening implications
    Reproduction decisions aside (since that was an aside), there is much to fear in the implications of this work. When the personal rewards are potentially great to me (international prestige, great wealth, increased power over others) and the costs to me are limited (sending your kids to fight the war, dig into the mine, clear the minefield, or bet your farm on the next big payout), why should I not overreach if I have the ability to control your resources without personally exposing my own?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    michcala
    09/25/2009
    Posts:1
  • Average fallacy
      Most people, for example, believe they are above-average drivers, a statistical impossibility.

    This is a common fallacy. It’s not at all impossible for most people (or even nearly all people) to be above-average drivers. To convince yourself, you merely need consider that almost everyone has an above-average number of legs.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    apag
    09/25/2009
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Average fallacy
      Well, if you interpret "average" as "mean", you are correct. But, particularly with something that is not naturally quantifiable, the more likely interpretation is "median", in which case there is no fallacy.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      ms
      09/26/2009
      Posts:141
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
  • Overconfident is the wrong word many times
    The correct word is "delusional." Overconfidence doesn't sound negative at all but the actions they promote are indicative of delusional behavior. Otherwise, why would one undertake action that is obviously illegal as in the case of Enron, some of the banks' activities, insider trading, etc.? Or torture, politicizing the Justice Dept. etc. Or doomed to failure --- fill in your recent war and country.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    fiberman
    09/28/2009
    Posts:80
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
Advertisement

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
•  Subscribe
Save 36%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
» Gift Subscription
» Digital Subscription
» Reprints, Back Issues
» Subscribe
» Table of Contents
» MIT News

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.