Thursday, September 03, 2009
Astronomers Turn To Omniscopes For Low-Cost Observation
Omniscopes promise omnidirectional, omnichromatic astronomy at reasonable cost.
Astronomers want bigger and better telescopes. That's understandable. But in
the world of radio telescopes, there's a problem looming: Greater sensitivity
requires a bigger surface area, and the cost for a steerable single-dish
telescope grows with area faster than linearly. So really big dishes are just
too expensive to build.
That's why astronomers are interested in the much cheaper approach of
connecting many smaller dishes together to form an interferometer. Such an
array of dishes can be as large as you like. The problem here is that in an
interferometer, the signals from each dish have to be correlated with all the
others, and the computational cost of this rises quadratically--i.e., the cost
is proportional to the square of the number of dishes.
That soon becomes prohibitive, so astronomers have looked at two cost-cutting
measures, say Max Tegmark at MIT in Cambridge and Matias Zaldarriaga at the
Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, N.J.
The first is to divide the array into groups, each considered a single
element. This cuts the correlation cost from N^2 to (N/M)^2, at the price of
reducing the sky area covered by a factor M. So the savings comes from ignoring
part of the sky and not having to compute it.
The second is to arrange the antennae into a rectangular grid that can be
correlated using fast Fourier transforms. This reduces the computational cost
from N^2 to N.log2 (N) at the price of lower resolution.
That's not such a bad trade-off. The question that Tegmark and Zaldarriaga
ask is what shapes of array can benefit from this N.log2 (N) computational cost
improvement.
Their answer is a surprisingly large class of arrays. It turns out that not
only rectangular arrays but arbitrary combinations of grids should benefit.
That should make it possible to build arrays of
dishes of almost any size and still benefit from the N.log2 (N) computational
cost. Tegmark and Zaldarriaga say,
"This opens up the possibility of getting the
best of both worlds, combining affordable signal processing with
baseline coverage tailored to specific scientific needs."
Such huge arrays would be omnidirectional and omnichromatic so Tegmark
and Zaldarriaga coin the term omniscopes to describe them.
Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0909.0001: Omniscopes: Large Area Telescope Arrays with only N log N Computational Cost
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Comments
Supply Sat TV dish makers with ultrawideband detectors instead of the narrow broadcast spectrum detectors currently in use. Institute a dish swap/retrofit program and in 5-10 years you'll have an Omniscope as big as the US or the entire usable hemisphere! By collecting data only from the dishes that fall within your optimal "array" grid, and you've got serious resolution. Think of the power of this kind of detector network. Equal to 5000-8000 Arecibo Dishes in size (using std 3 or 4 ft dishes) if ALL 130 million user's dishes are "in the array". Using 20% of the total number of dishes gives dish area equal to 1000 Arecibo dishes. Just have to find the right array design right? Different Sat TV companies could run multiple surveys at once. The system would be very fault tolerant (i.e. redundant) and would allow for multiple sections of the sky over the US to be observed in multiple modes of detection. If all the World's Sat TV Co. participate...well you get the idea.
As to the cost, how much will various Institutions invest in new dishes and hardware in the next 10 yrs? The VLA alone cost $78 million in 1972 US dollars and was completed early and under budget! Patiently delivering new detectors to Sat TV hardware manufactures to integrate into dishes at below cost will drive the adoption and coverage. Maybe money better spent? Almost certainly the results from such a virtual device would be revolutionary if not evolutionary in terms of scientific advancements.
Sadly, the degree of security & access and manipulation to the quantity of data from the 14 Sat TV companies would be absurd. The scale of such an undertaking would be immense to say the least. However improbable this device would be to complete and operate, the task is technically feasible and not altogether impossible.
We can only hope and write our Congresspersons. Maybe the right minds will become aware of this technology, meet, and decide to do something great for science, and in turn, humanity one more time.
Sponge
09/04/2009
Posts:6