Thursday, September 10, 2009
How to Create Quantum Superpositions of Living Things
First photons, atoms and molecules. Now physicists want to create a quantum superposition of a virus, which will allow them to perform Schrodinger's Cat experiment for real.
One of the great challenges for quantum physicists is to find
quantum behaviour in macroscopic objects. There are obvious examples
of quantum behaviour on a large scale, such as superconductivity and
superfluidity, but physicists want more.
Having created quantum superpositions of photons, electrons, atoms
and even molecules, one of the current obsessions is to create a
quantum superposition of a living thing, such as a virus. The
question is how to do this and whether it makes any sense to say
these things are living at all.
This is an experiment that will be hard. But today
Oriol Romero-Isart from the Max-Planck-Institut fur Quantenoptik in
Germany and a few buddies suggest that it is achievable with current
technology and outline the challenges that will have to be tackled to pull it off.
The experiment will first involve
storing a virus in a vacuum and then cooling it to its quantum
mechanical ground state in a microcavity. Zapping the virus with a
laser then leaves it in a superposition of the ground state and an
excited one.
This works only if the virus behaves like a dielectric, can
survive the vacuum and appears transparent to laser light, which
would otherwise rip it apart.
As luck would have it, Romero-Isart and co say that several
viruses fit the bill. The common flu virus is known to be able to
survive in a vacuum, seems to have the required dielectric properties
and may well be transparent to a careful choice of laser light.
The tobacco mosaic virus, to all intents and purposes a dielectric
rod, looks like another good candidate.
But does it make any sense to say that a large molecule in its
ground state is somehow alive? It's difficult enough now to define
what life means. Throw a quantum superposition into the mix and the
biologists who ponder these problems are likely to implode.
Nevertheless, many groups are currently looking to create
superpositions of things like tiny cantilevers and micromirrors, so viruses
certainly look achievable in the near future. And beyond that, why
not bigger organism such as the tardigrade (or water bear) which can
grow to 1.5 mm in length.
But why bother? Performing a Schrodinger's cat experiment would be
fun (although not for the virus). Romero-Isart and pals go further
and say the work will "experimentally address fundamental
questions, such as the role of life in quantum mechanics,and
differences between many-world and Copenhagen interpretations".
Perhaps.
But their contention that it will also address "the role of
consciousness in quantum mechanics" seems a step too far
(although a flu virus may beg to differ).
Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0909.1469: Towards Quantum Superposition of Living Organisms
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Comments
Ask a quantum physicist to explain why quantum interactions are probabilistic and you'll get a blank stare. They have no clue. None whatsoever. Yet, in spite of their glaring ignorance, they feel free to use the taxpayer's money to feed the lay public a bunch of made up nonsense. The pomposity and arrogance of physicists will never cease to amaze me.
Ask a physicist to explain why two particles in relative motion remain in motion and you'll come face to face with more abject ignorance.
As Paul Feyerabend wrote in Against Method, "the most stupid procedures and the most laughable results in their domain are surrounded with an aura of excellence. It is time to cut them down in size, and to give them a more modest position in society."
Not everybody is fooled by all the hocus pocus. When will it stop? Who will rise up and shake up physics for the rest of us?
Physics: The Problem with Motion
http://rebelscience.blogspot.com/2009/09/physics-problem-with-motion-part-i.html
Mapou
09/10/2009
Posts:65
heumpje
09/10/2009
Posts:2
heumpje
09/10/2009
Posts:2
snedunuri
09/10/2009
Posts:30
Mapou
09/10/2009
Posts:65
JDBailey
09/10/2009
Posts:13
Mapou
09/11/2009
Posts:65
Eman
09/13/2009
Posts:1
Mapou
09/16/2009
Posts:65
JDBailey
09/10/2009
Posts:13
jmcordes33
09/11/2009
Posts:1
mapou's comment to every TR article is that he's smarter than every scientist in the world and here's his own blog entry to prove it.
Rebelscience seems a lame joke at best, certianly spam, and a waste of collapsing waveforms at the least--especially to us regular ole scientists stuck with thinking inside the box...
kcasey
10/06/2009
Posts:5
charlieD
10/09/2009
Posts:1
I'll assume that the writer and readers of this post are aware that quantum particles are not objects in any macroscopic sense. The well-known double slit experiment not only shows this to be the case, but it also negates attempts to explain the experimental results as sequentially emitted particle self-interference by showing that this would require acceleration (for a single particle to, for example, follow a curved path and pass through both slits), and therefor force - but force is not an contextual component in the experiment, so acceleration and therefore self-interference are not possible.
