How to Create Quantum Superpositions of Living Things
First photons, atoms and molecules. Now physicists want to create a quantum superposition of a virus, which will allow them to perform Schrodinger's Cat experiment for real.
kfc 09/10/2009
- 23 Comments

One of the great challenges for quantum physicists is to find quantum behaviour in macroscopic objects. There are obvious examples of quantum behaviour on a large scale, such as superconductivity and superfluidity, but physicists want more.
Having created quantum superpositions of photons, electrons, atoms and even molecules, one of the current obsessions is to create a quantum superposition of a living thing, such as a virus. The question is how to do this and whether it makes any sense to say these things are living at all.
This is an experiment that will be hard. But today
Oriol Romero-Isart from the Max-Planck-Institut fur Quantenoptik in
Germany and a few buddies suggest that it is achievable with current
technology and outline the challenges that will have to be tackled to pull it off.
The experiment will first involve storing a virus in a vacuum and then cooling it to its quantum mechanical ground state in a microcavity. Zapping the virus with a laser then leaves it in a superposition of the ground state and an excited one.
This works only if the virus behaves like a dielectric, can survive the vacuum and appears transparent to laser light, which would otherwise rip it apart.
As luck would have it, Romero-Isart and co say that several viruses fit the bill. The common flu virus is known to be able to survive in a vacuum, seems to have the required dielectric properties and may well be transparent to a careful choice of laser light. The tobacco mosaic virus, to all intents and purposes a dielectric rod, looks like another good candidate.
But does it make any sense to say that a large molecule in its ground state is somehow alive? It's difficult enough now to define what life means. Throw a quantum superposition into the mix and the biologists who ponder these problems are likely to implode.
Nevertheless, many groups are currently looking to create superpositions of things like tiny cantilevers and micromirrors, so viruses certainly look achievable in the near future. And beyond that, why not bigger organism such as the tardigrade (or water bear) which can grow to 1.5 mm in length.
But why bother? Performing a Schrodinger's cat experiment would be fun (although not for the virus). Romero-Isart and pals go further and say the work will "experimentally address fundamental questions, such as the role of life in quantum mechanics,and differences between many-world and Copenhagen interpretations". Perhaps.
But their contention that it will also address "the role of consciousness in quantum mechanics" seems a step too far (although a flu virus may beg to differ).
Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0909.1469: Towards Quantum Superposition of Living Organisms



Mapou
357 Comments
Ignorance and Arrogance
The physics community has been engaging in an incestuous form of knowledge production for as long as peer review has been in vogue. It works for a while but rapidly degenerates into absurdities. Pseudoscientific monstrosities like superposition, parallel universes and time travel are the result. Power corrupts and we see this corruption in physics. Physicists have become immune to public criticism because they have managed to convince the public that they are too stupid to understand physics. Alarm bells should be ringing all over the place, especially in a democracy.
Ask a quantum physicist to explain why quantum interactions are probabilistic and you'll get a blank stare. They have no clue. None whatsoever. Yet, in spite of their glaring ignorance, they feel free to use the taxpayer's money to feed the lay public a bunch of made up nonsense. The pomposity and arrogance of physicists will never cease to amaze me.
Ask a physicist to explain why two particles in relative motion remain in motion and you'll come face to face with more abject ignorance.
As Paul Feyerabend wrote in Against Method, "the most stupid procedures and the most laughable results in their domain are surrounded with an aura of excellence. It is time to cut them down in size, and to give them a more modest position in society."
Not everybody is fooled by all the hocus pocus. When will it stop? Who will rise up and shake up physics for the rest of us?
Physics: The Problem with Motion
http://rebelscience.blogspot.com/2009/09/physics-problem-with-motion-part-i.html
Reply
heumpje
2 Comments
Re: Ignorance and Arrogance
Can we please also limit comments to actual comments on posts? You sir, fall in the crackpot category. I used to write lengthy posts in response to arguments like this, but it is useless: people like you are ignorant and arrogant themselves. You are too ignorant too read the books written by and for professional physicists (like me) and you are so arrogant that you refuse too accept clarifications when offered. If this is the level at which you like to participate in this blog: please go away and keep your comments for sites dedicated to people like you.
Reply
heumpje
2 Comments
Re: Ignorance and Arrogance
Aargh...cant...refrain...self. Had to look at the link provided, of course. Newton says: F=ma. In other words no F, no a. What is there not to understand about the way (m)a(ny) particle(s) keep moving? Please sir, take this list, read the entries you link to and ask yourself: should this be taken seriously?
Reply
snedunuri
67 Comments
Re: Ignorance and Arrogance
Yes, unf. T.R. seems to be attracting quite a few crackpots these days. If it weren't for science and technology these loonies wouldn't have the comfortable lives they have. Not that that stops them. Articles regarding evolution or climate change are particularly ripe targets. But now physics??
Reply
Mapou
357 Comments
Re: Ignorance and Arrogance
Just as I expected. Nothing new here. Still, it feels good to jump into the lion's den every once in a while and slap him a few times. It's funny. :-D
Reply
JDBailey
15 Comments
Re: Ignorance and Arrogance
It's crazy. %~p (to slap a lion or enter the den)
Reply
Mapou
357 Comments
Re: Ignorance and Arrogance
Not if you got an AK-47. ahahaha...
Reply
Eman
1 Comment
Re: Ignorance and Arrogance
I do have to hand it to you. You sure know how to stir a hornets nest. Unfortunately for you an AK-47 will be of little help. I'm not a physicist, but I am a technologist and if all the research the physics community puts out every year is hogwash, then you wouldn't be living with most of the modern conveniences we have today. Open research in all the sciences will only promote better economics through innovation. And innovation my friend is what creates jobs which our economy desperately needs. So as far as tax dollars go, they couldn't be better spent than on basic research. So pull your head out and go read some physics research the the data that backs it up. There's a reason scientists adhere to the scientific method. If you don't know what the scientific method is, you really do need to read more about science and really understand what its all about. Physicists aren't the bad guys, they contribute new knowledge everyday so technologist like me can bring new cool products and services to the masses. My advice to you is to keep your own ignorance and arrogance in check.
Reply
Mapou
357 Comments
Re: Ignorance and Arrogance
Strawman. Sorry.
Reply
JDBailey
15 Comments
Re: Ignorance and Arrogance
Was it fun being a troll and first post?
Reply
jmcordes33
1 Comment
Re: Ignorance and Arrogance
Sounds like a bad case of physics envy to me!
Reply
kcasey
12 Comments
Re: Ignorance and Arrogance
Would be nice to see TR do some editorial review and find some way to stop shameless plugs of ones own blogs. (censorship? egad--has it become necessary? thanks mapou!)
mapou's comment to every TR article is that he's smarter than every scientist in the world and here's his own blog entry to prove it.
Rebelscience seems a lame joke at best, certianly spam, and a waste of collapsing waveforms at the least--especially to us regular ole scientists stuck with thinking inside the box...
Reply
charlieD
1 Comment
Re: Ignorance and Arrogance
Rather than belonging in the category of science crackpots, I submit that Mister Mapou belongs in the category of Creationists and other Science Deniers.
Reply