In other words, even though quantum particles may be thought of as particles, this occurs only when the probability waves associated with all possible trajectories collapse upon measurement - i.e., when the particle interacts with the detector. This means that while particles are wave-like while in motion, this spin wave motion is analogous to how macroscopic waves propagate, through a medium (e.g., water), in which the medium does not itself propagate. While not a discrete projectile following a trajectory, the wave still requires force to exhibit positive or negative acceleration as it propagates through its medium. This is also true of quantum spin waves and quantum superposition collapse (pariicles).
By the way, Mapou: even though quantum mechanics follows experimentally-validated mathematical rules, physicists "can't explain" quantum tunneling, teleportation, indeterminism, absolute randomness, entanglement, nonlocality, and other counterintuitive phenomena because they cannot be understood in the way that we understand our macroscopic experience. Yet these phenomena are present in our lives at each and every turn: for example, computers depend on electronics whose operation is based on tunneling and other quantum effects, and our having this exchange clearly shows that a system (the brain) may function reliably without (yet) being completely understood.
OK?
sdambrot
09/10/2009
Posts:4
Blyxa
09/10/2009
Posts:1
*=AdeloVariable, the unknown/uncertain
If there could be quantum particle unique, multiple permeable, membranes surrounding particles and decreasing in permeability the closer to the particle... would the particle membranes provide the appearance of waves?
2D...4D picture
Reality is a fact, for humans, reality is self-induced hallucination.
Discovering the unknown will always be essential to species survival. That poor little defenseless virus helping folks discover....
JDBailey
09/10/2009
Posts:13
Regarding your comment about the poor virus: I assume this to be tongue-in-cheek, but if not, try to remember that opportunistic viral infections kill untold numbers of people (and other lifeforms) on a continual basis. Don't cry for them.
http://dambrot.com/criticalthought/
sdambrot
09/11/2009
Posts:4
http://aetherwavetheory.blogspot.com/2009/01/awt-and-bohmian-mechanics.html
ZephirAWT
09/13/2009
Posts:99
of the farmer with the horseshoe
over his barn door.
His neighbor: "You don't believe in that,
do you?"
"No, but my friends tell me
you don't have to believe in it for it to work."
HowBow
09/11/2009
Posts:1
sdambrot
09/11/2009
Posts:4
http://www.springerlink.com/content/0557v31188m3766x/
A water solution containing human cells infected by bacteria is sterilized by a filtering procedure and healthy cells are added to the filtrate. Within few weeks the infected cells re-appear. A possible speculation explanation (between many others much more natural, indeed) is the quantum mirage phenomena, which recreated a working copies of bacterial genome from water clusters matrices.
Water clusters exhibit interesting aspect of their behavior: albeit elastic, they behave like tiny pieces of plasticine due the quantum mirage phenomena. This well known quantum effect is able to fill holes in large groups of atoms by quantum resonance effect of probability wave.
http://www.aetherwavetheory.info/images/chemistry/water/cluster_memory.gif
When we separate hydrogen ion from some random side of cluster, the cluster will get another ion from environment in such a way, the original shape of it will be retained - although cluster as a whole suffers by wild attacks of water molecules from all sides.
This model explains autothixotropy of water, Mpemba effect and undeniable results of homeopathy and "cluster medicine". We can imagine, in contact with foreign molecules water clusters will get modeled by charge density into mirror-like shape which can be retained even after removal of original molecules.
After then the quantum mirage phenomena can take place again, just in opposite way: in contact with polarized surface the repeated contact with clusters can model this surface into shape of original molecules. It can affect for example surface proteins, which are sensitive to particular geometry of electric charge density, which transforms them into activated complex.
So we can imagine, in environment formed by shaped water clusters the synthesis of proteins will be affected in the way, which replaces the physical presence of bacterial RNA from original solution. Here are theories, organic life was transported into Earth from comets, in which existed in form of supercooled water clusters. Supercooled water at -150 deg. is behaving like solid gel, which keeps its shape after deformation, because water clusters are stabilized by low temperature here.
ZephirAWT
09/12/2009
Posts:99
ZephirAWT
09/12/2009
Posts:99
StvNrdqust
09/21/2009
Posts:1